scholarly journals University Students’ Perceptions of the Key Elements of Cooperative Learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 2019 (1) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Tomoko Hashimoto
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
University Students ◽  
Student Perceptions ◽  
First Year ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Group Processing ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Year University ◽  
Individual Accountability ◽  
Research Period

In this study I examined students’ perceptions of the way cooperative learning (CL) was used in their classroom setting. CL involves five key elements: positive interdependence (PI), face-to-face promotive interaction (FF), individual accountability (IA), interpersonal and small group skills (IS), and group processing (GP). For this study, first-year university students from three classes participated in informal CL (semistructured), formal CL (structured), and teacher-led instruction. At the end of the research period, students’ perceptions of these were rated. Analyses showed that for PI and IS, the mean score of the formal CL class was significantly higher than the teacher-led instruction class, but that there were no significant differences between FF, IA, and GP for these two groups. Student perceptions of the informal CL class did not show any significant difference when compared to the formal CL class nor the teacher-led instruction class for any of the five key elements. 本研究は、協同学習（CL）の5つの基本要素について、学生の認識を調べたものである。5つの基本要素とは、互恵的な相互依存（PI）、対面的で促進的な相互交渉（FF）、個人としての責任（IA）、社会的スキルや小グループ運営スキル（IS）、そしてグループの改善手続き（GP）である。本研究では、3つのクラスの大学1年生が、其々インフォーマルな協同学習、フォーマルな協同学習、そして、教員主導の学習を体験した後、協同学習の5つの基本要素の重要度を評価した。分析の結果、フォーマルな協同学習を経験した学生のPIとISの平均値は共に、教員主導の学習を体験した学生のものよりも、有意に高いことが示された。FF、IA、GPについては、この２つのクラス間に有意な差は見られなかった。また、協同学習の5つの基本要素は、インフォーマルな協同学習とフォーマルな協同学習、インフォーマルな協同学習と教員主導の学習のどちらを比較しても、有意差が認められなかった。

scholarly journals Investigation of The Attitudes of University Students at Different Departments Against Cooperative Learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
Alpaslan Kartal
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
University Students ◽  
Teaching Method ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Data Coding ◽  
Group Processing ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Working Together ◽  
Individual Accountability

Cooperative learning is a kind of teaching method, which includes students working together in projects. The teacher has to provide a cooperative situation that creates interdependence among the students. It consists of five different elements. These are positive interdependence, individual accountability, face to face interaction, interpersonal- small groups, social skills, and group processing. This study is aimed to investigate the attitudes of university students studying in different departments towards cooperative learning. Thus, the current situation is described with the analysis of the data obtained from the applied scales. The research is descriptive. The group of the research consists of students studying in different departments of Bozok University in Yozgat. For the research, the data collected and processed into the data coding form. Then, statistical analysis was applied to the data transferred to SPSS 24.0 Packet program. There is no statistically significant difference found between genders. There was a statistically significant difference in the attitude scores towards cooperative learning between the ages, the departments, and the grades. Cooperative learning is a more suitable method for students in the classes and develops learners' attitudes. Institutes are encouraged for positive collaboration involvement among students who will be connected in groups within the work environment in the long term.

scholarly journals Effect of Academic Background on Social Competence and its Relationship with Academic Motivation and Academic Performance of First Year University Students

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-28
Author(s):  
Ghania Yamin ◽  
Huma Khalid ◽  
Fizza Tahir ◽  
Erum Khatri ◽  
Sidra Shoaib
Keyword(s):  
Academic Performance ◽  
Social Competence ◽  
University Students ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Academic Motivation ◽  
First Year ◽  
Academic Background ◽  
Weak Relationship ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Year University

Certain differences have been observed in the students belonging to different academic backgrounds hence the purpose of the current research was to explore the effect of academic background (i.e., Cambridge & HSSC) on Social Competence and to see its relationship with Academic motivation and Academic performance among first year university students. The hypothesis states that there is a significant difference between Social Competence and Academic Motivation of Cambridge and Higher Secondary School Certificate (HSSC) students. There also exists a significant relationship between Social competence, Academic motivation and Academic performance of first year university students. Research design of the study was comparative co-relational survey design. Whereas sampling technique used was purposive convenient sampling. There were N=166 participants (Males n=53 & Females n=113; Cambridge n=90 & HSSC n=76) with the age range of 18-23 years (M=2.76, SD=1.28) from different private and government universities of Karachi. Academic Motivation Scale (Vallerrand, et al., 1992) and Social Competence Scale (Shujja, Malik, & Khan, 2015) for Adolescence were used for measuring academic motivation and social competence whereas for academic performance previous grades in last given exams were demanded. Statistical analysis including T-test was used for measuring relationship variables of Academic Motivation, Social Competence and Academic Performance among first year university students show no significant relationship. a positive but weak relationship was discovered between social competence and intrinsic motivation. Furthermore, a weak relationship was identified between social competence and gender. This study will help increase insight and improvise the education system and teaching methodologies of both educational systems. Implications for teachers to use innovative methodologies and strategies while teaching to enhance students’ social and academic skills to positively influence their performance.

PERSONALITY, LIVING ARRANGEMENTS, AND ALCOHOL USE BY FIRST YEAR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M. Valliant ◽  
Patricia Scanlan
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
Living Arrangements ◽  
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Alcohol Addiction ◽  
First Year ◽  
Life Styles ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Year University

The purpose of this study was to investigate the interaction of personality, living arrangements, and alcohol consumption amongst first year University students. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory, and the Ontario Life Styles Survey were administered to 94 Laurentian University Students. The subjects resided in one of three living arrangements; on campus, off campus, or with their parents. There was a significant difference between gender on the total weekly consumption scores and on risk for alcohol addiction. Male students living off campus and in residence showed greater risk for alcohol addiction than did students living with their parents. Those students who were at risk for alcohol addiction showed higher mean scores on clinical scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory including psychopathic deviance and mania. A significance was also noted in self-esteem and living arrangements with the students living off campus having higher self-esteem than those students living with parents or in residence.

scholarly journals Student communication and study habits of first-year university students in the digital era | Communication étudiante et habitudes d’étude des étudiants universitaires de première année à l’époque numérique

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliana Esther Gallardo-Echenique ◽  
Mark Bullen ◽  
Luis Marqués-Molías
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
Social Communication ◽  
Digital Technologies ◽  
Study Habits ◽  
First Year ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Digital Era ◽  
Academic School ◽  
Academic Communication ◽  
First Year University

This paper reports on research into how first-university students communicate with peers and professors and their general study habits and to examine the possible relationship between students’ use of digital technologies. The research is positioned in the interpretive paradigm. We conclude that most students feel comfortable with digital technologies and they see Facebook/MySpace as more about connecting and interacting with friends than for academic communication. Results show that students prefer face-to-face communication for both academic/school and social communication. Regarding study habits, students prefer to learn by themselves, work independently and to study at home. Cet article présente la recherche sur les habitudes d’étude des étudiants universitaires, leur usage des technologies numériques et leur façon de communiquer entre eux et avec leurs professeurs. Nous concluons que la plupart des étudiants se sentent à l’aise avec les technologies numériques et qu’ils utilisent les médias sociaux pour leurs liens et interactions avec leurs amis plutôt que pour la communication scolaire. Les étudiants préfèrent les communications en personne en ce qui a trait aux communications scolaires et sociales et préfèrent apprendre par eux-mêmes, travailler de manière autonome et étudier à la maison.

scholarly journals Three Approaches to Cooperative Learning in Higher Education

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2/3) ◽  
pp. 37-66
Author(s):  
David Kaufman ◽  
Elliott Sutow ◽  
Ken Dunn
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Group Processing ◽  
Social Skills Group ◽  
Skills Group ◽  
Six Elements ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Individual Accountability

This paper first discusses cooperative learning and provides a rationale for its use in higher education. From the literature, six elements are identified that are considered essential to the success of cooperative learning: positive interdependence, face-to-face verbal interaction, individual accountability, social skills, group processing, and appropriate grouping. Three distinct approaches at the postsecondary level are described in the fields of Medicine, Dentistry and Mathematics, and feedback from faculty and students is reported. The three approaches are presented within the context of the disciplines and are compared across the disciplines with respect to the essential six elements. Finally, the authors share some lessons learned from their research and experience in order to assist faculty who wish to incorporate cooperative learning into their teaching.

scholarly journals Effect of sex/gender on obesity traits in Canadian first year university students: The GENEiUS study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0247113
Author(s):  
Tanmay Sharma ◽  
Rita E. Morassut ◽  
Christine Langlois ◽  
David Meyre
Keyword(s):  
Weight Gain ◽  
University Students ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
First Year ◽  
Sex And Gender ◽  
First Year Students ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Year University

Background While weight gain during first year of university has been well documented in North America, literature on sex-specific effects is scarce and inconsistent. The objective of this investigation was to explore sex-specific changes in obesity traits during first year of university at McMaster University (Ontario, Canada). Methods 245 first-year students (80.4% females) were followed longitudinally with data collected early in the academic year and towards the end of the year. Obesity parameters including weight, waist and hip circumferences, BMI, and waist to hip ratio were investigated. The Mann-Whitney U test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for pairwise comparison of traits in the absence of adjustments. Additionally, the repeated-measures ANOVA test was used with covariate adjustments to investigate the interaction between sex and time. Results Overall sample trends indicated a significant increase in mean weight by 1.55 kg (95% CI: 1.24–1.86) over the school year (p<0.001). This was accompanied by significant gains in BMI, and waist and hip circumferences (p<0.001) in the overall sample. At baseline, males presented with higher body weight, BMI, waist and hip circumferences, and WHR, as compared to their females counterparts (p<0.01). Additionally, sex-stratified analysis indicated significant gains in weight, BMI, and waist and hip circumferences in both males and females (p<0.01). However, a comparison of the magnitude of change over time between the two sex groups revealed no significant difference for any of the investigated traits (p>0.05). Conclusion While our study confirms significant weight gain in both male and female first year university students in Ontario, Canada, it does not show sex specific differences within this context. Our investigation highlights the importance of accounting for sex and gender in health research and supports the need of further studies in this area.

Dynamic Changes and Individual Differences in Learners’ Perceptions of Cooperative Learning During a Project Activity

RELC Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 003368822110127
Author(s):  
Masahiro Yoshimura ◽  
Tomohito Hiromori ◽  
Ryo Kirimura
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Activity ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Dynamic Changes ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Group Processing ◽  
Social Skills Group ◽  
Skills Group ◽  
Five Elements ◽  
Weekly Journal

Although cooperative learning is a well-researched framework with many reports on its effective implementation in education, successful cooperative learning practice remains elusive in the classroom. The literature suggests certain elements of cooperative learning are key, but few studies have addressed their importance with respect to the dynamics of the learning activity and differences in individual learners’ attitudes. The objective of this study is to examine (1) whether learners’ perception of cooperative learning changes throughout a project, and (2) how differently individual learners perceive their activities with reference to the five elements (i.e. positive interdependence; face-to-face promotive interaction; individual accountability; social skills; group processing), and thereby to explore measures for successful implementation of cooperative learning. Analyses of a questionnaire survey and weekly journal entries revealed that there were dynamic changes in learners’ perception of cooperative learning in accordance with the shifts in phases of the project. The results also showed that there were significant differences in individual learners’ perceptions and that their engagement in cooperative learning could be affected by certain factors that were not weighed by the five elements. The results of this study can provide hints for better pedagogical interventions for teachers introducing cooperative learning into the classroom.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document