scholarly journals Instagram as Media to Enhance Students Writing Skill Creativity in State Islamic Institute of Ponorogo

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-120
Author(s):  
Kaukabilla Alya Parangu ◽  
Sulistyowati Sulistyowati
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Writing ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Teaching English ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative ◽  
Writing Test ◽  
Tukey Test ◽  
Effective Media ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Multifactor Analysis

Utilizing Instagram as media in teaching English is a new phenomenon in Education. Naturally, Instagram is a social media that usually used for sharing pictures and videos which is mostly used by the youths. However, it is such a good chance to use something the students are excited about for educational purpose.  This research aims to identify whether: 1) Instagram can improve the students’ writing skill; (2) there is an interaction between teaching media and students’ creativity in teaching writing. This research is classified as quasi-experimental study and the subjects of the research were 36 students of Shariah Economics in Economics Faculty in State Islamic Institute of Ponorogo. The data obtained during the research are in qualitative and quantitative forms. The data were acquired by using two instruments; questionnaire and writing test. Questionnaire was used to categorize both students having high or low creativity, and writing test was used to measure their writing skill. The data were, then, analyzed by using Multifactor Analysis of Variance ANOVA and Tukey test. Before conducting the ANOVA, pre-requisite tests such as normality and homogeneity test were conducted. This study finds that: (1) Instagram media is more effective than Powerpoint media to teach writing; (2) There is an interaction between teaching media and students’ creativity in teaching writing. The result of this study implies that Instagram media is an effective media in teaching writing to the second semester students.

scholarly journals SOMATIC, AUDITORY, VISUAL, INTELLECTUAL (SAVI): ITS EFFECTIVENESS TO TEACH WRITING FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Linda Septiyana
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Teaching Methods ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Teaching Writing ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Positive Contribution ◽  
Writing Test ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Multifactor Analysis ◽  
And Control

SAVI is a method used in teaching and learning process which has four main aspects, they are Somatic, it is learning by moving and doing; Auditory, it is learning by talking and hearing; Visual, it is learning by observing and seeing; Intellectual, it is learning by problem solving and reflecting. This article refers to an experimental study on the effectiveness of SAVI to teach writing at one of senior high school in Metro, Lampung. The samples were two classes namely experimental class which was taugh using SAVI and control class which was taught by TSTS. Each class consisted of two groups based on the level of critical thinking (high and low). To gain the data, two instruments were used namely writing test and critical thinking test. The data were, then, analysed by using Multifactor Analysis of Variance ANOVA 2X2 and Tukey test. Before conducting the ANOVA test, pre-requisite test namley normality and homogeneity test were conducted. The findings of this research are: (1) SAVI is more effective than TSTS (2) The students with high critical thinking have better writing skill than those having low critical thinking; and (3) There is an interaction between teaching methods and students’ critical thinking in teaching writing. Therefore, it is recommended for English teachers to implement SAVI in teaching writing activities because this method gives positive contribution in improving the students writing skill and facilitating the students’ critical thinking to produce a good text.

scholarly journals Applying PLEASE Strategy to Teach Writing Skill on Students with Different Linguistic Intelligence

TEKNOSASTIK ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Dyah Aminatun ◽  
Ngadiso Ngadiso ◽  
Sri Marmanto
Keyword(s):  
Intelligence Test ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Writing Test ◽  
Tukey Test ◽  
Road Map ◽  
Writing Strategy ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Guided Writing ◽  
Multifactor Analysis ◽  
And Control

PLEASE Strategy is a mnemonic that provides learners with a road map for writing a text. It is a strategy when a teacher teaches the students an acronym to remember each step in writing. PLEASE strategy will help students to write, to start the first sentence, and to put the data information in their writing. This article refers to an experimental study on the effectiveness of PLEASE Strategy to teach writing at the eleventh grade of SMA Negeri 1 Ngemplak. The samples were two classes, experimental class which was taught using PLEASE Strategy and control class which was taught using Guided Writing Strategy. To gain the data, two instruments were use, writing test and linguistic intelligence test. The data were, then, analyzed by using Multifactor Analysis of Variance ANOVA 2x2 and Tukey test. Before conducting the ANOVA test, pre-requisite test namely normality and homogeneity test were conducted. The findings of this research are: (1) PLEASE strategy is more effective than Guided Writing Strategy to teach writing; (2) The students having high linguistic intelligence have better writing skill than those having low linguistic intelligence; and (3) There is an interaction between teaching strategies and students’ linguistic intelligence in teaching writing.PLEASE Strategy is a mnemonic that provides learners with a road map for writing a text. It is a strategy when a teacher teaches the students an acronym to remember each step in writing. PLEASE strategy will help students to write, to start the first sentence, and to put the data information in their writing. This article refers to an experimental study on the effectiveness of PLEASE Strategy to teach writing at the eleventh grade of SMA Negeri 1 Ngemplak. The samples were two classes, experimental class which was taught using PLEASE Strategy and control class which was taught using Guided Writing Strategy. To gain the data, two instruments were use, writing test and linguistic intelligence test. The data were, then, analyzed by using Multifactor Analysis of Variance ANOVA 2x2 and Tukey test. Before conducting the ANOVA test, pre-requisite test namely normality and homogeneity test were conducted. The findings of this research are: (1) PLEASE strategy is more effective than Guided Writing Strategy to teach writing; (2) The students having high linguistic intelligence have better writing skill than those having low linguistic intelligence; and (3) There is an interaction between teaching strategies and students’ linguistic intelligence in teaching writing.

scholarly journals THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DICTOGLOSS IN TEACHING WRITING SKILL VIEWED FROM STUDENTS' MOTIVATION

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-74
Author(s):  
Dian Pertiwi
Keyword(s):  
Direct Instruction ◽  
Teaching Writing ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Islamic School ◽  
Writing Test ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Multifactor Analysis ◽  
High Motivation ◽  
And Control ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

This article refers to an experimental study on the effectiveness of Dictogloss to teach writing skill at one of Islamic School in Surakarta. The sampling used in this research was cluster random sampling with two classes as sample, namely experimental class taught using Dictogloss and control class taught using Direct Instruction. The collect the data, there were two instruments used in this research namely, writing test and motivation questionnaire. Writing test was used to find out students’ writing skill, while motivation questionnaire was conducted to know students’ motivation levels. The data were analyzed by using 2x2 Multifactor Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Before conducting the ANOVA test, pre-requisite test namely normality and homogeneity test were conducted. The result of this research shows that: (1) Dictogloss is more effective than Direct Instruction to teach writing; (2) Students having high motivation have better writing skill than those having low motivation.

scholarly journals THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GENERATING INTERACTION BETWEEN SCEMATA AND TEXT (GIST) TO TEACH WRITING VIEWED FROM STUDENTS’ INTELLIGENCE

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuri Ati Ningsih
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Strategies ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Teaching Writing ◽  
Second Grade ◽  
Writing Test ◽  
Second Grade Students ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
High Intelligence ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

The  research  method  was  quasi  experimental  research  by  using  simple  factorial design  2x2.  The  population  in  this  research  was  the  second  grade  students  of  English Teaching Department of IKIP PGRI Madiun. The writer used cluster random sampling to get the sample. It consists of 60 students which were divided into two classes, II D consisting 30 students as a control class and II B consisting 30 students as an experimental class. The instruments  used to  collect  the data were  writing test  to  get  the score  of writing skill. Documentation was used to get the data of students’   intelligence. Before the instruments were used, the tryout was done to know the validity and readiability of instruments. The writer analyzed the data in term of their frequency distribution, normality, and homogeneity. Then,  the  data  were  analyzed  by  using  multifactoral  analysis  2X2.The  findings  in  this research lead to some conclusions: (1) GIST is more effective than DI for teaching writing; (2) The students having high intelligence have better writing skill than the students having low intelligence; and (3) There is an  interaction between teaching strategies and students’ intelligence for teaching writing. The effect of teaching strategies on the students’writing skill depends on the students’intelligence.

scholarly journals Using Task-based Materials in Teaching Writing for EFL Classes in Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Sundari ◽  
Rina Husnaini Febriyanti ◽  
Gustaman Saragih
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Writing ◽  
Writing Classes ◽  
Writing Test ◽  
Content Organization ◽  
Writing Class ◽  
Language Classroom ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
And Control ◽  
Method Approach

Task-based language teaching has been widely used for language classroom. Using tasks as main activities, task-based materials was developed particularly for writing class. This article is intended to present the study of effectiveness of task-based materials in improving writing class for university. To accommodate the research purposes, mixed method approach was carried out by using quasi experimental research and content analysis of sentence complexity. The respondents were 210 students from writing classes as experiment and control with writing test as instrument. The results of data analysis showed that there were significant differences of writing skill to those who taught using developed task-based materials. Despite the fact that the score did not significantly differ on the aspect of writing mechanics, a developed task-based material has been proved to improve students’ writing skill in the aspect of format, content, organization and grammar. Moreover, the levels of lexical complexity and accuracy from the students whose materials use task-based design are higher than those who do not use it. Then, it can be drawn a conclusion that the use of developed task-based materials brings significant effects toward writing performance.   

scholarly journals PLEASE Strategy for Teaching Writing Viewed from Students' Self-Esteem

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-319
Author(s):  
Arief Eko Priyo Atmojo
Keyword(s):  
Secondary School ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Teaching Writing ◽  
Effective Strategy ◽  
Writing Test ◽  
Tukey Test ◽  
Innovative Materials ◽  
Multifactor Analysis ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

This research aims to investigate whether: (1) PLEASE strategy is more effective than RAFT strategy for writing; (2) Students having high self-esteem are better in writing than those having low self-esteem; and (3) There is an interaction between the strategies and the students’ self-esteem. This research was done at a state secondary school located in Sragen, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia. Cluster random sampling was employed to get the sample consisting of two classes. PLEASE strategy was used in the experimental class meanwhile RAFT strategy was employed in the control class. The students in each class were categorized into students having high self-esteem and low self-esteem. Writing test and self-esteem questionnaire were utilized to gather data. Multifactor Analysis of Variance ANOVA 2 x 2 test and Tukey test were employed to analyze the data after normality and homogeneity tests were undergone. The results indicate that: (1) PLEASE strategy is more effective than RAFT strategy for writing; (2) Students having high self-esteem are better in writing than those having low self-esteem; and (3) There is an interaction between the strategies and the students’ self-esteem. It suggests that PLEASE strategy is an effective strategy for writing compared to RAFT strategy. Further researches comparing PLEASE strategy to other strategies, techniques, or methods and collaborating it with media and innovative materials for writing are encouraged.

scholarly journals The Picture Word Inductive Model: Its Effectiveness to Teach Writing Viewed from Students' Interest

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-258
Author(s):  
Rahayu Meliasari ◽  
Ngadiso Ngadiso ◽  
Sri Marmanto
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Teaching Writing ◽  
Writing Test ◽  
Writing Strategy ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Multifactor Analysis ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Picture Word Inductive Model is an inquiry-oriented strategy for teaching writing that uses picture containing familiar objects to fully lead students into inquiring about words, adding words to their writing, and ultimately developing the title, sentences, and paragraphs about their picture. This experimental study aimed to find out the effectiveness of PWIM to teach writing viewed from students’ interest in the eighth grade of MTs. ASWAJA Pontianak. Sampling technique was through cluster random sampling resulting 2 classes which consist of 26 students of each class contributed to the study. Technique of data collection encompassed writing test and questionnaire. The data were analyzed by using 2x2 Multifactor Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s HSD Test. The result revealed that: (1) Picture Word Inductive Model(PWIM) is more effective than Controlled-Writing Strategy (CWS) to teach writing; (2) students having high interest have better writing skill than those having low interest. (3) there is an interaction between teaching strategies and the level of interest on students’ writing skill.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF TEACHING STRATEGIES AND SELF CONFIDENCE ON STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT IN AN INDONESIAN SCHOOL

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Triana Ramdha
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Strategies ◽  
Teaching Strategy ◽  
T Test ◽  
Teaching Writing ◽  
Writing Test ◽  
Self Confidence ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Academic Year

In teaching writing, teaching strategy and students’ self-confidence influence students’ writing skill. The research was conducted to find out the effect of Roundtable Strategy and students’ self-confidence on students’ writing skill of descriptive text. The design of this research was quasi experimental with 2x2 factorial design. The population of this research was the VIII grade students of SMP Tri Bhakti Pekanbaru, 2015/2016 academic year. Writing test and self-confidence questionnaire were used as the research instruments. Then, the data were analyzed by using t-test formula and two ways Anova. The result of this research shows that (1) students who were taught by using Roundtable Strategy had better writing skill in writing descriptive text than those who were taught by using Three Phase Strategy. It was proven by the result of t-test which showed that tobserved was bigger than ttable, (2) students with high self-confidence who were taught by Roundtable Strategy had better writing skill in descriptive text than those who were taught by using Three Phase Strategy, (3) students with low self-confidence who were taught by Roundtable Strategy had better writing skill in descriptive text than those who were taught by using Three Phase Strategy, and (4) there was no interaction between both strategies and students’ self-confidence toward students’ writing skill, where Fobserved (0.004) was less than Ftable (3.39). In conclusion, Roundtable Strategy had a significant result on students’ writing skill than Three Phase Strategy and there was no interaction between teaching strategies and students’ self-confidence toward students’ writing skill.

scholarly journals The effect of Dictogloss Technique on the students’ writing skill

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-293
Author(s):  
Dian Pertiwi ◽  
Ngadiso Ngadiso ◽  
Nur Arifah Drajati
Keyword(s):  
Direct Instruction ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Learning Context ◽  
Islamic School ◽  
Writing Test ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Multifactor Analysis ◽  
High Motivation ◽  
Low Motivation

Dictogloss can be considered as way for integrating form and meaning in the learning context. The main objective of this research is to analyze whether: (1) Dictogloss is more effective than Direct Instruction to teach writing for the eleventh grades students, and (2) students having high motivation have better writing skill than those having low motivation for the eleventh-grade students. This article refers to an experimental study on the effectiveness of Dictogloss to teach writing skill at one of Islamic School in Surakarta, Indonesia. The sampling used in this research was cluster random sampling with two classes as sample, namely the experimental class taught using Dictogloss and the control class taught using Direct Instruction. To collect the data, there were two instruments used in this research namely, the writing test and the motivation questionnaire. After treatment was given to both classes in eight meetings, a post-test of writing to obtain data was conducted. The data were analyzed by using 2x2 Multifactor Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Before conducting the ANOVA test, pre-requisite test namely normality and homogeneity test were conducted. The result of this research shows that: (1) Dictogloss is more effective than Direct Instruction to teach writing, and (2) students having high motivation have better writing skill than those having low motivation. Therefore, it is recommended for the English teacher to apply Dictogloss in writing activity to promote an effective teaching on writing skill. In conclusion, Dictogloss can be used to improve students’ writing skill for the eleventh-grade students.

scholarly journals TEACHING WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT BY USING COLLABORATIVE LEARNING

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 329
Author(s):  
Indra Rizki ◽  
Deyan Nouvaldi ◽  
Yanuarti Apsari
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Learning ◽  
Round Table ◽  
Narrative Text ◽  
Teaching Writing ◽  
Writing Ability ◽  
Writing Test ◽  
Scientific Approach ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference

Writing is an important skill that should  be mastered by English learner. This research deals with teaching writing narrative text by using Collaborative Learning Approach (round table technique) and Scientific Approach. The subjects of this research were X RPL 1 as experimental class and X RPL 3 as control class. Both classes consist of 33 students. The objectives of this research are to know wheter or not the difference between students’ writing ability who were taught by using Collaborative Learning. This research employs the quasi experimental design. The instrument of this ressearch are writing test (pre-test and post test), observation, and interview. The data were analyzed by using statistical product and service solution (SPSS) 25 which through the normality and mann whitney process. The findings showed that the calculation result of gain score showed that the significance value was lower than 0.05 (0.0049 < 0.05) which means there is a difference between students who were taught by Collaborative Learning and those who were taught by using Scientific Approach. Keywords:  Writing, Narrative, Collaborative Learning, Round Table Technique

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document