Legal positions of the supreme court in cases on division of labor and civil relations

2020 ◽  
pp. 29-34
Author(s):  
D. Kutomanov
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Labor Relations ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Specific Situation ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Systematic Assessment ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject

Problem setting. Of the large volume of cases before national courts, cases involving the distinction between labor and civil relations are of particular interest. Superficial familiarization with the practice of consideration of this type of labor disputes reveals the existence of conflicting enforcement approaches, sometimes contradictory to each other, which determines the need for a deeper understanding of the issues of disputes caused by such phenomena as concealment or replacement of labor relations. The purpose of the research is to reveal the problematic issues of the distinction between labor and civil relations, both from the point of view of the existing doctrine of labor law, and through the prism of the existing rulemaking practice, aimed at improving national legislation on labor. Analysis of resent researches and publications. The issues of the distinction between labor and civil relations have become the subject of scientific analysis in the writings of such scientists as O.V. Zabrodina, L.O. Zolotukhina, M.I. Inshin, R.A. Maidanik, S.M. Prilipko, Ya.V. Svichkaryova, D.I. Sirokha, N.V. Fedorchenko, O.M. Yaroshenko and others. At the same time, these issues require further research in order to develop comprehensive recommendations aimed at improving labor law. Article’s main body. Among the specific number of court cases that are subject to the applicable rules of labor law are the two most common categories of cases through which the Supreme Court formulates legal positions on the distinction between labor and civil relations. The subject of the first category of cases are the demands of individuals on the recognition of relationships, formulated in the form of a civil contract labor. The subject of the second category of cases is disputes between employers and the State Service of Ukraine on labor issues on the recognition of illegal and the cancellation of prescriptions and resolutions of the state body. The analysis of the legal positions of the Supreme Court, formulated as a result of consideration of the above categories of cases, leads to the conclusion that the basic concept of the distinction between labor and civil relations, which is applied in the practice of the Supreme Court, is fully consistent with the doctrinal approach and is to determine the employment relationship, what relation, subject advocates the process of organization of work, not its result, with a further combination of the specified trait with other traits in each specific situation (duration of relationships, systematic the promptness of payment, the presence of signs of subordination, and others).. Conclusion. In the case of disputes related to the concealment of labor relations or their replacement through the conclusion of civil contracts with employees, the case-law proceeds from the need for a systematic assessment of the content of contracts concluded between the parties for the purpose of revealing in their terms direct or indirect signs of employment relations. The approaches taken by the Supreme Court to distinguish between labor and civil relations certainly enrich the law-enforcement practice and, given the binding status of its rulings, help to formulate uniform approaches to the interpretation and application of the provisions of current law.

Some New Emphases in Extradition Case Law

1981 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.Z. Feller
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
District Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject ◽  
State Of Israel

In Azen v. State of Israel, the Supreme Court heard the appeal of a person who had been declared extraditable to France for offences of stealing by an agent and fraud, committed, according to the request for extradition, in France. One of the pleas raised against the decision of the District Court, in which Azen was declared extraditable, was that the specialty limitation was not guaranteed in the Extradition Treaty between Israel and France, as required by sec. 17 (a) of the Israeli Extradition Law, 1954. This section states unequivocally that —A wanted person shall not be extradited unless it has been ensured, by an agreement with the requesting State, that he will not be detained, tried or punished in that State for another offence committed prior to his extradition;whereas in art. 17 of the said Treaty, specialty is guaranteed in the following words: L'individu qui aura été délivré ne pourra ni être poursuivi ou jugé en sa présence ni être, détenu …i.e. under the Treaty, the specialty limitation is restricted, from the procedural point of view, to those processes involving physical, personal enforcement against the subject of extradition—he will not be “summoned” for interrogation, nor judged “in his presence”, nor “detained”; the Extradition Law, however, contains no such restriction, with the exception of detention which, by its very nature, requires physical enforcement.

scholarly journals La connaissance judiciaire des actes réglementaires

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 427-446
Author(s):  
Raoul P. Barbe
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
The State ◽  
Civil Litigation ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Supreme Court Ruling ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Clear Statement

This paper describes the state of federal and Québec law as regards judicial notice of statutory instruments. The position in respect of federal instruments is first surveyed by reference to the provisions of the Canada Evidence Act and Canadian and British cases on the subject ; mention is then made of the now superseded Regulations Act of 1950 and the questions of interpretation that arose from it; and finally the impact of s. 23 of the Statutory Instruments Act of 1971 is evaluated in the light of the Supreme Court ruling in R. v. The « Evgenia Chandris ». The position in Québec law appears to be somewhat more confused. While the rule that regulations should be a matter for judicial notice seems well secured by s. 105 of the Summary Proceedings Act, this obviously only settles the point as regards penal proceedings under provincial statutes. In civil litigation, in the absence of any clear statement that regulations are to be judicially noticed, caution would seem to advise litigants to specifically plead and evidence the existence of regulations they intend to rely on. The author concludes by calling on the Québec Legislature to state explicitly the rule that regulations are a matter for judicial notice in any kind of proceedings.

scholarly journals Legitimação ativa da defensoria pública no mandado de injunção coletivo

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-95
Author(s):  
Olavo Augusto Vianna Alves Ferreira ◽  
Guilherme De Siqueira Castro
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
The Other ◽  
Public Defender ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law

O presente artigo tem o objetivo de examinar a legitimidade ativa da Defensoria Pública no mandado de injunção coletivo. Para a consecução desta finalidade, o tema será abordado tanto do ponto de vista constitucional como do ponto de vista processual. Será estudado o vício de constitucionalidade formal da Lei 13.300/2016 no que tange a legitimidade ativa da Defensoria Pública no mandado de injunção coletivo. A necessidade de pertinência temática para a impetração e o tipo de interesse transindividual tutelado são questões que envolvem um profícuo debate constitucional que já foi objeto de exame pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal. Por derradeiro, abordaremos a possibilidade de litisconsórcio ativo no mandado de injunção envolvendo a Defensoria Pública e os demais legitimados extraordinários previsto na lei de regência da ação injuncional.   Abstract This article aims to examine the active legitimacy of the Office of the Public Defender in the collective writ of injunction. To achieve this purpose, the subject will be addressed both from a constitutional point of view and from a procedural point of view. This paper will study the formal constitutional vice of Law 13.300 / 2016 regarding the active legitimacy of the Office of the Public Defender in the collective writ of injunction. The need for thematic relevance to the filing and type of ward transindividual interest are issues involving a fruitful constitutional debate that has been the subject of examination by the Supreme Court. For last, we discuss the possibility of active joinder in the writ of injunction involving the Office of the Public Defender and the other extraordinary legitimated under the law of Regency injuncional action.

scholarly journals A repercussão geral no recurso extraordinário e seu impacto na seara tributária / The overall impact on the extraordinary appeal and its impact on tax field

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastião Sergio da Silveira ◽  
Alcides Belfort da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Constitutional Amendment ◽  
Economic Point ◽  
The North ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
American Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Speedy Trial ◽  
The Impact

Resumo: O presente trabalho tem por objetivo analisar o impacto do filtro processual instituído pela Emenda Constitucional nº 45, qual seja, a repercussão geral no recurso extraordinário e o seu propósito de celeridade processual junto ao Supremo Tribunal Federal. Trata-se de um requisito de admissibilidade do recurso extraordinário, que foi inspirado no direito norte-americano e tem como principal objetivo solucionar a crise vivenciada pela Suprema Corte. Para a verificação da repercussão geral deverá ser levada em consideração a existência, ou não, de questões relevantes do ponto de vista econômico, político, social, ou jurídico, que ultrapassem os interesses subjetivos da causa (CPC, §1º do art. 543-A), atual redação dada pelo NCPC nos termos do artigo 1.035. É justamente neste ponto a pertinência que guarda com o Direito Tributário, vez que tal ramo (ou setor, como preferem outros) impacta na vida do cidadão de maneira incisiva. Assim, a maioria das causas tributárias, devido ao seu impacto social e jurídico, desembocam no Supremo Tribunal Federal, sendo que a Corte é responsável por delimitar o tema da forma mais consentânea possível.Abstract: This study aims to analyze the impact of procedural filter established by Constitutional Amendment 45, which is the general impact on the extraordinary appeal and its aimed speedy trial by the Supreme Court. This is an extraordinary appeal admissibility requirement, which was inspired by the North American law and aims to resolve the crisis experienced by the Supreme Court. To check the general defense must take into account the existence or not of relevant issues from the economic point of view, political, social, or legal, exceeding the subjective interests of the cause. It is precisely at this point that the relevance guard with the Tax Law, since this branch (or sector, as they prefer other) impacts the life of incisively citizen. Thus, most of the tax claims, due to their social and legal impact, leading into the Supreme Court, and the Court is responsible for defining the subject of more consistent as possible.

Functions of legal guarantees in labor law: current issues

2021 ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
Maryna Pyzhova Pyzhova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Theoretical Study ◽  
Labor Relations ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Labor Rights ◽  
Main Body ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Problem Setting

Problem setting. The concept of “guarantee” is the subject of many scientific studies, and in various fields of law. But this is especially true of labor law, and above all, work on guarantees of labor rights of citizens. That is why a special place in the system of national labor law is occupied by the institution of guarantees and compensations. Unfortunately, the outdated Labor Code of Ukraine has significant problems with terminological uncertainty, as it contains neither a definition of guarantees nor a definition of compensation, in contrast to the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, where Article 164 clearly defines that guarantees are funds. ways and conditions by which the exercise of rights granted to employees in the field of social and labor relations is ensured. And compensations are monetary payments established for the purpose of reimbursement to employees of the expenses connected with performance by them of labor or other duties provided by this Code and other federal laws. Therefore, we see it necessary to investigate and determine the purpose and indicate what functions are guaranteed by labor law in Ukraine. Analysis of recent research. Scientists approach the understanding of the essence and content of legal guarantees in different ways, among them E. Ametistov, V. Andriev, N. Bolotina, O. Valetska, S. Venediktov, S. Verlanov, M. Grekova, S. Ivanov, I. Kiselyov, N. Kokhan, E. Krasnov, M. Feskov, G. Chanisheva, and problems of the institute of remuneration – V. Bozhko, V. Zhernakov, M. Inshin, O. Protsevsky, S. Prilipko, O. Sytnitskaya, N. Khutoryan, O. Yaroshenko, I. Yatskevich and others. Target of research is to consider the issue of legal guarantees in labor law and highlight their functions. Article’s main body. The article considers the issue of assigning legal guarantees in labor law. The author’s definition of the functions of legal guarantees in labor law is given, it is indicated that these are the areas of influence on the realization of employees and employers of their labor rights and responsibilities, protection of rights and freedoms and their restoration in case of violation. It is proposed to distinguish four main functions of legal guarantees in labor law, including security, instrumental, creating a balance between the interests of the employee and the employer, providing stability to labor relations. The articles of the national security legislation which express the specified functions are analyzed. Conclusions and prospects for the development. In our opinion, the definition and understanding of the functions of legal guarantees in labor law is necessary for further scientific and theoretical study of the institution of guarantees in labor law, as well as for law enforcement. We are convinced that guarantees are an important and necessary tool for the realization of the declared rights and freedoms of citizens in the field of labor. That is why there is an urgent need to develop and consolidate at the legislative level the conceptual apparatus of the institution of guarantees.

scholarly journals LEGAL INCENTIVES AND INCENTIVE LEGAL RELATIONS IN LABOR LAW

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryna L. Smolyarova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Labor Relations ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Form ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Legal Forms

The article is devoted to the study of the main elements of the mechanism of legal incentives: legal incentives and incentive legal relations in labor law. Based on the analysis of works of domestic and foreign scholars on general theory of law and representatives of various branches of law, including labor law, the author emphasizes that stimulating legal relations are quite dynamic phenomena � they arise, change, cease. The dynamics of legal relations is associated with real life circumstances, which in legal science are called legal facts. Since the result of the action of legal incentives is the emergence of a socially active act, the legal facts can only act as lawful actions. Implementation of a legal incentive is a form of socio-legal activity of legal entities. Legal incentives also affect behavior indirectly � through consciousness and will, that is, what determines the behavior itself. Purposeful labor activity carried out with the help of legal incentives that affect the consciousness of the subject, and is the process of regulating the actual legal relationship. The subject of labor relations develops, first of all, the ideal model of his behavior, assessing the content of legal incentives, taking into account the current practice, anticipating the possible favorable consequences for him. In real behavior of the person the maintenance of stimulating legal relations is realized. The goal of the stimulating subject is achieved. It is emphasized that the stimulating legal relationship as a kind of labor relations has the following features: stimulating legal relations arise between the subjects of labor relations, it is the result of voluntary and conscious action of the employee; incentive legal relations arise, change or terminate only on the basis of legal incentives. Legal incentives generate a stimulating legal relationship and are directly realized through it; the subjects of stimulating legal relations are the bearers of subjective rights and legal obligations; stimulating legal relationship is characterized by such a quality as individuality, it identifies specific participants and determines the extent of their lawful behavior; stimulating legal relations are voluntary. For their emergence, it is not enough to have a legal incentive that includes the state will. The main thing is the manifestation of the will of its participants, as the stimulating legal relationship is realized, primarily through human consciousness; stimulating legal relations are especially protected by the state, which is directly interested in their effectiveness. Based on an in-depth theoretical analysis of existing views in legal science, the relationship between legal incentives and incentive legal relations in labor law is revealed. The process of stimulating employees from the point of view of its legal nature is analyzed. Emphasis is placed on the fact that the emergence and development of incentive legal relations is directly dependent on the mechanism of legal incentives. The mechanism of legal incentives is a complex systemic phenomenon, the components of which are formed as a mechanism of legal regulation - the main special legal form of legal influence, and non-legal forms of legal influence, which in some way from the internal characteristics of the person. It is emphasized that certain legal remedies, which are presented in the mechanism of legal incentives, do not affect the effectiveness of this mechanism and only in their totality and interaction, they ensure its effective operation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document