scholarly journals LEGAL INCENTIVES AND INCENTIVE LEGAL RELATIONS IN LABOR LAW

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryna L. Smolyarova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Labor Relations ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Form ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Legal Forms

The article is devoted to the study of the main elements of the mechanism of legal incentives: legal incentives and incentive legal relations in labor law. Based on the analysis of works of domestic and foreign scholars on general theory of law and representatives of various branches of law, including labor law, the author emphasizes that stimulating legal relations are quite dynamic phenomena � they arise, change, cease. The dynamics of legal relations is associated with real life circumstances, which in legal science are called legal facts. Since the result of the action of legal incentives is the emergence of a socially active act, the legal facts can only act as lawful actions. Implementation of a legal incentive is a form of socio-legal activity of legal entities. Legal incentives also affect behavior indirectly � through consciousness and will, that is, what determines the behavior itself. Purposeful labor activity carried out with the help of legal incentives that affect the consciousness of the subject, and is the process of regulating the actual legal relationship. The subject of labor relations develops, first of all, the ideal model of his behavior, assessing the content of legal incentives, taking into account the current practice, anticipating the possible favorable consequences for him. In real behavior of the person the maintenance of stimulating legal relations is realized. The goal of the stimulating subject is achieved. It is emphasized that the stimulating legal relationship as a kind of labor relations has the following features: stimulating legal relations arise between the subjects of labor relations, it is the result of voluntary and conscious action of the employee; incentive legal relations arise, change or terminate only on the basis of legal incentives. Legal incentives generate a stimulating legal relationship and are directly realized through it; the subjects of stimulating legal relations are the bearers of subjective rights and legal obligations; stimulating legal relationship is characterized by such a quality as individuality, it identifies specific participants and determines the extent of their lawful behavior; stimulating legal relations are voluntary. For their emergence, it is not enough to have a legal incentive that includes the state will. The main thing is the manifestation of the will of its participants, as the stimulating legal relationship is realized, primarily through human consciousness; stimulating legal relations are especially protected by the state, which is directly interested in their effectiveness. Based on an in-depth theoretical analysis of existing views in legal science, the relationship between legal incentives and incentive legal relations in labor law is revealed. The process of stimulating employees from the point of view of its legal nature is analyzed. Emphasis is placed on the fact that the emergence and development of incentive legal relations is directly dependent on the mechanism of legal incentives. The mechanism of legal incentives is a complex systemic phenomenon, the components of which are formed as a mechanism of legal regulation - the main special legal form of legal influence, and non-legal forms of legal influence, which in some way from the internal characteristics of the person. It is emphasized that certain legal remedies, which are presented in the mechanism of legal incentives, do not affect the effectiveness of this mechanism and only in their totality and interaction, they ensure its effective operation.

The ratio of private and public beginnings in Labor Law

2021 ◽  
pp. 168
Author(s):  
Lyubov A. Lomakina
Keyword(s):  
Labor Relations ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
Labor Contract ◽  
Labor Legislation ◽  
Private And Public

The article highlights some issues of solving the priority tasks of labor legislation, coordination of the interests of the parties to labor relations, the interests of the state, which are determined by the principles of legal regulation of labor relations. Principles, as a legal category, form the basis for regulating any branch of law, including labor law, and determine the direction of development of the branch of law. One of these principles is the principle of combining private and public interests, which is reflected in Labor Law as the principle of combining state and contractual regulation of labor relations, it is aimed at balancing the various interests of the parties to the labor contract and the state.

Legal positions of the supreme court in cases on division of labor and civil relations

2020 ◽  
pp. 29-34
Author(s):  
D. Kutomanov
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Labor Relations ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Specific Situation ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Systematic Assessment ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject

Problem setting. Of the large volume of cases before national courts, cases involving the distinction between labor and civil relations are of particular interest. Superficial familiarization with the practice of consideration of this type of labor disputes reveals the existence of conflicting enforcement approaches, sometimes contradictory to each other, which determines the need for a deeper understanding of the issues of disputes caused by such phenomena as concealment or replacement of labor relations. The purpose of the research is to reveal the problematic issues of the distinction between labor and civil relations, both from the point of view of the existing doctrine of labor law, and through the prism of the existing rulemaking practice, aimed at improving national legislation on labor. Analysis of resent researches and publications. The issues of the distinction between labor and civil relations have become the subject of scientific analysis in the writings of such scientists as O.V. Zabrodina, L.O. Zolotukhina, M.I. Inshin, R.A. Maidanik, S.M. Prilipko, Ya.V. Svichkaryova, D.I. Sirokha, N.V. Fedorchenko, O.M. Yaroshenko and others. At the same time, these issues require further research in order to develop comprehensive recommendations aimed at improving labor law. Article’s main body. Among the specific number of court cases that are subject to the applicable rules of labor law are the two most common categories of cases through which the Supreme Court formulates legal positions on the distinction between labor and civil relations. The subject of the first category of cases are the demands of individuals on the recognition of relationships, formulated in the form of a civil contract labor. The subject of the second category of cases is disputes between employers and the State Service of Ukraine on labor issues on the recognition of illegal and the cancellation of prescriptions and resolutions of the state body. The analysis of the legal positions of the Supreme Court, formulated as a result of consideration of the above categories of cases, leads to the conclusion that the basic concept of the distinction between labor and civil relations, which is applied in the practice of the Supreme Court, is fully consistent with the doctrinal approach and is to determine the employment relationship, what relation, subject advocates the process of organization of work, not its result, with a further combination of the specified trait with other traits in each specific situation (duration of relationships, systematic the promptness of payment, the presence of signs of subordination, and others).. Conclusion. In the case of disputes related to the concealment of labor relations or their replacement through the conclusion of civil contracts with employees, the case-law proceeds from the need for a systematic assessment of the content of contracts concluded between the parties for the purpose of revealing in their terms direct or indirect signs of employment relations. The approaches taken by the Supreme Court to distinguish between labor and civil relations certainly enrich the law-enforcement practice and, given the binding status of its rulings, help to formulate uniform approaches to the interpretation and application of the provisions of current law.

scholarly journals Error both in the general philosophical sense and as a subject of study of legal science

2021 ◽  
pp. 148-153
Author(s):  
S. V. Havrilyuk
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Human Behavior ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
The Will ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Human Desire

The article focuses on the exploration of philosophical teachings on the concept of «error». Philosophers of antiquity introduced the concept of «natural law», which was formed over the centuries from the human desire to understand the world and to determine our place in society. It was from that time that the concept of human rights gradually began to emerge, and the links between the state and individual and the state and society were established. Error was considered the result of the erroneous course of thought, wrong actions, actions that do not achieve the goal: model of human behavior based on delusions. An error is always aberration: an action opposite of the correct one and committed unintentionally. It always implies illegality. Errors are associated with the wrong course of thought in reasoning, inadequate thinking, misinterpretation and inaccuracy of actions and violation of certain rules. Such fallaciousness of thought and action violates the truth of the substance of thinking and activity and thus leads to various kinds of errors. It should be indicated that the problem of error has an independent meaning in various fields of scientific knowledge:philosophy, logic, mathematics, law, cybernetics, medicine, linguistics, economics, etc. Through the analysis of the concepts and signs of errors provided by the philosophers mentioned in the article we conclude that error should be considered as both process and result of human activity. In addition, the ambiguous positions of modern legal scholars on the semantic meaning of the terms «error» and «legal error» are highlighted, which often leads to inconsistencies in the conceptual apparatus of modern legal theory. They may interpret the concept of «error» as a shortcoming, a flaw, a mistake, a distortion or in a more categorical way: a delusion, an imperfection, an inconsistency or a gap. Particular attention is paid to the causes of legal errors, in particular, it is noted that in modern legal science they are divided into objective errors which do not depend on the will and conscious actions of lawmakers and subjective which is generated through the will of lawmakers, as only professional legal activity and its results may be the potential sources of error. The objective causes of legal errors include the constant development of public relations, as the legislator and other legal bodies and institutions do not always keep up with the demands of life. In turn, subjective factors stem from personal qualities, human behavior and actions. In general, legal scholars define legal error as a negative result caused by unintentional, incorrect action of the subject of legal activity and as various accidental and unintentional actions on the course of the decisions of the subjects of legal relations (legal body or public official), which reflects the flaws of the will of the subject of law in the process of expression of such will, leads to a negative result and can be committed at any stage of legal regulation). Keywords: error, delusion, legal error, erroneous behavior.

scholarly journals Ustawa o dokumentach publicznych i jej rola w zapobieganiu fałszerstwom dokumentów

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Mieczysław Goc ◽  
Dorota Semków
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Document Security ◽  
Positive Assessment ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Almost All

<p>Forgeries of documents concern almost all types – from ID cards, passports, to money marks and securities. This procedure is a serious threat to proper legal transactions. Security of legal transactions means the need to ensure the credibility of documents by caring for trust in the document as a formal way of ascertaining the law, legal relationship or circumstances that may have legal significance. For this reason, the document benefits from protection in many areas. There are nearly 400 legal acts in the legal system in force in Poland, the subject of which are documents. Representatives of the scientific community, lawyers and experts in the field of document research, however, have for years emphasized the need for a legal act to legally organize the issues of documents. The Act of 22 November 2018 on Public Documents, therefore, constitutes a long-awaited legal regulation and thus is an important element in the process of preventing crimes against the credibility of documents, filling the organizational and legal gap in the broadly understood issue of public documents. The Act had to be a form of coherent, comprehensive legal regulation that would be used in both administrative, civil and criminal law. Its solutions should be considered as correct and necessary in creating a system of public document security. The implementation of the provisions of the Act on Public Documents gives hope for comprehensive regulation of the indicated issues. Both from the perspective of securing the interests of the state and its citizens, the Act deserves a positive assessment of its provisions.</p>

Features of legal regulation of labor relations regarding the implementation of legal guarantees

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Pyzhova
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Labor Relations ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Independent Form ◽  
Single Method ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

Problem setting. The implementation of the norms of a particular branch of law can occur only in the relations that constitute its subject, thus transforming these relations into legal relations. Labor law is no exception. In this regard, the rules on guarantees must be considered in terms of implementation in relations that are part of the subject of labor law. Note that the relations that are the subject of labor law are governed by special methods that form a single method of this branch of law. This, in turn, gives rise to the assertion that an additional circumstance that allows to include the relations included in the subject of labor law to an independent form, is the possibility of applying to these relations methods of legal regulation characteristic of the method of this branch of law. This approach should be used in relation to the provision of guarantees and compensation, the inclusion of which in the subject of labor law as a separate type is not excluded. To do this, we highlight the main methods of legal regulation proposed by the science of labor law, which characterize the method of this branch of law. Analysis of recent research. The works of many labor scientists, in particular: N. Bobrova, M. Vitruk, D. Karpenko, T. Markina, P. Nedbayl, K. Urzhinsky, are devoted to the study of guarantees in labor law. V. Skobelkin, O. Smirnov, N. Stolyar, L. Surovskaya, O. Yaroshenko and others. Target of research is to consider the relationship between the methods of legal regulation of the method of legal law for the provision of guarantees and compensation. Article’s main body. The article covers the issues of legal regulation of labor relations for the implementation of legal guarantees. The peculiarities of the method of legal regulation are described. It is indicated how the methods of legal regulation of the method of labor law relate to the relationship of providing guarantees and compensations. It is concluded that the regulation of relations on the provision of guarantees and indemnities takes place using special methods that are not used in relations that are the subject of labor law. Conclusions and prospects for the development. Thus, the characteristics of the method of labor law, in terms of the possibility of applying its methods to the relationship of guarantees and compensation allows us to draw the following conclusions: the method of labor law is a special combination of ways to influence the rules of law on public relations. The regulation of relations for the provision of guarantees and compensation is using methods that determine the method of labor law. At the same time, the regulation of relations on the provision of guarantees and indemnities also takes place using special methods that are not used in relations that are the subject of labor law. This fact determines the specifics of their intended purpose and indicates the presence in the system of labor law of an independent legal institution – the institution of guarantees and compensations.

Differentiation of Legal Regulation of Labor Relations as Typical Tendencies of Labor Law Development

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Алия Нуртдинова ◽  
Aliya Nurtdinova ◽  
Людмила Чиканова ◽  
Lyudmila CHikanova
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Labor Relations ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Professional Activity ◽  
Legal Form ◽  
Professional Activities ◽  
Special Rules ◽  
Polar Opposite

The articles dwells upon the issue of differentiation of legal regulation of labor relations which is seen as a legal instrument, which allows taking into account the specificity of social relations that are formed under the conditions of or among the labor law subjects and that have specific features. The differentiation is a polar opposite to the legal regulation unity which embodies the existence of a unified legal status of employees, their equality, and, ultimately, the unity of the branch of law, which is unthinkable without stability and certainty of legal standing of principal participants of relevant legal relations. Further differentiation of legal regulation of labor relations is one of the most typical tendencies in labor law development. The article notes that the grounds for differentiation, out of necessity to coordinate with the principle of equality, and hence abidance by discrimination prohibition, must be entitative, justified and directly linked with an object of legal regulation and satisfy the principles of clarity and unambiguousness. Based on the abovementioned criteria, the authors analyze such grounds of differentiation of legal regulation of labor relations as peculiarities of labor process, its organization, and the type and nature of labor activity, the field of economic activity which uses labor, and the working and environmental employment terms. The articles notes that the grounds for differentiation, chosen by a legislator, do not always correspond to the mentioned criteria. They are often arbitrary and do not reflect their objective need or do not correspond to the reality. For example, inclusion into the Labor Code of peculiarities of legal regulation of labor relations for those categories of workers, in relation to whom these peculiarities have already been established by special laws. In fact these rules do not convey any regulatory meaning and therefore complicate the legislation and do not contribute to clarity and transparency of those workers’ legal status. The analysis shows that the employer’s legal form and the peculiarities of the employees’ professional activities have recently become the mostly widespread grounds for differentiation. The authors draw the conclusion that differentiation cannot be considered valid if it was derived on the basis of one criterion (the employer’s legal form) without taking into account other significant criteria. While the admissibility (and sometimes the necessity) of setting the specificity of legal regulation based on the peculiarities of labor (professional) activity does not raise doubts. The only issue that could be raised is the issue of existence (or absence) of such peculiarities and of the advisability of specific manifestations of the differentiation, i.e. special rules adopted by a legislator.

Historical Foundations of Development of the Institution of Employment Contract

2019 ◽  
pp. 68-75
Author(s):  
Yuliya Chernenilova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Labor Relations ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Economic Management ◽  
Persons With Disabilities ◽  
Employment Contract ◽  
Labor Legislation ◽  
The Russian Federation

This article describes the periods of development of the legal institution of employment contract in Russia. The characteristic features for each of them are defined. The first period was the longest and was marked by develogment of the contract of personal employment as the origin of the modern institution of employment contract. In the second period, the contract of personal employment represented the institution of civil law, and later became the subject of study of the civil law science. At that time the industrial law of the country was forming. A distinctive feature of the third period was the adoption of codified acts, as well as differentiation in the legal regulation of labor relations of temporary and seasonal workers. The fourth period is characterized by changes in state-legal methods of economic management. With the adoption of the Constitution of the Russian Federation labor legislation was assigned to the joint jurisdiction of the Russian Federation and its subjects. It is concluded that the adoption of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation necessitates a more accurate study of the problems arising in the application of specific rules of law governing the peculiarities of labor of certain categories of workers (for example, labor relations with persons with disabilities are not yet perfect because of the youth of the labor law), conflict of laws issues arising in practice, contradictions that occur in a huge array of legal documents not only in labor law, but also in other branches of law.

Wage indexation as a means of ensuring that real wage levels are raised

2020 ◽  
pp. 40-47
Author(s):  
Е. A. Shapoval
Keyword(s):  
Real Wage ◽  
Labor Relations ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Wage Indexation ◽  
Definition Of

The article considers issues related to the state guarantee of ensuring an increase in the level of real wage content, the definition of the concept of “wage indexation”, the procedure for its implementation and the mechanisms for determining the amount based on the approaches developed in the science of labor law and judicial practice taking into account priorities in the field of social and labor relations.

UNITY AND DIFFERENTIATION OF LEGAL REGULATION OF LABOR RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES OF THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonid Mohilevskyi ◽  
◽  
Olha Sіevidova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Labor Relations ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Labor Rights ◽  
Work Activity ◽  
Theoretical Approaches ◽  
Labor Legislation ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Definition Of

The Public Prosecutor's Office in Ukraine plays a major role in the protection of human rights and freedom, of general interests of the society and the country, and in the strengthening of law and order, thus facilitating the establishment and development of the democratic constitutional state. The effectiveness of performing the duties put onto the prosecution of Ukraine is directly dependent on the prosecutor's offices' employees that are empowered to fulfill their professional responsibilities. The legal status of an employee of a prosecutor's office is specified in the Law of Ukraine “On Public Prosecutor’s Office”. Although, some aspects of these employees' work activity are normalised in the general labor law. This expresses the principle of unity and differentiation of the legal regulation of prosecutor's office's employee's labor relations. This article researches theoretical approaches to the definition of the concepts "unity" and "differentiation". The unity of the legal regulation of labor relations is manifested in the legally established equality of all employees. Differentiation is not opposed to the principle of unity, but takes into account the characteristics of different categories of workers and working conditions to ensure equality. The relationship between the general labor law and the special law on the prosecutor's office regarding the adjustment of the labor rights of the employees of Ukraine's prosecutor's offices had been analysed. The key to effective legal regulation of labor rights of employees of the prosecutor's office of Ukraine is compliance with unity and differentiation. It had been determined that the differentiation of the legal regulation of prosecutor's office's employee's labor rights determines the mandatory and priority application of the special legislation norms. In turn, the unity of the legal regulation of prosecutor's office's employee's labor rights determines the subsidiary usage of labor legislation norms in cases of an employee's individual labor rights not being determined in the special law on Public Prosecutor's Office. Unification of labor law norms governing the labor activity of this category of workers will make it possible to achieve an optimal balance of unity and differentiation.

scholarly journals Ensuring Freedom of Labor in Ukraine in the Context of Labor Emigration

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-31
Author(s):  
Mykola Inshyn ◽  
Olena Moskalenko
Keyword(s):  
Labor Migration ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Labor Relations ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Labor Disputes ◽  
Existing Problems ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Wide Range

Abstract The article is devoted to substantiating the necessity of using existing tools and means of labor law science in certain aspects of labor migration, particularly, concerning the provision of labor freedom for Ukrainian workers - labor emigrants. The integrated approach to the development of methodological foundations for such provision and the development of relevant legal provisions at various stages of realization of a person’s right to labor, as well as in part of ensuring the prohibition of compulsory labor, can qualitatively raise the level of legal regulation of labor migration through the inclusion of labor law science. In support of its argument the article provides a wide range of statistical data on Ukrainian labor emigration. It is determined that the existing problems of Ukrainian labor emigration in the context of ensuring freedom of work can be systematized at the stages of their occurrence in the following way: 1) before the emergence of labor relations with a foreign employer, that is, as long as a Ukrainian citizen is still in Ukraine and acts for the purpose of employment abroad; 2) the emergence of labor relations with a foreign employer, that is, the legal registration of such relationships; 3) the actual beginning of labor relations outside Ukraine, the course of labor relations and the presence of a Ukrainian labor emigrant in them; 4) termination of labor relations of the Ukrainian labor emigrant and return to the territory of Ukraine. The emergence of labor disputes is the optional stage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document