The basis of the appearance of personal non-property rights of legal entities

2020 ◽  
pp. 90-95
Author(s):  
Sofiia Popova
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Economic Competition ◽  
Legal Form ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
State Registration ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Entities

Problem setting. The role of a legal entity in the economic and legal development of the state is quite important. Legal support for the implementation and protection of the essence and activities of these organizations is an important element in achieving these goals. Therefore, in order to improve the legal provisions for legal entities, it is necessary to investigate such a feature of the features of non-property rights as the specificity of their origin, through interaction with the essence of the organization. Analysis of recent researches and publications. Among the researchers who in their works addressed the issue of the basis of the appearance of personal non-property rights ot should be noted Y. M. Zhornokuy and S. O. Slipchenko, V. V. Kachurovsky and R. O. Stefanchuk. Previous research has shown that personal non-property rights of legal entities have specific basis of the emergence. It is concluded that since a legal entity is created on the basis of state registration, the state thus recognizes it as a subject of law. Target of research. Our study is based on the certain aspects of the emergence of definite rights of these subjects of legal relations because legal entities take a special place in the development of the state. The main aim of the study is to research the basis of the appearance of personal non-property rights of legal entities. Article’s main body. Due to the fact that a legal entity is created on the basis of state registration, the state recognizes such a person as a subject of law. This indicates that the characteristic of a legal entity is the publicity of the emergence. Determining the classification of personal non-property rights of legal entities, their differentiation into general, which are related to the essence of the legal entity and special, which have a primary distinguishing feature. These species helped to apply this criterion to the basis for such rights. The analysis of separate personal non-property rights of the organizations is carried out and it is established that certain of them appear at the legal entity in connection with certain conditions, that is special personal non-property rights of the legal entity appear at the organizations in connection with their belonging to a certain kind, organizational and legal form and whether it carries out business activities. It is determined that the moment of the emergence of the right to economic competition cannot be established. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The base for the emergence of general personal non-property rights of organizations are, first of all – its creation through state registration or issuance of an administrative act by a body of state power and local self-government. Also the basis is to obtain an appropriate permit, violation of such rights, the task of property or moral damage, as well as an abstract form of acquisition by the organization of a commercial name. Special basic of the emergence of personal non-property rights of legal entities are the basics with a primary distinguishing feature. This issue is quite relevant and requires further research.

scholarly journals LEGAL NATURE OF PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THEIR STATE REGISTRATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4(106)) ◽  
pp. 183-191
Author(s):  
Ю. М. Щавинська
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Family Relations ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Administrative Duty ◽  
State Organizations ◽  
State Registration ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Entities

The relevance of the article is that the property rights of citizens and businesses are not only the basis of Ukraine's economy - they are based on family relations, they are also the material basis of local governments and state organizations, institutions and enterprises. In other words, without their proper registration and protection, it is impossible to ensure any other sphere of public life. In Ukraine, some attention is paid to the legislative definition of property rights and the problem of their state registration. And if with the first part of the outlined, in our opinion, a certain harmony is reached, then the issue of protection of property rights in today's conditions is acute. Its violations, in particular raids on enterprises and other violations of the property rights of individuals and legal entities, although decreased in number, but such facts have not remained in the past. The leading instrument of administrative legal protection of property rights is the institution of state registration of property rights, which in today's conditions is undergoing a process of further transformation and improvement in the effectiveness of protection of the rights of property rights. The artіcle reveals and descrіbes the legal nature of property rіghts and theіr state regіstratіon. Thіs іs done on the basіs of the theory of natural law, the theory of admіnіstratіve law, the theory of cіvіl law, as well as domestіc legіslatіon. Іt іs proved that the legal nature of the state regіstratіon of real rіghts to іmmovable property іs that іn іts іmplementatіon there are specіfіc admіnіstratіve and legal relatіons of a protectіve nature. It is concluded that the legal nature of state registration of property rights to property rights is that in its implementation there are classic administrative and legal protection relations, which involve applicants or their authorized persons, usually private legal entities, and public ( public) registrars as subjects of power. The content of these relations is: 1) the subjective right of the applicant to receive a kind of public protection in formal form (security document) and in essence - to use the entire public apparatus of protection and state coercion in his case in case of violation of registered property rights; 2) the administrative duty of a special subject of public administration (registrar) is a public obligation to carry out such registration. In turn, the registrar has the right to demand from the applicant provided by the current legislation confirmation of ownership of the property rights submitted for registration. Legal facts in the analyzed area of administrative and legal relations are the entry in the register of decisions on state registration, which directly lead to a change or termination of legal relations. A separate line in this area should be noted administrative-legal, administrative-procedural and economic-procedural legal relations that arise when appealing the decisions of state registrars to refuse registration (registration) of property rights to administrative or (and) judicial authorities.

scholarly journals Theoretical and legal bases of protection of business entities from raiders in Ukraine

2020 ◽  
pp. 51-56
Author(s):  
N.S. Horobets ◽  
Ye.S. Pylypenko
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Private Property ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
The State ◽  
Small Enterprises ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Business Entities ◽  
State Registration ◽  
The Right ◽  
Common Understanding

The article is devoted to the study of theoretical and legal principles of protection of business entities from raids in Ukraine due to the low level of quality of the system of protection of private property rights in the state. It is stated that for small enterprises the lack of financial resources and the risk of illegal seizure or takeover, ie "raiding", is a more common problem, but large enterprises are also subject to raids. It was found that raiding is a real threat to the integrity of enterprises, stable economic development and information security of the state, its danger is confirmed by data on the number of raider seizures of property in Ukraine. It is noted that one of the areas of counteraction to raiding is the consolidation at the legislative level of a common understanding of this concept, but the Civil Code of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine "On Joint Stock Companies" deals only with certain aspects of raiding. Features of "white", "gray", "black" raiding are revealed. There are two ways to warn and protect businesses from raiding: the use of government tools and self-preventive protection of the enterprise. The state instruments of warning and protection of enterprises from raids include: legislative guarantees of inviolability of property and protection of property rights of enterprises in case of violation, criminal liability for misappropriation of property, the procedure of state registration of property rights, the right to apply for protection of rights and interests to the court and the Office for Combating Raiding at the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. It is emphasized that only 20% of enterprises independently protect themselves from raider encroachment, which explains the large number of raider seizures in Ukraine. Among the methods of such protection, emphasis is placed on creating a reliable system of protection of information about the company, ensuring timely and full payment of dividends to shareholders, preventing the mass purchase of shares and monitoring the current situation. It is concluded that it is expedient to develop and consolidate at the legislative level a common understanding of the concept of "raiding", guarantees of warning and protection of business entities from raiding in Ukraine, improving the powers of courts and the Office for Combating Raiding in Ukraine to consider issues of registration of property rights of enterprises.

State Organizations as Subjects of Corporate Relations: on the Possibility of Participation in Corporate Relations of Unitary Legal Entities

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Олег Гутников ◽  
Olyeg Gutnikov
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Public Enterprises ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Unitary State ◽  
State Organizations ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Entities

The article raises the question on possible participation of the State and legal persons established by it (public enterprises and institutions) in corporate relations. The article criticizes the approach, dominant both in the doctrine and in the legislation, that corporate relations appear only in corporate organizations. This view is based on an incorrect identification of corporate relations with the relations of participation (membership), while the participation (membership) is not a sign of corporate relations, but happens in many civil and other relations with a variety of persons. The conclusion is that it is necessary to recognize corporate relationship, related to management of any legal entity. The author proves that the right to manage a legal entity has the same nature for both corporate organizations and for unitary state organizations.

scholarly journals Legal nature of state registration as a legal fact in the mechanism of dynamics of property rights

2020 ◽  
pp. 45-51
Author(s):  
M. Hudyma
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Scientific Publication ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
State Registration ◽  
Legal Fact ◽  
The Right

This scientific publication attempts to clarify the legal nature of state registration as a legal fact in the mechanism of the dynamics of property rights. There has been made a critical analysis of the viewpoint of supporters of the recognition of the right-establishing character of the state registration and the viewpoint of scholars who consider that the state registration has the function of confirmation, legalization of already established rights. The legislative approach to the relevant issues, which reveals the inconsistency of regulations on the place and importance of state registration in the mechanism of the dynamics of property rights is analyzed. The root of all disagreements and inconsistencies is seen in the desire to take a clear position that the state registration performs only one function: either statutory or confirmatory, while the possibility of simultaneous performance of these two functions was not practically considered.It is substantiated that the legal nature of state registration is quite heterogeneous. If we talk about the property and legal significance of the act of state registration, then for the parties to the contract or other direct participants in the relative legal relationship aimed at the transfer of property rights to real estate, it will have a confirmatory value, and for third parties in absolute legal relations it will be of legal significance, providing a proof of this fact known. If we consider the state registration from the point of view of the dynamics of the process of transfer of property rights, to determine its role in this mechanism, it is the final legal fact in the legal structure, which entails the emergence of a new right holder. The publication emphasizes that giving state registration the importance of the final legal fact in the legal structure that causes the transition of property right we should not, however, shift the emphasis and consider it a priority legal fact in comparison with others. Although the registration of property rights is mandatory, it is secondary to the mechanism of transfer of ownership and other property rights to real estate, because it loses any sense and is absolutely impossible without the occurrence of other legal facts, including – the conclusion of a contract (real or consensual).

scholarly journals Protection of the property rights of legal entities to real estate: mandatory methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 8-11
Author(s):  
P.A. Strelnikov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Property Right ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Judicial Procedure ◽  
State Registration ◽  
Legal Entities

This article reveals the features of obligatory ways of protection of the rights of privacy to immovable property of legal entities from the perspective of the established judicial practice. The importance of this problem is conditioned by the basic nature of the property right as the basis of property turnover in the state and legal guarantees of protection of rights, freedoms and legal interests of legal entities to immovable property, among which the judicial procedure of protection of rights of legal entities is one of the ways of not prohibited and practiced. The purpose of this article is to identify the features of invalidation of the transaction and the application of the consequences of invalidity, as well as the recognition of invalidation of the act of state registration of rights to immovable property of legal entities, including challenging the registered right to immovable property of legal entities. To achieve this goal, the author formulates the following tasks: identification of specifics of obligatory ways to protect the rights to immovable property of legal entities.

ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI BLORA TENTANG DUALISME KEPENGURUSAN YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM KARTAYUDA YANG AKTA PENDIRIANNYA DIBUAT OLEH DAN DIHADAPAN NOTARIS (Studi Kasus Putusan Perkara PN Blora No. 34/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Bla)

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 463
Author(s):  
Muslim Ansori ◽  
Akhmad Khisni
Keyword(s):  
Private Schools ◽  
Education System ◽  
Crucial Role ◽  
The State ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Non Profit ◽  
The Right

With the enactment of the Education System Act no 20 of 2003 (better known as the Sisdiknas Act), the State has determined that educational institutions should have a legal umbrella in the form of a legal entity, or better known as the Legal Entity Education. As a non-profit organization, the Foundation is the right legal entity that becomes a place for educational institutions, especially private schools. Therefore, of course, Notary has a very crucial role in making notary deed in the form of establishment and deed of change, such as example how in making the right basic budget and not multi interpresatasi for stake holders in the foundation. Therefore, the role of function and authority of the organ of the foundation must be clearly stated in the articles of association, so as not to cause a dispute in the future.KEYWORDS: Notaries, Foundation, Organ Foundation,

scholarly journals Advocacy as a tool for the realization of the fundamental right of a person to professional legal assistance

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 240-243
Author(s):  
P. Badzeliuk
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Society ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Profession ◽  
The State ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Entities

This article is devoted to the study of the implementation of the fundamental right of a person to professional legal assistance through the vectors of influence of the bar, the role of the human rights institution in the mechanism of such a right and its place in public life.An effective justice system provides not only an independent and impartial judiciary, but also an independent legal profession. Lawyers play an important role in ensuring access to justice. They facilitate the interaction between individuals and legal entities and the judiciary by providing legal advice to their clients and presenting them to the courts. Without the assistance of a lawyer, the right to a fair trial and the right to an effective remedy would be irrevocably violated.Thus, the bar in the mechanism of protection of human and civil rights and freedoms is one of the means of self-limitation of state power through the creation and active functioning of an independent human rights institution, which is an active subject in the process of fundamental rights. The main constitutional function of the state is to implement and protect the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, and the constitutional and legal status of the legal profession allows it to actively ensure the rights of civil society as a whole and not just the individual. Effectively implement the human rights function of the state by ensuring proper interaction between the authorities and civil society, while being an active participant in the law enforcement mechanism and occupying an independent place in the justice system.Thus, the activities of lawyers are a complex manifestation of both state and public interest. After all, it is through advocacy and thanks to it that the rule of law realizes the possibility of ensuring the rights and freedoms of its citizens. Advocacy, on the one hand, has a constitutionally defined state character, and on the other hand, lawyers should be as independent as possible from the state in order to effectively protect citizens and legal entities from administrative arbitrariness. Thus, the bar is a unique legal phenomenon that performs a state (public-law) function, while remaining an independent, non-governmental self-governing institution.

scholarly journals ABUSE OF THE RIGHT TO INITIATE BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS

2020 ◽  
pp. 259-264
Author(s):  
В. В. Дутка
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Bankruptcy Procedure ◽  
Good For ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ordinary Citizens ◽  
Legal Entities

The relevance of the article is that society’s attitude to the bankruptcy procedure is ambiguous: ordinary citizens who have never been involved in bankruptcy proceedings often perceive it as a certain negative phenomenon that should be avoided and avoided. On the other hand, for many debtors, bankruptcy becomes the “lifeline” with which they can repay their claims to creditors and start financial life “from scratch”. At the same time, it should be noted that many debtors and creditors use the bankruptcy procedure not for the purposes provided by the legislator in the relevant legal norms, but to satisfy only their own interests, to the detriment of the interests of other parties to the case. In this regard, the study of the abuse of the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings becomes relevant. The article is devoted to the study of abuse of the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings. The purpose of the article is to study the abuse of the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings and highlight the author’s vision of this issue. According to the results of the study, the author concludes that the application to the debtor of bankruptcy procedures can be both good for the debtor and to the detriment of the interests of his creditors. Entities that could potentially abuse the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings are: creditors of the debtor – a legal entity, as well as debtors – legal entities, individuals and individuals – entrepreneurs. The fact of exemption of debtors from the court fee for filing an application to initiate bankruptcy proceedings is not only an unjustified luxury for our state, but also only contributes to the abuse of the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings by unscrupulous debtors. In order to reduce the number of cases of abuse of the right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings, the author justifies the need to complicate the conditions for opening bankruptcy proceedings, for example, by returning the conditions provided by the Law of Ukraine “On Restoration of Debtor’s Solvency or Recognition of Debtor’s Bankruptcy”.

scholarly journals The right to protection against unfair use of the means of individualization: content and features

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 313-318
Author(s):  
Pekar A.
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Unfair Competition ◽  
Economic Competition ◽  
Economic Entity ◽  
Objective Meaning ◽  
The Right

The article deals with the nature and features of the right to protection against unfair use of the means of individualization. It is argued that it is inappropriate to distinguish the right to protection against unfair use of the means of individualization in the structure of intellectual property rights from the right to protection of economic competition. Based on a system analysis of the legislation, scientific literature review, and the practice of its application, the right to protection is classified in an objective and subjective meaning. In its objective meaning, the right to protection against unfair use of the means of individualization is a component of the right to intellectual property, to protection against unfair competition. The subjective right to protection against the unfair use of the means of individualization is an independent right. The following features of the right to protection against unfair use of the means of individualization are identified on the basis of the analysis. The objective right to protection against unfair use of the means of individualization is characterized by a set of civil law rules governing relations in the field of intellectual property rights and economic competition and determining the grounds, forms, procedure and methods of protection of such rights. This right combines two components: the protection of intellectual property rights and economic competition relations. The subjects of this right are economic entities. At the same time, the exercise of the right to protection in connection with the violation of the law on protection against unfair competition ensures the protection of consumers’ rights, as it guarantees them good quality goods on the market. The object of this right is relations in the field of intellectual property rights and economic competition. The subjective right to protection against unfair use of the means of individuation is the use of a provided by law capacity to renew, recognize or award the right to use the means of individualization by an economic entity. Such subjective right is characterized by the following features: it always implies the implementation of active actions, the possibility of choosing the forms and methods of protection. Keywords: means of individualization, unfair use, right to protection, objective right, subjective right, intellectual property rights, unfair competition.

scholarly journals Recovery of Damages from the Head of an Economic Entity: Legislation of the Russian Federation and Law Enforcement Practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 10003
Author(s):  
Y.A. Dorofeeva ◽  
M.N. Zubkova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Historical Method ◽  
Economic Entity ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Entities

A legal entity as a union recognized in law and absent as an independent entity outside the law, exists and carries out its activities through the governing bodies whose composition and competence are always predetermined by the norms of positive law. Undoubtedly, the rights of the governing bodies of a legal entity, as well as the duties of the head of the organization, must be strictly predetermined and have limits defined by law. Failure of this rule would mean the possibility of abuse of the right by the governing bodies of legal entities, their release from the obligation to lead the organization in good faith and reasonably, evasion from the fulfillment of obligations assumed by the legal entity through the sole executive body or another governing body of the organization. In order to prevent harm to the organization and third parties, the governing bodies of the legal entity, the legislator set certain rules for the activities of the governing bodies of the legal entity, as well as the grounds for applying measures of responsibility for violating such rules. The responsibility of the head includes the recovery of damages caused by his fault to a legal entity. The purpose of the study is to analyze the grounds and conditions for recovery of damages caused by the head of the organization in the legislation of the Russian Federation and arbitration practice. The objectives of the study are to determine the grounds for liability of the head of a legal entity in the form of damages, show the genesis of the formation of Russian legislation and the practice of its use by courts on recovering losses of a legal entity from the head of an organization, identify criteria for determining the presence of both good faith and reasonableness in the behavior of managers of legal entities, brought to responsibility in the form of the obligation to pay damages to the organization they lead. In carrying out the study, such methods were used as: general scientific - analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization, historical method; private-scientific: formal-legal, comparative-legal, allowing to consider the issues of bringing to responsibility in the form of recovery of damages of the head of a legal entity; Formal legal method for determining the content of abstract categories - reasonableness, good faith, permissible behavior, method of system-structural analysis - to study the possibility of applying damages as a form of responsibility for the guilty behavior of a special entity - the head of a legal entity The result of the study is the establishment of the grounds and conditions for applying to the head (former head) of a legal entity responsibility in the form of recovery of damages caused to the organization managed by it, in the legislation of the Russian Federation and judicial practice. The findings and results of the study can be used for further research and as educational material, in legislative work and in law enforcement practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document