scholarly journals “EFEKTIVITAS PEMANFAATAN APLIKASI WHATSAPP DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN REDAKSI” (Studi : Redaksional Harian Rakyat Maluku)

BADATI ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-97
Author(s):  
MARLEEN MUSKITA
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Print Media ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
People’S Daily ◽  
Editorial Decision ◽  
Descriptive Approach ◽  
People's Daily

This research was conducted to determine the extent of the effectiveness of the use of Whatsapp applications in editorial decision making. The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze the utilization of whatsapp applications in newspapers, especially the People's Daily Editor of Maluku. This research uses a qualitative approach with the type of research used is a descriptive approach.          The use of whatsapp is very effective in editorial decision making in the Maluku People's Daily print media because many journalists are chasing deadlines so that they do not have much time to conduct editorial meetings face-to-face, and are done through the whatsapp group. The use of whatsapp is very effective for the acquisition of information and the division of reporting and evaluation tasks in the Maluku People's Daily.

scholarly journals DECISION MAKING BIASES AND ERRORS AMONG MUSLIM GROUPS AND SECTS IN BANGLADESH: A MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVE

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 55-69
Author(s):  
Md. Ariful Islam
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cognitive Biases ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Information Load ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Information Bias ◽  
Bias Risk ◽  
Management Perspective ◽  
Decision Making Biases

Different Muslim groups/sects in Bangladesh are very intolerant to other groups/sects where Islam teaches brotherhood and unity. This study tried to see the issue from a management perspective, especially in the area of decision making. The study tried to identify the decision-making biases and/or errors among Muslim groups/sects in Bangladesh, and their impacts on their decision-making process. The study adopted a model developed by Kieren Jamieson and Paul Hyland (2006). This study followed a qualitative approach. It interviewed 20 Islamic scholars and unity initiators who are working for establishing brotherhood and unity among Muslim groups/sects in Bangladesh. Guidelines have been used while conducting a face-to-face interview. Firstly, the study tried to find whether there are biases and/or errors in the decision-making process among different Muslim groups/sects in Bangladesh, and we found some serious biases and/or errors that can surely lead to biased/inappropriate decisions about other Muslim groups/sects. Secondly, the study tried to specifically find the nature and impacts of those biases and/or errors according to the research framework. It categorized those biases and/or errors in information bias, cognitive bias, risk bias, and uncertainty bias. Those biases and/or errors occurred in the information load, and in the decision-making process. Cognitive biases, the study found, have the most impacts on decision making. From the study, we developed a model to present the decision-making biases and/errors, and their impacts on decisions Muslim groups/sects in Bangladesh take.

Witnesses in Cyberbullying: Roles and Dilemmas

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faye Mishna ◽  
Debra Pepler ◽  
Jeremy Doucet ◽  
Melanie Lameiro
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Social Media ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Moral Disengagement ◽  
Peer Interactions ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Traditional Bullying ◽  
Face To Face

  This study explored youths’ perceptions of the nature and dilemmas of being a bystander in cyberbullying. Although there are many benefits of peer interactions through social media, there are risks, including cyberbullying. Bystanders are integral in the dynamics and harm in both face-to-face and cyberbullying. Using a qualitative approach, authors share youth voices on the experience of witnessing cyberbullying and the dilemmas they face in deciding whether and how to respond to support a peer. Authors conducted thematic analysis of qualitative interviews with 16 adolescents. Youths described a range of feelings experienced by witnesses, from discomfort and anger to moral disengagement and justification for cyberbullying. Youths reported three forms of bystander roles: outsider, assistant, and defender, consistent with traditional bullying. The dilemmas they faced in witnessing and intervening that emerged were consistent with the five stages of bystander decision making. Youths indicated that the solutions for cyberbullying rest on the shoulders of adults.

scholarly journals Measuring differences in the Chinese press: A study of People’s Daily and Southern Metropolitan Daily

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiyan Wang ◽  
Colin Sparks ◽  
Yu Huang
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Communist Party ◽  
Empirical Data ◽  
Party Control ◽  
People’S Daily ◽  
People's Daily ◽  
Commercial Press

The development of the market has produced a differentiation inside the Chinese press between an ‘official’ press with traditional propaganda functions on behalf of the Communist Party and a ‘commercial’ press whose objective is to maximise revenue. Scholarly opinion has differed over whether marketization undermines Party control and whether new forms of journalism have arisen that lead to conflicts. These discussions have rested on little evidence as to the practises of Chinese journalism. This article presents empirical data on the extent of the differentiation, reporting on a content analysis of the national news in People’s Daily and Southern Metropolitan Daily. These titles are popularly believed to represent the polar opposites of official, orthodox journalism and commercial, liberal journalism. The evidence presented here demonstrates that while there are indeed significant differences in the journalism of the two titles, there remains a substantial overlap in their choice of subjects, their use of sources and the degree to which news is presented ‘objectively’. Southern Metropolitan Daily does display some ‘popular’ features and does contain more ‘watchdog’ journalism, but it shares with its official cousin an emphasis upon the party as the source for news.

scholarly journals The Influence of Police Treatment and Decision-making on Perceptions of Procedural Justice: A Field Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 002242782110309
Author(s):  
Bo L. Terpstra ◽  
Peter W. van Wijck
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Police Behavior ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Independent Variables ◽  
Social Observation ◽  
Perceived Procedural Justice ◽  
Dutch Cities

Objectives: This study examines whether police behavior that signals higher quality of treatment or decision-making leads to higher perceived procedural justice. Methods: Analyses are based on data collected during police traffic controls of moped drivers in two Dutch cities over a period of six months. Police behavior was measured through systematic social observation (SSO), and data on perceived procedural justice were collected through face-to-face interviews immediately after the encounters. Linear regression analysis with bootstrap estimates was used (n = 218), with an overall perceived procedural justice scale as the dependent variable in all regressions. Independent variables included an overall observed procedural justice index and four separate scales of police treatment and decision-making. Results: We find no evidence that police behavior that signals fairer treatment or decision-making leads to higher perceived procedural justice. Conclusions: Our findings add to the currently very limited empirical evidence on an important question, and raise questions about a central idea, that more procedurally just treatment and decision making by authorities leads to an increase in perceived procedural justice and enhanced compliance. The first of these requires more research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document