scholarly journals How AI Can Aid Bioethics

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong ◽  
Joshua (Gus) August Skorburg
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Moral Judgment ◽  
Hybrid Method ◽  
Moral Judgments ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Moral Issues ◽  
Sources Of Error ◽  
Hybrid Approaches ◽  
Novel Method

This paper explores some ways in which artificial intelligence (AI) could be used to improve human moral judgments in bioethics by avoiding some of the most common sources of error in moral judgment, including ignorance, confusion, and bias. It surveys three existing proposals for building human morality into AI: Top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches. Then it proposes a multi-step, hybrid method, using the example of kidney allocations for transplants as a test case. The paper concludes with brief remarks about how to handle several complications, respond to some objections, and extend this novel method to other important moral issues in bioethics and beyond.

scholarly journals Word vector embeddings hold social ontological relations capable of reflecting meaningful fairness assessments

AI & Society ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Izzidien
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Cosine Similarity ◽  
Word Embeddings ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
Bottom Up ◽  
Hybrid Approaches

AbstractProgramming artificial intelligence (AI) to make fairness assessments of texts through top-down rules, bottom-up training, or hybrid approaches, has presented the challenge of defining cross-cultural fairness. In this paper a simple method is presented which uses vectors to discover if a verb is unfair (e.g., slur, insult) or fair (e.g., thank, appreciate). It uses already existing relational social ontologies inherent in Word Embeddings and thus requires no training. The plausibility of the approach rests on two premises. That individuals consider fair acts those that they would be willing to accept if done to themselves. Secondly, that such a construal is ontologically reflected in Word Embeddings, by virtue of their ability to reflect the dimensions of such a perception. These dimensions being: responsibility vs. irresponsibility, gain vs. loss, reward vs. sanction, joy vs. pain, all as a single vector (FairVec). The paper finds it possible to quantify and qualify a verb as fair or unfair by calculating the cosine similarity of the said verb’s embedding vector against FairVec—which represents the above dimensions. We apply this to Glove and Word2Vec embeddings. Testing on a list of verbs produces an F1 score of 95.7, which is improved to 97.0. Lastly, a demonstration of the method’s applicability to sentence measurement is carried out.

The strength of emotions in moral judgment and decision-making under risk

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Tyszka ◽  
Tomasz Zaleskiewicz
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Moral Judgment ◽  
Judgment And Decision Making ◽  
Moral Judgments ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Moral Norms ◽  
Decision Making Under Risk ◽  
Moral Issues ◽  
Risk Parameters

The strength of emotions in moral judgment and decision-making under risk The focus of this paper is the role of emotions in judgments and choices associated with moral issues. Study 1 shows that depending on the strength of emotions when making a moral decision, people become sensitive to the severity and the probability of harm that their decisions can bring to others. A possible interpretation is that depending on the strength of emotions, people in their moral judgments choose to be either utilitarian or deontologist. In Study 2, following the priority heuristic model, we found that in situations in which the violation of moral norms does not evoke strong negative emotions, people are sensitive to quantitative risk parameters (probabilities and outcomes), and the decision-making process requires a relatively longer time. In moral situations in which a violation of the moral norm evokes strong emotions, decision-making is based on arguments other than quantitative risk parameters, and the process takes a shorter time.

Is Empathy Required for Making Moral Judgments?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Deigh
Keyword(s):  
Moral Judgment ◽  
Moral Judgments ◽  
Psychopathic Personality ◽  
Critical Examination ◽  
Psychological Profile ◽  
Main Thesis ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Additional Support

This essay is a study of the nature of moral judgment. Its main thesis is that moral judgment is a type of judgment defined by its content and not its psychological profile. The essay arrives at this thesis through a critical examination of Hume’s sentimentalism and the role of empathy in its account of moral judgment. The main objection to Hume’s account is its exclusion of people whom one can describe as making moral judgments though they have no motivation to act on them. Consideration of such people, particularly those with a psychopathic personality, argues for a distinction between different types of moral judgment in keeping with the essay’s main thesis. Additional support for the main thesis is then drawn from Piaget’s theory of moral judgment in children.

Effect of Power on Moral Judgment

1978 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 387-394
Author(s):  
Russell Hamby
Keyword(s):  
Social Psychology ◽  
Moral Responsibility ◽  
Low Power ◽  
Moral Judgment ◽  
Factorial Design ◽  
High Power ◽  
Moral Judgments ◽  
Need For Power ◽  
Experimenter Effects

Ambiguous effects of power on attributions of moral responsibility for an accident are interpreted to result from the intervening effects of need for power, which is aroused by the anticipation of exercising power over another. 160 subjects from introductory social psychology classes participated in a questionnaire-type experiment comparing effects of high/low carelessness, severe/minor consequences, and high/low power of the attributor in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design. In a follow-up experiment 30 subjects were assigned to conditions of high or low power, and their needs for power and moral attributions were measured. High power seemed to arouse need for power, which was curvilinearly related to moral judgments. Those high and low in need for power attributed more moral responsibility to the perpetrator of an accident than those with moderate levels of need for power. The results suggest complicated models of both moral judgments and experimenter effects related to the level or arousal of motivations.

scholarly journals A novel method for dried chili pepper classification using artificial intelligence

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 100099
Author(s):  
O. Cruz-Domínguez ◽  
J.L. Carrera-Escobedo ◽  
C.H. Guzmán-Valdivia ◽  
A. Ortiz-Rivera ◽  
M. García-Ruiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Chili Pepper ◽  
Novel Method

scholarly journals Small-scale societies exhibit fundamental variation in the role of intentions in moral judgment

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (17) ◽  
pp. 4688-4693 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Clark Barrett ◽  
Alexander Bolyanatz ◽  
Alyssa N. Crittenden ◽  
Daniel M. T. Fessler ◽  
Simon Fitzpatrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Moral Judgment ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Narrow Range ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Moral Judgments ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Cultural Variation ◽  
Moral Assessment ◽  
Mitigating Circumstances

Intent and mitigating circumstances play a central role in moral and legal assessments in large-scale industrialized societies. Although these features of moral assessment are widely assumed to be universal, to date, they have only been studied in a narrow range of societies. We show that there is substantial cross-cultural variation among eight traditional small-scale societies (ranging from hunter-gatherer to pastoralist to horticulturalist) and two Western societies (one urban, one rural) in the extent to which intent and mitigating circumstances influence moral judgments. Although participants in all societies took such factors into account to some degree, they did so to very different extents, varying in both the types of considerations taken into account and the types of violations to which such considerations were applied. The particular patterns of assessment characteristic of large-scale industrialized societies may thus reflect relatively recently culturally evolved norms rather than inherent features of human moral judgment.

The Frame Problem in Ethics

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 53-73
Author(s):  
Sebastian Gałecki
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Moral Judgment ◽  
First Principles ◽  
Practical Reasoning ◽  
Ethical Principles ◽  
Frame Problem ◽  
Classical Philosophy ◽  
The Frame Problem ◽  
The Invisible

Although the “frame problem” in philosophy has been raised in the context of the artificial intelligence, it is only an exemplification of broader problem. It seems that contemporary ethical debates are not so much about conclusions, decisions, norms, but rather about what we might call a “frame”. Metaethics has always been the bridge between purely ethical principles (“this is good and it should be done”, “this is wrong and it should be avoided”) and broader (ontological, epistemic, anthropological etc.) assumptions. One of the most interesting meta-ethical debates concerns the “frame problem”: whether the ethical frame is objective and self-evident, or is it objective but not self-evident? In classical philosophy, this problem takes the form of a debate on the first principles: nonprovable but necessary starting points for any practical reasoning. They constitute the invisible but essential frame of every moral judgment, decision and action. The role of philosophy is not only to expose these principles, but also to understand the nature of the moral frame.

Developmental Study of Moral Judgments by Japanese Children

1991 ◽  
Vol 68 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1131-1136
Author(s):  
Hirotsugu Yamauchi
Keyword(s):  
Moral Judgment ◽  
Causal Attribution ◽  
Helping Behavior ◽  
Moral Judgments ◽  
Developmental Study ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Frequency Data ◽  
Japanese Children ◽  
Dual Scaling ◽  
Evaluative Feedback

The purpose of this study was to examine the determinants of causal attribution in the contexts of moral judgment and the developmental shifts of the determinants. Subjects were children in Grades 2, 4, and 6 ( ns = 83, 122, and 84). Moral judgments were measured by asking subjects to provide “evaluative feedback” to an hypothetical child's helping behavior. The method of dual scaling was applied to the frequency data of moral judgments. Two-dimensional solutions show that subjects judged whether the hypothetical child should be rewarded or punished and what amount of reward or punishment was given to the hypothetical child. Developmental shifts were found for moral judgment.

scholarly journals 195 The Application of Radiomics in Laryngeal Cancer: The Forgotten Cohort

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Rajgor ◽  
A McQueen ◽  
T Ali ◽  
E Aboagye ◽  
B Obara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Laryngeal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Head And Neck Cancers ◽  
High Dimensional ◽  
Naked Eye ◽  
Online Databases ◽  
Novel Method

Abstract Background Radiomics is a novel method of extracting data from medical images that is difficult to visualise through the naked eye. This technique transforms digital images that hold information on pathology into high-dimensional-data for analysis. Radiomics has the potential to enhance laryngeal cancer care and to date, has shown promise in various other specialties. Aim The aim of this review is to summarise the applications of this technique to laryngeal cancer and potential future benefits. Method A comprehensive systematic review-informed search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE online databases was undertaken. Keywords ‘laryngeal cancer’ OR ‘larynx’ OR ‘larynx cancer’ OR ‘head and neck cancer’ were combined with ‘radiomic’ OR ‘signature’ OR ‘machine learning’ OR ‘artificial intelligence’. Additional articles were obtained from bibliographies using the ‘snowball method’. Results Seventeen articles were identified that evaluated the role of radiomics in laryngeal cancer. Two studies affirmed the value of radiomics in improving the accuracy of staging, whilst fifteen studies highlighted the potential prognostic value of radiomics in laryngeal cancer. Twelve (of thirteen) studies incorporated an array of different head and neck cancers in the analysis and only one study assessed laryngeal cancer exclusively. Conclusions Literature to date has various limitations including, small and heterogeneous cohorts incorporating patients with head and neck cancers of distinct anatomical subsites and stages. The lack of uniform data on solely laryngeal cancer and radiomics means drawing conclusions is difficult, although these studies have affirmed its value. Further large prospective studies exclusively in laryngeal cancer are required to unlock its true potential.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document