An Analysis of Hospitality and Tourism Research

2015 ◽  
pp. 359-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Calhoun ◽  
Alecia Douglas
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Dynamic Environment ◽  
Triple Bottom Line ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Sustainable Competitive Advantage ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Tourism Research ◽  
Body Of Knowledge ◽  
Sustainability Practices ◽  
Hospitality And Tourism

Learning organizations (LOs) have been identified as an innovative practice essential for global businesses to not only effectively compete in today's dynamic environment but also to achieve and maintain a sustainable competitive advantage and increase overall firm performance. The objective of this chapter is to examine the current body of knowledge on LOs and their impact on sustainability practices in an effort to identify what is being done by organizations, where knowledge is applied, and, how systems are created to influence sustainability practices. In the context of hospitality and tourism businesses, the literature examining LOs is limited though a wealth of studies have been conducted in the mainstream. Using a qualitative approach, a content analysis was conducted to investigate its impact on sustainability practices in hospitality and tourism organizations. The results indicate that destinations in particular have adopted this approach to compete globally and to address triple-bottom line sustainability.

An Analysis of Hospitality and Tourism Research

2019 ◽  
pp. 23-47
Author(s):  
Jennifer Calhoun ◽  
Alecia Douglas
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Dynamic Environment ◽  
Triple Bottom Line ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Sustainable Competitive Advantage ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Tourism Research ◽  
Body Of Knowledge ◽  
Sustainability Practices ◽  
Hospitality And Tourism

Learning organizations (LOs) have been identified as an innovative practice essential for global businesses to not only effectively compete in today's dynamic environment but also to achieve and maintain a sustainable competitive advantage and increase overall firm performance. The objective of this chapter is to examine the current body of knowledge on LOs and their impact on sustainability practices in an effort to identify what is being done by organizations, where knowledge is applied, and, how systems are created to influence sustainability practices. In the context of hospitality and tourism businesses, the literature examining LOs is limited though a wealth of studies have been conducted in the mainstream. Using a qualitative approach, a content analysis was conducted to investigate its impact on sustainability practices in hospitality and tourism organizations. The results indicate that destinations in particular have adopted this approach to compete globally and to address triple-bottom line sustainability.

How social enterprises called benefit organisations fulfil the triple bottom line

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-63
Author(s):  
Hem Raj Dhakal
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Foundation ◽  
Triple Bottom Line ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Social Enterprises ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Holistic Thinking ◽  
Body Of Knowledge ◽  
Benefit Corporations ◽  
Paradoxical Thinking

The purpose of this qualitative multi-case study was to explore how the leaders of benefit organisations fulfil the triple bottom line (social, economic, and environmental missions) of social enterprises that were formed as benefit corporations, benefit LLCs (limited liability companies), and certified benefit corporations between 2010 and 2015 in Maryland and Virginia. The theoretical foundation used for this study was the triple bottom line (TBL) model. This research contributed to the existing body of knowledge by investigating the interdependence between the three components of the TBL. Thirteen top leaders of benefit organisations participated in this study. The data were collected from documentation, interviews, and questionnaires. The key findings of this study indicated that leaders of social enterprises used holistic thinking instead of paradoxical thinking to fulfil the TBL. These leaders developed internal and external collaboration and coordination to accomplish the triple missions. Finally, the data of this study revealed the synergistic interrelationships between these missions.

Apparel Design Scholarship Practices: Analysis of ITAA Professionals’ Design Abstract Proceedings From 1999 to 2017

2020 ◽  
pp. 0887302X2092146
Author(s):  
Young-A Lee ◽  
Seoha Min ◽  
Sumin Helen Koo
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
The Body ◽  
Apparel Design ◽  
Design Work ◽  
The Past ◽  
Body Of Knowledge ◽  
Textile And Apparel ◽  
Sustainability Practices ◽  
Citation Practices ◽  
The Impact

We explored the topical trends of the International Textile and Apparel Association professionals’ Design Abstract Proceedings (DAP) and how apparel design scholarship has been cited in the discipline for the past two decades. Using a content analysis, three research objectives were as follows: to examine (a) designer-identified keywords trends of the DAP, (b) to examine DAP directly cited in scholarly works, and (c) to examine DAP not directly cited but related to designers’ scholarship. Six overarching themes (inspirational references, apparel design, technology, sustainability practices, textiles, and nonapparel) were identified through the keywords analysis and used for further analyses. We found that design scholars were not used to cite other relevant scholarly works or their own works in their scholarly design work. The study findings provide an awareness for the strong need to establish citation practices for design scholars, which will add to the body of knowledge in clothing and textiles and increase the impact of design scholarship beyond the discipline.

Sustainability and company attractiveness

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 470-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrien Presley ◽  
Theresa Presley ◽  
Michael Blum
Keyword(s):  
Triple Bottom Line ◽  
The Body ◽  
Job Choice ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Sustainability Performance ◽  
Potential Employer ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Sustainability Practices ◽  
A Company

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine whether a company’s sustainability practices affect job seekers’ perceptions of the attractiveness of the company as a potential employer. Design/methodology/approach A survey completed by 259 university students assessed the respondents’ attitudes toward sustainability. Participants were then presented a series of scenarios describing the sustainable practices of hypothetical companies using the triple bottom line factors of sustainability (economic, environmental and social) and were asked how attractive they found the company to be and the likelihood that they would accept a job offer from the company. Findings The findings indicate that sustainability as a single concept and each sustainability factor individually influenced the attractiveness of a company to potential employees. Research limitations/implications The results of the study add to the body of job choice research, specifically as related to sustainability practices of companies. It furthers the body of work related to signaling theory and job attractiveness. Practical implications The results of this study indicate that sustainability performance is an important factor in determining the attractiveness of a company to potential applicants. Social implications The research highlights the importance of sustainability to potential job applicants. Companies should be aware that positive sustainability performance can make it more attractive to these applicants. The results reported from this research provides additional motivation for companies to pursue efforts in sustainability. Originality/value The research builds upon existing research in the fields of sustainability and job choice. While previous research has looked at many factors regarding applicants and job choice including, no other research was found which explicitly considered the triple bottom line factors of sustainability.

An empirical analysis of SMES’ triple bottom line practices

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jude Edeigba ◽  
Chris Arasanmi
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Empirical Analysis ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Triple Bottom Line ◽  
Business Practices ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Regulatory Policies ◽  
Operational Policies ◽  
Sustainability Practices

Purpose This study aims to examine the determinants of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) sustainability practices in New Zealand from the triple bottom line (3BL) perspective. Unlike large companies and government agencies whose sustainability practices are driven by regulations and attempts to legitimise business operations, little is known about the drivers of SMEs’ sustainability practices. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey approach was adopted for the data collection. The analysis was mainly descriptive, while the covariates’ effects were measured based on partial least squares structural equation modelling. Findings This paper identified that SMEs’ 3BL practices are significantly influenced by local bylaws, voluntary adoption of 3BL operational policies and company size. This paper finds that the SMEs’ industry type is not statistically significant as a determinant of their 3BL practices. This implies that regulation and operational policies increase sustainability practices in the SME sector. Practical implications These findings provide insights to SMEs’ managers on the importance of sustainability policies adoption and bylaws. Government departments and local government councils could adopt the findings in developing regulatory policies that support SMEs’ 3BL. Social implications This study provides support for economically, environmentally and socially sustainable business practices amongst SMEs. Originality/value A dearth of studies on SMEs sustainability practices exists in the extant literature, particularly in New Zealand. The study focusses on SMEs sustainability in the viewpoint of 3BL practices based on an empirical analysis.

scholarly journals Green Purchasing: Capabilities, Practices and Effects on Firms’ Triple Bottom Line Performance

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meow Foo
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Concern ◽  
Triple Bottom Line ◽  
Green Manufacturing ◽  
Significant Positive Effect ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Supply Chain Strategy ◽  
Sustainability Practices ◽  
Green Purchasing ◽  
Internal Operations ◽  
Positive Effect

Sustainability and the concept of environmental concern have become a mainstream matter triggering firms to utilise green opportunities in their supply chain strategy. However, many firms have concentrated sustainability efforts only in their internal operations. They have disregarded the need to scrutinize the sustainability practices of their supply base, by developing the internal green purchasing capabilities and by embracing green purchasing practices for firm sustainability. One of concern for most firms is what green capabilities do the firms need to be equipped with in order to implement the green purchasing practices. Using 163 Malaysian manufacturing firms and PLS technique was used to empirically test the hypotheses. The findings indicate that there is a significant positive effect of green manufacturing, integration, intra-organisational and financial capabilities towards green purchasing practices. The study also revealed that green purchasing practices have a significant positive effect on the firms’ triple bottom line performance.Keywords: Green purchasing capabilities; green purchasing practices; Triple Bottom Line performance.

scholarly journals A Review of Sustainable Machining Engineering: Optimization Process Through Triple Bottom Line

2016 ◽  
Vol 138 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
María Estela Peralta Álvarez ◽  
Mariano Marcos Bárcena ◽  
Francisco Aguayo González
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Manufacturing ◽  
Triple Bottom Line ◽  
Development Trend ◽  
Unified Framework ◽  
Machining Processes ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Metabolic Rift ◽  
Sustainable Machining ◽  
Body Of Knowledge ◽  
Machining Operations

The studies about sustainable manufacturing engineering (SME) contain an increasing body of knowledge, motivated by the rising interest in the processes lifecycle sustainability. Its continuous improvement and optimization (including sustainability criteria) has become an emerging necessity. For this reason, new clean technologies and proposals of work methods are required; they have to integrate the ecological and social dimensions at an operational level in the manufacturing processes, maintaining the economic and technical feasibility attained up to this moment. However, a unified framework does not exist to orientate the lines of research in optimization when applied to sustainability. In this sense, the article reviews studies from scientific literature about sustainable machining developed in the last 15 years. The review has been carried out from the triple bottom-line (TBL) perspective, defined by the three general sustainability dimensions (economy, ecology, and equity). It contributes to the literature and current machining engineering knowledge, with its involvement in mitigating the metabolic rift. The results from the review have allowed to characterize the investigation effort, with regard to the optimization of the sustainable machining processes; even though numerous studies exist which optimize machining operations (with the aim to find the trade-off between different environmental and equity factors), in general, the technical and economic feasibilities are still the priority. The patterns defined through the analysis of the publications have established the current development trend; furthermore, as a consequence of the review results, we propose an outline of articulated lines of investigation with the aim to mitigate the metabolic rift through triple bottom-line, necessary so that machining engineering assumes the goal of finding the balance to achieve integral sustainability.

Decision support framework for integrating triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability in agriculture supply chain

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Singh ◽  
Samir K. Srivastava
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Emerging Economies ◽  
Triple Bottom Line ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Agriculture Sector ◽  
Decision Support Framework ◽  
The Social ◽  
Sustainability Practices

Purpose This paper aims to address the conceptual and practical challenges in integrating triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability in the agriculture supply chain (ASC). It identifies the key enablers for each of the three dimensions of TBL sustainability, analyses their causal relationships as well as cross-dimensional interactions under each TBL dimension. Further, it develops a decision support framework (DSF) for the assessment of TBL sustainability practices and policies in ASC and validates it through a case study. Design/methodology/approach An interpretive structure modelling (ISM) methodology is deployed to establish the interrelationships among all TBL enablers and to identify the enablers with high driving power on sustainable ASC. Brainstorming by a group of experts was used to identify the relevant enables. Finally, a DSF was developed as a resultant of ISM. Findings The paper provides a set of enablers with high driving power that can significantly influence the sustainability practices and policies in ASC. The social enablers directly help to enhance the effect of economic enablers and collectively these enhance the effect of environmental enablers. If agriculture firms and supply chains design innovative policies and develop practices based on these enablers, they can achieve sustainable ASC. Consequently, the living standards of the people directly or indirectly associated with the agriculture firm or supply chain can be improved without compromising on economic performance. Research limitations/implications The paper consolidates the fragmented knowledge of sustainable supply chain management in the agriculture sector and suggests a DSF to policymakers, managers and practitioners for assessing TBL sustainability practices and policies. The DSF has wide applicability in other sectors of production and operations management as these sectors also face the challenge of achieving TBL sustainability across their supply chain. Practical implications The DSF, developed in the paper, is a useful tool for practitioners to frame and analyse sustainability initiatives and policies for ASC. A firm or supply chain may achieve TBL sustainability if it succeeds in uplifting the social status of its stakeholders. Social implications It is a first step towards addressing the practical challenge of integrating sustainability in the agriculture sector of emerging economies and provides a path to improve the livelihood of people in the agriculture sector. Stakeholder engagement with a focus on collaboration and awareness may lead to the desired social and environmental consequences. Potential adverse social effects also need to be considered. Originality/value This paper focusses on the so far rather neglected but essential aspect of integrating TBL sustainability in the agriculture sector of emerging economies. The hierarchal representation and classification of the TBL sustainability enablers of sustainability is a unique effort in the field of ASC. Development of DSF is one of the first attempts to create a mapping between various enablers of TBL sustainability. The novelty of the study lies in the sector-specific, holistic evaluation of TBL sustainability policy measures that may lead to improvements in practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document