Gender Differences in Online Courses

Author(s):  
Raquel Benbunan-Fich ◽  
J. B. Arbaugh

The effects of gender on learning outcomes of online courses depend upon general attitudes toward computers and computer usage, and particular perceptions of the online communication medium. The role of gender on use and attitudes toward computers has been studied thoroughly (Dyck & Smither, 1994; Gattiker & Hlavka, 1992; Whitely, 1997). There is also theoretical and empirical evidence suggesting that men and women conceptualize and use an online communication medium differently (Gefen & Straub, 1997; Herring, 1996). However, despite this body of work, the empirical evidence on the effects of these differences on learning perception and student achievement is mixed or inconclusive. In a recent review of the literature on gender effects in online courses, Hiltz and Shea (2005) conclude that some studies document advantages for women because they participated more than men and/or achieved greater success in online courses (Moskal & Dziuban, 2001; Ory, Bullock, & Burnasa, 1997), while other studies found no significant differences by gender (Arbaugh, 2000a; Bourne, McMaster, Rieger, & Campbell, 1997). Empirical research based on multi-course samples also reports inconsistent findings regarding the effects of gender on learning outcomes. For example, while Arbaugh (2005) found a negative relationship between women and perceived learning in graduate level online courses, Fredericksen, Pickett, Pelz, Swan, and Shea (2000) found small but significant differences indicating that women perceived higher levels of learning in online courses when compared to men. In contrast, in a comparison among face-to-face, pure online, and hybrid courses, Benbunan-Fich and Hiltz (2002) report that women obtained higher grades regardless of the mode in which the course was delivered, but that learning perception was not affected by gender. Since women and men differ in their preferred communication patterns, we believe that gender differences would emerge when we analyze online courses in terms of such patterns. Moreover, in order to understand such effects, researchers should take into account the instructional design of the courses in terms of how information is delivered through the medium and whether the students learn in isolation or in the context of collaborative exercises. The combination of the communication patterns that define the structure of online courses along with the gender-based preferences for these patterns will show whether there are gender differences in online courses and whether these differences affect learning outcomes. This article offers a new perspective to examine the effects of gender on outcomes of online learning. We begin by briefly reviewing the literature in technology-mediated learning environments and previous gender studies and developing gender-related hypotheses for this study. Then, we describe the research methods and the sample. The data comes from post-course surveys of more than 500 students enrolled in forty MBA courses entirely delivered online. We follow with the presentation of the results and their discussion and present the future trends and conclusions in the last sections.

2009 ◽  
pp. 2644-2654 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Gefen ◽  
Nitza Geri ◽  
Narasimha Paravastu

In the ITC cross-cultural literature, we often talk about the differences among peoples and how their respective culture and history may affect their adoption and preference usage patterns of ITC. However, do we really need to look that far to find such cross-cultural differences? Considering language is one of the major defining attributes of culture, this article takes a sociolinguistic approach to argue that there is also a cross-cultural aspect to ITC adoption within the same culture. Sociolinguists have claimed for years that, to a large extent, the communication between men and women, even within the supposedly same culture, has such characteristics because men and women communicate with different underlying social objectives and so their communication patterns are very different. This article examines this sociolinguistic perspective in the context of online courses. A key finding is that although the stage is set to smother cultural and gender differences if participants wish to do so through ITC, gender based cultural patterns still emerge. These differences were actually strong enough to allow us to significantly identify the gender of the student, despite the gender neutral context of the course discussions. Implications for ITC, in general, in view of this Vive la Différence, are discussed.


Author(s):  
David Gefen ◽  
Nitza Geri ◽  
Narasimha Paravastu

In the ITC cross-cultural literature, we often talk about the differences among peoples and how their respective culture and history may affect their adoption and preference usage patterns of ITC. However, do we really need to look that far to find such cross-cultural differences? Considering language is one of the major defining attributes of culture, this article takes a sociolinguistic approach to argue that there is also a cross-cultural aspect to ITC adoption within the same culture. Sociolinguists have claimed for years that, to a large extent, the communication between men and women, even within the supposedly same culture, has such characteristics because men and women communicate with different underlying social objectives and so their communication patterns are very different. This article examines this sociolinguistic perspective in the context of online courses. A key finding is that although the stage is set to smother cultural and gender differences if participants wish to do so through ITC, gender based cultural patterns still emerge. These differences were actually strong enough to allow us to significantly identify the gender of the student, despite the gender neutral context of the course discussions. Implications for ITC, in general, in view of this Vive la Différence, are discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 6148
Author(s):  
Nicolás Bronfman ◽  
Paula Repetto ◽  
Paola Cordón ◽  
Javiera Castañeda ◽  
Pamela Cisternas

Previous studies have reported differences between men and women in the adoption of preventive behaviors against infectious diseases. This study aims to examine gender differences on a set of psychosocial factors shown to influence preventive behaviors against infectious diseases such as COVID-19. We conducted a web survey (N = 1.004) a few weeks after the end of the peak of the first wave of infections in Chile. The survey assessed participants’ perception of risk and worry about the COVID-19 pandemic, confidence in the government’s competence and integrity in dealing with the crisis, attribution of responsibility to various stakeholders, and adoption of preventive behaviors such as hygiene, distancing, and information-seeking. Our results confirm significant gender-based differences for both the psychosocial factors and the adoption of preventive behaviors. We conclude that women show a higher level of worry and fear of the pandemic and are keener to adopt preventive hygiene and social distancing behaviors. Similarly, participants report a low level of trust in government authorities, with women reporting the lowest trust level. The implications of these findings for the design of future risk communication strategies are discussed.


SAGE Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 215824402110299
Author(s):  
Cong Zhang ◽  
Rui Yuan

The differences of linguistic features between Chang Hen Ge ( Ge) and Chang Hen Ge Zhuan ( Zhuan) have rarely been mentioned in the relevant fields. Nevertheless, these differences can best highlight the specialness of poetry, for the two works were written contemporaneously by two friends on the same subject, in distinct styles. This article employs quantitative methods and indicators to provide empirical evidence for the specialness of Ge through comparisons between the two. The results show that, on the premise of expressing the same subject in different styles, Ge does have certain linguistic characteristics compared with Zhuan. Its particularity is reflected not only in fewer repeat characters and words but also in their richness, as well as in the use of more content words and fewer function words. Moreover, all of these characteristics have had a great influence on Ge’s artistic level and dissemination. Through this study, we hope that our methods provide a new perspective and shed some light on this area.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-430

The current paper aimed to investigate taboo language using animal names in Facebook Messenger in the Jordanian setting based on the context where it appeared. A total of (100) male and female university students answered a questionnaire devised to examine the way how students use taboo language. It was noticed that "pig" recorded the highest frequency of occurrence comprising (11.59) of the total number of the taboo words followed by "dog" and "bitch". Important differences were observed in the frequency and use of taboo words by male (68. 8 %) and female (32.2%) students. The study explained the reasons why such words were deemed taboo in the Jordanian setting taking into consideration the socio-cultural and religious norms of the society. The study also concluded that taboo language was used to express different themes such as humor, relaxation, anger and abuse. Keywords: Taboo Language, Gender Differences, Themes, Socio-Pragmatic, Facebook Messenger.


2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (9/10) ◽  
pp. 572-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alok Baikadi ◽  
Carrie Demmans Epp ◽  
Christian D. Schunn

Purpose The purpose of this study was to provide a new characterization of the extent to which learners complete learning activities in massive open online courses (MOOCs), a central challenge in these contexts. Prior explorations of learner interactions with MOOC materials have often described these interactions through stereotypes, which accounts for neither the full spectrum of potential learner activities nor the ways those patterns differ across course designs. Design/methodology/approach To overcome these shortcomings, the authors apply confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis to learner activities within three MOOCs to test different models of participation across courses and populations found within those courses. Findings Courses varied in the extent to which participation was driven by learning activities vs time/topic or a mixture of both, but this was stable across offerings of the same course. Research limitations/implications The results call for a reconceptualization of how different learning activities within a MOOC are designed to work together, to better allow strong learning outcomes even within one activity form or more strongly encourage participation across activities. Originality/value The authors validate new continuous-patterns rather than a discrete-pattern participation model for MOOC learning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document