Interlaboratory Comparison (Round Robin) of the Application of the Rietveld Method to Quantitative Phase Analysis by X-Ray and Neutron Diffraction

2001 ◽  
Vol 378-381 ◽  
pp. 124-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Peplinski ◽  
Dietrich Schultze ◽  
J. Wenzel
2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Rowles

The quality of X-ray powder diffraction data and the number and type of refinable parameters have been examined with respect to their effect on quantitative phase analysis (QPA) by the Rietveld method using data collected from two samples from the QPA round robin [Madsen, Scarlett, Cranswick & Lwin (2001). J. Appl. Cryst. 34, 409–426]. From the analyses of these best-case-scenario specimens, a series of recommendations for minimum standards of data collection and analysis are proposed. It is hoped that these will aid new QPA-by-Rietveld users in their analyses.


2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terezinha Ferreira de Oliveira ◽  
Roberto Ribeiro de Avillez ◽  
Eugenio Kahn Epprecht ◽  
Joaquim Carlos Barbosa Queiroz

2017 ◽  
Vol 898 ◽  
pp. 2054-2059
Author(s):  
Yan Ling Gan ◽  
Su Ping Cui ◽  
Ya Li Wang ◽  
Hong Xia Guo

For cement-matrix materials, the microstructure plays a vital important role in the research. Recently, quantitative phase analysis of cementitious materials can be performed using the Rietveld method by fitting the calculated X-ray diffraction (XRD) profile with the observed one. The aim of this paper is to further perform the quantitative analysis by the Rietveld method and discuss the influence of testing factors on the Rietveld quantitative phase analysis. The factors included the collection range of pattern, step size and the scan time of per step. In this study, the chemical composition of the samples was determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry. And their phase composition was calculated by X-ray powder diffraction and Rietveld analysis. The results showed that the collection range of pattern depended on the tested materials , and the scanning range should include the main diffraction peak of the sample. Smaller step size and longer scan time of each step made the fitting factor smaller, also the calculated pattern coincided with the measured pattern, better enhance the precision of the analyses.


2018 ◽  
Vol 212 ◽  
pp. 51-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme A. Calligaris ◽  
Thais L.T. da Silva ◽  
Ana Paula B. Ribeiro ◽  
Adenilson O. dos Santos ◽  
Lisandro P. Cardoso

2014 ◽  
Vol 881-883 ◽  
pp. 1241-1244
Author(s):  
Wei Jin Zeng ◽  
Chao Zeng ◽  
Wei He

The quantitative phase analyses of a slag have been successfully carried out by using both of the full-profile Rietveld and RIR methods from X-ray powder diffraction data. The qualitative phase analysis indicates that the slag contains mayenite (CaO)12(Al2O3)7, olivine Ca2(SiO4), gehlenite Ca2Al (AlSiO7), lemite Ca2(SiO4) and hibonite CaO(Al2O3)6. The quantitative analysis from Rietveld refinement shows that the weight concentrations of mayenite, olivine, gehlenite, lemite and hibonite for the slag are 48.8(4) wt.%, 32.2(5) wt.%, 11.0(9) wt.%, 6.2(1.1) wt.% and 1.8 (1.2) wt.%, respectively. The quantitative phase analysis results obtained by Rietveld method are more precise then those by RIR method.


1966 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 1741-1745 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. F. Karlak ◽  
D. S. Burnett

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document