scholarly journals Oncology Nursing Support for Safe and Effective Use of Eribulin in Metastatic Breast Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. CMO.S14038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Donovan ◽  
Laura Urquhart ◽  
Una Hopkins ◽  
Sandra Knight ◽  
Laura Moore
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Nurse Practitioner ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Proactive Management ◽  
Metastatic Setting

Nurse practitioners play important roles in breast cancer prevention, early detection, therapeutic efficacy, and surveillance. Assessment of a patient's health status is part of the nine nurse practitioner core competencies updated in 2012 by the National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties. Although adverse events are common in treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), proactive management strategies can limit the number and/or severity of adverse events. Additionally, knowledge of common metastatic sites and clinical signs/symptoms of recurrence provides one of the first-line strategies for successful treatment. We review five case studies of women with MBC who were managed successfully with eribulin mesylate in late lines of therapy after at least two chemotherapeutic regimens for advanced breast cancer that included both an anthracycline and a taxane in either the adjuvant or metastatic setting.

A phase II, single-arm study of apatinib and oral etoposide in pretreated metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1076-1076
Author(s):  
Nanlin Hu ◽  
Peng Yuan
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Oral Etoposide ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Prior Chemotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Setting

1076 Background: There is no standard treatment strategy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer suffering progression after one prior chemotherapy with metastasis setting. Apatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2(VEGFR-2). Etoposide is a highly active chemo-drug in the treatment of advanced breast cancer, both as a single agent or in combination regimens, and is well tolerated, with a low incidence of severe toxicity. This study is performed to assessed the efficacy and safety of apatinib and oral etoposide in patients with HER2 negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer for whom at least one lines of prior chemotherapy had failed. Methods: This open-label, single arm study enrolled patients with HER2-negative breast cancer, pretreated with anthracycline, taxanes, and who failed in the metastatic setting at least one prior chemotherapy regimens and at least one endocrine drug for hormone receptor-positive patients. Apatinib was administered 425/500mg daily according to patients ECOG(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) status, oral etoposide was administered 50mg/m2 for first 10 days in a 21-days cycle. The primary end point of this study was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. The treatment duration is until disease progression or intolerability of apatinib or oral etoposide. Results: 20 eligible patients were enrolled in this, open-label, single arm study and received apatinib and oral etoposide with a median age of 54 years old(range 36 to 66 years). Median follow-up time was 11months. 20 patients were eligible for efficacy analysis. Median PFS was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 4.01 m – 8.42 m). ORR was 20% (4/20). DCR was 70% (14/20). Median OS was 11.2 months (95% CI, 9.6 m – 14.95 m). The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were hypertension (30%), and proteinuria (5%), nausea (5%). 35%(7/20) patients had dose reduction because of adverse events, after that all adverse events can return to less than 2 grade. Conclusions: Apatinib with oral etoposide exhibited objective efficacy in pretreated, metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer with manageable toxicity. Prospective studies enrolling more patients are needed. Clinical trial information: NCT03535961.

Phase II Study of Temsirolimus (CCI-779), a Novel Inhibitor of mTOR, in Heavily Pretreated Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (23) ◽  
pp. 5314-5322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Chan ◽  
Max E. Scheulen ◽  
Stephen Johnston ◽  
Klaus Mross ◽  
Fatima Cardoso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Time To Tumor Progression

Purpose In this study, two doses of temsirolimus (CCI-779), a novel inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, were evaluated for efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had been heavily pretreated. Patients and Methods Patients (n = 109) were randomly assigned to receive 75 or 250 mg of temsirolimus weekly as a 30-minute intravenous infusion. Patients were evaluated for tumor response, time to tumor progression, adverse events, and pharmacokinetics of temsirolimus. Results Temsirolimus produced an objective response rate of 9.2% (10 partial responses) in the intent-to-treat population. Median time to tumor progression was 12.0 weeks. Efficacy was similar for both dose levels but toxicity was more common with the higher dose level, especially grade 3 or 4 depression (10% of patients at the 250-mg dose level, 0% at the 75-mg dose level). The most common temsirolimus-related adverse events of all grades were mucositis (70%), maculopapular rash (51%), and nausea (43%). The most common, clinically important grade 3 or 4 adverse events were mucositis (9%), leukopenia (7%), hyperglycemia (7%), somnolence (6%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and depression (5%). Conclusion In heavily pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, 75 and 250 mg temsirolimus showed antitumor activity and 75 mg temsirolimus showed a generally tolerable safety profile.

Subcutaneous Trastuzumab with Pertuzumab and Docetaxel in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Final Analysis of MetaPHER, A Phase 3b Single-Arm Safety Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherko Kümmel ◽  
Carlo Alberto Tondini ◽  
Jacinta Abraham ◽  
Zbigniew Nowecki ◽  
Bartosz Itrych ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
The Body ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract BACKGROUND Intravenous trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and docetaxel is first-line standard of care for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Subcutaneous trastuzumab plus intravenous pertuzumab and chemotherapy has shown similar safety and tolerability to intravenous trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early and metastatic breast cancer; however, in the metastatic setting, this has yet to be shown globally.METHODS In this open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase 3b study, eligible patients were ≥18 years old with histologically/cytologically confirmed previously untreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. All patients received ≥1 dose of subcutaneous trastuzumab (fixed-dose 600 mg) plus intravenous pertuzumab (loading dose: 840 mg/kg; maintenance dose: 420 mg/kg) and docetaxel (≥6 cycles; initial dose 75 mg/m2) every 3 weeks. The primary objective was safety and tolerability; secondary objectives included efficacy.RESULTS At clinical cutoff, 276 patients had completed the study; median duration of follow-up was 27 months. The most common any-grade adverse events were diarrhea, alopecia, and asthenia. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and hypertension. There were no cardiac deaths and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was stable over time. Median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 18.7 months; objective response rate was 75.6%.CONCLUSIONS Efficacy/safety results of subcutaneous trastuzumab plus intravenous pertuzumab and docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer are consistent with historical evidence of intravenous trastuzumab. These findings further support the body of evidence indicating that subcutaneous administration does not affect the safety and efficacy profile of trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02402712 (date of registration: 30th March 2015)

scholarly journals Locoregional Surgery in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Do Concomitant Metabolic Aspects Have a Role on the Management and Prognosis in this Setting?

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 227
Author(s):  
Maria Ida Amabile ◽  
Federico Frusone ◽  
Alessandro De Luca ◽  
Domenico Tripodi ◽  
Giovanni Imbimbo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
Metastatic Setting

Although they cannot be considered curative, the new therapeutic integrated advances in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have substantially improved patient outcomes. Traditionally, surgery was confined to palliation of symptomatic or ulcerating lumps. Data suggest, in some cases, a possible additive role for more aggressive locoregional surgical therapy in combination with systemic treatments in the metastatic setting, although a low level of evidence has been shown in terms of improvement in overall survival in MBC patients treated with surgery and medical treatment compared to medical treatment alone. In this light, tumor heterogeneity remains a challenge. To effectively reshape the therapeutic approach to MBC, careful consideration of who is a good candidate for locoregional resection is paramount. The patient’s global health condition, impacting on cancer progression and morbidity and their associated molecular targets, have to be considered in treatment decision-making. In particular, more recently, research has been focused on the role of metabolic derangements, including the presence of metabolic syndrome, which represent well-known conditions related to breast cancer recurrence and distant metastasis and are, therefore, involved in the prognosis. In the present article, we focus on locoregional surgical strategies in MBC and whether concomitant metabolic derangements may have a role in prognosis.

Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine Alone or in Combination in Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Previously Treated with Anthracycline and Taxane: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 694-702
Author(s):  
Louai Alsaloumi ◽  
Shaima Shawagfeh ◽  
Abdikarim Abdi ◽  
Bilgen Basgut
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Capecitabine is frequently used alone or combined with other chemotherapy agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in relapsed patients. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of capecitabine monotherapy versus combination in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracycline and taxane. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Eligible randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy and safety of capecitabine alone compared to capecitabine combination were systematically searched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and grades 3–4 drug-related adverse events were the outcomes assessed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 6,714 patients of 9 trials were involved in the pooled analysis. Our findings demonstrated that capecitabine combination is significantly superior to capecitabine monotherapy in improving PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, 95% CI 1.13–1.54, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001) and ORR (risk ratio [RR] 0.67, 95% CI 0.54–0.83, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), but it was insignificant in OS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.98–1.22, <i>p</i> = 0.12). On the other hand, the incidence of non-hematological adverse events such as hand-foot syndrome and diarrhea was lower in capecitabine combination compared to capecitabine monotherapy. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy showed superiority over capecitabine monotherapy in terms of PFS and ORR, with no significant difference in OS. Non-hematological adverse effects such as hand-foot syndrome were fewer with a combination regimen. However, hematological adverse events were fewer with capecitabine monotherapy regimen.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document