METABOLIC FECAL NITROGEN IN RUMINANTS ESTIMATED FROM DRY MATTER EXCRETION

1970 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. HIRONAKA ◽  
C. B. BAILEY ◽  
G. C. KOZUB

Relationships between dry matter (DM) and nitrogen (N) intakes and excretions were examined using digestibility data from 45 rations fed to sheep and cattle. The proportion of total variation due to regression was greater when N intake was expressed as a function of DM excretion than as a function of DM intake. Nitrogen excretion was expressed by the equation y = −0.021x2 + 0.137x + 0.891, where y = g N excretion per 100 g of fecal DM and x = g N intake per 100 g fecal DM. Extrapolating N excretion to zero N intake, the point of intercept at y = 0.891 g N per 100 g of fecal DM excretion is suggested as a measure of metabolic fecal nitrogen independent of the hay to concentrate ratio of the ration.

1957 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. Cunningham ◽  
G. J. Brisson

Daily observations were made on the fecal and urinary nitrogen excretions of four calves fed nitrogen-free diets during the second and fifth weeks after birth. The endogenous urinary nitrogen excretion was equivalent to 65.3 mg. per kg. of body weight (W) per day or 186 mg. per kg. W0.72. The metabolic fecal nitrogen excretion averaged 44.0 mg. per kg. of body weight per day or 0.334 per cent of the dry matter intake.


1957 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Whiting ◽  
L. M. Bezeau

Nitrogen balance experiments were carried out with growing Yorkshire barrows to determine the influence of level of fibre (5, 10, and 15 per cent wood cellulose) in the ration, and weight of pig (15, 30, 45, and 60 kg.) on the metabolic fecal nitrogen (M.F.N.) excretion. Semi-synthetic rations containing 0.3, 5.4, 9.4, 14.0, 18.0, and 22.0 per cent protein were fed. The source of the protein was a mixture of wheat, skimmilk powder, and fishmeal. M.F.N. by direct determination on the protein-low ration (0.3 per cent protein) was compared with M.F.N. determined by extrapolation to zero protein from the other rations.An increase in the level of fibre in the ration significantly (p < 0.01) increased the M.F.N. excretion and decreased the apparent and true digestibility of the protein but had no effect on the biological value (B.V.) of the protein. As the pigs increased in weight from 15 to 50 kg., the M.F.N. excretion, per 100 gm. dry matter (D.M.) consumed, decreased in proportion to the 0.3 power of body weight, the apparent digestibility of the protein increased, and the B.V. of the protein decreased. M.F.N, per 100 gm. D.M. consumed, apparent digestibility, and B.V. of the protein did not change significantly between body weights of 50 and 65 kg.There was no significant difference between M.F.N. determined by extrapolation to zero N intake and M.F.N. determined directly by feeding a protein-low (0.3 per cent protein) ration, when the rations contained the same percentage of cellulose. The M.F.N. (gm. per 100 gm. D.M. intake) for pigs weighing an average 37 kg. was 0.10, 0.13 and 0.14 for rations containing 5, 10, and 15 per cent cellulose, respectively.Since weight of pig and the level of fibre in the ration significantly influenced the M.F.N. excretion, the latter should be determined, either directly or by extrapolation, using rations of the same fibre content and pigs of the same body weight as are used in determining the true digestibility and B.V. of proteins.


1969 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Summers ◽  
E. T. Moran Jr. ◽  
W. F. Pepper

Nitrogen digestibility values were determined with rats for wheat bran, shorts, red dog and germ from nine different wheat samples. Red dog and germ resulted in similar and the highest values obtained, followed by shorts and then bran. By and large, most samples within a particular by-product series gave similar nitrogen digestibility values and where differences were noted, these in many cases paralleled the results of the other wheat fractions. A good correlation (r = 0.90) was obtained between fecal nitrogen excretion and fecal dry matter excretion when all treatments were compared. A similar comparison between feed intake and fecal nitrogen excretion resulted in a poor correlation (r = 0.33), suggesting that with protein supplements of different composition, feed intake is not a good measure of metabolic fecal nitrogen. The merits of using nitrogen digestibility values as a measure of the nutritional worth of a protein as compared with net protein utilization and protein efficiency ratio values are discussed.


2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 1141-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Lima de Souza ◽  
Rasmo Garcia ◽  
Luciano da Silva Cabral ◽  
Mara Lúcia Albuquerque Pereira ◽  
Rilene Ferreira Diniz Valadares

It was evaluated nitrogen compounds and microbial protein synthesis in heifers fed diets containing coffee hulls (0.0; 8.75; 17.25; and 26.25% of dry matter) replacing ground corn concentrate at the following levels of coffee hulls in the total diet dry matter: 0.0, 3.5, 7.0 or 10.5%. It was used 24 crossbreed heifers (7/8, 15/16 and 31/32 Holstein-Zebu), which were distributed in a random block design made up accordingly to the weight of the animals. Spot samples of urine were colleted aproximatelly four hours after morning feeding and were used to estimate microbial protein synthesis by using urine purine derivatives. It was not observed effect of coffee hull levels in the diet on total nitrogen intake (160 g/day) and nitrogen excretion in the urine (87.4 g/day). The inclusion of coffee hull in the diet linearly increased nitrogen excretion in feces, as well as nitrogen balance. There was linear reduction in urinary excretion of allantoin, in total purine derivative and absorbed purine, which reduced 0.715, 0.873, and 0.954 mmol/day to each coffee hull unity added to the concentrate, respectively. Coffee hull altered microbial protein synthesis, which reduced in 0.687 g/day to each coffee hull unity added to the concentrate. Reduction in microbial protein synthesis can reduce weight gain in heifers fed coffee hulls.


2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 325 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. PERTTILÄ ◽  
J. VALAJA ◽  
T. JALAVA

Using ileal digestible amino acids in feed optimising will intensify feed protein utilizing and decrease nitrogen excretion to the environment. The study determined the apparent ileal digestibility (AID) coefficients of amino acids in barley, wheat, oats, triticale, maize, and dehulled oats in the diets of 180 Ross broiler chickens (aged 24–35 days). The birds were fed semi-purified diets that contained grain as the sole protein source and chromium-mordanted straw as an indigestible marker. The AID coefficients of the nutrients were assessed using the slaughter technique, and the apparent metabolisable energy (AME) was determined using total excreta collection. The ileal digestibility of the dry matter and organic matter were the highest in maize. The AME of maize was higher than that of other cereals. The ileal digestibility of crude protein was higher in wheat than that in barley, oats and dehulled oats. The AME of wheat was similar to that of barley and oats but lower than that of triticale and dehulled oats. The amino acid AID was highest in wheat (0.86) and triticale (0.85) and lowest in oats (0.79) and barley 0.77). The average amino acid AID was 0.81 in dehulled oats. The threonine AID was the same in all tested ingredients. The lysine, methionine, and cystine AID coefficients were 0.81, 0.79, and 0.71 respectively for barley; 0.86, 0.84, and 0.38 respectively for oats; 0.87, 0.86, and 0.53 respectively for dehulled oats; 0.84, 0.90, and 0.66 respectively for maize; 0.89, 0.88, and 0.77 respectively for triticale; and 0.87, 0.85, and 0.71 respectively for wheat. Results indicated that AME –values of domestic grains (barley, oats and wheat) are in the same level. Especially, low AME value of wheat needs further investigation.;


1993 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-89
Author(s):  
D. Bustos ◽  
G. Negri ◽  
J.C. Bandi ◽  
M.I. Caldarini ◽  
K. Ogawa ◽  
...  

1954 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 483-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. H. Mitchell ◽  
M. H. Bert

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document