Daily Task Performance and Information Processing among People with Schizophrenia and Healthy Controls: A Comparative Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 77 (9) ◽  
pp. 466-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ginette Aubin ◽  
Julie Lamoureux ◽  
Isabelle Gélinas ◽  
Christine Chapparo ◽  
Emmanuel Stip ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. S-566
Author(s):  
Jessica Breton ◽  
Vincent Tu ◽  
Ceylan Tanes ◽  
Maire A. Conrad ◽  
Kelly Kachelries ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 1929-1937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina O. Heidrich ◽  
Emely Jensen ◽  
Francisco Rebelo ◽  
Tiago Oliveira

ABSTRACT This article presents a comparative study among people with cerebral palsy and healthy controls, of various ages, using a Brain-computer Interface (BCI) device. The research is qualitative in its approach. Researchers worked with Observational Case Studies. People with cerebral palsy and healthy controls were evaluated in Portugal and in Brazil. The study aimed to develop a study for product evaluation in order to perceive whether people with cerebral palsy could interact with the computer and compare whether their performance is similar to that of healthy controls when using the Brain-computer Interface. Ultimately, it was found that there are no significant differences between people with cerebral palsy in the two countries, as well as between populations without cerebral palsy (healthy controls).


2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 613-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily M. Owens ◽  
Douglas R. Denney ◽  
Sharon G. Lynch

AbstractPrevious studies show that MS patients take longer than healthy controls to plan their solutions to Tower of London (TOL) problems but yield conflicting results regarding the quality of their solutions. The present study evaluated performance under untimed or timed conditions to assess the possibility that differences in planning ability only occur when restrictions in solution times are imposed. MS patients (n = 39) and healthy controls (n = 43) completed a computerized version of the TOL under one of two conditions. In the untimed condition, participants were allowed as much time as needed on each problem. In the timed condition, limits were imposed on solution times and time remaining was displayed with each problem. Patients exhibited longer planning times than controls, and the disparity between groups increased with problem difficulty. Planning performance depended upon condition. In the untimed condition, patients and controls performed equally well. When solution times were restricted, however, patients solved fewer problems than controls. MS patients’ planning ability is intact when permitted sufficient time to formulate the required plan. Deficiencies in planning are only evident when time is restricted, and, therefore, are more accurately considered a relative consequence of disease-related problems in information processing speed. (JINS, 2013, 19, 1–8)


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-152
Author(s):  
Chester A. Schriesheim ◽  
Yonghong Liu

Drawing on social information processing theory, this study investigates the mechanisms by which authentic leadership affects subordinate task performance through subordinate attitudes and behavior. Sportsmanship, conceptualized as a behavioral indicator of employee positivity and persistence in pursuing high performance, is argued to be a potentially important outcome for authentic leadership. Data collected from 203 matched subordinate–supervisor dyads in six organizations from six diverse industries were subjected to contrast analysis with bootstrapping. The results suggest that the indirect effect of authentic leadership on subordinate sportsmanship is mainly via a cognitive process, as opposed to an affective one. Furthermore, it is the employee’s sportsmanship that transmits the effects of authentic leadership on employee task performance. Implications and future directions are discussed.


2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (5) ◽  
pp. S-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Ellrichmann ◽  
Perdita Wietzke-Braun ◽  
Luise Wintermeyer ◽  
Susanna Nikolaus ◽  
Alexander Arlt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document