scholarly journals Resident Perceptions of Service Versus Clinical Education

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 472-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelley L. Galvin ◽  
Elizabeth Buys
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynecology ◽  
Educational Goals ◽  
Personal Factors ◽  
Educational Value ◽  
Community Needs ◽  
Resident Perceptions ◽  
Qualitative Survey

Abstract Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education states that education needs to have priority over service. There is a potential for residents to have a negative perception of activities termed service. Objective To understand how residents of one obstetrics and gynecology program conceptualize service and clinical education in their daily training experiences. Methods We conducted a qualitative survey using semistructured interviews with 9 residents in obstetrics and gynecology. Verbatim transcripts underwent phenomenologic analysis for themes and statements exemplifying the essence and nuances of residents' experiences. Results The conceptualization of service and clinical education encompassed 6 categories, with some overlap between terms. The category education encompassed (1) tasks and situations with some educational value termed indirect patient care; (2) tasks and situations with high educational values subdivided into direct patient care and teacher-learner interactions; and (3) traditional educational activities, including reflection. Service denoted: (1) tasks and situations with little to no educational value subdivided into indirect and direct patient care categories; (2) tasks and situations with some educational value described as direct patient care; and (3) community service to patients and communities. Conclusions Definitions and the relative educational value of service and clinical education experiences overlapped considerably, but they varied by systematic, environmental, and personal factors. Service was used interchangeably to connote negative experiences that interfered with educational goals and positive experiences at the core of the profession's higher calling, the raison d'être of many physicians. The community needs to agree on the definitions of these terms and clarify the meaning of an appropriate balance.

Quality improvement in neurology residency programs

Neurology ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 1205-1207 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. G. Bradley ◽  
J. Daube ◽  
J. R. Mendell ◽  
J. Posner ◽  
D. Richman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Educational Goals ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
One Year ◽  
Minimum Criteria

The neurology residency programs in the United States are facing a crisis of quality. The Association of University Professors of Neurology (AUPN) approved the Quality Improvement Committee to examine this situation and make recommendations, which have been accepted by the AUPN. The recommendations are (1) that the educational goals of neurology residency training be dissociated from patient-care needs in academic medical centers and (2) that minimum levels of quality be applied to residents in neurology residency programs and to these programs themselves. These minimum criteria should include minimum educational criteria for entry into the program, minimum criteria for advancement from one year to the next in the program, and minimum criteria for performance of the graduates of neurology residency programs for program accreditation. The implementation of these recommendations will require a shift of funding of the care of indigent patients from the graduate medical education budget to direct patient-care sources. These recommendations will significantly improve the quality of neurologists and neurologic care in the United States.

scholarly journals Rounds Today: A Qualitative Study of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics Resident Perceptions

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphael Rabinowitz ◽  
Jeanne Farnan ◽  
Oliver Hulland ◽  
Lisa Kearns ◽  
Michele Long ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Family Involvement ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Comparative Method ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Resident Perceptions ◽  
Attending Rounds ◽  
Teaching Learning

ABSTRACT Background  Attending rounds is a key component of patient care and education at teaching hospitals, yet there is an absence of studies addressing trainees' perceptions of rounds. Objective  To determine perceptions of pediatrics and internal medicine residents about the current and ideal purposes of inpatient rounds on hospitalist services. Methods  In this multi-institutional qualitative study, the authors conducted focus groups with a purposive sample of internal medicine and pediatrics residents at 4 teaching hospitals. The constant comparative method was used to identify themes and codes. Results  The study identified 4 themes: patient care, clinical education, patient/family involvement, and evaluation. Patient care included references to activities on rounds that forwarded care of the patient. Clinical education pertained to teaching/learning on rounds. Patient/family involvement encompassed comments about incorporating patients and families on rounds. Evaluation described residents demonstrating skill for attendings. Conclusions  Resident perceptions of the purposes of rounds aligned with rounding activities described by prior observational studies of rounds. The influence of time pressures and the divergent needs of participants on today's rounds placed these identified purposes in tension, and led to resident dissatisfaction in the achievement of all of them. Suboptimal congruency exists between perceived resident clinical education and specialty-specific milestones. These findings suggest a need for education of multiple stakeholders by (1) enhancing faculty teaching strategies to maximize clinical education while minimizing inefficiencies; (2) informing residents about the value of patient interactions and family-centered rounds; and (3) educating program directors in proper alignment of inpatient rotational objectives to the milestones.

scholarly journals Can We Assess What We Purport to Teach In Clinical Law Courses?

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Roy Stuckey
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Education ◽  
First Generation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Educational Goals ◽  
Clinical Teachers ◽  
Educational Value ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Reliable Assessment ◽  
Current Practices

<p>"Assessment - evaluation: A judgment about something based on an understanding of the situation."</p><p>"Assess: to judge . . . the . . . quality . . . of something."</p><p>Many claims are made about the educational value of clinical education in law schools. Unfortunately, the first generation of clinical law teachers did not clearly articulate our educational goals nor did we fully explore how to assess the effectiveness of our instruction. Subsequent generations of clinical teachers adopted the practices of their predecessors and mentors. Consequently, many issues related to assessments of clinical students remain unexplored, and current practices tend to be neither valid nor reliable. While clinical teachers in the United Kingdom have made more progress than those in the United States, all clinical teachers need to work together to improve our understanding of assessments and to develop improved methods for finding out whether our students are learning what we purport to teach.</p><p>This article explains the importance and nature of assessments, illustrates some of the issues presented by current practices, and proposes some new directions to consider. It concludes that much work remains to be done to clarify the goals of clinical legal education and to develop valid and reliable assessment tools.</p>

scholarly journals Contamination of Healthcare Worker Personal Protective Equipment with MRSA Outside the Intensive Care Unit Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s27-s28
Author(s):  
Gita Nadimpalli ◽  
Lisa Pineles ◽  
Karly Lebherz ◽  
J. Kristie Johnson ◽  
David Calfee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Care Group ◽  
Surveillance Culture ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Patient Interactions ◽  
The Right

Background: Estimates of contamination of healthcare personnel (HCP) gloves and gowns with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) following interactions with colonized or infected patients range from 17% to 20%. Most studies were conducted in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting where patients had a recent positive clinical culture. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of MRSA transmission to HCP gloves and gown in non-ICU acute-care hospital units and to identify associated risk factors. Methods: Patients on contact precautions with history of MRSA colonization or infection admitted to non-ICU settings were randomly selected from electronic health records. We observed patient care activities and cultured the gloves and gowns of 10 HCP interactions per patient prior to doffing. Cultures from patients’ anterior nares, chest, antecubital fossa and perianal area were collected to quantify bacterial bioburden. Bacterial counts were log transformed. Results: We observed 55 patients (Fig. 1), and 517 HCP–patient interactions. Of the HCP–patient interactions, 16 (3.1%) led to MRSA contamination of HCP gloves, 18 (3.5%) led to contamination of HCP gown, and 28 (5.4%) led to contamination of either gloves or gown. In addition, 5 (12.8%) patients had a positive clinical or surveillance culture for MRSA in the prior 7 days. Nurses, physicians and technicians were grouped in “direct patient care”, and rest of the HCPs were included in “no direct care group.” Of 404 interactions, 26 (6.4%) of providers in the “direct patient care” group showed transmission of MRSA to gloves or gown in comparison to 2 of 113 (1.8%) interactions involving providers in the “no direct patient care” group (P = .05) (Fig. 2). The median MRSA bioburden was 0 log 10CFU/mL in the nares (range, 0–3.6), perianal region (range, 0–3.5), the arm skin (range, 0-0.3), and the chest skin (range, 0–6.2). Detectable bioburden on patients was negatively correlated with the time since placed on contact precautions (rs= −0.06; P < .001). Of 97 observations with detectable bacterial bioburden at any site, 9 (9.3%) resulted in transmission of MRSA to HCP in comparison to 11 (3.6%) of 310 observations with no detectable bioburden at all sites (P = .03). Conclusions: Transmission of MRSA to gloves or gowns of HCP caring for patients on contact precautions for MRSA in non-ICU settings was lower than in the ICU setting. More evidence is needed to help guide the optimal use of contact precautions for the right patient, in the right setting, for the right type of encounter.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Physician Workflow in Two Distinctive Emergency Departments: An Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 141-152
Author(s):  
Vimla L. Patel ◽  
Courtney A. Denton ◽  
Hiral C. Soni ◽  
Thomas G. Kannampallil ◽  
Stephen J. Traub ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Team Communication ◽  
Delivery Of Care ◽  
Physician Practices ◽  
Clinical Observations ◽  
Workflow Pattern ◽  
Open Coding ◽  
Temporal Events

Abstract Objectives We characterize physician workflow in two distinctive emergency departments (ED). Physician practices mediated by electronic health records (EHR) are explored within the context of organizational complexity for the delivery of care. Methods Two urban clinical sites, including an academic teaching ED, were selected. Fourteen physicians were recruited. Overall, 62 hours of direct clinical observations were conducted characterizing clinical activities (EHR use, team communication, and patient care). Data were analyzed using qualitative open-coding techniques and descriptive statistics. Timeline belts were used to represent temporal events. Results At site 1, physicians, engaged in more team communication, followed by direct patient care. Although physicians spent 61% of their clinical time at workstations, only 25% was spent on the EHR, primarily for clinical documentation and review. Site 2 physicians engaged primarily in direct patient care spending 52% of their time at a workstation, and 31% dedicated to EHRs, focused on chart review. At site 1, physicians showed nonlinear complex workflow patterns with a greater frequency of multitasking and interruptions, resulting in workflow fragmentation. In comparison, at site 2, a less complex environment with a unique patient assignment system, resulting in a more linear workflow pattern. Conclusion The nature of the clinical practice and EHR-mediated workflow reflects the ED work practices. Physicians in more complex organizations may be less efficient because of the fragmented workflow. However, these effects can be mitigated by effort distribution through team communication, which affords inherent safety checks.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection in Hospital Workers: Results From a Screening Study in New Jersey, United States in Spring 2020

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily S Barrett ◽  
Daniel B Horton ◽  
Jason Roy ◽  
Weiyi Xia ◽  
Patricia Greenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New Jersey ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Underrepresented Minorities ◽  
Patient Contact ◽  
Food Services ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Screening Study ◽  
White Workers

Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is a critical concern among healthcare workers (HCWs). Other studies have assessed SARS-CoV-2 virus and antibodies in HCWs, with disparate findings regarding risk based on role and demographics. Methods We screened 3904 employees and clinicians for SARS-CoV-2 virus positivity and serum immunoglobulin (Ig)G at a major New Jersey hospital from April 28 to June 30, 2020. We assessed positive tests in relation to demographic and occupational characteristics and prior coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms using multivariable logistic regression models. Results Thirteen participants (0.3%) tested positive for virus and 374 (9.6%) tested positive for IgG (total positive: 381 [9.8%]). Compared with participants with no patient care duties, the odds of positive testing (virus or antibodies) were higher for those with direct patient contact: below-median patient contact, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.71 and 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18–2.48; above-median patient contact, aOR = 1.98 and 95% CI = 1.35–2.91. The proportion of participants testing positive was highest for phlebotomists (23.9%), maintenance/housekeeping (17.3%), dining/food services (16.9%), and interpersonal/support roles (13.7%) despite lower levels of direct patient care duties. Positivity rates were lower among doctors (7.2%) and nurses (9.1%), roles with fewer underrepresented minorities. After adjusting for job role and patient care responsibilities and other factors, Black and Latinx workers had 2-fold increased odds of a positive test compared with white workers. Loss of smell, taste, and fever were associated with positive testing. Conclusions The HCW categories at highest risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection include support staff and underrepresented minorities with and without patient care responsibilities. Future work is needed to examine potential sources of community and nosocomial exposure among these understudied HCWs.

Psychology Staffing at Cancer Centers: Data From National Comprehensive Cancer Network Member Institutions

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e1343-e1354
Author(s):  
Laura Melton ◽  
Diana Krause ◽  
Jessica Sugalski
Keyword(s):  
National Comprehensive Cancer Network ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Network Member ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Cancer Network

PURPOSE: The field of psycho-oncology is relatively undeveloped, with little information existing regarding the use of psychologists at cancer centers. Comprising 30 leading cancer centers across the United States, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) set out to understand the trends in its Member Institutions. METHODS: The NCCN Best Practices Committee surveyed NCCN Member Institutions regarding their use of psychologists. The survey was administered electronically in the spring/summer of 2017. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 18 cancer centers. Across institutions, 94% have psychologists appointed to provide direct care to their cancer center patients. The number of licensed psychologist full-time equivalents (FTEs) on staff who provide direct patient care ranged from < 1.0 FTE (17%) to 17.0-17.9 FTEs (6%). Regarding psychologist appointments, 41% have both faculty and staff appointments, 41% have all faculty appointments, and 18% have all staff appointments. Forty-three percent of institutions indicated that some licensed psychologists at their centers (ranging from 1%-65%) do not provide any direct clinical care, and 57% indicated that all licensed psychologist on staff devote some amount of time to direct clinical care. The percent of clinical care time that is spent on direct clinical care ranged from 15%-90%. CONCLUSION: There is great variability in psychology staffing, academic appointments, and the amount of direct patient care provided by on-staff psychologists at cancer centers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document