Knowledge of Herbal Medicines and Herb-drug Interaction Among Medical and Pharmacy Students of the University of Lagos, Nigeria

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-70
Author(s):  
O.U. Amaeze ◽  
O.A. Olugbake ◽  
M. Lawal
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Herbal Medicine ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Herbal Medicines ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Medical Undergraduate ◽  
The University

Background: Concurrent use of herbal and orthodox medicines can result in herb-drug interaction, which could remain unidentified due to the limited knowledge of health care providers on herbal medicines effects and safety.Objectives: This study aimed to assess the knowledge of medical and pharmacy students of the University of Lagos on herbal medicines and herb-drug interactions.Method: The study was a cross-sectional survey of final year pharmacy and medical undergraduate students (422) of the University of Lagos. Data was collected using a validated, previously developed, and standardized self-administered questionnaire. Descriptive statistics was used to evaluate the students’ demographics, knowledge of herbal medicines and herb-drug interactions, types and uses of herbal medicines, while inferential statistics was employed to assess the association between the students’ demographics and their knowledge of herb-drug interactions. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.Results: The response rate was 97%. The students (98.0%) knew that herbs can be used as medicines; common uses of herbal medicines reported by the students include malaria (11.4%), pain (24.6%), and fever (36.2%). There was no association between the students’ demographics and their knowledge about herbal medicine. Age was significantly associated with knowledge of herb-drug interaction (P<0.05). The students (96.8%) knew that herbs can interact with conventional drugs when administered concurrently. The sources of the students’ knowledge about herbal medicine and herb-drug interaction include lectures (52.2%), literature (14%) and personal experience (13.9%).Conclusion: The students had good knowledge of herbal medicines; however, the subject of herbal medicines and their effects should be given more attention in the medical and pharmacy program curriculum, in order to enhance the students’ knowledge base of herbal medicines and interactions, and equip the future physicians and pharmacists adequately for better patient care. Keywords: Herbal medicines, Herb-drug interaction, Pharmacy students, Medical students

scholarly journals Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug-Drug interactions in various regions of Andhra Pradesh

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 248-253
Author(s):  
Bothiraj M ◽  
Alagusundaram M ◽  
Chandra Sekhar K B
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Andhra Pradesh ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Monitoring Program ◽  
General Medicine ◽  
P Value ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
A Prospective Study

Pharmacoepidemiology deals with the use and effects of medications in a large number of population—the combination of epidemiology principles to the effects of drug and its usage. Pharmacoepidemiology helps in optimal utilization of medicines and assist health care providers in making better decisions on drug therapy that will tend to curtail the Drug-Drug interactions, thereby prevents alteration in the pharmacological activity of one drug by another. Among all types of interaction, Drug-Drug interaction causes a higher rate of mortality. A prospective study conducted with 653 prescriptions that were collected from the various regions of Andhra Pradesh like Kadapa, Proddatur, Pulivendula, Kurnool are checked in interaction checker, results are projected in 4 categories a) Age and Sex preponderance(Demographics) rate of drugs interaction b) Interaction rate of major/minor type c) Department wise - General medicine (72.37%), Gynaec (69.02%), Pediatric (29.33%), Ophthalmology (75%) d) Most common interacting pairs of various department Ex: Ceftriaxone & Furosemide, Diclofenac & Furosemide, Albuterol & Losartan are observed in General Medicine. Statistical significance (P-value 0.00002) is obtained based on One Way ANOVA. This study elucidates the significance of pharmacoepidemiology; however, this requires much efforts to prevent causation effects of drugs. It is helpful to locate them by the establishment of “Drug interaction monitoring program” or by establishing “Pharmacoepidemiological centres” in every hospital for the screening of prescriptions by “Pharmacist” and thereby edify doctors and public for better medication use.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Tertiary Drug Resources’ Consistency Regarding Drug-Drug Interactions of Adjunctive Analgesics

2020 ◽  
pp. 875512252095133
Author(s):  
Andrew Lang ◽  
Michael A. Veronin ◽  
Justin P. Reinert
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Drug Information ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Information Resources ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Drug Drug Interaction

Background: Health care providers routinely rely on tertiary drug information resources to affirm knowledge or proactively verify the safety and efficacy of medications. Though all patient care areas are affected, the reliability of these resources is perhaps nowhere as poignant as it is in high-acuity settings, including the emergency department and the intensive care unit. As providers seek to identify adjunctive analgesics for acute pain in these areas, they must be able to rely on the integrity to whichever resource their institution has granted access. Objective: To determine the congruency of drug-drug interaction information found on 3 tertiary drug resources. Methods: A drug-drug interaction analysis was conducted on Micromedex, Lexicomp, and Medscape. Adjunctive analgesics included dexmedetomidine and ketamine, which were compared with the intravenous opioid products morphine, fentanyl, and hydromorphone. Results: Significant discrepancies were appreciated with regard to the severity of drug-drug interactions. In addition, the heterogeneity in which reaction severity and likelihood are described by each respective resource makes direct comparisons difficult. Interaction warnings for dexmedetomidine and fentanyl included a “major interaction” from Micromedex, whereas Lexicomp did not identify a risk and Medscape only recommended increased monitoring on the grounds of respiratory and central nervous system depression. Conclusions: Health care providers must remain vigilant when reviewing tertiary drug information resources. Pharmacists possess the training and skills necessary to assist interdisciplinary medical teams in providing optimal patient care through evaluating and applying the information gleaned from these resources.

scholarly journals HERBAL MEDICINES QUESTIONNAIRE AND EVALUATION OF ATTITUDE, PERCEPTIONS AND SELF-USE AMONG HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS IN RAK, UAE: PILOT STUDY

2019 ◽  
pp. 86-90
Author(s):  
AMAD M. AL-AZZAWI ◽  
NEHAD MEHDI ◽  
ALYAA G. AL-JUBOORI ◽  
ANAM EJAZ ◽  
HANEEN ALI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Herbal Medicine ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Herbal Medicines ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Item Questionnaire

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the perceptions of different healthcare professionals towards HM. Methods: The 16-item questionnaire on the belief of health care professionals in herbal medicine was designed by the interdisciplinary task force. Eligible participants were health care providers who were English-and Arabic-literate. The response rate was 78% of participants (781 of 1000) were respondents. In total, 553 out of 781 (71%) participants indicated that they had previously used herbal medicines. The remaining 228 participants did not believe in herbal medicine due to lack of scientific evidence, ineffectiveness and other reasons. Results: The findings of this study indicate that health care professionals including pharmacists believe they have a responsibility to provide information on HM to their patients. However, the current consensus among the respondents is that current HM-focused knowledge is inadequate for such an application. Conclusion: Health care professionals believe in using HM for their needs and have a responsibility to provide information on HM to their patients.

scholarly journals Understanding forgotten exposures towards achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3: a cross‐sectional study on herbal medicine use during pregnancy or delivery in Tanzania

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Tengia-Kessy ◽  
George Chombe Msalale
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Herbal Medicine ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Herbal Medicines ◽  
Prevalence Ratio ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Medicine Use ◽  
Sustainable Development Goal ◽  
Development Goal

Abstract Background In most of the sub-Sahara African countries, use of herbal medications is widely practiced during pregnancy or delivery for various reasons despite uncertainties on their pharmacological profiles. Use of unregistered herbal medicines has the potential of causing adverse health effects to the mother and the newborn, thus deterring achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 3, which aims to “ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages”. One of the targets is on reduction of morbidity and mortality among mothers and newborns. This study investigated use of herbal medicines and predictors of usage during pregnancy or delivery as a forgotten exposure towards understanding some of the challenges in achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3. Methods This cross-sectional quantitative study gathered information from women who delivered a live-born baby in the preceding two years. Using a two-stage-sampling technique, women attending reproductive, maternal and child health clinics in Tabora were selected and interviewed. Proportions were compared using chi-square test and Poisson regression analysis was performed to determine independent correlates of herbal medicine use. Results Of 340 recruited women, 208 [61.2 %; 95 % confidence interval: 55.4, 66.3 %] used herbal medicines during pregnancy or delivery. Major reasons for use included accelerating labour, 81 (38.9 %) and reducing labour pains, 58 (27.9 %). Women who made less than four antenatal visits had a 24 % higher adjusted prevalence ratio of using herbal medicines as compared to those who had at least four visits [adjusted prevalence ratio:1.24; 95 % confidence interval: 1.02, 1.50, p = 0.03]. Furthermore, the adjusted prevalence ratio of using herbal medicines was 35 % higher among women who were not discouraged by health care providers against their use as compared to those who were discouraged (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.35; 95 % confidence interval: 1.13, 1.60, p = 0.01). Conclusions Use of herbal medicines during pregnancy or delivery among women in Tanzania is common. Independent predictors of herbal medicine use were number of antenatal visits and stance of maternity health care providers on their use. Comprehensive investigations on the magnitude, patterns and predictors of use of herbal medicines during pregnancy or delivery are warranted.

scholarly journals Herbal Medicine for Pain Management: Efficacy and Drug Interactions

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 251
Author(s):  
Behdad Jahromi ◽  
Iulia Pirvulescu ◽  
Kenneth D. Candido ◽  
Nebojsa Nick Knezevic
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Herbal Medicine ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Herbal Medicines ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Global Market ◽  
Complementary And Alternative Medicines ◽  
Alternative Medicines ◽  
Complementary And Alternative

Complementary and alternative medicines such as herbal medicines are not currently part of the conventional medical system. As the popularity of and global market for herbal medicine grows among all age groups, with supporting scientific data and clinical trials, specific alternative treatments such as herbal medicine can be reclassified as a practice of conventional medicine. One of the most common conditions for which adults use herbal medicine is pain. However, herbal medicines carry safety concerns and may impact the efficacy of conventional therapies. Unfortunately, mechanisms of action are poorly understood, and their use is unregulated and often underreported to medical professionals. This review aims to compile common and available herbal medicines which can be used as an alternative to or in combination with conventional pain management approaches. Efficacy and safety are assessed through clinical studies on pain relief. Ensuing herb–drug interactions such as cytochrome modulation, additive and synergistic effects, and contraindications are discussed. While self-management has been recognized as part of the overall treatment strategy for patients suffering from chronic pain, it is important for practitioners to be able to also optimize and integrate herbal medicine and, if warranted, other complementary and alternative medicines into their care.

Creating Academic and Health Care Partnerships that Impact Public Health

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 378-384
Author(s):  
Peter W. Grandjean ◽  
Burritt W. Hess ◽  
Nicholas Schwedock ◽  
Jackson O. Griggs ◽  
Paul M. Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Professional Training ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Research Partnerships ◽  
Local Health Care ◽  
Training Community ◽  
The University

Kinesiology programs are well positioned to create and develop partnerships within the university, with local health care providers, and with the community to integrate and enhance the activities of professional training, community service, public health outreach, and collaborative research. Partnerships with medical and health care organizations may be structured to fulfill accreditation standards and the objectives of the “Exercise is Medicine®” initiative to improve public health through primary prevention. Barriers of scale, location, time, human resources, and funding can be overcome so all stakeholder benefits are much greater than the costs.

The CTSA Mandate: Are We There Yet?

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn M. Sampselle ◽  
Kenneth J. Pienta ◽  
Dorene S. Markel
Keyword(s):  
Community Engagement ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
National Institutes Of Health ◽  
Health Priorities ◽  
University Of Michigan ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Front Line ◽  
The University ◽  
Bidirectional Flow ◽  
Flow Of Information

The ultimate aim of the National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) initiative is to accelerate the movement of discoveries that can benefit human health into widespread public use. To accomplish this translational mandate, the contributions of multiple disciplines, such as dentistry, nursing, pharmacy, public health, biostatistics, epidemiology, and bioengineering, are required in addition to medicine. The research community is also mandated to establish new partnerships with organized patient communities and front line health care providers to assure the bidirectional flow of information in order that health priorities experienced by the community inform the research agenda. This article summarizes current clinical research directives, the experience of the University of Michigan faculty during the first 2 years of CTSA support, and recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of future CTSA as well as other interdisciplinary initiatives. While the manuscript focuses most closely on the CTSA Community Engagement mission, the challenges to interdisciplinarity and bidirectionality extend beyond the focus of community engagement.

scholarly journals Utilization of Non-Pharmacological Methods and the Perceived Barriers for Adult Postoperative Pain Management by the Nurses at Selected National Hospitals in Asmara, Eritrea

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betiel Yihdego Kidanemariam ◽  
Traudl Elsholz ◽  
Laban L. Simel ◽  
Eyasu H. Tesfamariam ◽  
Yonatan Mehari Andemeskel
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Work Experience ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Perceived Barriers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Cross Sectional

Abstract Background: Pharmacological methods are widely used for postoperative pain management however, poorly controlled pain continues to pose a significant challenge. Non pharmacological methods could contribute to the unresolved postoperative pain management in assisting nurses’ routine care and reducing the need for medication. This study aimed to assess nurses’ utilization of non-pharmacological methods in postoperative pain and the perceived barriers for their implementation at the National Hospitals.Methods: This was a descriptive cross sectional study conducted among 154 nurses working at the National Referral Hospitals and Sembel Private Hospital. A standardized five-point Likert-scale questionnaire which assesses nurses' utilization of selected non-pharmacological methods and the perceived barriers for the implementation was used to collect data. Descriptive statistics for the demographic data, independent samples t-test, one way ANOVA and factorial ANOVA were used to analyze the data. Statistical significance level was set at P < 0.05.Results: The study found out that emotional support (45.5%), helping with daily activities (67.5%) and creating a comfortable environment (61%) were mostly used while, cognitive-behavioral (5.9%) and physical methods (5.8%) were hardly used. The results also showed that, characteristics such as, age (p=0.013), level of education (p=0.012), work experience (p=0.001) and place of work (p=0.001), were significantly related to the use of non-pharmacological methods at bivariate level. However, hospitals were the only determinants of the non-pharmacological methods at multivariable level with a statistical significance of (p<0.001). On the perceived barriers; heavy work load (87.7%), shortage of time (84.4%), limited resources (82.5%), deficit in the guidelines for pain management (77.3%), patient’s uncooperative behavior (57.1%), language difference (64.4%), nurse’s lack of knowledge (50%) and experience (40.3%) were identified.Conclusion: The use of non-pharmacological methods in the studied hospitals varied greatly on the knowledge and experience of the nurses. Therefore, it is recommended that exposure and training for all health care providers at all level is a paramount importance in order to appreciate the benefits of non-pharmacological methods applicable to postoperative pain management. This could be achieved through on job training, seminars, scientific conferences and other brainstorming forums.

Breaking bad news in the oncologic population: Residents' perspective.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24113-e24113
Author(s):  
Vihitha Thota ◽  
Mahati Paravathaneni ◽  
Sudheer Konduru ◽  
Bohdan Baralo ◽  
Sana Mulla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Confidence Level ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Further Education ◽  
Bad News ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Prior Training ◽  
Oncologic Patients ◽  
Delivering Bad News

e24113 Background: Delivering bad news to patients is a delicate but required skill for doctors as part of patient care. There has been evidence that good communication from health care providers can improve patients' compliance to treatment as well as be beneficial emotionally. While many studies have been done in regards to patients' perceptions of receiving bad news, there are limited studies looking at a physicians' perspective, and even more so concerning residents' perceptions. In community hospitals, many patients are diagnosed with cancer, and resident physicians are often responsible for informing the patients and their families regarding the diagnosis. The manner in which the news is delivered is important, however it is unclear how much training is provided to residents before they are required to break bad news to patients. The lack of training can often result in improper delivery and poor patient care. Methods: We surveyed Internal Medicine and General Surgery residents at Mercy Catholic Medical Center, a conglomeration of two community teaching hospitals in Philadelphia, about prior training, confidence level, attitudes, and need for further education on delivering bad news to oncologic patients using a survey created after extensive research. The factors associated with confidence level were analyzed using paired T-test and ANOVA methods. Results: A total of 65 residents (72%) participated. No statistical significance was seen between American versus foreign medical graduates, MD vs. DO residents, or among those in different specialties when assessing their confidence in delivering bad news. Though only 62% of participants reported having had prior training in delivering bad news, residents with previous training (p1) or who have had to deliver bad news previously (p2) reported higher confidence when it came to delivering a new diagnosis of cancer (p1 0.03, p2 0.001), delivering news regarding the progression of cancer (p1 0.03, p2 0.02), delivering news regarding the recurrence of cancer (p1 0.04, p2 0.002), and delivering news regarding end-stage cancer with little to no treatment options left (p1 0.04, p2 0.003). 100% of participants thought communicating bad news is an important skill for a physician, and 92% of participants thought further education would help prepare them for similar scenarios in the future. Simulated patient scenarios (64%), grand rounds lectures/presentations (59%), and feedback from faculty after actual patient scenarios (57%) were the most requested whereas pamphlets/brochures (17%) and online training courses (20%) were less popular. Conclusions: Our study highlights the importance of prior training or exposure among residents in being able to deliver bad news to patients effectively. We propose that implementing further training in the form of simulated scenarios and lectures can improve residents' confidence at delivering bad news and result in a better physician-patient relationship.

Herbal Drug Interactions

2017 ◽  
pp. 201-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mymoona Akhter
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Herbal Medicines ◽  
Herbal Drugs ◽  
Herbal Drug ◽  
Herbal Therapy ◽  
Alternative Medicines ◽  
Regulatory Bodies

Use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) for preventive and therapeutic purposes has increased tremendously in the last two decades internationally. The manufacturers of these products are not required to submit proof of safety or efficacy to the Food and Drug Administration. As a result, the adverse effects and drug interactions associated with them are largely unknown. In this chapter, the author presents interactions of herbal medicines with other medicines (herbal or non-herbal). A large number of herbal drugs, including from single drug to a variety of mixtures have been used to treat kidney disorders. Herb-herb or herb drug interaction has been reported intensively during last decade, therefore it becomes important to keep an eye on the use of combination herbal therapy in order to avoid serious results because of interactions with each other. Due to the growing awareness about the interactions and side effects of herbal drugs/supplements over the past few years, regulatory bodies are working on these issues and pharmacopoeias are being developed for reference.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document