scholarly journals “RIPSSL”: A New Reflective Inquiry Protocol to Lift the Lid on Students’ Significant Extra-Curricular Learning Outcomes from Study Abroad

Author(s):  
Andrea Reid ◽  
Christine Slade ◽  
Susan Rowland

Education abroad generally has no overarching curriculum outside the formal study component. This paper presents the Reflective Inquiry Protocol for Surfacing Significant Learning (RIPSSL), a new approach for understanding and articulating significant learning from education abroad. Tests of RIPSSL show education abroad students use it to move beyond “it was great” when considering learning from their experiences. Our findings are important for educators and students as they work to recognize and articulate the value of education abroad. RIPSSL provides a reflective educational approach to evidence learning from life experiences by surfacing students’ significant learning in their own words.

The field of education abroad is always seeking better data about learning outcomes to improve programs and advocate for the value of education abroad. To support this work, the Forum has published a Guide to Outcomes Assessment in Education Abroad which debuted at the Forum Conference in Austin, Texas. Edited by Mell C. Bolen (Brethren Colleges Abroad), this essential publication provides tools for implementing outcomes assessment as a part of education abroad programming.


2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. vii-ix
Author(s):  
Brian Whalen

This Special Issue is a collaboration between Frontiers and the Forum on Education Abroad. The idea for this volume came from the Forum’s Committee on Outcomes Assessment, which initiated the Undergraduate Research Awards as a way to document the very best examples of student learning outcomes in education abroad. Members of that initial Committee were Mell Bolen, Lilli Engle, Pat Martin, Laura Siaya, Mick Vande Berg and myself. The first awards competition in 2004 yielded over 60 nominations from 40 Forum member institutions, including ones submitted by students from overseas institutions. Each application included an abstract, a detailed outline, and a faculty recommendation. A committee of faculty from various Forum member institutions and various academic disciplines chose the three winners: Heidi Boutros, Brian Hoyer, and Kevin McAdam. Frontiers has had as its central mission the examination of the distinctive process and substantial outcomes of student learning abroad. The journal’s strategic partnership with the Forum represents a shared interest in documenting and promoting the study abroad learning process. Previous Special Issues of Frontiers have focused on the many perspectives on study abroad learning, including language learning, science education abroad, experiential education in a study abroad context, the relation between area studies and study abroad, and a volume devoted exclusively to student learning outcomes. The Frontiers editorial board viewed the Forum’s Undergraduate Research Award as an opportunity for the journal to develop a series of Special Issues that would provide an in-depth examination of the value of a research approach to study abroad learning. We therefore invited the top 15 students in the competition to submit their full manuscripts for consideration. The eight student articles that appear in this volume were selected by the editorial board as excellent representations of the type of research of which students studying abroad are capable. In conceiving this special issue we were mindful of the context for student research. We wanted to be certain to include the perspectives of faculty advisors familiar with the students’ research since faculty play the critical roles of mentoring, supporting, monitoring, sometimes collaborating with, and assessing the students. We asked faculty to relate their view of the students’ research, especially how it relates to the students’ entire undergraduate experience. We also asked faculty to consider ways in which the research conducted abroad furthers the aims of the relevant academic discipline. In this way, we hoped to inspire discussions about how disciplinary curricula may incorporate research conducted abroad in order to advance the particular learning goals of major fields of study. Two members of the Forum’s Committee on Outcomes Assessment, Mell Bolen and Pat Martin, agreed to represent the views of education abroad professionals in this volume. They provide a useful perspective on how we as study abroad advisors and administrators may support the process of developing and promoting opportunities for undergraduate student research in education abroad. We also felt strongly that hearing from the students themselves, apart from their research papers, was critically important, and also would be of great interest to our readers. The winners of the 2004 Forum Undergraduate Awards presented their projects to an eager audience of education abroad professionals at a plenary session at the Forum Annual Conference. This volume provides another opportunity for us to “hear” their voices. We, therefore, asked each of them to write about the “research context” of their projects so that readers would understand the ways in which the research related to the education abroad experience. Following on a suggestion made by Kathy Sideli, Chair of the Forum Board of Directors, Frontiers and the Forum will be following the lives of these students and assess on an ongoing basis the impact of their research and study abroad experiences. We believe these students represent the most outstanding students who study abroad. Assessing the longitudinal impact of study abroad on these students will provide evidence for the tangible outcomes that education abroad has on our students. As a first step in that process we have asked each student to provide a short postscript in which they reflect, over a year after their graduation from their institutions, on how their research and study abroad experience continues to influence their lives. We will continue to provide yearly updates on these students and continue to track what are likely to be interesting careers and lives influenced by their research presented here. It is important to note that this is the first in what we hope will be an ongoing series of Special Issues that present undergraduate research conducted as part of education abroad. The second round of the Forum’s Undergraduate Research Awards have been completed, and we are already planning the 2006 Special Issue that will feature students’ work from that competition. Generous funding from the IFSA Foundation has made this entire project possible. Frontiers received a grant of $30,000 from the IFSA Foundation to publish the first three Special Issues, and we thank them for recognizing the importance of this project for the field of education abroad. Indeed, the Frontiers editorial board and the Forum believe strongly that one of the best measures of education abroad outcomes are volumes such as this one that showcase the very best examples of student learning. Both Frontiers and the Forum are committed to facilitating research on the outcomes of education abroad. This volume and those to follow are contributions to an ongoing effort that we hope will be useful in providing evidence of learning outcomes. We also have another goal: to inspire faculty and study abroad professionals to consider ways in which undergraduate research conducted as part of education abroad can form an essential part of our campus curricula. Brian Whalen, Dickinson College The Forum on Education Abroad


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joris Boonen ◽  
Ankie Hoefnagels ◽  
Mark Pluymaekers ◽  
Armand Odekerken

PurposeThe authors examine the role of internationalisation at-home activities and an international classroom at a home institution to promote intercultural competence development during a study abroad.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use large scale longitudinal data from the global mind monitor (GMM) (2018–2020) to examine change over time in both multicultural personality (MPQ) and cultural knowledge (CQ) among students in Dutch higher education institutions. The authors analyse the moderating effect of the preparation in the home institution by looking at the added value of both intercultural communication courses and international classroom setting for intercultural competence development during a study abroad.FindingsThe results show that particularly courses on intercultural communication significantly promote intercultural competence development during a stay abroad. Frequent interactions with international staff also seem to be beneficial for this development.Research limitations/implicationsThis study was conducted in the Netherlands, in one of the most internationalised educational systems in the world. Therefore, it is difficult to generalise these findings to other contexts before any further empirical research is conducted.Practical implicationsBased on the findings, the authors formulate practical advice for higher education institutions that aim to get the most out of the international learning outcomes of a study abroad.Originality/valueThis paper is the first to assess the moderating effect of preparatory internationalisation at home initiatives on the intercultural learning effects of international experiences later on in a study program. Other studies have proposed that these effects will exist but have not tested them empirically with longitudinal data.


Author(s):  
Marco BRANCUCCI

"Learning about freedom as freedom to make right choices responsibly is the pivotal task of educational intervention (Chionna 2001). As a practitioner of juvenile penitentiary re-education I experiment it, trying to re-educate young offenders in a prison, where the “capability approach” should be invoked (Sen 2011) and, according to the relational ethics paradigm (Muschitiello, 2012), we teach the young the capacity/ability of choice between alternative life experiences, which should be inspired and embodied by the educational authority of the adults. As agency is a constitutive element of a capability, I wonder: who is the agent? The one who re-educates an inmate? Or the inmate himself? Who should be more efficient and responsible to act in prison? Is it all about specific required competencies that are influenced by the context where penitentiary personnel and inmates act/react reciprocally? Penitentiary educators should adjust their approach, improving their language-as-dialogue tools first, just because the relationship with inmates is based on a dialogic axis. No exception can be made for cultural and linguistic mediators, who are involved in the treatment of foreign inmates (Brancucci 2018). So, I investigate the agency level of penitentiary educators and cultural/linguistic mediators, working together synergistically and/or autonomously. They try to respond to different scenarios, recognizing there is no one-size -fits-all approach to managing cases of re-educational emergencies, and assuming that educational interventions recall a daily presence in the context (Bertolini 1993), especially in prison where people ‘live’ in close proximity (WHO, 2020). But, how to achieve agency when this proximity fades away, or is temporarily interrupted, even turning into a virtual telematic educational approach? The challenge is to transform the consolidated educational-linguistic-dialogic practices into a new bidirectional way to think, act/react (from prison personnel towards inmates and vice-versa), because of the social distance required by the COVID-19 breakthrough."


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-168
Author(s):  
Sara A. McComb ◽  
Lorenzo Fedele ◽  
Patrick A. Brunese ◽  
Vicki L. Simpson

The purpose of this paper is to describe a short term study abroad program that exposes engineering and nursing undergraduate students from the United States and Italy to an intercultural and interprofessional immersion experience . Faculty fr om Purdue University and Sapienza Università di Roma collaborated to design a technical program that demonstrates the complementary nature of engineering and public health in the service sector, with Rome as an integral component of the program. S pecifically, the intersection of topics including systems, reliability, process flow, maintenance management, and public health are covered through online lectures, in class activities and case study discussions, field experiences, and assessments. Here in, administrat ive issues such as student recruitment, selection, and preparation are elucidated. Additionally, the pedagogical approach used to ensure constructive alignment among the program goals, the intended learning outcomes, and the teaching and learning activitie s is described. Finally, examples of learning outcomes resulting from this alignment are provided.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2S11) ◽  
pp. 2883-2885

This paper tries to explore that, Action Research is a supplementary source for English Language Teachers to bring out better teaching outcome of the teachers and better learning outcomes of the students. In the current scenario, apart from the syllabus, English Language teachers expect a supplementary source to follow a new strategy in order to satisfy the expectations of the students inside the classroom. They face many challenges in the classroom and one of the important problems is to draw continuous involvement of the students as well as to create good understanding of the subject in the classroom. In this connection, Action Research helps the teachers to explore effective teaching strategy in the classroom. This Action Research is integrated with a new approach called MUSE (Manageable, Urgent, Significant and Engaging), that helps the teachers to plan effectively. Besides, it is an exploratory or activity based classroom research and so it encourages the students to learn effectively and understand clearly with more involvement in the classroom. This study suggests a need for the supplementary source and it also focuses on Action Research to aid the teachers.


2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 289-309
Author(s):  
Michael Woolf

The object of this discussion is to explore some of the ways in which Europe has been created and recreated in the American mind and to relate those constructs to the limitations, opportunities and dynamics that may be explored in education abroad. Those constructs represent in part the baggage that students bring with them. In what follows, the structure will recreate the experience of students coming to Europe. The essay explores the baggage they carry; engagement with the European environment and, finally, the process of return. In that structure, which mirrors the experience of the study abroad student, a partial but suggestive set of perspectives emerge that go further than defending the traditional and, instead, present a cogent set of rich realities that collectively create the case for Europe.


Author(s):  
Teresa Yanitska-Panek

Literary education is very important in the process of forming the personality of the individual. It is necessary to implement a number of conditions in order to student’s contact with literature was a great experience. Reading can be seen as a way of man’s existence in the world of symbols and information. Reading can also be a medium through which cultural content reaches to the recipient and enrich and improve his language and engage him emotionally. Reading is an act of great importance, austerity and effort, and at the same time it is an act of preparing the reader and the recipient to the reflection.Many authors emphasize the value of reading, inspired many motives. The authors draw attention to the different attitudes towards reading of the text which have been described by Lech Witkowski, philosopher and pedagogue in 2007. Eight status of the text in the course of reading are specific hints for teachers and non-pedagogical readers how to treat the text. The philosopher’s look on the function of reading puts this ability in a variety of contexts and makes that people interested in reading can become seekers and creative.The reading is determined the following learning outcomes: student reads fluently, correctly, fluently and expressively aloud texts consisting of words discussed during classes. These texts relate to real-life experiences of children and cognitive expectations. A student also understands short texts read silently; student correctly reads aloud texts written own in a notebook and texts stored on a PC. The student working with text by searching for the most beautiful piece. He is also able to distinguish in literary texts the forms such as narrative, description and dialogue.


2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 553-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoko Taguchi ◽  
Joseph Collentine

Isabelli-García, Bown, Plew & Dewey (forthcoming) presented the ‘state of the art’ in research on language learning abroad. Beginning with Carroll's (1967) claim that ‘time spent abroad is one of the most potent variables’ predicting second language (L2) abilities (p. 137), the scope of study-abroad research has grown multifold in guiding theoretical frameworks, empirical methods, and objects of examination. A half-century of work surveyed in Isabelli-García et al.’s review reveals diverse goals of investigation, ranging from studies focusing on documenting learning outcomes, to studies aiming to unveil the process and nature of learning in a study-abroad context.


Author(s):  
Carola Smith

This chapter is a descriptive case study on one community college in California to show how the institution was able to successfully institutionalize study abroad through advocacy, strategic planning, and the cultivation of local, statewide, and international collaborations. Because of the longevity and vitality of the program examined in this particular case study, there is useful insight for other education abroad professionals who are at varying stages of implementing, developing, or institutionalizing study abroad programs at their respective institutions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document