scholarly journals Election Criminal Law Enforcement in the Era of Simultaneous General Election 2019

Author(s):  
Narwanto Narwanto ◽  

This thesis addressed the issue of election criminal law enforcement in the era of simultaneous general election in 2019. Based on data released by The General Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu) there were 2,724 reports and findings of alleged violations of election crimes, which continued with the investigation of 582 cases, closed at the investigation stage there were 132 cases, then closed at prosecuting 41 cases, and ajudicated by the court in 319 cases. Meanwhile, based on the Indonesian Legal Roundtable (ILR) data from the whole cases in electoral crime, 170 cases or 53% were sentenced to conditional or probation. The method of this research is used normative legal research methods (normative juridical). Data research compiled based on suited laws and regulations through statutory approach, case approach, historical approach, comparative approach, and conceptual approach. Furthermore, normatively the data is analyzed based on applicable regulations as positive legal norms by interpreting and constructing statements contained in documents and applicable laws. The results of this study are to reveal and analyze the law enforcement applied in handling election crimes that occurred in simultaneous general elections in 2019. Analyzing the formulation of criminal law in tackling more effective general election crimes for the future through the formulation definite regulations, fair, not multi-interpreted and attend to all parties in equal rights of each individual before the law in order to establish a general election which honest and fair as well as legitimate

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Zulkarnaen Zulkarnaen ◽  
Zainal Asikin ◽  
Amiruddin Amiruddin

This research was conducted to find out how the concept of abuse of authority in criminal acts of corruption after the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration; and How was law enforcement in handling criminal acts of corruption after the enactment of the Law Number 30 of 2014. This research was a normative legal research. The approach used in this research was the statutory approach, the conceptual approach, and the comparative approach. From the results of the study it could be concluded that the concept of abuse of authority in criminal acts of corruption after the entry into force of Law Number 30 of 2024 concerning Government Administration was the Abuse of authority in accordance with Article 17 of Law No. 30 of 2014. Law No. 30 of 2014 focused on preventing abuse of authority. Aspects of criminal acts of corruption were first proven based on administrative law. In the process of law enforcement, if there was indeed an abuse of authority, then it became the basis by law enforcement officials to investigate or investigate allegations of corruption against the abusers of authority, whereas if in testing the abuse of authority by the State Administrative Court, the evidence was not proven, of course these actions could not be used as a basis for conducting investigations.


Lentera Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Ayu Izza Elvany

This paper analyzes how formulation policy of lobster seeds smuggling regulated in Indonesian law to optimize the effectiveness of illegal fishing enforcement, considering penal policy is the basis of criminal law operationalization. This research uses both statute approach and conceptual approach as legal research methods to analyze the issued legal problem. Fishery law in Indonesia regulated in Law No. 45 of 2009 amending Law No. 31 of 2004 concerning Fishery, especially Articles 88 and 16 paragraph (1) which cover the formulation policy of lobster seeds smuggling enforcement. This study will be analyzed into three aspects which are the conduct (the criminal offense), criminal liability, and sentencing system. The result shows that law enforcement regarding the smuggling of lobster seeds in Indonesia is ineffective due to the nonexistence of corporate criminal liability in the fishery law and its sentencing system is lack of both the specific minimum penalty regulation and the penal measures as criminal punishment. However, the draft of the fishery law has already set corporate criminal liability; hence it also regulates the penal measures, in the form of secondary sanctions. Nevertheless, instead of enacting the specific minimum penalty, the draft only determined the maximum penalty as well. Keywords: Formulation Policy, Fishery Law, Lobster Seeds Smuggling.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-82
Author(s):  
I Kadek Andika Setiawan ◽  
I Gusti Bagus Suryawan ◽  
I Wayan Arthanaya

A failed general election will result in a re-election and will certainly require additional budget. The purpose of this research is to find out the mechanism for the implementation of the re-election and to analyze the use of the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget in the implementation of the re-election. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the mechanism for implementing the re-election is a dispute over the results of the disputed General Election, by presidential candidates and members of the legislative candidates through the Constitutional Court decision. The mechanism for the provision of funds from the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget in the implementation of the re-General Election is the submission of additional costs by the General Election Commission to the Budget Institution and the Budget Department to revise the budget for the implementation of General Elections that are undergoing re-election.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-34
Author(s):  
Syailendra Anantya Prawira

General Elections are the embodiments of the mandate stipulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Article 1 paragraph (2) which affirms that "sovereignty is in the hands of the people and carried out according to the Constitution". The Formulation Document that will be formulated in the research are: (1) What is the violation in the general election? And (2) What is law enforcement in general election. The method used in this study is normative legal research, normative legal research methods or library law research methods are methods or procedures that are used in legal research by examining existing library material. Election violations constitute acts prohibited by the Election Law against election organizers resulting in the imposition of sanctions for violations. The enactment of Law Number 7 Year 2017 on General Elections provides for different types of violations, disputes, criminal offenses and electoral disputes. The crime of elections is a criminal offense punishable by a particular punishment based on the criminal justice system. The purpose of election is to carry out popular sovereignty and the realization of the political rights of the people to produce leaders who will occupy important positions in the government.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 500-504
Author(s):  
I Dewa Gede Pramana adhi ◽  
I Nnyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara

Indonesia is a developing country where each region has its own natural wealth. This advantage cannot be used because there are many people who send out of the region without permission and vice versa, goods from outside countries are smuggled into Indonesia only to avoid the applicable taxes. This study aims to examine the regulation of smuggling in criminal law in Indonesia and reveal the responsibility of the director of PT. Garuda Indonesia, which carried out the act of smuggling luxury motorcycles. This research is a type of normative legal research conducted with research methods based on legal materials, while the problem approach used is a legislative and conceptual approach. Sources of data used are primary and secondary legal materials. Another bad example is shown by one of the people who has a big name in Indonesia, the smuggling case by the president of Garuda Indonesia is an illustration of how weak the law in Indonesia is and this incident has resulted in criminal and administrative sanctions. The results of the study indicate that the regulation of smuggling crimes in Indonesia is contained in Law Number 17 of 2006 concerning Customs. Handling of violations of customs provisions is more focused on the fiscal settlement, namely in the form of payment of a sum of money to the State in the form of a fine. The criminal liability of smugglers is regulated in Law No. 17 of 2006 the president director of PT. Garuda Indonesia is threatened with criminal and administrative sanctions


Author(s):  
I Made Tambir

As the gateway to the criminal justice system, law enforcement that carried out by polri always influenced by social change factors. In accordance with the development of law today, polri required to be able to resolve criminal acts by prioritizing restorative justice approach. However it hasn’t been regulated in statutory. The research purposes to describe and analyze the settlement of criminal acts with restorative justice approach in investigation level at the present and the future. The research used normative legal research, using a statute approach, historical approach and comparative approach, using primary and secondary legal materials that collected by a systematic method and then analyzed by descriptive and interpretation techniques. The research show that polri has carried out several policies to answer the community expectations and demands in accordance with the development of law today by issuing several letters and regulations, namely Surat Kapolri No. Pol. B/3022/XII/2009/Sde Ops, ST Kabareskrim No. ST/110/V/2011, STR Kabareskrim No. STR/583/VIII/2012, Perkap 15/2013, Perkap 3/2015, SE Kapolri No. SE/7/VII/2018 and SE Kapolri No. SE/8/VII/2018. In perspective of “ius constituendum,” it is needed criminal law policy to regulate the settlement of criminal acts with restorative justice approach in investigation level, by carrying out a renewal of material criminal law, including the understanding of criminal acts, objectives and guidelins for criminal actions and also renewal of formal criminal law including updating KUHAP, Perkap 14/2012 and Perkap 3/2015. Sebagai pintu gerbang sistem peradilan pidana, penegakan hukum yang dilakukan polri selalu dipengaruhi oleh faktor perubahan sosial. Dalam perkembangan hukum dewasa ini, polri dituntut mampu menyelesaikan tindak pidana dengan mengedepankan pendekatan restorative justice. Akan tetapi hal itu belum diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis pendekatan restorative justice dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana di tingkat penyidikan pada saat ini dan pada masa yang akan datang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif, menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, pendekatan historis, pendekatan perbandingan dan pendekatan konsep, dengan menggunakan bahan-bahan hukum primer dan bahan-bahan hukum sekunder yang dikumpulkan dengan metode sistematis yang selanjutnya dianalisis dengan teknik deskriptif dan interpretasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa polri telah melakukan beberapa kebijakan untuk menjawab harapan dan tuntutan masyarakat sesuai dengan perkembangan hukum dewasa ini dengan menerbitkan beberapa surat dan peraturan, yaitu Surat Kapolri No. Pol. B/3022/XII/2009/Sde Ops, ST Kabareskrim No. ST/110/V/2011, STR Kabareskrim No. STR/583/VIII/2012, Perkap 15/2013, Perkap 3/2015, SE Kapolri No. SE/7/VII/2018 dan SE Kapolri No. SE/8/VII/2018. Dalam perspektif ius constituendum diperlukan kebijakan hukum pidana untuk mengatur penerapan konsep restorative justice dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana di tingkat penyidikan, dengan melakukan pembaharuan hukum pidana materiil, mencakup pengertian tindak pidana, tujuan dan pedoman pemidanaan, serta melakukan pembaharuan hukum pidana formil, mencakup pembaharuan KUHAP, Perkap 14/2012 dan Perkap 3/2015.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.9) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Boy Yendra Tamin ◽  
. .

The high number of corruption cases among government officials in Indonesia cannot be separated from what is the object of the criminal law of corruption, especially since corruption laws in Indonesia do not distinguish between discretion and abuse of authority due to position. This raises the question, can discretion be the legal object of criminal corruption? This legal research is carried out with conceptual approach, statute approach and case approach, it can be concluded that discretion cannot be used as an object of the criminal law of corruption because discretion is not based on the principle of legality. Placing discretion as the object of the law of corruption is inconsistent with the demands of the welfare state. In the use of discretion, it is necessary only to set strict standards and supervision, and the use of discretion with consistent purpose principles. And it must be stated in the Act, that the expression is not the object of corruption.  


Author(s):  
Oleg G. Soloviev ◽  
Yulia O. Goncharova

The article examines the means and techniques of legislative technique as the main primary components of the construction of legal norms, the authors explore the controversial aspects of determining the range of key technical and legal instruments. The authors note the negative aspects in the process of using the tools and techniques of legislative technique in the regulation of criminal law prohibitions. The main technical and legal problems in modern criminal law-making are the unjustified casuistification of dispositions of normative prescriptions, the bulkiness of criminal law prohibitions. In some cases, the volume (capacity) of individual dispositions exceeds 150 words. Such normative decisions significantly complicate the perception of elements of a crime, complicate the assessment and comparison of the committed act with a specific criminal norm. These circumstances negatively affect the qualification process and do not meet the needs of law enforcement practice. Certain gaps are observed in the construction of blank dispositions, in a situation where the legislator uses significant prescriptions borrowed from normative acts of other branches of law in the description of encroachments. The paper also notes, that the rules of legislative technique do not relate to basic structural elements, since they are auxiliary (secondary) components of the legislative process and are already associated with the use of tools and techniques in the course of practical normative design, formation of specific legal prescriptions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Lilik Mulyadi

This article describes some problems of the result of research regarding the shifting of burden of proof upon corruption offences in the Indonesian system of criminal law with regards UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) 2003. There are two basic questions which become the research objections, firstly: to what extent the shifting of burden of proof has been implemented in the criminal court regarding corruption cases, and secondly, to what extent does the legislation policy apply for the shifting of burden of proof in relation with UNCAC 2003. The article uses normative research which regulation, conceptual, case and comparative approach. Such research emphasizes interpretation and legal construction to obtain some legal norms, conception, regulation list and its implementation in concreto cases. Regulation and conceptual approach to used how to know, existention, consistency and harmonization regarding the shifting of burden of proof upon corruption offences in legislation body. The cases approach uses comparative law regarding the reversal burden of proof upon corruption offencer between Indonesia and the other countries. This research shows that the shifting of burden of proof has never yet applied for in the corruption cases Indonesia. Those experiences is not similar with the experiences of against corruption Hong Kong and India, wihich implement the reversal burden of proof by using some approach socalled balanced probability of principles in the relation to the property or asset of defendant comes from. The Indonesian corruption regulation policy, especialy article 12B, 37, 37A, 38B apparently it’s not cleaq and disharmony to norm of sudden charge of fortune the shifting of burden of proof formulation in connection with United Nations Convention Against Corruption 2003(KAK 2003). So, necessary (needs) of modification sudden charge of fortune shifting of burden of proof formulation which preventive, represive and restorative characteristic.  Keywords: Shifting the Burden of Proof, Corruption Offences, Criminal Justice System


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-78
Author(s):  
Ridwan Arifin

The number of general elections in Indonesia, such as in regional head elections, leagislative elections and in the election of president and vice president. In general elections, the president and vice president are often referred to as legislative elections, while the head of the region itself has the title, namely regional head elections only. The proverb says that where there is a rule there will be an offense. Therefore, to avoid any undesirable things, an improvement is needed to deal with this. In order to avoid fraud, in the improvement there is certainly an institution that regulates, namely from the law apparatus, as an apparatus in law enforcement is required to be able to ensure the existence of violations in the implementation of elections only because solely to enforce integrated law. In fact, the general election is always interesting so that it can be investigated, which is contained in the rules, implementation, and in the participants and the community. It certainly determines the success of the general election. If the rules are already felt or considered to be good in its implementation without capable law enforcement so that it will be difficult also in its realization. Good rules and good law enforcers also cannot maximize if the people themselves are ignorant and do not care about existing regulations. So, order between the three of them bound each other. In general elections it does not only involve one or two people, but requires a lot of people, so that the community is required to participate in issuing their opinions. But with so many parties participating in the election, there were many violations of the implementation, for example in 2014, where there were still many violations in general elections. Whereas at that time there was a socialization of the implementation of the general election which was socialized by the KPU and Bawaslu, not only socialization but also from the Bawaslu and its staff who participated in efforts to prevent the occurrence of violations in general elections. Although in the end socialization in prevention still cannot reduce the number of violations that exist. In dealing with this problem the creation of a system can reduce violations during the election, namely the process of synergy of Gakkumdu with the aim of realizing democratic elections in 2019 in the hope that it can provide the effect of clarity and change in carrying out general elections


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document