scholarly journals Sixth report of adverse events with biological treatments in Argentina. BIOBADASAR registry report

2019 ◽  
pp. 4-9
Author(s):  
G. Gómez ◽  
G. Pons-Estel ◽  
G. Citera ◽  
E. Soriano ◽  
V. Saurit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Biological Therapies ◽  
Biological Treatments ◽  
Registry Report

Objective: update the results of the BIOBADASAR registry on safety, duration and causes of treatment interruption after 8 years of follow-up. Methods: BIOBADASAR is a safety record of biological therapies established by the Argentine Society of Rheumatology. The description of BIOBADASAR 3.0 is presented, a cohort of 53 centers in Argentina followed prospectively from August 2010 to January 2018.

Design and implementation of a mobile app for the pharmacotherapeutic follow-up of patients diagnosed with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: eMidCare (Preprint)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Romero-Jimenez ◽  
Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana ◽  
Esther Chamorro-de-Vega ◽  
Arantza Ais-Larisgoitia ◽  
Maria Elena Lobato Matilla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Biological Therapy ◽  
Inflammatory Diseases ◽  
Injection Site Reaction ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Biological Therapies ◽  
Patient Profile ◽  
Immune Mediated

BACKGROUND Pharmacotherapeutic management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) has become more complex due to the development of new treatments, such as biological therapies. Mobile health, especially apps, can provide IMID patients with greater autonomy and facilitate communication with healthcare professionals. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to design and implement an app for remote monitoring and communication with IMID patients. We also assessed the usability of and satisfaction with the app. METHODS A multidisciplinary group comprising pharmacists, dermatologists, rheumatologists, gastroenterologists, and nurses was created to design and develop an app for IMID patients in a tertiary hospital. The app functionalities were identified through a focus group with IMID patients and through an observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study of all available apps for IMID patients at App Store and Play Store platforms. Once the app was designed and developed, we started offering the app to all IMID patients who initiated a new biological therapy. We performed an observational, longitudinal study of patients followed using the app to assess the tool's impact on safety, communication, satisfaction, and usability. The inclusion period was from December 2020 to August 2021. The inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, diagnosis of an IMID, and ownership of a Smartphone. Patients with language barriers were excluded. RESULTS We designed an app (eMidCare®) with the following modules: My Medication, My Questionnaires, Adverse Events, Useful Information, Messages, and Patient Profile. A total of 86 patients were installed with the app (the median age was 48.3 [18.1-79.4] years and 62.4 were female). The median (range) follow-up time for app use was 123 (5-270) days. In the My Medication module, 100% of patients registered their biological therapy and 25.9% also used this module to record each dose of medication administered. A total of 82 adverse events (AEs) were registered. Thirty-two percent of the patients registered at least 1 AE. The most frequent AEs were fatigue, injection site reaction, headache, and nausea. Fifty-two percent of patients used the Messages module to communicate with healthcare professionals. The most frequent messages concerned doubts about managing AEs (26.2%) and drug interactions (18.9%). The satisfaction survey yielded a median (range) score of 9.1 (7-10) out of 10. The app sections that patients browsed for the longest time were Messages (21.9%), Start screen (20.9%), My questionnaires (20.4%), My medication (8.8%), and Adverse events (7.1%). CONCLUSIONS We developed an app, eMidCare®, which reminds patients to take their medication, enables them to record AEs, and helps them communicate with healthcare professionals. Approximately one-third of the patients registered the administration of the biological therapies and registered at least 1 AE. The most used and most satisfactory functionality was communication with health professionals. Patient satisfaction and retention were very high.

scholarly journals 1767. Structured Treatment Interruptions in HIV-Infected Patients Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy—Implications for Future HIV Cure Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S64-S65
Author(s):  
Melanie Stecher ◽  
Annika Y Löhnert ◽  
Florian Klein ◽  
Clara Lehmann ◽  
Christoph Wyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Hiv Cure ◽  
Analytical Treatment ◽  
Meta Regression

Abstract Background Safety and tolerability of analytical treatment interruption (TI) as part of HIV cure studies has been discussed controversially. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we report current evidence for the occurrence of adverse effects during different types of TI. Methods A systematic literature search on studies reporting on TIs was conducted using a defined search term, covering the period from January 1988 to May 2017. All interventional and observational studies were reviewed, and results were extracted based on predefined criteria. We evaluated the proportion of adverse effects during TI by using a random effect meta-analysis model. A meta-regression model was calculated to explore the variation across studies and the influence of key factors. Results We identified 1,048 studies, of which we obtained data from 24 studies investigating TI including 7,961 individuals. Sample sizes varied from 6 to 5,472 subjects. The number of reported events during TI ranged from 0 to 241. Follow-up intervals during TI varied from 2 days up to 3 months. We compared reported adverse effects in studies with long TI (>4 weeks) by the lengths of follow-up intervals, comparing narrow (≤4 weeks) and wide (>4 weeks) follow-up during TI. The proportion of patients exhibiting adverse events during long TI was 1% (95% CI 0–4, I2 = 24.9%) in studies with narrow and 10% (95% CI 5–117, I2 = 95.1%) in studies with wide follow-up intervals, with an overall reported rate of 5% (95% CI: 3–15, z = 3.93, P ≤ 0.00) (Figure 1). The number of reported deaths was relatively low, but higher in studies with wide follow-up compared with studies with narrow follow-up (Figure 2). Meta regression analysis indicated that adverse events were increasing with the length of the monitoring interval (β = 0.75, 95% CI 0.24–1.27, P = 0.007) (Figure 3). Conclusion Current evidence indicates that studies with narrow follow-up intervals did not show a substantial increase of adverse effects other than viral rebound during TI. Analytical treatment interruption may be a safe strategy as part of HIV cure trials if patients undergo intense follow-up routines. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Safety_and_Pharmacokinetics_of_Dapivirine_Delivery.7

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lungwani Muungo
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Hiv Transmission ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Vaginal Fluid ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Vaginal Microbicides ◽  
Intravaginal Rings ◽  
Lower Genital Tract ◽  
The Matrix

Vaginal microbicides for the prevention of HIV transmission maybe an important option for protecting women from infection.Incorporation of dapivirine, a lead candidate nonnucleoside reversetranscriptase inhibitor, into intravaginal rings (IVRs) for sustainedmucosal delivery may increase microbicide product adherence andefficacy compared with conventional vaginal formulations. Twentyfourhealthy HIV-negative women 18–35 years of age were randomlyassigned (1:1:1) to dapivirine matrix IVR, dapivirine reservoir IVR,or placebo IVR. Dapivirine concentrations were measured in plasmaand vaginal fluid samples collected at sequential time points over the33-day study period (28 days of IVR use, 5 days of follow-up). Safetywas assessed by pelvic/colposcopic examinations, clinical laboratorytests, and adverse events. Both IVR types were safe and well toleratedwith similar adverse events observed in the placebo and dapivirinegroups. Dapivirine from both IVR types was successfully distributedthroughout the lower genital tract at concentrations over 4 logs greaterthan the EC50 against wild-type HIV-1 (LAI) in MT4 cells. Maximumconcentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration–time curve(AUC) values were significantly higher with the matrix than reservoirIVR. Mean plasma concentrations of dapivirine were ,2 ng/mL.These findings suggest that IVR delivery of microbicides is a viableoption meriting further study.Key Words: dapivirine, HIV, intravaginal ring, microbicide,pharmacokinetics, prevention

scholarly journals Intermittent treatment interruption and its effect on multidrug resistant tuberculosis treatment outcome in Ethiopia

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Habteyes H. Tola ◽  
Kourosh Holakouie-Naieni ◽  
Mohammad A. Mansournia ◽  
Mehdi Yaseri ◽  
Ephrem Tesfaye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Considerable Proportion ◽  
Adjusted Risk ◽  
Successful Treatment Outcome ◽  
Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Unsuccessful Treatment ◽  
Poor Treatment Outcome

AbstractTreatment interruption is one of the main risk factors of poor treatment outcome and occurrence of additional drug resistant tuberculosis. This study is a national retrospective cohort study with 10 years follow up period in MDR-TB patients in Ethiopia. We included 204 patients who had missed the treatment at least for one day over the course of the treatment (exposed group) and 203 patients who had never interrupted the treatment (unexposed group). We categorized treatment outcome into successful (cured or completed) and unsuccessful (lost to follow up, failed or died). We described treatment interruption by the length of time between interruptions, time to first interruption, total number of interruption episodes and percent of missed doses. We used Poisson regression model with robust standard error to determine the association between treatment interruption and outcome. 82% of the patients interrupted the treatment in the first six month of treatment period, and considerable proportion of patients demonstrated long intervals between two consecutive interruptions. Treatment interruption was significantly associated with unsuccessful treatment outcome (Adjusted Risk Ratio (ARR) = 1.9; 95% CI (1.4–2.6)). Early identification of patients at high risk of interruption is vital in improving successful treatment outcome.

scholarly journals O06 Baseline predictors of methotrexate-related adverse events in methotrexate-naïve patients with RA

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad A Sherbini ◽  
James M Gwinnutt ◽  
Kimme L Hyrich ◽  
Suzanne M M Verstappen ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Prevalence Rates ◽  
Clinical Predictors ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Related Data ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background/Aims  Methotrexate (MTX) is the most common treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The prevalence of adverse events (AEs) associated with MTX treatment for RA have been studied extensively, but there are limited data on the predictors of these AEs. This study aims to summarise the prevalence rates of MTX AEs, including gastrointestinal (GI), neurological, mucocutaneous, and elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) enzyme, and to identify baseline demographic and clinical predictors of these AEs. Methods  The Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication Study (RAMS) is a UK multi-centre prospective cohort study of patients with RA starting MTX for the first time. Relevant demographic, medication, clinical and disease related data were collected at baseline. AEs were reported at six and twelve months follow-ups. The prevalence rates of AEs were calculated based on the proportions of patients who reported having had an AE within one year of follow-up. The associations between candidate baseline predictors and AEs were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Results  A total of 2,089 patients were included with a mean age of 58.4 (standard deviation: 13.5) years, 1390 (66.5%) were women. 1,814 and 1,579 patients completed the 6 and 12 months follow-up visits, respectively. The prevalence rates of the AEs within one year of follow-up were: GI = 777 (40.6%), mucocutaneous = 441 (23.1%), neurological = 487 (25.5%), elevated ALT (> upper limit of normal [ULN]) = 286 (15.5%). Younger age and being a woman were associated with increased risk of GI AEs, (age: OR 0.97 per year increase in age, 95% CI 0.98, 1.00; male sex: OR 0.58 vs female, 95% CI 0.46, 0.74) (Table 1). Higher baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score was an independent predictor of GI, mucocutaneous, and neurological AEs. Furthermore, having ALT >1xULN at baseline or history of diabetes was associated with increased risk of subsequent ALT elevation during the study follow-up. Conclusion  In patients with RA starting MTX, GI AEs were the most commonly reported AEs during the first year of follow-up. The identified predictors of AEs may facilitate discussions between clinicians and patients prior to commencing MTX, and may lead to increased adherence and consequently improved effectiveness. Disclosure  A.A. Sherbini: None. J.M. Gwinnutt: Grants/research support; BMS. K.L. Hyrich: Member of speakers’ bureau; Abbvie. Grants/research support; Pfizer, UCB, BMS. S.M.M. Verstappen: Consultancies; Celltrion. Member of speakers’ bureau; Pfizer. Grants/research support; BMS.

scholarly journals AB0542 EVALUATION OF APREMILAST USE IN THE ROUTINE CLINICAL PRACTICE IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS NAÏVE TO BIOLOGICAL TREATMENTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1303.2-1304
Author(s):  
J. Gratacos-Masmitja ◽  
J. L. Álvarez Vega ◽  
E. Beltrán ◽  
A. Urruticoechea-Arana ◽  
C. Fito-Manteca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Psychiatric Disease ◽  
Biological Therapies ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Disease Evolution ◽  
Biological Treatments

Background:Apremilast is a non-biologic systemic agent approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis, oral ulcers of Behcet’s disease and PsA with proven efficacy in clinical trials [1,2]. However, more real-world evidence of apremilast use and effectiveness is needed to identify the patient profile most likely to benefit from this treatment [3].Objectives:To evaluate the persistence of apremilast treatment in patients with PsA naïve to biological treatments in routine clinical practice and assess its effectiveness. Baseline clinical characteristics on patients who started apremilast were also evaluated.Methods:Observational, prospective, multicenter (20 centers) study including consecutive adult patients with PsA naïve to biological therapies who had started treatment with apremilast during the previous 5 to 7 months and were followed-up during 12 months. Variables recorded were persistence of treatment with apremilast at 6 months (6mo) and number of swelling joints, presence of enthesitis and dactylitis, and disease activity, measured by the Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) score and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of psoriasis, collected at baseline (BL) (i.e., apremilast treatment start) and 6mo; comorbidities were retrospectively collected at BL. Categorical and quantitative variables were compared using McNemar’s and Wilcoxon test, respectively. Data sets analyzed included all assessable patients.Results:Of the 60 patients recruited at the time of this interim analysis, 54 (90.0%) [mean (SD) age 53.4 (13.9) years] were assessable; 41 (75.9%) of these continued treatment with apremilast at 6mo. At BL, 34 (63.0%) patients had at least one comorbidity, the most frequent being cardiovascular disease (n=15, 27.8%), including hypertension (n=8, 14.8%), metabolic/endocrine disease (n=18, 33.3%), including obesity (n=8, 14.8%) and dyslipidemia (n=10, 18.5%). Psychiatric disease (i.e., depression) (n=5, 9.3%) and neoplasia (n=8, 14.8%) were also observed. The number of swelling joints decreased from median (Q1, Q3) 4.0 (2.0, 7.0) at BL to 1.5 (0.0, 4.0) at 6mo (p=0.0012). Patients with dactylitis and enthesitis decreased from 19 (35.2%) and 16 (29.6%) at BL to 10 (18.5%) and 9 (16.7%) at 6mo (p=0.0225 and p=0.0391), respectively. The distribution of patients in the different disease activity categories according to DAPSA scale changed between BL and 6mo, indicating a favorable disease evolution (Figure 1 next page). According to PGA, at BL (n=53), disease activity was categorized as mild in 18.0%, as moderate in 72.0%, and as severe in 10% of patients and, at 6mo (n=54), as mild in 70.6%, as moderate in 25.5%, and as severe in 3.9% of patients. Fifteen (27.8%) patients interrupted treatment permanently (n=13, 24.1%) or temporarily (n=2, 3.7%), due to no/partial response (n=8, 14.8%), tolerability issues leading to adverse events (n=3, 5.6%), patient decision (n=2, 3.7%), and other reasons (n=2, 3.7%) after a mean (SD) treatment of 3.05 (2.20) months.Conclusion:Forty-one (75.9%) patients with PsA naïve to biological therapies were treated with apremilast during ≥6 months. After treatment, the number of swelling joints, and dactylitis and enthesitis decreased and changes in disease activity according to DAPSA and PGA pointed to a favorable disease evolution. Apremilast treatment provides a clinical benefit to patients with PsA treated in clinical practice.References:[1]Gossec L, Smolen JS, Ramiro S, et al. European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2015 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Feb 10;75(3):499 LP-510[2]Torres T and Puig L. Apremilast: A novel oral treatment for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Am J clin Dermatol. 2018 Feb;19(1):23-32[3]Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ et al. Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis 2015. Treatment Recommendations for Psoriatic Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(5):1060– 71.Disclosure of Interests:Jordi Gratacos-Masmitja Speakers bureau: MSD, Pfizer, AbbVie, Janssen Cilag, Novartis, Celgene y Lilly., Consultant of: MSD, Pfizer, AbbVie, Janssen Cilag, Novartis, Celgene y Lilly., José Luis Álvarez Vega Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, MSD, Lilly, Roche, Esteve, UCB, Menarini, Pfizer, GSK, BMS, Janssen, Novartis, Gebro., Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, MSD, Lilly, Roche, Esteve, UCB, Menarini, Pfizer, GSK, BMS, Janssen, Novartis, Gebro., Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, MSD, Lilly, Roche, Esteve, UCB, Menarini, Pfizer, GSK, BMS, Janssen, Novartis, Gebro., Emma Beltrán Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Bristol, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Bristol, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared., C. Fito-Manteca: None declared., Francisco Maceiras: None declared., Joaquin Maria Belzunegui Otano Speakers bureau: Lilly, Amgen, Novartis, Abbvie, Janssen., J. Fernández-Melón Speakers bureau: Amgen SL, Eugenio Chamizo Carmona: None declared., Abad Hernández Speakers bureau: MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, Kern, Novartis, Biogen, Sandoz, Amgen, Sanofi, Lilly, Roche and Janssen-Cilag, Consultant of: MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, Kern, Novartis, Biogen, Sandoz, Amgen, Sanofi, Lilly, Roche and Janssen-Cilag, Grant/research support from: MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, Kern, Novartis, Biogen, Sandoz, Amgen, Sanofi, Lilly, Roche and Janssen-Cilag, Inmaculada Ros Consultant of: Amgen, Grant/research support from: MSD, Roche, Novartis, lilly, Pfizer, Amgen, Eva Pascual Shareholder of: Amgen, Employee of: Amgen, Juan Carlos Torre Speakers bureau: Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, Consultant of: Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer.

OP270 Why The Haute Autorité de Santé Rejects the Widespread Use Of “Mini-Bypass”/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass For Obesity In France

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (S1) ◽  
pp. 4-4
Author(s):  
Jean-Charles Lafarge ◽  
Denis-Jean David ◽  
Cédric Carbonneil
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Severe Obesity ◽  
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Multicenter Rct ◽  
Nutritional Complications

IntroductionOne anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has become a widespread technique over the last few years in France, without any prior assessment and despite existing controversies among bariatric surgeons. An older bypass technique for treating obesity, the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), is available and reimbursed, having been assessed and approved for use in 2005. In 2019, the French Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) assessed OAGB for the treatment of severe and massive obesity. This assessment, the first in the world, was undertaken for OAGBs carried out with a 200- or 150-centimeter biliopancreatic-limb (BP-limb) length.MethodsA systematic review (SR) of the literature and consultation of a working group consisting of both healthcare professionals (clinician and surgeons) and patients were carried out. The primary aim of our assessment was to determine whether the OAGB technique can replace RYGB. The efficacy and safety profile of OAGB was compared with RYGB in adult patients with massive, severe obesity. Complications and postoperative follow up specific to OAGB were identified.ResultsThe three selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could not confirm the superiority or the non-inferiority of OAGB, compared with RYGB, on the selected efficacy endpoints of weight loss, resolution of comorbidities, and quality of life. Adverse events reported for OAGB included severe nutritional complications and bile reflux that could potentially lead to lower esophageal cancer. In one RCT, the frequency of serious adverse events in the OAGB group was almost two times higher than in the RYGB group.ConclusionsHAS considered that OAGB carried out with a longer (200 centimeter) BP-limb is not a validated technique for the surgical treatment of massive, severe obesity. Thus, it cannot be considered an alternative to RYGB. There were insufficient data available on OAGB performed with a 150-centimeter BP-limb. Thus, HAS recommended undertaking a multicenter RCT to assess the efficacy and safety of OAGB. Patients who have already undergone OAGB should receive the same follow up as patients who have received RYGB, including close monitoring for nutritional complications and lower esophageal cancer and an endoscopic examination five years after surgery.

scholarly journals Bioabsorbable Implant for Treatment of Nasal Valve Collapse with or without Concomitant Procedures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas M. Sidle ◽  
Pablo Stolovitzky ◽  
Ellen M. O'Malley ◽  
Randall A. Ow ◽  
Nathan E. Nachlas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Inferior Turbinate ◽  
Nasal Valve ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Nasal Implant ◽  
Nasal Valve Collapse

AbstractThe aim of the study is to report outcomes after treatment of nasal valve collapse with a bioabsorbable nasal implant. It involves two prospective, multicenter, post-market studies evaluating long-term effectiveness of the LATERA implant for severe to extreme nasal obstruction. Participants underwent implant alone or with concomitant inferior turbinate reduction (ITR) and/or septoplasty. Outcome measures included the change from baseline Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores, NOSE responder rates, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and adverse events. A total cohort of 277 participants (109 implants only, 67 implants + ITR, 101 implants + septoplasty + ITR) enrolled at 19 U.S. centers was available for analysis with 177 participants (69 implants only, 39 implants + ITR, 69 implants + septoplasty + ITR) available at 2 years. The mean changes from baseline in NOSE scores and VAS scores were statistically significant (p < 0.001) at all follow-up periods. The baseline NOSE score of 77.8 ± 13.6 was improved to 24.2 ± 23.6 at 24 months. Greater than 90% of participants were NOSE responders across all follow-up periods, 6.1% withdrew for lack of treatment effect. The baseline VAS score of 66.7 ± 18.8 was improved to 21.1 ± 23.9 at 24 months. There were no serious adverse events related to the device or implant procedure. Implant retrieval rate was 4.0% (22/543 implants). Nonserious adverse events were mild to moderate in severity, typically occurred within 6 months of implant, and resolved or were stable. Significant reductions in NOSE and VAS scores and high responder rates from our large population of patients with nasal obstruction who had nasal valve implants confirm sustained effectiveness at 24 months after treatment. The studies are registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02952313 and NCT02964312).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document