scholarly journals Restrukturisasi Budaya Hukum Kejaksaan Dalam Penuntutan Sebagai Independensi di Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia

SASI ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 571
Author(s):  
Appludnopsanji Appludnopsanji ◽  
Pujiyono Pujiyono
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Contextual Approach ◽  
System Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Know How ◽  
Ambiguous Position

The position of the prosecutor's office which is under two powers namely executive and judiciary causes the prosecutor's office to become an institution that is not independent and free, thus causing blemishes to commit fraud by prosecutors. This study aims to find out how the reality of the independence of prosecutors in prosecution and know how the cultural rearrangement for prosecutors in prosecution as a process of the criminal justice system. Research methods The research method uses normative research through a conceptual approach and a statue approach. The results showed that the ambiguous position of the prosecutor made the prosecutor hesitant in carrying out their duties, was not independent and was not free and there was a judicial mafia. With regard to this condition, re-structuring of the prosecutor's independence in prosecution is needed. This is intended so that the prosecutor's office becomes an independent institution by integrally restructuring the legal culture together with other criminal justice sub-systems through a religious approach, contextual approach and comparative approach

scholarly journals Prevention of the Crime of Using Narcotics by Children as a Form of Opened System

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 603-609
Author(s):  
Mohamad Syarhan ◽  
◽  
Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya ◽  
Bambang Hartono
Keyword(s):  
Political Economy ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Community Involvement ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Education Technology ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Problems

This study aimed to find a model for the prevention of the use of narcotics by children as a form of the opened system. This needs to be done because seeing the number of users and dealers carried out by children. It is very concerned if children continuously carry out these actions. The research method used is a type of normative juridical research with a statute and conceptual approach. The technique of collecting data is through a library study by tracing secondary data. This study found that there are still many legal problems experienced by children, including criminal cases of narcotics use by children in Kuningan Regency and Padang City. This behavior requires prevention that does not harm the child's future. This prevention can be implemented through the criminal justice system as an open system, where the settlement requires community involvement. Its implementation will consider the existing layers, including; society, political economy, education, technology, and the criminal justice system's subsystems.

scholarly journals Comparison of Rechterlijk Pardon Concept on 2019 Criminal Code Draft and Article 70 Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning Juvenile Criminal Justice System

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 603-622
Author(s):  
Irma Yuliawati
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Physical Development ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Existing Problems ◽  
Sense Of Justice

The formulation of the idea of ​​​​forgiving judges (rechterlijk pardon) in the Draft Criminal Code is motivated by the rigidity and inhumanity of the current Criminal Code. Which resulted in small cases that were decided criminal, because the current Criminal Code does not accommodate the authority of judges to forgive cases that are considered unfit to be sentenced. This modification of the rechterlijk pardon concept is expected to reflect a sense of justice, benefit within the framework of Pancasila as a source of law for the Indonesian nation. In contrast to the concept of rechterlijk pardon in Article 70 of Law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, which has previously applied the concept, to minimize the imposition of crimes against children which should not be based on appropriate retaliation for the crimes committed, because it will be fatal to the physical and physical development of children. To answer the existing problems the author uses a qualitative approach with normative juridical research on the statute approach, conceptual approach and comparative approach. The use of this normative qualitative analysis method is closely related to the problems discussed in comparative approach and conceptual approach, so that it takes the form of descriptive-analytical. The results of this research comparison show that the forgiveness of judges in the Criminal Code Bill needs to categorize the types of minor/moderate/serious crimes and what crimes are forgiven categorized based on the material law itself must also adjust to the implementing rules.

scholarly journals The Position of Constitutional Complaint in the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-78
Author(s):  
Agsel Awanisa ◽  
Yusdianto Yusdianto ◽  
Siti Khoiriah
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
South Korea ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Case Number

The purpose of this research is to determine the constitutional complaint mechanism based on comparisons in other countries, practices, and adaptation of constitutional complaints under the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Many cases with constitutional complaint substance have been submitted to the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia even though they don’t have this authority. This research uses a normative legal research method using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, a comparative approach, and a case approach. This research indicates that the constitutional complaint mechanism in Germany, South Korea, and South Africa has been well implemented. In practice, cases with constitutional complaint substance are filed to the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia by changing the form by using the legal means of a judicial review, such as case number 16/PUU-VI/ 2008, case number 140/PUU-XIII/2015 and case number 102/PUU-VII/2009. Due to the consideration of the structure, substance, and culture of law, adaptation of constitutional complaint within the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia needs to be carried out by amending Law Number 24 of 2003 jo. Law Number 7 of 2020 concerning the Constitutional Court.

scholarly journals Constitutional Protection For Crime Victims And Witnesses In Indonesia And Its Problems

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-62
Author(s):  
John Kenedi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Crime Victims ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Constitutional Protection ◽  
Unfair Treatment ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Constitutional Protections

The constitutional protections toward crime witnesses in Indonesia are indisputably inevitable. As an effort to uphold justice, Indonesia relies on the formal mechanism of criminal law known as the criminal justice system. The system starts from reports by the police, prosecution by the prosecutor, to the stage of a trial in a court, and execution in a prison. Throughout its development, the criminal justice system seemed to focus more on protecting criminal offenses (criminal oriented) rather than paying attention to the rights of witnesses and victims (witness and victim-oriented). Therefore, the studies that concern the rights of witnesses and victims are highly needed in order to figure out ways to balance the treatment between the suspects/defendants and the witnesses and victims. Through the use of the statue approach and conceptual approach, the positions and the rights of legal protection for witnesses and victims are thoroughly captured and described in this current research. Besides, the factors causing uneven attention and unfair treatment toward crime victims are also specifically identified.

scholarly journals Cyber Espionage Sebagai Ancaman Terhadap Pertahanan Dan Keamanan Negara Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-25
Author(s):  
Evi Dwi Hastri
Keyword(s):  
Cyber Security ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
National Defense ◽  
Cyber Defense ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Cyber Espionage ◽  
The Stability

This research aims to analyze the norms that have a blur (Vague Norm) against Cyber Espionage related to Indonesia's legal ability to accommodate Cyber Espionage attacks. In addition, this study also aims to analyze Indonesia's efforts to overcome the Cyber Espionage attack that could threaten the stability of national defense and security. The type of research in the legal research method used is normative juridical with three problem approaches, namely the Statute Approach, Conceptual Approach, and Comparative Approach. Primary and secondary legal materials that have been collected will be processed through deductive methods and an analysis of legal materials is carried out, namely by systematic interpretation and extentive interpretation. So based on the results of the discussion, then there is a Vague Norm about Cyber Espionage that affects Indonesian law in accommodating. The efforts taken by Indonesia to deal with Cyber Espionage outside of juridical efforts began with the preventive efforts of Cyber Security and Cyber Defense, optimizing the role of the TNI, BIN, and POLRI as national resources in defending the country's defense.

scholarly journals Implantation of the Accusatory Criminal Justice System in Mexico

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (56) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Luis Arturo Rivas Tovar ◽  
Gustavo Adolfo Pérez Rojas ◽  
Juan Blas Arriaga
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Organizational Design ◽  
Participant Observation ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Strategic Orientation ◽  
Organizational Characteristic ◽  
And Performance

Este es un artículo de reflexión que describe la evolución del proceso de implantación del sistema de justicia penal en México. El método de investigación fue la observación participante y la investigación--acción como resultado de la participación en diecisiete seminarios de prediagnóstico en los estados de la república mexicana. Las categorías de análisis fueron las siguientes: características de organización y desempeño del órgano implementador federal Secretariado Técnico para la reforma del sistema de justicia penal (Setec), modelo de evaluación de avances de la reforma, tipología de implantaciones de la reforma y resultados del seminario de prediagnóstico de implantación en diecisiete entidades. Como resultado de lo anterior se concluye que la reforma ha avanzado en México a cuatro velocidades, que la Setec ha tenido un bajo desempeño como órgano implementador debido a sus constantes cambios de líderes y a su desestructurada orientación estratégica y su diseño organizativo y que d mejor modelo de implantación es el que se hace por regiones y que los sistemas de justicia estudiados, siendo muy diferentes en tamaño y complejidad, comparten una problematica común.This is an article of reflection that describes the evolution of the process of implanting the Criminal Justice System in Mexico. The research method used was that of participant observation and action-research as a result of participation in 17 pre-diagnosis seminars in the states of the Mexican republic. The analysis categories were the following: organizational characteristic. and performance of the implementing agency - the Technical Secretariat for Reform of the Criminal Justice System (SETEC), the model for evaluating advances in the reform, typology of implantations of the reform and results of the implantation pre-diagnosis seminar in 17 entities. As a result of the above, it was concluded that: the reform has advanced at four different speeds in Mexico, the SETEC has had poor performance as an implementing entity due to constant changes of its leaders and its unstructured strategic orientation and its organizational design, and the best model of implantation is that which is done by regions and that the justice systems studied, while very different in size and complexity, share common problematic characteristics. 

scholarly journals INFRA PETITA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI YANG MENEROBOS KETENTUAN PEMIDANAAN MINIMUM

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Anshar Anshar ◽  
Suwito Suwito
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Corruption Case

ABSTRAKPenanganan perkara tindak pidana korupsi menganut sistem pemidanaan minimum bagi pelaku yang diputus bersalah oleh pengadilan. Istilah ketentuan pidana minimum khusus secara normatif diatur dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999, sebagaimana telah diubah menjadi Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Pada tataran praktiknya terdapat fenomena adanya putusan pengadilan yang menerobos sistem pemidanaan minimum yang dianut tersebut. Salah satu contoh putusan pengadilan yang ditelaah dalam tulisan ini adalah Putusan Nomor 2399 K/PID.SUS/2010. Permasalahan yang timbul adalah apa saja yang menjadi landasan infra petita hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan yang menerobos ketentuan pemidanaan minimum dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi tersebut. Metode dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang. Penulis berkesimpulan bahwa putusan pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi yang menerobos ketentuan pemidanaan minimum dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi pada dasarnya diperbolehkan. Sepanjang putusan hakim yang infra petita tersebut memiliki esensi ratio legis yang kuat dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan, atas dasar alasan pertimbangan nilai keadilan dan pertimbangan judex factie sebagaimana pada perkara a quo.Kata kunci: putusan, korupsi, pemidanaan minimum. ABSTRACT In the handling of a corruption case, mandatory minimum penalty is adopted in the criminal justice system for the offender who was found guilty by the court. The term ‘mandatory minimum penalty’ is normatively regulated in Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law Number 31 of 1999, as amended to Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption Eradication. In practice there is a phenomenon of a court decision breaching the adopted mandatory minimum penalty. One example of a court decision analyzed hereon is the Decision Number 2399 K/PID.SUS/2010. The arising problem is what the consideration of the judge is for infra petita in imposing decision which breached the mandatory minimum penalty provision in that corruption case. This research uses normative legal research method with legislation approach. It can be concluded that it is basically permissible in the corruption court’s decision to breach the minimum penalty provisions as stipulated in the Corruption Eradication Law. Provided that the judge’s decision of infra petita, is based on strong legislation ratio and can be accounted for, on the basis of justice value and judex factie considerations as in the a quo case. Keywords: court decision, corruption, minimum penalty.

scholarly journals Pemenuhan Hak Rekreasional Terhadap Narapidana Anak Di Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak Banda Aceh

Media Iuris ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 265
Author(s):  
Zulyani Mahmud ◽  
Zahratul Idami ◽  
Suhaimi Suhaimi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Musical Instruments ◽  
Inhibitory Factors ◽  
Justice Process ◽  
Criminal Justice Process ◽  
The Right ◽  
Banda Aceh

This article discusses and describes the task of the Banda Aceh Special Development Institute (LPKA) in providing guidance and fulfilling the rights of children in lpka. Law No. 11 of 2012 on the child criminal justice system in Article 3 states that every child in the criminal justice process has the right to conduct recreational activities, but in fact the fulfillment of children’s recreational rights has not been carried out to the maximum while in LPKA. The research method used is empirical juridical research method. The results showed the granting of Recreational Rights has not been running optimally, from within the LPKA is done by giving a schedule of play to students on holidays, activities carried out are playing volleys and playing musical instruments, activities outside lpka is to be a guest at discussion events held by other parties. not clearly regulated how the granting of recreational rights, the granting of recreational rights is done only on the basis of the policy of the Head of LPKA. Inhibitory factors in the absence of a special budget for the granting of recreational rights.Keywords: Fullfillment; Right; Recreational; Child Prisioner.Artikel ini membahas dan menganilis tugas Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak (LPKA) Banda Aceh dalam memberikan pembinaan dan mempenuhi hak-hak anak di dalam LPKA, Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang sistem peradilan pidana anak dalam Pasal 3 menyebutkan bahwa setiap anak dalam proses peradilan pidana berhak melakukan kegiatan rekreasional, Namun dalam faktanya pemenuhan hak rekreasional anak belumlah terlaksana dengan maksimal selama di LPKA. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian yuridis empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukan pemberian Hak Rekreasional belum berjalan maksimal, dari dalam LPKA dilakukan dengan cara memberikan jadwal bermain kepada anak didik di hari libur, kegiatan yang dilakukan adalah bermain volley dan bermain alat musik, kegiatan di luar LPKA yaitu menjadi tamu pada acara-acara diskusi yang di selenggarkan pihak lain. tidak diatur secara jelas bagaimana pemberian hak rekreasional tersebut, pemberian hak rekreasional dilakukan hanya atas dasar kebijakan Kepala LPKA. Faktor Penghambat tidak adanya anggaran khusus untuk pemberian hak rekreasional.Kata Kunci: Pemenuhan; Hak; Rekreasional; Narapidana Anak.

OPTIMALISASI ASAS OPORTUNITAS PADA KEWENANGAN JAKSA GUNA MEMINIMALISIR DAMPAK PRIMUM REMEDIUM DALAM PEMIDANAAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-236
Author(s):  
Yodi Nugraha
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
The Public

In the Indonesian criminal justice system, every public prosecutor possesses the authority to cease criminal prosecution in the name of public interest. In contrast, in the Netherland, only the Attorney General (Procureur Generaal) at the Supreme Court has this authority.  This article discusses this authority to cease of terminate criminal prosecution in the name of public interest.  To do this a comparative approach is used in which the ruling of this authority to terminate criminal prosecution as found in the Draft of the Indonesian Criminal Code will be compared against the same regulation and policy used in the Netherlands.  A doctrinal and comparative law approach will be used. One recommendation resulting from this research is the need to re-evaluate the existing procedure and requirement of terminating criminal prosecution in the public interest in the Indonesian context and the introduction of Rechter-Commissaris into the criminal justice system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document