scholarly journals A Comparison between Bupivacaine Alone and Bupivacaine with Tramadol in Epidural Block for Postoperative Pain Management

Esculapio ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4 (oct 2020 - dec 2020)) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saadia Khaleeq ◽  
Azib Ali ◽  
Sahir Shafiq ◽  
Muhammad Muazzam Butt ◽  
Mudassar Aslam ◽  
...  

Objective: This study was designed to compare the mean pain score with bupivacaine versus tramadol plus bupivacaine in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. Randomized Controlled Study. Anesthesia department of SIMS medical college/Services Hospital, Lahore. Duration is 13 months from 20th August2017 till 24th September 2018. Method: 80 patients aged 20-60 years of ASA I & II status, undergoing elective surgery were selected. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (Group A and B) of 40 each, using random numbers table. An epidural catheter was placed at L3-L4 intervertebral level. Group A was given 30 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine and Group B was given 25mg Tramadol plus 0.125% bupivacaine mixture in the same volume. General anesthesia was induced with IV Propofol 2mg/kg and atracurium 0.5mg/kg. After recovery from anesthesia, patients were shifted to HDU. Post-operative pain was assessed using the 10-point VAS score. Injection nalbuphine 0.1mg/kg was given as rescue analgesic when VAS score became more than 4. Results: The mean age of patient in Group A was 37.5 ± 9.1 years and 38.6 ± 7.0 years in Group B. Mean BMI in Group A was 33.2 ± 4.3 and 32.2 ± 4.2 in Group B. The mean pain score after 12 hours of surgery was 3.6 ± 0.8 in Group A and 1.5 ± 0.9 in Group B, p value was significant. Conclusion: Thus, the present study concludes that epidural administration of tramadol as adjuvant with bupivacaine is more effective in postoperative pain relief as compared to bupivacaine alone. Key Words: Bupivacaine, Epidural, Postoperative pain, Tramadol. How to Cite: Khaleeq S, Ali A, Shafiq S, Butt M M, Aslam M, Jehangir MU. A Comparison between Bupivacaine alone and Bupivacaine with Tramadol in epidural block for postoperative pain management. Esculapio.2021;17(1): page number. Esculapio.2020;16(04):101-104.

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa C. Kir ◽  
Gulay Kir

Objective: Postoperative pain is a frequent problem after orthopedic procedures like hallux valgus surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether ankle block improves early and mid-term functional outcomes and postoperative pain management after hallux valgus surgery in patients receiving general anesthesia. Subjects and Methods: This randomized controlled trial investigated 60 patients who underwent hallux valgus surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were prospectively randomized into 2 groups: general anesthesia only (group A) and ankle block added to general anesthesia (group B). Age, body-mass index, tourniquet time, duration of surgery, first analgesic need time, perioperative analgesic regimen, visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), and length of hospital stay were recorded. Independent variables were analyzed by t test. Nonparametric data were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Patient age, demographics, and body mass indices were similar between the 2 groups. The average length of hospital stay was significantly longer in group A (p < 0.01). Group B had a longer time to first analgesic need than group A (p < 0.01). Patients in group B required less analgesic during the postoperative period. Preoperative VAS and AOFAS scores were not statistically dif ferent between the 2 groups. The postoperative day 1 VAS score was significantly lower in group B than in group A. Follow-up visits at 3, 6, and 12 months showed significantly lower VAS and higher AOFAS scores in group B than group A. Conclusion: Ankle block added to general anesthesia may improve early and mid-term postoperative functional outcomes and postoperative pain management in patients who undergo hallux valgus surgery.


2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
Abdullah Al Maruf ◽  
Iqbal Hosain Chowdhury ◽  
Kazi Ashkar Lateef ◽  
Manzoorul Haq Laskar ◽  
Md Mustafa Kamal

The purpose of the study was to compare the analgesic effectiveness of epidural administration of ketamine mixed bupivacaine with fentanyl mixed bupivacaine in the management of postoperative pain. This prospective study was carried out in CMH, Bogra in one calendar year from July 2004 to June 2005. For postoperative pain management 100 patients of both sex, age ranging between 20 to 50 years, ASA physical status I and II scheduled for lower abdominal, pelvic and inguinal surgery were included in the study. All patients were divided into two groups. Epidural catheter was inserted in each patient through space between L3 to L2. Surgery was done under epidural anaesthesia in both groups. In group A (n=50) surgery was done with 0.5% bupivacaine and fentanyl (bupivacaine 1.5 ml/segment + fentanyl 2?g/ml). In group B (n=50) surgery was done with 0.5% bupivacaine and ketamine (bupivacaine 1.5ml/segment + ketamine 0.3mg/kg body weight). Epidural analgesia was continued in postoperative ward with 6 ml 0.25% bupivacaine + fentanyl 2?g/ml in group A and with 6 ml 0.25% bupivacaine + ketamine 0.3mg/kg bodyweight in group B, 4 hourly for 24 hours. The efficacy of analgesia was assessed by using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). Mean VAS and mean VRS were less than 3 in both groups, which proved adequate postoperative analgesia. Differences of mean VAS and mean VRS between two groups were statistically not significant. Haemodynamic parameters, respiration and oxygenation were within normal range in both groups. Postoperative complications, like inadequate analgesia, post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), headache and vertigo were less in both groups. It was observed that epidural administration of both bupivacaine mixed with ketamine and bupivacaine mixed with fentanyl found safe, effective and tolerable for postoperative pain management. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v22i1.18097 Journal of BSA, 2009; 22(1): 21-25


QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E F Ebied ◽  
A A Khalil ◽  
A I I Soliman

Abstract Background Hernia is a common problem of the modern world with an incidence ranging from 5%-7%. Of all groin hernias, around 75% are inguinal hernias. Recently with advancement in laparoscopy, endoscopic repairs seem to offer better quality of life, decreasing hospital stay and early return to work. Aim of the Work To compare between self fixating mesh and non self fixating mesh in laproscopic inguinal hernia repair transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach as regards intraoperative time, complications, postoperative pain, return to normal activity and incidence of recurrence. Patients and Methods This study was conducted on 30 adult patients presenting with inguinal hernias. They were divided into 2 equal groups of 15 patients each. The first group (A): includes fifteen patients and was operated upon by a Laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernioplasty technique using self -gripping (SGM group) (Parietex ProGrip] Laparoscopic (PPL) meshes), while the second group (B): includes fifteen patients and were operated upon by a Laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernioplasty technique with non-self fixating mesh. Results The postoperative pain assessment at 24 hours and 4 weeks shows that the mean VAS score for GROUP A was (3.70 ± 1.72) and for GROUP B (3.90 ± 1.25) while after 1 month duration follow up, the mean VAS score was (1.25 ± 0.79) for Group A and (1.20 ± 0.77) for Group B with no difference between the two groups confirming the atraumatic nature of the self gripping mesh. Conclusion After this comparative study, both mesh fixation with absorpable tacks and fixation using SGM approaches are similarly effective in terms of operative time, the incidence of recurrence, complications and chronic pain coinciding with all the available literature.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (08) ◽  
pp. 1359-1364
Author(s):  
Sara Jamil ◽  
Rizwan Jouhar ◽  
Dinaz Gandhi ◽  
Tayyaba Tahira ◽  
Jamshed Shaikh

Endodontic Pain if occurs after few hours or days after the treatment indicates a poor pathosis and a bad prognosis in long term, due to this a newer generation of instruments for canal treatment has been introduced from Ni-Ti alloy which has even better ability to shape narrow and curved root canals, without causing aberration. To compare the mean postoperative pain score after manual SS (stainless steel) K-files and mechanical Ni-Ti rotary path files in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of Operative Dentistry, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Karachi. Period: 6 months from 01-10-2017 to 30-03-2018. Materials and Methods: Total 60 patients of irreversible pulpitis with moderate pain score ≥5 were included and divided equally in manual stainless-steel k-files and mechanical Ni-Ti rotary path files groups. Treatment was started with local anesthesia. Patients were recalled after 24 hours and the level of postoperative pain was examined. T-test was applied to compare the outcome in both groups. Stratification was done using t-test and P value ≤0.05 was significantly considered. Results: The mean pre-treatment VAS in group-A and group-B was 7.16±1.44 and 7.86±1.38 respectively. Mean post-treatment VAS in group-A and group-B was 2.33±1.02 and 1.10±0.66 respectively. A significant difference between the pre and post op pain was noted between the two groups, when compared after 24hours by using VAS. Conclusion: Mean post-operative pain score was significantly less with NiTi rotary path files as compare to manual stainless steel K-files.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1188
Author(s):  
B. Srinivasulu Reddy ◽  
G. Pratapa Reddy

Background: Pain pathway has profound implications for management of acute pain and provoked interest in the use of pre-emptive analgesia and new methods of postoperative pain management with new agents like opioid and non-opioid drugs either independently or in combination. The objective of the study was to study efficacy of Ketamine Hcl and Tramadol Hcl (preservative free) by epidural route for lower abdominal surgeries.Methods: This study has been conducted on hundred patients in the age group of 20 to 50 years. These patients have undergone various lower abdominal surgeries, gynecological and surgical procedures. Failed epidurals, catheter kinking, catheter migration and dural puncture cases are excluded from the study. The patients were divided into two groups namely Group-A and Group-B, with 50 patients in each group.Results: Both groups were similar in terms of age, sex and weight. In Group-A patients who received 30 mg of Ketamine, the mean time of onset of analgesia being 17.01+2.65 minutes compared to 12.18+2.28 minutes in Group -B patients who received 100 mg of tramadol, In Group-A the mean time of duration of analgesia is 6.75+0.46 hours compared to 9.36+0.84 hours in Group-B. Nausea and vomiting (24% vs. 2%), urinary retention (4% vs. 2%) was more in group B compared to group A patients. Backache was equal in both the group patients (6% vs. 6%). Pain on injection more in group A patients i.e. 8% compared to only 2% in patients who belonged to group B.Conclusions: Epidural tramadol is superior to epidural ketamine for postoperative pain relief.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (04) ◽  
pp. 677-681
Author(s):  
Afiya Zulfikar ◽  
Usman Qureshi ◽  
Muhammad Salman Shafique ◽  
Jahangir Sarwar Khan

Objectives: To compare open hemorrhoidectomy with internal sphincterotomy versus open hemorrhoidectomy alone in terms of frequency of the postoperative pain. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Surgical Unit - I, Holy family Hospital, Rawalpindi. Period: For one year  i.e. from January 2016 to December 2016. Material & Methods: 250 patients were divided in two equal groups by lottery method. The surgical procedure was performed using standard protocols after obtaining written informed consent. Anal dilatation was done  after open hemorrhoidectomy in patients of control group (Group A). In the study group (Group B), the patients were subjected to lateral internal sphincterotomy after completion of classical open hemorrhoidectomy. Postoperative pain score was recorded by using visual analog scale. Difference between both groups for pain was analyzed using chi-square test. Results: There were 68 males and 57 females in Group-A and 61 males and 64 females in Group-B. The mean age of patients in Group-A was 33.10±8.77years and in Group-B was 32.52±9.4years. The mean pain score of patients in Goup-A and Group-B was 2.82±2.51 and 1.59±1.58 respectively (P<0.05). In Group-A, 94 (75.2%) cases had no pain while in Group-B, 116 (92.8%) cases were pain free following the procedure. The difference between both groups was significant i.e. P < 0.05. Conclusion: Open hemorrhoidectomy with internal sphincterotomy is effective in reducing postoperative pain.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 514-518
Author(s):  
Sadaf Ghulam Rasul ◽  
Uzma Yaqub ◽  
Maida Manzoor ◽  
Hafsa Mubasshar

Endometriosis is an estrogen-regulated disease, and is signified by the existence of a particular endometrial tissue exterior to the uterus. It is a principal cause of long lasting morbidity, mostly from serious pelvic pain(1). Endometriotic tissue has the potential for aromatase gene expression that leads to aromataseand estrogen production. Danazol is a synthetic androgen whereas Letrozole is aromatase inhibitor. This study was conducted to compare the mean decrease in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score with Danazol versus Letrozole for the pain management of endometriosis in females. A total of 140 females fulfillinginclusion criteria were registered and an non-probability purposive technique of sampling was used. Diagnostic laparoscopy was conducted to make a diagnosis of endometriosis. Females were divided into two groups. Females in group A received treatment with Letrozole tablets (2.5 mg/day) and in group B receivedDanazol tablets (600 mg/day) for 3 months. Pelvic pain was assessed using VAS score and the mean decrease in pain score was assessed between two groups using independent sample student t-test. Results of this study demonstrate that the mean age of the patients was 29.99±5.80 and the mean pain score before treatment in Letrozole group was 3.04±1.01 while in Danazol group was 5.05±1.02. Post-three months of treatments, mean pain score was 2.01±0.95 and 2.78±0.99 in Letrozole and Danazol groups, respectively. The mean decrease in pain score in Letrozole group was 1.02±1.09 (p-value=0.00) while in Danazol group; it was 3.06±1.23 (p-value=0.00). This difference in pain score was considerably different in both treatment groups. A higher decrease in pain score was observed in Danazol compared to Letrozole treated groups.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Lemming ◽  
Gary Fang ◽  
Marcia L. Buck

OBJECTIVES Use of lidocaine as part of a multimodal approach to postoperative pain management has increased in adults; however, limited information is available regarding safety and tolerability in pediatrics. This study's primary objective was to evaluate the incidence of adverse effects related to lidocaine infusions in a sample of pediatric patients. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted in pediatric patients receiving lidocaine infusion for the management of postoperative analgesia at the University of Virginia Health System. RESULTS A total of 50 patients with 51 infusions were included in the final analysis. The median patient age was 14 years (range, 2–17 years). The most frequent surgeries were spinal fusion (30%), Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum (16%), and nephrectomy (6%). The mean ± SD starting rate was 13.6 ± 6.5 mcg/kg/min. The mean infusion rate during administration was 15.2 ± 6.3 mcg/kg/min, with 14.4 ± 6.2 mcg/kg/min at discontinuation. The mean length of therapy was 30.6 ± 22 hours. A total of 12 infusions (24%) were associated with adverse effects, primarily neurologic ones, including paresthesias in the upper extremities (10%) and visual disturbances (4%). The average time to onset was 16.2 ± 15.2 hours. Seven infusions were discontinued, whereas the remaining infusions resulted in either dose reduction or continuation without further incident. No patients experienced toxicity requiring treatment with lipid emulsion. CONCLUSIONS In this sample, lidocaine was a well-tolerated addition to multimodal postoperative pain management in the pediatric population. Although adverse effects were common, they were mild and resolved with either dose reduction or discontinuation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-61
Author(s):  
Md Mustafa Kamal ◽  
Abdullah Al Maruf ◽  
Sabina Yeasmeen ◽  
Abdul Hye

Background Most spinal surgery is painful and good postoperative analgesia is important. Opioids are the traditional first-line treatment. Ketorolac has been used for postoperative pain relief. However, there is no data available about controlling postoperative pain with ketorolac after open lumbar discectomy or laminectomy in Bangladesah. Objective To compare the efficacy of a Parentral ketorolac with conventional opioid for management of postoperative pain after lumbar disectomy or laminectomy. Methods Sixty patients who underwent lumbar disectomy or laminectomy were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A (n = 30) patients received 30 mg intramuscular ketorolac upon surgical closure and every 6 hours for 24 hours and intramuscular pethidine 1.5 mg/kg/b.w. as needed (PRN). Group B (n = 30) patients received only intramuscular pethidine 1.5 mgkg-1/b.w. every 6 hours for 24 hours and as needed (PRN). Postoperative analgesia was assessed in both groups by Visual Analogue Scale at arrival in postoperative ward and at 6, 12 and 24 hours for 24 hours. Total postoperative narcotic consumption and side effects like post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), dizziness, urinary retention and pruritus were also recorded. Results Baseline data were comparable between the two groups. The mean VAS almost similar and less than 3 at different reading in both groups which indicate adequate postoperative analgesia and the differences were statistically not significant. The mean total cumulative amount of pethidine administered over 24 hrs period was less in group A it was 64.31+19.13 mg where as in group B was 161.23+21.25 mg. and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). Incidences of side effects like PONV, urinary retention and pruritus were more in group B than group A and differences were statistically significant (p<0.01). Conclusion For postoperative pain management after lumbar spine surgery both ketorolac and traditional parental opioid found effective. Total opioid consumption is significantly less with ketorolac and side effects like PONV, dizziness, urinary retention and pruritus were more with opioid alone. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v23i2.18175 Journal of BSA, 2009; 23(2): 56-61


Author(s):  
Lupi Lestari ◽  
Elizeus Hanindito ◽  
Arie Utariani

Introduction: Effective postoperative pain management provides improved patient comfort and satisfaction, earlier mobilization, fewer pulmonary and cardiac complications, reduced risk deep vein thrombosis, fast recovery, and reduced cost of care. Preemptive analgesia, initiated before the surgical procedure to prevent pain in the early postoperative period, has the potential to be more effective than a similar analgesic treatment initiated after surgery. As a part of multimodal analgesia, the use of NSAIDs should always be considered for acute postoperative pain management. NSAIDs can be used preoperatively as a part of the preemptive regimen and for postoperative pain control to increase the efficacy of opioids and reduce its side effects. Material and Method: This research was experimental research with a case-control design of the study. The samples separated into two groups, the first group got ketoprofen suppository before the induction, and the second group didn’t get the ketoprofen suppository The intensity of pain measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) or Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale was the variable studied at different postoperative times (30 min, 60 min, 120 min, 2-6 hours, 6-12 hours). The total amount of rescue analgesics (fentanyl) and side effects were other variables of this study. Result and Discussion: The result is ketoprofen suppository as preemptive analgesia administrations can reduce postoperative pain. Numeric Rating Scale was significantly lower in the ketoprofen group compared to the control group (p < 0,05) at 30 min, 60 min, 230 min, 2-6 hours, 6-12 hours. The number of postoperative analgesics needed in the recovery room was significant differences among both groups (p < 0,05). Conclusion: Preemptive analgesia in patients who underwent an operation with general anesthesia with ketoprofen suppository was effectively in blocking noxious stimuli and central sensitization, with subsequent prevention of acute postoperative pain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document