Meteorological and cloud conditions during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition

Abstract. The Arctic Ocean 2018 (AO2018) expedition took place in the central Arctic Ocean in August and September 2018. An extensive suite of instrumentation provided detailed measurements of surface water chemistry and biology, sea ice and ocean physical and biogeochemical properties, surface exchange processes, aerosols, clouds, and the state of the atmosphere. The measurements provide important information on the coupling of the ocean and ice surface to the atmosphere and in particular to clouds. This paper provides: (i) an overview of the synoptic-scale atmospheric conditions and its climatological anomaly to help interpret the process studies and put the detailed observations from AO2018 into a larger context, both spatially and temporally; (ii) a statistical analysis of the thermodynamic and near-surface meteorological conditions, boundary layer, cloud, and fog characteristics; (iii) a comparison of the results to observations from earlier Arctic Ocean expeditions, in particular AOE96, SHEBA, AOE2001, ASCOS, ACSE, and AO2016, to provide an assessment of the representativeness of the measurements. The results show that near-surface conditions were broadly comparable to earlier experiments, however the thermodynamic vertical structure was quite different. An unusually high frequency of well-mixed boundary layers up to about 1 km depth occurred, and only a few cases of the prototypical Arctic summer single-layer stratocumulus deck were observed. Instead, an unexpectedly high amount of multiple cloud layers and mid-level clouds was present throughout the campaign. These differences from previous studies are related to the high frequency of cyclonic activity in the central Arctic in 2018.

Download Full-text

Meteorological and cloud conditions during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics ◽

10.5194/acp-21-289-2021 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

pp. 289-314 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jutta Vüllers ◽

Peggy Achtert ◽

Ian M. Brooks ◽

Michael Tjernström ◽

John Prytherch ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Arctic Ocean ◽

High Frequency ◽

Heat Budget ◽

Mixed Boundary ◽

The Arctic ◽

Central Arctic Ocean ◽

Surface Water Chemistry ◽

Near Surface ◽

The Arctic Ocean ◽

Arctic Summer

Abstract. The Arctic Ocean 2018 (AO2018) took place in the central Arctic Ocean in August and September 2018 on the Swedish icebreaker Oden. An extensive suite of instrumentation provided detailed measurements of surface water chemistry and biology, sea ice and ocean physical and biogeochemical properties, surface exchange processes, aerosols, clouds, and the state of the atmosphere. The measurements provide important information on the coupling of the ocean and ice surface to the atmosphere and in particular to clouds. This paper provides (i) an overview of the synoptic-scale atmospheric conditions and their climatological anomaly to help interpret the process studies and put the detailed observations from AO2018 into a larger context, both spatially and temporally; (ii) a statistical analysis of the thermodynamic and near-surface meteorological conditions, boundary layer, cloud, and fog characteristics; and (iii) a comparison of the results to observations from earlier Arctic Ocean expeditions – in particular AOE1996 (Arctic Ocean Expedition 1996), SHEBA (Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean), AOE2001 (Arctic Ocean Experiment 2001), ASCOS (Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study), ACSE (Arctic Clouds in Summer Experiment), and AO2016 (Arctic Ocean 2016) – to provide an assessment of the representativeness of the measurements. The results show that near-surface conditions were broadly comparable to earlier experiments; however the thermodynamic vertical structure was quite different. An unusually high frequency of well-mixed boundary layers up to about 1 km depth occurred, and only a few cases of the “prototypical” Arctic summer single-layer stratocumulus deck were observed. Instead, an unexpectedly high amount of multiple cloud layers and mid-level clouds were present throughout the campaign. These differences from previous studies are related to the high frequency of cyclonic activity in the central Arctic in 2018.

Download Full-text

An Evaluation of Surface Atmospheric Changes over the Arctic Ocean for 2000–09 Using Recent Reanalyses

Earth Interactions ◽

10.1175/ei-d-14-0012.1 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 19 (2) ◽

pp. 1-18 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ayan H. Chaudhuri ◽

Rui M. Ponte

Keyword(s):

Arctic Ocean ◽

Extreme Event ◽

Longwave Radiation ◽

Remotely Sensed ◽

Surface Radiation ◽

Shortwave Radiation ◽

The Arctic ◽

Near Surface ◽

The Arctic Ocean ◽

Ice Retreat

Abstract The authors examine five recent reanalysis products [NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR), Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA), Japanese 25-year Reanalysis Project (JRA-25), Interim ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-Interim), and Arctic System Reanalysis (ASR)] for 1) trends in near-surface radiation fluxes, air temperature, and humidity, which are important indicators of changes within the Arctic Ocean and also influence sea ice and ocean conditions, and 2) fidelity of these atmospheric fields and effects for an extreme event: namely, the 2007 ice retreat. An analysis of trends over the Arctic for the past decade (2000–09) shows that reanalysis solutions have large spreads, particularly for downwelling shortwave radiation. In many cases, the differences in significant trends between the five reanalysis products are comparable to the estimated trend within a particular product. These discrepancies make it difficult to establish a consensus on likely changes occurring in the Arctic solely based on results from reanalyses fields. Regarding the 2007 ice retreat event, comparisons with remotely sensed estimates of downwelling radiation observations against these reanalysis products present an ambiguity. Remotely sensed observations from a study cited herewith suggest a large increase in downwelling summertime shortwave radiation and decrease in downwelling summertime longwave radiation from 2006 and 2007. On the contrary, the reanalysis products show only small gains in summertime shortwave radiation, if any; however, all the products show increases in downwelling longwave radiation. Thus, agreement within reanalysis fields needs to be further checked against observations to assess possible biases common to all products.

Download Full-text

Arctic Ocean State-Changes: Self Interests and Common Interests

The Yearbook of Polar Law Online ◽

10.1163/22116427-91000026 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 511-525

Author(s):

Paul Arthur Berkman

Keyword(s):

Arctic Ocean ◽

The Arctic ◽

International Governance ◽

State Change ◽

Central Arctic Ocean ◽

Nation States ◽

Free Region ◽

The Arctic Ocean ◽

Challenges And Opportunities ◽

State Changes

Abstract Environmental and geopolitical state-changes are the underlying first principles of the diverse stakeholder positioning in the Arctic Ocean. The Arctic Ocean is changing from an ice-covered region to an ice-free region during the summer, which is an environmental state-change. As provided under the framework of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the central Arctic Ocean currently involves “High-Seas” (beyond the “Exclusive Economic Zones”) and the underlying “Area” of the deep-sea floor (beyond the “Continental Shelves”). Governance applications of this ‘donut’ demography – with international space surrounded by sovereign sectors – would be a geopolitical state-change in the Arctic Ocean. International governance strategies and applications for the central Arctic Ocean have far-reaching implications for the stewardship of other international spaces, which between Antarctica and the ocean beyond national jurisdictions account for nearly 75 percent of the Earth’s surface. In view of planetary-scale strategies for humankind, with frameworks such as climate, the Arctic Ocean underscores the challenges and opportunities to balance the governance of nation states and international spaces centuries into the future.

Download Full-text

Sea Ice Enhancements to Polar WRF*

Monthly Weather Review ◽

10.1175/mwr-d-14-00344.1 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 143 (6) ◽

pp. 2363-2385 ◽

Cited By ~ 40

Author(s):

Keith M. Hines ◽

David H. Bromwich ◽

Lesheng Bai ◽

Cecilia M. Bitz ◽

Jordan G. Powers ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Arctic Ocean ◽

Snow Depth ◽

Arctic Sea Ice ◽

The Arctic ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

Surface Model ◽

Sea Ice Thickness ◽

Near Surface ◽

The Arctic Ocean

Abstract The Polar Weather Research and Forecasting Model (Polar WRF), a polar-optimized version of the WRF Model, is developed and made available to the community by Ohio State University’s Polar Meteorology Group (PMG) as a code supplement to the WRF release from the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). While annual NCAR official releases contain polar modifications, the PMG provides very recent updates to users. PMG supplement versions up to WRF version 3.4 include modified Noah land surface model sea ice representation, allowing the specification of variable sea ice thickness and snow depth over sea ice rather than the default 3-m thickness and 0.05-m snow depth. Starting with WRF V3.5, these options are implemented by NCAR into the standard WRF release. Gridded distributions of Arctic ice thickness and snow depth over sea ice have recently become available. Their impacts are tested with PMG’s WRF V3.5-based Polar WRF in two case studies. First, 20-km-resolution model results for January 1998 are compared with observations during the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean project. Polar WRF using analyzed thickness and snow depth fields appears to simulate January 1998 slightly better than WRF without polar settings selected. Sensitivity tests show that the simulated impacts of realistic variability in sea ice thickness and snow depth on near-surface temperature is several degrees. The 40-km resolution simulations of a second case study covering Europe and the Arctic Ocean demonstrate remote impacts of Arctic sea ice thickness on midlatitude synoptic meteorology that develop within 2 weeks during a winter 2012 blocking event.

Download Full-text

Light-absorbing impurities in Arctic snow

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions ◽

10.5194/acpd-10-18807-2010 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 10 (8) ◽

pp. 18807-18878 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

S. J. Doherty ◽

S. G. Warren ◽

T. C. Grenfell ◽

A. D. Clarke ◽

R. E. Brandt

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Arctic Ocean ◽

Greenland Ice Sheet ◽

Surface Energy Budget ◽

The Arctic ◽

Arctic Canada ◽

Near Surface ◽

Near Ultraviolet ◽

The Arctic Ocean ◽

Snow Samples

Abstract. Absorption of radiation by ice is extremely weak at visible and near-ultraviolet wavelengths, so small amounts of light-absorbing impurities in snow can dominate the absorption of solar radiation at these wavelengths, reducing the albedo relative to that of pure snow, contributing to the surface energy budget and leading to earlier snowmelt. In this study Arctic snow is surveyed for its content of light-absorbing impurities, expanding and updating the 1983–1984 survey of Clarke and Noone. Samples were collected in Alaska, Canada, Greenland, Svalbard, Norway, Russia, and the Arctic Ocean during 2005–2009, on tundra, glaciers, ice caps, sea ice, frozen lakes, and in boreal forests. Snow was collected mostly in spring, when the entire winter snowpack is accessible for sampling. Sampling was carried out in summer on the Greenland ice sheet and on the Arctic Ocean, of melting glacier snow and sea ice as well as cold snow. About 1200 snow samples have been analyzed for this study. The snow is melted and filtered; the filters are analyzed in a specially designed spectrophotometer system to infer the concentration of black carbon (BC), the fraction of absorption due to non-BC light-absorbing constituents and the absorption Ångstrom exponent of all particles. The reduction of snow albedo is primarily due to BC, but other impurities, principally brown (organic) carbon, are typically responsible for ~40% of the visible and ultraviolet absorption. The meltwater from selected snow samples was saved for chemical analysis to identify sources of the impurities. Median BC amounts in surface snow are as follows (nanograms of carbon per gram of snow): Greenland 3, Arctic Ocean snow 7, melting sea ice 8, Arctic Canada 8, Subarctic Canada 14, Svalbard 13, Northern Norway 21, Western Arctic Russia 26, Northeastern Siberia 17. Concentrations are more variable in the European Arctic than in Arctic Canada or the Arctic Ocean, probably because of the proximity to BC sources. Individual samples of falling snow were collected on Svalbard, documenting the springtime decline of BC from March through May. Absorption Ångstrom exponents are 1.5–1.7 in Norway, Svalbard, and Western Russia, 2.1–2.3 elsewhere in the Arctic, and 2.5 in Greenland. Correspondingly, the estimated contribution to absorption by non-BC constituents in these regions is ~25%, 40%, and 50%, respectively. It has been hypothesized that when the snow surface layer melts some of the BC is left at the top of the snowpack rather than being carried away in meltwater. This process was observed in a few locations and would cause a positive feedback on snowmelt. The BC content of the Arctic atmosphere has declined markedly since 1989, according to the continuous measurements of near-surface air at Alert (Canada), Barrow (Alaska), and Ny-Ålesund (Svalbard). Correspondingly, the new BC concentrations for Arctic snow are somewhat lower than those reported by Clarke and Noone for 1983–1984, but because of methodological differences it is not clear that the differences are significant.

Download Full-text

Parameterization of vertical chlorophyll a in the Arctic Ocean: impact of the subsurface chlorophyll maximum on regional, seasonal and annual primary production estimates

Biogeosciences Discussions ◽

10.5194/bgd-10-1345-2013 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

pp. 1345-1399 ◽

Cited By ~ 22

Author(s):

M. Ardyna ◽

M. Babin ◽

M. Gosselin ◽

E. Devred ◽

S. Bélanger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Primary Production ◽

Arctic Ocean ◽

Empirical Model ◽

Ocean Color ◽

The Arctic ◽

Winter Period ◽

Substantial Impact ◽

Near Surface ◽

Chl A ◽

The Arctic Ocean

Abstract. Predicting water-column phytoplankton biomass from near-surface measurements is a common approach in biological oceanography, particularly since the advent of satellite remote sensing of ocean color (OC). In the Arctic Ocean, deep subsurface chlorophyll maxima (SCMs) that significantly contribute to primary production (PP) are often observed. These are neither detected by ocean color sensors nor accounted for the primary production models applied to the Arctic Ocean. Here, we assemble a large database of pan-Arctic observations (i.e. 5206 stations) and develop an empirical model to estimate vertical chlorophyll a (chl a) according to: (1) the shelf-offshore gradient delimited by the 50 m isobath, (2) seasonal variability along pre-bloom, post-bloom and winter periods, and (3) regional differences across ten sub-Arctic and Arctic seas. Our detailed analysis of the dataset shows that, for the pre-bloom and winter periods, as well as for high surface chl a concentration (chl asurf; 0.7–30 mg m−3) throughout the open water period, the chl a maximum is mainly located at or near the surface. Deep SCMs occur chiefly during the post-bloom period when chl asurf is low (0–0.5 mg m−3). By applying our empirical model to annual chl asurf time series, instead of the conventional method assuming vertically homogenous chl a, we produce novel pan-Arctic PP estimates and associated uncertainties. Our results show that vertical variations in chl a have a limited impact on annual depth-integrated PP. Small overestimates found when SCMs are shallow (i.e. pre-bloom, post-bloom > 0.05 mg m−3 and the winter period) somehow compensate for the underestimates found when SCMs are deep (i.e. post-bloom < 0.05 mg m−3). SCMs are, however, important seasonal features with a substantial impact on depth-integrated PP estimates, especially when surface nitrate is exhausted in the Arctic Ocean and where highly stratified and oligotrophic conditions prevail.

Download Full-text

Drivers of sea ice decline in the Fram Strait and north of Svalbard

10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13529 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Agata Grynczel ◽

Agnieszka Beszczynska-Moeller ◽

Waldemar Walczowski

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Arctic Ocean ◽

Ice Cover ◽

Atlantic Water ◽

The Arctic ◽

Fram Strait ◽

Atmospheric Conditions ◽

The North ◽

The Arctic Ocean ◽

Atlantic Origin

The Arctic Ocean is undergoing rapid change. Satellite observations indicate significant negative Arctic sea ice extent trends in all months and substantial reduction of winter sea ice in the Atlantic sector. One of the possible reasons can be sought in the observed warming of Atlantic water, carried through Fram Strait into the Arctic Ocean. Fram Strait, as well as the region north of Svalbard, play a key role in controlling the amount of oceanic heat supplied to the Arctic Ocean and are the place of dynamic interaction between the ocean and sea ice. Shrinking sea ice cover in the southern part of Nansen Basin (north of Svalbard) and shifting the ice edge in Fram Strait are driven by the interplay between increased advection of oceanic heat in the Atlantic origin water and changes in the local atmospheric conditions.Processes related to the loss of sea ice and the upward transport of heat from the layers of the Arctic Ocean occupied by the Atlantic water are still not fully explored, but higher than average temperature of Atlantic inflow in the Nordic Seas influence the upper ocean stratification and ice cover in the Arctic Ocean, in particular in the north of Svalbard area. The regional sea ice cover decline is statistically signifcant in all months, but the largest changes in the Nansen Basin are observed in winter season. The winter sea ice loss north of Svalbard is most pronounced above the core of the inflow warm Atlantic water. The basis for this hypothesis of the research is that continuously shrinking sea ice cover in the region north of Svalbard and withdrawal of the sea ice cover towards the northeast are driven by the interplay between increased oceanic heat in the Atlantic origin water and changes in the local atmospheric conditions, that can result in the increased ocean-air-sea ice exchange in winter seasons. In the current study we describe seasonal, interannual and decadal variability of concentration, drift, and thickness of sea ice in two regions, the north of Svalbard and central part of the Fram Strait, based on the satellite observations. To analyze the observed changes in the sea ice cover in relation to Atlantic water variability and atmospheric forcing we employ hydrographic data from the repeated CTD sections and new atmospheric reanalysis from ERA5. Atlantic water variability is described based on the set of summer synoptic sections across the Fram Strait branch of the Atlantic inflow that have been occupied annually since 1996 under the long-term observational program AREX of the Institute of Oceanology PAS. To elucidate driving mechanisms of the sea ice cover changes observed in different seasons in Fram Strait and north of Svalbard we analyze changes in the temperature, heat content and transport of the Atlantic water and describe their potential links to variable atmospheric forcing, including air temperature, air-ocean fluxes, and changes in wind pattern and wind stress.

Download Full-text

Sediment archives from the Arctic Ocean provide evidence for massive remobilization of permafrost carbon in Siberia during the last glacial termination

10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-18643 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Jannik Martens ◽

Birgit Wild ◽

Tommaso Tesi ◽

Francesco Muschitiello ◽

Matt O’Regan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Arctic Ocean ◽

Large Scale ◽

Sediment Cores ◽

The Arctic ◽

Last Deglaciation ◽

Central Arctic Ocean ◽

Last Glacial ◽

The Arctic Ocean ◽

Siberian Shelf ◽

The Last Glacial

Environmental archives and carbon cycle models suggest that climate warming during the last deglaciation (the transition from the last glacial to the Holocene) caused large-scale thaw of Arctic permafrost, followed by the release of previously freeze-locked carbon. In addition to changing oceanic circulation and outgassing of CO2 trapped in the deep glacial ocean, organic carbon (OC) release from thawing permafrost might have contributed to the rise in atmospheric CO2 by 80 ppmv or ~200 Pg C between 17.5 and 11.7 kyr before present (BP). The few Arctic sediment cores to date, however, lack either temporal resolution or reflect only regional catchments, leaving most of the permafrost OC remobilization of the deglaciation unconstrained.Our study explores the flux and fate of OC released from permafrost to the Siberian Arctic Seas during the last deglaciation. The Arctic Ocean is the main recipient of permafrost material delivered by river transport or collapse of coastal permafrost, providing an archive for current and past release of OC from thawing permafrost. We studied isotopes (&#916;14C-OC, &#948;13C-OC) and terrestrial biomarkers (CuO-derived lignin phenols, n-alkanes, n-alkanoic acids) in a number of sediment cores from the Siberian Shelf and Central Arctic Ocean to reconstruct source and fate of OC previously locked in permafrost.The composite record of three cores from the Laptev, East Siberian and Chukchi Seas suggest a combination of OC released by deepening of permafrost active layer in inland Siberia and by thermal collapse of coastal permafrost during the deglaciation. Coastal erosion of permafrost during the deglaciation suggests that sea-level rise and flooding of the Siberian shelf remobilized OC from permafrost deposits that covered the dry shelf areas during the last glacial. A sediment core from the Central Arctic Ocean demonstrates that this occurred in two major pulses; i) during the B&#248;lling-Aller&#248;d (14.7-12.9 kyr BP), but most strongly ii) during the early Holocene (11-7.6 kyr BP). In the early Holocene, flooding of 80% of the Siberian shelf amplified permafrost OC release to the Arctic Ocean, with peak fluxes 10-9 kyr BP one order of magnitude higher than at other times in the Holocene.It is likely that the remobilization of permafrost OC by flooding of the Siberian shelf released climate-significant amounts of dormant OC into active biogeochemical cycling and the atmosphere. Previous studies estimated that a pool of 300-600 Pg OC was held in permafrost covering Arctic Ocean shelves during the last glacial maximum; one can only speculate about its whereabouts after the deglaciation. Present und future reconstructions of historical remobilization of permafrost OC will help to understand how important permafrost thawing is to large-scale carbon cycling.

Download Full-text

Large-scale temperature and salinity changes in the upper Canadian Basin of the Arctic Ocean at a time of a drastic Arctic Oscillation inversion

Ocean Science ◽

10.5194/os-9-447-2013 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 9 (2) ◽

pp. 447-460 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

P. Bourgain ◽

J. C. Gascard ◽

J. Shi ◽

J. Zhao

Keyword(s):

Solar Radiation ◽

Arctic Ocean ◽

Large Scale ◽

Arctic Oscillation ◽

The Arctic ◽

Near Surface ◽

Beaufort Gyre ◽

The Pacific ◽

The Arctic Ocean ◽

Canadian Basin

Abstract. Between 2008 and 2010, the Arctic Oscillation index over Arctic regions shifted from positive values corresponding to more cyclonic conditions prevailing during the 4th International Polar Year (IPY) period (2007–2008) to extremely negative values corresponding to strong anticyclonic conditions in 2010. In this context, we investigated the recent large-scale evolution of the upper western Arctic Ocean, based on temperature and salinity summertime observations collected during icebreaker campaigns and from ice-tethered profilers (ITPs) drifting across the region in 2008 and 2010. Particularly, we focused on (1) the freshwater content which was extensively studied during previous years, (2) the near-surface temperature maximum due to incoming solar radiation, and (3) the water masses advected from the Pacific Ocean into the Arctic Ocean. The observations revealed a freshwater content change in the Canadian Basin during this time period. South of 80° N, the freshwater content increased, while north of 80° N, less freshening occurred in 2010 compared to 2008. This was more likely due to the strong anticyclonicity characteristic of a low AO index mode that enhanced both a wind-generated Ekman pumping in the Beaufort Gyre and a possible diversion of the Siberian River runoff toward the Eurasian Basin at the same time. The near-surface temperature maximum due to incoming solar radiation was almost 1 °C colder in the southern Canada Basin (south of 75° N) in 2010 compared to 2008, which contrasted with the positive trend observed during previous years. This was more likely due to higher summer sea ice concentration in 2010 compared to 2008 in that region, and surface albedo feedback reflecting more sun radiation back in space. The Pacific water (PaW) was also subjected to strong spatial and temporal variability between 2008 and 2010. In the Canada Basin, both summer and winter PaW signatures were stronger between 75° N and 80° N. This was more likely due to a strong recirculation within the Beaufort Gyre. In contrast, south of 75° N, the cooling and warming of the summer and winter PaW, respectively, suggest that either the PaW was less present in 2010 than in 2008 in this region, and/or the PaW was older in 2010 than in 2008. In addition, in the vicinity of the Chukchi Sea, both summer and winter PaW were significantly warmer in 2010 than in 2008, as a consequence of a general warming trend of the PaW entering in the deep Arctic Ocean as of 2008.

Download Full-text

Does the Summer Arctic Frontal Zone Influence Arctic Ocean Cyclone Activity?

Journal of Climate ◽

10.1175/jcli-d-15-0755.1 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 29 (13) ◽

pp. 4977-4993 ◽

Cited By ~ 25

Author(s):

Alex D. Crawford ◽

Mark C. Serreze

Keyword(s):

Arctic Ocean ◽

Large Scale ◽

Frontal Zone ◽

External Source ◽

The Arctic ◽

Cyclone Activity ◽

Central Arctic Ocean ◽

The Arctic Ocean ◽

Summer Maximum ◽

Horizontal Temperature Gradients

Abstract Extratropical cyclone activity over the central Arctic Ocean reaches its peak in summer. Previous research has argued for the existence of two external source regions for cyclones contributing to this summer maximum: the Eurasian continent interior and a narrow band of strong horizontal temperature gradients along the Arctic coastline known as the Arctic frontal zone (AFZ). This study incorporates data from an atmospheric reanalysis and an advanced cyclone detection and tracking algorithm to critically evaluate the relationship between the summer AFZ and cyclone activity in the central Arctic Ocean. Analysis of both individual cyclone tracks and seasonal fields of cyclone characteristics shows that the Arctic coast (and therefore the AFZ) is not a region of cyclogenesis. Rather, the AFZ acts as an intensification area for systems forming over Eurasia. As these systems migrate toward the Arctic Ocean, they experience greater deepening in situations when the AFZ is strong at midtropospheric levels. On a broader scale, intensity of the summer AFZ at midtropospheric levels has a positive correlation with cyclone intensity in the Arctic Ocean during summer, even when controlling for variability in the northern annular mode. Taken as a whole, these findings suggest that the summer AFZ can intensify cyclones that cross the coast into the Arctic Ocean, but focused modeling studies are needed to disentangle the relative importance of the AFZ, large-scale circulation patterns, and topographic controls.

Download Full-text

Meteorological and cloud conditions during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition