High-resolution and high-accuracy  global ionosphere maps estimated by GNSS and LEO constellations: simulative and real data experimental results

Author(s):  
Xiaodong Ren ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Xiaohong Zhang

<p>Global ionospheric total electron content (TEC) map has been employed in many high-precision areas. However, its spatial and temporal resolution is not ideal since the ground-based Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) stations distributed unevenly. Fortunately, many low earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellations will provide a large number of observations that can be used for ionospheric monitoring in the future. In this contribution, we presented two methods, which are the single-layer normalization (SLN) method and the dual-layer superposition (DLS) method, for ionospheric modeling based on the simulative and real data of GNSS+LEO satellites.</p><p>For simulative data, a constellation with 192 LEO satellites is simulated. And then,  the global ionospheric maps (GIMs) are estimated by all Multi-GNSS and simulative LEO satellite observations. The results showed that the root mean square (RMS) is reduced by approximately 25% and 21% for SLN method and DLS method, respectively. For real data,  20 available scientific LEO satellites, such as Jason-2/3, COSMIC-1/-2, Swarm missions, etc.,  are employed in the ground-based GNSS ionospheric modeling. The results showed that the differences between the ionospheric model estimated by GNSS+LEO and that by GNSS data are mainly over the oceanic region, which may exceed ±20 TECU. The improvement of RMS over the oceanic region is about 15% for the ionospheric model estimated by GNSS+LEO. The RMS of the ionospheric model improved approximately 4.0% compared with that by GNSS data using the dSTEC assessment method.</p>

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liangliang Yuan ◽  
Shuanggen Jin ◽  
Mainul Hoque

The differential code bias (DCB) of the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) receiver should be precisely corrected when conducting ionospheric remote sensing and precise point positioning. The DCBs can usually be estimated by the ground GNSS network based on the parameterization of the global ionosphere together with the global ionospheric map (GIM). In order to reduce the spatial-temporal complexities, various algorithms based on GIM and local ionospheric modeling are conducted, but rely on station selection. In this paper, we present a recursive method to estimate the DCBs of Global Positioning System (GPS) satellites based on a recursive filter and independent reference station selection procedure. The satellite and receiver DCBs are estimated once per local day and aligned with the DCB product provided by the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE). From the statistical analysis with CODE DCB products, the results show that the accuracy of GPS satellite DCB estimates obtained by the recursive method can reach about 0.10 ns under solar quiet condition. The influence of stations with bad performances on DCB estimation can be reduced through the independent iterative reference selection. The accuracy of local ionospheric modeling based on recursive filter is less than 2 Total Electron Content Unit (TECU) in the monthly median sense. The performance of the recursive method is also evaluated under different solar conditions and the results show that the local ionospheric modeling is sensitive to solar conditions. Moreover, the recursive method has the potential to be implemented in the near real-time DCB estimation and GNSS data quality check.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (20) ◽  
pp. 3354
Author(s):  
Yang Wang ◽  
Yibin Yao ◽  
Liang Zhang ◽  
Mingshan Fang

Ionospheric delay is a crucial error source and determines the source of single-frequency precise point positioning (SF-PPP) accuracy. To meet the demands of real-time SF-PPP (RT-SF-PPP), several international global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) service (IGS) analysis centers provide real-time global ionospheric vertical total electron content (VTEC) products. However, the accuracy distribution of VTEC products is nonuniform. Proposing a refinement method is a convenient means to obtain a more accuracy and consistent VTEC product. In this study, we proposed a refinement method of a real-time ionospheric VTEC model for China and carried out experiments to validate the model effectiveness. First, based on the refinement method and the Centre National d’Études Spatiales (CNES) VTEC products, three refined real-time global ionospheric models (RRTGIMs) with one, three, and six stations in China were built via GNSS observations. Second, the slant total electron content (STEC) and Jason-3 VTEC were used as references to evaluate VTEC accuracy. Third, RT-SF-PPP was used to evaluate the accuracy in the positioning domain. Results showed that even if using only one station to refine the global ionospheric model, the refined model achieved a better performance than CNES and the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE). The refinement model with six stations was found to be the best of the three refinement models.


GPS Solutions ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liangliang Yuan ◽  
Mainul Hoque ◽  
Shuanggen Jin

AbstractThe differential code biases (DCBs) of the global positioning system (GPS) receiver onboard low-Earth orbit (LEO) satellites are commonly estimated by a local spherical symmetry assumption together with the known GPS satellite DCBs from ground-based observations. Nowadays, more and more LEO satellites are equipped with GPS receivers for precise orbit determination, which provides a unique chance to estimate both satellite and receiver DCBs without any ground data. A new method to estimate the GPS satellite and receiver DCBs using a network of LEO receivers is proposed. A multi-layer mapping function (MF) is used to combine multi-LEO satellite data at varying orbit heights. First, model simulations are conducted to compare the vertical total electron content (VTEC) derived from the multi-layer MF and the reference VTEC obtained from the empirical ionosphere model International Reference Ionosphere and Global Core Plasmasphere Model. Second, GPS data are collected from five LEO missions, including ten receivers used to estimate both the satellite and receiver DCBs simultaneously with the multi-layer MF. The results show that the GPS satellite DCB solutions obtained from space-based data are consistent with ground-based solutions provided by the Centre for Orbit Determination in Europe. The proposed normalization procedure combining topside observations from different LEO missions has the potential to improve the accuracies of satellite DCBs of Global Navigation Satellite Systems as well as the receiver DCBs onboard LEO satellites, although the number of LEO missions and spatial–temporal coverage of topside observations are limited.


Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leszek P. Błaszkiewicz ◽  
Paweł Flisek ◽  
Kacper Kotulak ◽  
Andrzej Krankowski ◽  
Wojciech Lewandowski ◽  
...  

Pulsars’ signals reaching the atmosphere can be considered being stable under certain assumptions. In such a case the ionosphere remains the main factor distorting signal from the extraterrestrial sources, particularly if we observe them at long radio waves. In this article we present the results of the analysis of relative peak flux changes for two selected pulsars: PSR J0332+5434 (B0329+54) and PSR J1509+5531 (B1508+55), observed with the long radio wave sensor (The PL612 Low Frequency Array (LOFAR) station in Bałdy), together with the analysis of Rate of TEC (ROT) parameter changes measured with the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) sensor (IGS LAMA station (IGS: International GSSN Service)). The main objective of the work is to find if the rapid plasma density (observed with the Rate of Total Electron Content (TEC)) has a counterpart in the pulsar observation characteristics. This focuses the attention on ionosphere influence during pulsar investigations at low radio frequencies. Additionally, what was the aim of this work, our results give reasons for using pulsar signals from LOFAR together with GNSS data as multi instrumental ionosphere state probes. Our results show a clear anti-correlation between the ROT and the pulsar profile’s peak flux trends.


Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 443
Author(s):  
Ye Wang ◽  
Lin Zhao ◽  
Yang Gao

In the use of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) to monitor ionosphere variations by estimating total electron content (TEC), differential code biases (DCBs) in GNSS measurements are a primary source of errors. Satellite DCBs are currently estimated and broadcast to users by International GNSS Service (IGS) using a network of GNSS hardware receivers which are inside structure fixed. We propose an approach for satellite DCB estimation using a multi-spacing GNSS software receiver to analyze the influence of the correlator spacing on satellite DCB estimates and estimate satellite DCBs based on different correlator spacing observations from the software receiver. This software receiver-based approach is called multi-spacing DCB (MSDCB) estimation. In the software receiver approach, GNSS observations with different correlator spacings from intermediate frequency datasets can be generated. Since each correlator spacing allows the software receiver to output observations like a local GNSS receiver station, GNSS observations from different correlator spacings constitute a network of GNSS receivers, which makes it possible to use a single software receiver to estimate satellite DCBs. By comparing the MSDCBs to the IGS DCB products, the results show that the proposed correlator spacing flexible software receiver is able to predict satellite DCBs with increased flexibility and cost-effectiveness than the current hardware receiver-based DCB estimation approach.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Freeshah ◽  
Xiaohong Zhang ◽  
Erman Şentürk ◽  
Xiaodong Ren ◽  
Muhammad Arqim Adil ◽  
...  

<p>Natural hazards such as shallow earthquakes and volcanic explosions are known to generate acoustic and gravity waves at infrasonic velocity to propagate in the atmosphere layers. These waves could induce the layers of the ionosphere by change the electron density based on the neutral particles and free electrons coupling. Recently, some studies have dealt with some manmade hazards such as buried explosions and underground nuclear explosions which could cause a trigger to the ionosphere. The Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) provide a good way to measure ionospheric total electron content (TEC) through the line of sight (LOS) from satellite to receiver. The carrier-to-code leveling (CCL) technique is carried out for each continuous arc where CCL eliminates potential ambiguity influence and it degrades the pseudo-range noise. Meanwhile, the CCL retains high precision in the carrier-phase. In this study, we focus on the Beirut Explosion on August 4, 2020, to check slant TEC (STEC) variations that may be associated with the blast of Beirut Port. The TECs were analyzed through the Morlet wavelet to check the possible ionospheric response to the blast. An acoustic‐gravity wave could be generated by the event which could disturb the ionosphere through coupling between solid earth-atmosphere-ionosphere during the explosion. To verify TEC disturbances are not associated with space weather, disturbance storm-time (Dst), and Kp indices were investigated before, during, and after the explosion. The steady-state of space weather before and during the event indicated that the observed variations of TEC sequences were caused by the ammonium nitrate explosion. There was a large initial explosion, followed by a series of smaller blasts, about ~30 seconds, a colossal explosion has happened, a supersonic blast wave radiating through Beirut City. As a result of the chemistry behind ammonium nitrate’s explosive, a mushroom cloud was sent into the air. We suggest that these different explosions in strength and time could be the reason for different time arrival of the detected ionospheric disturbances over GNSS ground-based stations.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Garcia-Rigo ◽  
Benedikt Soja

<p>Multiple space geodetic techniques are capable of measuring effects caused by space weather events. In particular, space weather events can cause ionospheric disturbances correlated with variations in the vertical total electron content (VTEC) or the electron density (Ne) of the ionosphere.</p><p>In this regard and in the context of the new Focus Area on Geodetic Space Weather Research within IAG’s GGOS (International Association of Geodesy; Global Geodetic Observing System), the Joint Working Group 3 on Improved understanding of space weather events and their monitoring by satellite missions has been created as part of IAG Commission 4, Sub-Commission 4.3 to run for the next four years.</p><p>Within JWG3, we expect investigating different approaches to monitor space weather events using the data from different space geodetic techniques and, in particular, combinations thereof. Simulations will be beneficial to identify the contribution of different techniques and prepare for the analysis of real data. Different strategies for the combination of data will also be investigated, in particular, the weighting of estimates from different techniques in order to increase the performance and reliability of the combined estimates. Furthermore, existing algorithms for the detection and prediction of space weather events will be explored and improved to the extent possible. Furthermore, the geodetic measurement of the ionospheric electron density will be complemented by direct observations from the Sun gathered from existing spacecraft, such as SOHO, ACE, SDO, Parker Solar Probe, among others. The combination and joint evaluation of multiple datasets with the measurements of space geodetic observation techniques (e.g. geodetic VLBI) is still a great challenge. In addition, other indications for solar activity - such as the F10.7 index on solar radio flux, SOLERA as EUV proxy or rate of Global Electron Content (dGEC)-, provide additional opportunities for comparisons and validation.</p><p>Through these investigations, we will identify the key parameters useful to improve real-time/prediction of ionospheric/plasmaspheric VTEC, Ne estimates, as well as ionospheric perturbations, in case of extreme solar weather conditions. In general, we will gain a better understanding of space weather events and their effect on Earth’s atmosphere and near-Earth environment.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaa A. Elghazouly ◽  
Mohamed I. Doma ◽  
Ahmed A. Sedeek

Abstract Due to the ionosphere delay, which has become the dominant GPS error source, it is crucial to remove the ionospheric effect before estimating point coordinates. Therefore, different agencies started to generate daily Global Ionosphere Maps (GIMs); the Vertical Total Electron Content (VTEC) values represented in GIMs produced by several providers can be used to remove the ionosphere error from observations. In this research, An analysis will be carried with three sources for VTEC maps produced by the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE), Regional TEC Mapping (RTM), and the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI). The evaluation is focused on the effects of a specific ionosphere GIM correction on the precise point positioning (PPP) solutions. Two networks were considered. The first network consists of seven Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) receivers from (IGS) global stations. The selected test days are six days, three of them quiet, and three other days are stormy to check the influence of geomagnetic storms on relative kinematic positioning solutions. The second network is a regional network in Egypt. The results show that the calculated coordinates using the three VTEC map sources are far from each other on stormy days rather than on quiet days. Also, the standard deviation values are large on stormy days compared to those on quiet days. Using CODE and RTM IONEX file produces the most precise coordinates after that the values of IRI. The elimination of ionospheric biases over the estimated lengths of many baselines up to 1000 km has resulted in positive findings, which show the feasibility of the suggested assessment procedure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (14) ◽  
pp. 2200
Author(s):  
Chao Gao ◽  
Shuanggen Jin ◽  
Liangliang Yuan

Geomagnetic storms are extreme space weather events, which have considerable impacts on the ionosphere and power transmission systems. In this paper, the ionospheric responses to the geomagnetic storm on 22 June 2015, are analyzed from ground-based and satellite-based Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations as well as observational data of digital ionosondes, and the main physical mechanisms of the ionospheric disturbances observed during the geomagnetic storm are discussed. Salient positive and negative storms are observed from vertical total electron content (VTEC) based on ground-based GNSS observations at different stages of the storm. Combining topside observations of Low-Earth-Orbit (LEO) satellites (GRACE and MetOp satellites) with different orbital altitudes and corresponding ground-based observations, the ionospheric responses above and below the orbits are studied during the storm. To obtain VTEC from the slant TEC between Global Positioning System (GPS) and LEO satellites, we employ a multi-layer mapping function, which can effectively reduce the overall error caused by the single-layer geometric assumption where the horizontal gradient of the ionosphere is not considered. The results show that the topside observations of the GRACE satellite with a lower orbit can intuitively detect the impact caused by the fluctuation of the F2 peak height (hmF2). At the same time, the latitude range corresponding to the peak value of the up-looking VTEC on the event day becomes wider, which is the precursor of the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA). However, no obvious response is observed in the up-looking VTEC from MetOp satellites with higher orbits, which indicates that the VTEC responses to the geomagnetic storm mainly take place below the orbit of MetOp satellites.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document