Use of satellite and modeled soil moisture data for predicting event soil loss at plot scale

Abstract. The potential of coupling soil moisture and a Universal Soil Loss Equation-based (USLE-based) model for event soil loss estimation at plot scale is carefully investigated at the Masse area, in central Italy. The derived model, named Soil Moisture for Erosion (SM4E), is applied by considering the unavailability of in situ soil moisture measurements, by using the data predicted by a soil water balance model (SWBM) and derived from satellite sensors, i.e., the Advanced SCATterometer (ASCAT). The soil loss estimation accuracy is validated using in situ measurements in which event observations at plot scale are available for the period 2008–2013. The results showed that including soil moisture observations in the event rainfall–runoff erosivity factor of the USLE enhances the capability of the model to account for variations in event soil losses, the soil moisture being an effective alternative to the estimated runoff, in the prediction of the event soil loss at Masse. The agreement between observed and estimated soil losses (through SM4E) is fairly satisfactory with a determination coefficient (log-scale) equal to ~ 0.35 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of ~ 2.8 Mg ha−1. These results are particularly significant for the operational estimation of soil losses. Indeed, currently, soil moisture is a relatively simple measurement at the field scale and remote sensing data are also widely available on a global scale. Through satellite data, there is the potential of applying the SM4E model for large-scale monitoring and quantification of the soil erosion process.

Download Full-text

Use of satellite and modelled soil moisture data for predicting event soil loss at plot scale

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions ◽

10.5194/hessd-12-2945-2015 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 12 (3) ◽

pp. 2945-2973

Author(s):

F. Todisco ◽

L. Brocca ◽

L. F. Termite ◽

W. Wagner

Keyword(s):

Soil Moisture ◽

Soil Loss ◽

Large Scale ◽

Central Italy ◽

Remote Sensing Data ◽

Loss Estimation ◽

Balance Model ◽

Estimation Accuracy ◽

Soil Losses

Abstract. The potential of coupling soil moisture and a~USLE-based model for event soil loss estimation at plot scale is carefully investigated at the Masse area, in Central Italy. The derived model, named Soil Moisture for Erosion (SM4E), is applied by considering the unavailability of in situ soil moisture measurements, by using the data predicted by a soil water balance model (SWBM) and derived from satellite sensors, i.e. the Advanced SCATterometer (ASCAT). The soil loss estimation accuracy is validated using in situ measurements in which event observations at plot scale are available for the period 2008–2013. The results showed that including soil moisture observations in the event rainfall–runoff erosivity factor of the RUSLE/USLE, enhances the capability of the model to account for variations in event soil losses, being the soil moisture an effective alternative to the estimated runoff, in the prediction of the event soil loss at Masse. The agreement between observed and estimated soil losses (through SM4E) is fairly satisfactory with a determination coefficient (log-scale) equal to of ~ 0.35 and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of ~ 2.8 Mg ha−1. These results are particularly significant for the operational estimation of soil losses. Indeed, currently, soil moisture is a relatively simple measurement at the field scale and remote sensing data are also widely available on a global scale. Through satellite data, there is the potential of applying the SM4E model for large-scale monitoring and quantification of the soil erosion process.

Download Full-text

A systematic assessment of uncertainties in large scale soil loss estimation from different representations of USLE input factors – A case study for Kenya and Uganda

10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-13787 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Christoph Schürz ◽

Bano Mehdi ◽

Jens Kiesel ◽

Karsten Schulz ◽

Mathew Herrnegger

Keyword(s):

Sensitivity Analysis ◽

Soil Loss ◽

Field Data ◽

Large Scale ◽

Loss Estimation ◽

Observation Data ◽

Systematic Assessment ◽

Soil Losses

The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) is a standard model to assess soil erosion by water. The model equation quantifies long-term average annual soil loss as a product of the rainfall erosivity R, soil erodibility K, slope length and slope steepness LS, the soil cover C and support measures P. Several methods exist to derive each of the model inputs from readily available data. The estimated values of a model input, however, can strongly differ depending on the method that was applied. The multiplication of the input factors with the USLE eventually results in large uncertainties for the soil loss estimates. A comparison of the estimated soil loss to observation data can potentially reduce the uncertainties. Yet, for large scale soil loss estimations, in-field observations are rare and their comparability to long-term soil estimates is limited. This work puts a focus on uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in large scale soil loss estimation employing the USLE with different realizations of the USLE input factors.In a systematic analysis we developed different representations of the USLE inputs for the study domain of Kenya and Uganda with a spatial resolution of 90 m. All combinations of the generated USLE inputs resulted in 756 USLE model setups. We assessed the resulting distributions in soil loss, both spatially distributed and on district level for Kenya and Uganda. In a sensitivity analysis we analyzed the contributions of the USLE model inputs to the ranges in soil loss and analyzed their spatial patterns. We compared the calculated USLE ensemble soil estimates to available in-field data and other study results and addressed possibilities and limitations of the USLE model evaluation.The USLE model ensemble resulted in wide ranges of estimated soil loss, exceeding the mean soil loss by over an order of magnitude particularly in hilly topographies. The study implies that a soil loss assessment with the USLE is highly uncertain and strongly depends on the realizations of the model input factors. The employed sensitivity analysis enabled us to identify spatial patterns in the importance of the USLE input factors. The C and K factors showed large scale patterns of importance in the densely vegetated part of Uganda and the dry north of Kenya, respectively. The LS factor estimates were mostly relevant in small scale heterogeneous patterns. Major challenges for the evaluation of the estimated soil losses with in-field data were due to spatial and temporal limitations of the observation data, but also due to measured soil losses describing processes that are different to the ones that are represented by the USLE.Reference: Sch&#252;rz, C., Mehdi, B., Kiesel, J., Schulz, K., and Herrnegger, M.: A systematic assessment of uncertainties in large scale soil loss estimation from different representations of USLE input factors &#8211; A case study for Kenya and Uganda, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-602, in review, 2019.&#160;

Download Full-text

Mapping High Spatiotemporal-Resolution Soil Moisture by Upscaling Sparse Ground-Based Observations Using a Bayesian Linear Regression Method for Comparison with Microwave Remotely Sensed Soil Moisture Products

Remote Sensing ◽

10.3390/rs13020228 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (2) ◽

pp. 228

Author(s):

Jian Kang ◽

Rui Jin ◽

Xin Li ◽

Yang Zhang

Keyword(s):

Soil Moisture ◽

Large Scale ◽

Spatial Scales ◽

Microwave Remote Sensing ◽

In Situ Measurements ◽

Spatial Density ◽

Linear Regression Method ◽

Spatiotemporal Resolution ◽

Pixel Scale

In recent decades, microwave remote sensing (RS) has been used to measure soil moisture (SM). Long-term and large-scale RS SM datasets derived from various microwave sensors have been used in environmental fields. Understanding the accuracies of RS SM products is essential for their proper applications. However, due to the mismatched spatial scale between the ground-based and RS observations, the truth at the pixel scale may not be accurately represented by ground-based observations, especially when the spatial density of in situ measurements is low. Because ground-based observations are often sparsely distributed, temporal upscaling was adopted to transform a few in situ measurements into SM values at a pixel scale of 1 km by introducing the temperature vegetation dryness index (TVDI) related to SM. The upscaled SM showed high consistency with in situ SM observations and could accurately capture rainfall events. The upscaled SM was considered as the reference data to evaluate RS SM products at different spatial scales. In regard to the validation results, in addition to the correlation coefficient (R) of the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) SM being slightly lower than that of the Climate Change Initiative (CCI) SM, SMAP had the best performance in terms of the root-mean-square error (RMSE), unbiased RMSE and bias, followed by the CCI. The Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) products were in worse agreement with the upscaled SM and were inferior to the R value of the X-band SM of the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2). In conclusion, in the study area, the SMAP and CCI SM are more reliable, although both products were underestimated by 0.060 cm3 cm−3 and 0.077 cm3 cm−3, respectively. If the biases are corrected, then the improved SMAP with an RMSE of 0.043 cm3 cm−3 and the CCI with an RMSE of 0.039 cm3 cm−3 will hopefully reach the application requirement for an accuracy with an RMSE less than 0.040 cm3 cm−3.

Download Full-text

Global soil moisture data derived through machine learning trained with in-situ measurements

Scientific Data ◽

10.1038/s41597-021-00964-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Sungmin O. ◽

Rene Orth

Keyword(s):

Machine Learning ◽

Soil Moisture ◽

Large Scale ◽

Short Term Memory ◽

Temporal Dynamics ◽

Soil Moisture Data ◽

Wide Range ◽

Global Soil

AbstractWhile soil moisture information is essential for a wide range of hydrologic and climate applications, spatially-continuous soil moisture data is only available from satellite observations or model simulations. Here we present a global, long-term dataset of soil moisture derived through machine learning trained with in-situ measurements, SoMo.ml. We train a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model to extrapolate daily soil moisture dynamics in space and in time, based on in-situ data collected from more than 1,000 stations across the globe. SoMo.ml provides multi-layer soil moisture data (0–10 cm, 10–30 cm, and 30–50 cm) at 0.25° spatial and daily temporal resolution over the period 2000–2019. The performance of the resulting dataset is evaluated through cross validation and inter-comparison with existing soil moisture datasets. SoMo.ml performs especially well in terms of temporal dynamics, making it particularly useful for applications requiring time-varying soil moisture, such as anomaly detection and memory analyses. SoMo.ml complements the existing suite of modelled and satellite-based datasets given its distinct derivation, to support large-scale hydrological, meteorological, and ecological analyses.

Download Full-text

Evaluating Machine Learning and Geostatistical Methods for Spatial Gap-filling of Monthly ESA CCI Soil Moisture in China

Remote Sensing ◽

10.3390/rs13142848 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (14) ◽

pp. 2848

Author(s):

Hao Sun ◽

Qian Xu

Keyword(s):

Machine Learning ◽

Soil Moisture ◽

Water Resource Management ◽

Large Scale ◽

Gap Filling ◽

Spatial Continuity ◽

Study Results ◽

Data Gaps

Obtaining large-scale, long-term, and spatial continuous soil moisture (SM) data is crucial for climate change, hydrology, and water resource management, etc. ESA CCI SM is such a large-scale and long-term SM (longer than 40 years until now). However, there exist data gaps, especially for the area of China, due to the limitations in remote sensing of SM such as complex topography, human-induced radio frequency interference (RFI), and vegetation disturbances, etc. The data gaps make the CCI SM data cannot achieve spatial continuity, which entails the study of gap-filling methods. In order to develop suitable methods to fill the gaps of CCI SM in the whole area of China, we compared typical Machine Learning (ML) methods, including Random Forest method (RF), Feedforward Neural Network method (FNN), and Generalized Linear Model (GLM) with a geostatistical method, i.e., Ordinary Kriging (OK) in this study. More than 30 years of passive–active combined CCI SM from 1982 to 2018 and other biophysical variables such as Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), precipitation, air temperature, Digital Elevation Model (DEM), soil type, and in situ SM from International Soil Moisture Network (ISMN) were utilized in this study. Results indicated that: 1) the data gap of CCI SM is frequent in China, which is found not only in cold seasons and areas but also in warm seasons and areas. The ratio of gap pixel numbers to the whole pixel numbers can be greater than 80%, and its average is around 40%. 2) ML methods can fill the gaps of CCI SM all up. Among the ML methods, RF had the best performance in fitting the relationship between CCI SM and biophysical variables. 3) Over simulated gap areas, RF had a comparable performance with OK, and they outperformed the FNN and GLM methods greatly. 4) Over in situ SM networks, RF achieved better performance than the OK method. 5) We also explored various strategies for gap-filling CCI SM. Results demonstrated that the strategy of constructing a monthly model with one RF for simulating monthly average SM and another RF for simulating monthly SM disturbance achieved the best performance. Such strategy combining with the ML method such as the RF is suggested in this study for filling the gaps of CCI SM in China.

Download Full-text

Identifying erosive periods by using RUSLE factors in mountain fields of the Central Spanish Pyrenees

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences ◽

10.5194/hess-12-523-2008 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 523-535 ◽

Cited By ~ 53

Author(s):

M. López-Vicente ◽

A. Navas ◽

J. Machín

Keyword(s):

Soil Moisture ◽

Moisture Content ◽

Soil Loss ◽

Rainfall Intensity ◽

Soil Moisture Content ◽

Rainfall Erosivity ◽

Soil Erodibility ◽

Maximum Rainfall ◽

Freeze Thaw ◽

Soil Losses

Abstract. The Mediterranean environment is characterized by strong temporal variations in rainfall volume and intensity, soil moisture and vegetation cover along the year. These factors play a key role on soil erosion. The aim of this work is to identify different erosive periods in function of the temporal changes in rainfall and runoff characteristics (erosivity, maximum intensity and number of erosive events), soil properties (soil erodibility in relation to freeze-thaw processes and soil moisture content) and current tillage practices in a set of agricultural fields in a mountainous area of the Central Pyrenees in NE Spain. To this purpose the rainfall and runoff erosivity (R), the soil erodibility (K) and the cover-management (C) factors of the empirical RUSLE soil loss model were used. The R, K and C factors were calculated at monthly scale. The first erosive period extends from July to October and presents the highest values of erosivity (87.8 MJ mm ha−1 h−1), maximum rainfall intensity (22.3 mm h−1) and monthly soil erosion (0.25 Mg ha−1 month−1) with the minimum values of duration of erosive storms, freeze-thaw cycles, soil moisture content and soil erodibility (0.007 Mg h MJ−1 mm−1). This period includes the harvesting and the plowing tillage practices. The second erosive period has a duration of two months, from May to June, and presents the lowest total and monthly soil losses (0.10 Mg ha−1 month−1) that correspond to the maximum protection of the soil by the crop-cover ($C$ factor = 0.05) due to the maximum stage of the growing season and intermediate values of rainfall and runoff erosivity, maximum rainfall intensity and soil erodibility. The third erosive period extends from November to April and has the minimum values of rainfall erosivity (17.5 MJ mm ha−1 h−1) and maximum rainfall intensity (6.0 mm h−1) with the highest number of freeze-thaw cycles, soil moisture content and soil erodibility (0.021 Mg h MJ−1 mm−1) that explain the high value of monthly soil loss (0.24 Mg ha−1 month−1). The interactions between the rainfall erosivity, soil erodibility, and cover-management factors explain the similar predicted soil losses for the first and the third erosive periods in spite of the strong temporal differences in the values of the three RUSLE factors. The estimated value of annual soil loss with the RUSLE model (3.34 Mg ha−1 yr−1) was lower than the measured value with 137Cs (5.38 Mg ha−1 yr−1) due to the low values of precipitation recorded during the studied period. To optimize agricultural practices and to promote sustainable strategies for the preservation of fragile Mediterranean agrosystems it is necessary to delay plowing till October, especially in dryland agriculture regions. Thus, the protective role of the crop residues will extend until September when the greatest rainfall occurs together with the highest runoff erosivity and soil losses.

Download Full-text

Spatial variability and its scale dependency of observed and modeled soil moisture over different climate regions

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences ◽

10.5194/hess-17-1177-2013 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 17 (3) ◽

pp. 1177-1188 ◽

Cited By ~ 45

Author(s):

B. Li ◽

M. Rodell

Keyword(s):

Soil Moisture ◽

Spatial Variability ◽

Land Surface ◽

Large Scale ◽

Warm Season ◽

Scale Dependency ◽

Convex Shape ◽

Spatial Moments ◽

Environmental Controls

Abstract. Past studies on soil moisture spatial variability have been mainly conducted at catchment scales where soil moisture is often sampled over a short time period; as a result, the observed soil moisture often exhibited smaller dynamic ranges, which prevented the complete revelation of soil moisture spatial variability as a function of mean soil moisture. In this study, spatial statistics (mean, spatial variability and skewness) of in situ soil moisture, modeled and satellite-retrieved soil moisture obtained in a warm season (198 days) were examined over three large climate regions in the US. The study found that spatial moments of in situ measurements strongly depend on climates, with distinct mean, spatial variability and skewness observed in each climate zone. In addition, an upward convex shape, which was revealed in several smaller scale studies, was observed for the relationship between spatial variability of in situ soil moisture and its spatial mean when statistics from dry, intermediate, and wet climates were combined. This upward convex shape was vaguely or partially observable in modeled and satellite-retrieved soil moisture estimates due to their smaller dynamic ranges. Despite different environmental controls on large-scale soil moisture spatial variability, the correlation between spatial variability and mean soil moisture remained similar to that observed at small scales, which is attributed to the boundedness of soil moisture. From the smaller support (effective area or volume represented by a measurement or estimate) to larger ones, soil moisture spatial variability decreased in each climate region. The scale dependency of spatial variability all followed the power law, but data with large supports showed stronger scale dependency than those with smaller supports. The scale dependency of soil moisture variability also varied with climates, which may be linked to the scale dependency of precipitation spatial variability. Influences of environmental controls on soil moisture spatial variability at large scales are discussed. The results of this study should be useful for diagnosing large scale soil moisture estimates and for improving the estimation of land surface processes.

Download Full-text

Using data assimilation to optimize pedotransfer functions using large-scale in-situ soil moisture observations

10.5194/hess-2020-359 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Elizabeth Cooper ◽

Eleanor Blyth ◽

Hollie Cooper ◽

Rich Ellis ◽

Ewan Pinnington ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Soil Moisture ◽

Data Assimilation ◽

Land Surface ◽

Large Scale ◽

Pedotransfer Functions ◽

Surface Model ◽

Climate Projections ◽

Land Surface Models ◽

Surface Models

Abstract. Soil moisture predictions from land surface models are important in hydrological, ecological and meteorological applications. In recent years the availability of wide-area soil-moisture measurements has increased, but few studies have combined model-based soil moisture predictions with in-situ observations beyond the point scale. Here we show that we can markedly improve soil moisture estimates from the JULES land surface model using field scale observations and data assimilation techniques. Rather than directly updating soil moisture estimates towards observed values, we optimize constants in the underlying pedotransfer functions, which relate soil texture to JULES soil physics parameters. In this way we generate a single set of newly calibrated pedotransfer functions based on observations from a number of UK sites with different soil textures. We demonstrate that calibrating a pedotransfer function in this way can improve the performance of land surface models, leading to the potential for better flood, drought and climate projections.

Download Full-text

Large Scale Operational Soil Moisture Mapping from Passive MW Radiometry: SMOS product evaluation in Europe & USA

10.31219/osf.io/rzfbu ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Khidir Abdalla Kwal Deng ◽

Salim Lamine ◽

Andrew Pavlides ◽

Yansong Bao ◽

George Petropoulos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Soil Moisture ◽

Large Scale ◽

Water Security ◽

Product Evaluation ◽

Practical Applications ◽

Study Results ◽

Different Seasons ◽

Lower Correlation ◽

Land Types

Earth Observation (EO) allows deriving from a range of sensors, often globally, operational estimates of surface soil moisture (SSM) at range of spatiotemporal resolutions. Yet, an evaluation of the accuracy of those products in a variety of environmental conditions has been often limited. In this study the accuracy of the SMOS SSM global operational product across 2 continents (USA, and Europe) is investigated. SMOS predictions were compared against near concurrent in-situ SSM measurements from the FLUXNET observational network. In total, 7 experimental sites were used to assess the accuracy of SMOS derived soil moisture for 2 complete years of observations (2010 to 2011). The accuracy of the SMOS SSM product is investigated in different seasons for the seasonal cycle as well as different continents and land types. Results showed a generally reasonable agreement between the SMOS product and the in-situ soil moisture measurements in the 0-5 cm soil moisture layer. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in most cases was close to 0.1 m3 m-3 (minimum 0.067 m3 m-3). With a few exceptions, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was found up to approx. 55%. Grassland, shrublands and woody savanna land cover types attained a satisfactory agreement between satellite derived and in-situ measurements but needleleaf forests had lower correlation. Better agreement was found for the grassland sites in both continents. Seasonally, summer and autumn underperformed spring and winter. Our study results provide supportive evidence of the potential value of this operational product for meso-scale studies in a range of practical applications, helping to address key challenges present nowadays linked to food and water security.

Download Full-text

Estimation of soil moisture content using Citizen observatory data -lessons learnt from GROW Observatory project

10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-7613 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Endre Dobos ◽

Károly Kovács ◽

Daniel Kibirige ◽

Péter Vadnai

Keyword(s):

Soil Moisture ◽

Monitoring System ◽

Large Scale ◽

Technological Development ◽

Special Focus ◽

Agricultural Activity ◽

The European Union ◽

Horizon 2020 ◽

Soil Moisture Monitoring

Soil moisture is a crucial factor for agricultural activity, but also an important factor for weather forecast and climate science. Despite of the technological development in soil moisture sensing, no full coverage global or continental or even national scale soil moisture monitoring system exist.&#160; There is a new European initiative to demonstrate the feasibility of a citizen observatory based soil moisture monitoring system.&#160; The aim of this study is to characterize this new monitoring approach and provide provisional results on the interpretation and system performance.GROW Observatory is a project funded under the European Union&#8217;s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program. Its aim is to establish a large scale (>20,000 participants), resilient and integrated &#8216;Citizen Observatory&#8217; (CO) and community for environmental monitoring that is self-sustaining beyond the life of the project. This article describes how the initial framework and tools were developed to evolve, bring together and train such a community; raising interest, engaging participants, and educating to support reliable observations, measurements and documentation, and considerations with a special focus on the reliability of the resulting dataset for scientific purposes. The scientific purposes of GROW observatory are to test the data quality and the spatial representativity of a citizen engagement driven spatial distribution as reliably inputs for soil moisture monitoring and&#160;&#160; to create timely series of&#160; gridded soil moisture products based on citizens&#8217; observations using low cost soil moisture (SM) sensors, and to provide an extensive dataset of in-situ soil moisture observations which can serve as a reference to validate satellite-based SM products and support the Copernicus in-situ component. This article aims to showcase the design, tools and the digital soil mapping approaches of the final soil moisture product.

Download Full-text