scholarly journals Simulation of rainfall fields conditioned on rain gauge observations and radar estimates using random mixing

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieru Yan ◽  
Fei Li ◽  
András Bárdossy ◽  
Tao Tao
Keyword(s):  
Distribution Function ◽  
Marginal Distribution ◽  
Conditional Simulation ◽  
Simulation Method ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Spatial Coverage ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Random Mixing

Abstract. The accuracy of spatial precipitation estimates with the relatively high temporospatial resolution is of vital importance in various fields of research and practice. Yet the intricate variability and the intermittent nature of precipitation make it very difficult to obtain accurate spatial precipitation estimates. Radar and rain gauge are two complementary sources of precipitation information: the former is inaccurate in general but is a valid indicator for the spatial pattern of the rainfall field; the latter is relatively accurate but lack spatial coverage. Considering the pros and cons of the two sources of precipitation information, a number of radar-gauge merging techniques have been developed to obtain spatial precipitation estimates over the past years. Conditional simulation has great potential to be used in spatial precipitation estimation. Unlike the commonly used interpolation methods, the results from the conditional simulation is a range of possible estimates due to its Monte Carlo framework. Yet an obstacle that hampers the application of conditional simulation in spatial precipitation estimation is how to obtain the marginal distribution function of the rainfall field with accuracy. In this work, we propose a method to obtain the marginal distribution function of the rainfall field based on rain gauge observations and radar estimates. The conditional simulation method, random mixing (RM), is used to simulate rainfall fields. The properties of the results from the proposed method are elaborated through the comparison with the results from other methods: ordinary kriging, kriging with external drift, and conditional merging. Finally, the sensitivity of the proposed method towards the two factors – density of rain gauges and random error in radar estimates – is analyzed.

scholarly journals Conditional simulation of surface rainfall fields using modified phase annealing

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 2287-2301
Author(s):  
Jieru Yan ◽  
András Bárdossy ◽  
Sebastian Hörning ◽  
Tao Tao
Keyword(s):  
Conditional Simulation ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Simulation Method ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Global Constraints ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
System Temperature ◽  
Residual Kriging ◽  
Multiple Domains

Abstract. The accuracy of quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) over a given region and period is of vital importance across multiple domains and disciplines. However, due to the intricate temporospatial variability and the intermittent nature of precipitation, it is challenging to obtain QPE with adequate accuracy. This paper aims to simulate rainfall fields while honoring both the local constraints imposed by the point-wise rain gauge observations and the global constraints imposed by the field measurements obtained from weather radar. The conditional simulation method employed in this study is modified phase annealing (PA), which is practically an evolution from the traditional simulated annealing (SA). Yet unlike SA, which implements perturbations in the spatial field, PA implements perturbations in Fourier space, making it superior to SA in many respects. PA is developed in two ways. First, taking advantage of the global characteristic of PA, the method is only used to deal with global constraints, and the local ones are handed over to residual kriging. Second, except for the system temperature, the number of perturbed phases is also annealed during the simulation process, making the influence of the perturbation more global at initial phases and decreasing the global impact of the perturbation gradually as the number of perturbed phases decreases. The proposed method is used to simulate the rainfall field for a 30 min event using different scenarios: with and without integrating the uncertainty of the radar-indicated rainfall pattern and with different objective functions.

scholarly journals Conditional simulation of surface rainfall fields using modified phase annealing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieru Yan ◽  
András Bárdossy ◽  
Sebastian Hörning ◽  
Tao Tao
Keyword(s):  
Conditional Simulation ◽  
Simulation Method ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Global Constraints ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
System Temperature ◽  
Residual Kriging ◽  
Multiple Domains ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. The accuracy of quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) over a certain region and period is of vital importance across multiple domains and disciplines. However, due to the intricate tempo-spatial variability and the intermittent nature of precipitation, it is challenging to obtain QPE with adequate accuracy. This paper aims at simulating rainfall fields honoring both the local constraints subject by the point-wise rain-gauge observations and the global constraints subject by the field measurement from weather radar. The employed conditional simulation method is the modified phase annealing (PA), which is practically an evolvement of the traditional simulated annealing (SA). Yet, unlike SA which implements perturbations in the spatial field, PA implements perturbations in the Fourier space, making it superior to SA in many aspects. The modification of PA is reflected in two aspects. First, taking advantage of the global characteristic of PA, the method is only used to deal with global constraints, and the local ones are handed over to residual kriging. Second, except for the system temperature, the number of perturbed phases is also annealed during the simulation process, making the influence of the perturbation more global at initial phases. The impact of the perturbation decreases gradually as the number of the perturbed phases decreases. The proposed method is used to simulate the rainfall field for a 30-min-event using different scenarios: with and without integrating the uncertainty of the radar-indicated rainfall pattern and with different objective functions.

scholarly journals Improving Multisensor Precipitation Estimation via Adaptive Conditional Bias–Penalized Merging of Rain Gauge Data and Remotely Sensed Quantitative Precipitation Estimates

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 2347-2365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Jozaghi ◽  
Mohammad Nabatian ◽  
Seongjin Noh ◽  
Dong-Jun Seo ◽  
Lin Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computational Cost ◽  
Mean Field ◽  
Remotely Sensed ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rain Gauge Data ◽  
Gauge Data ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Radar Satellite ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimates

Abstract We describe and evaluate adaptive conditional bias–penalized cokriging (CBPCK) for improved multisensor precipitation estimation using rain gauge data and remotely sensed quantitative precipitation estimates (QPE). The remotely sensed QPEs used are radar-only and radar–satellite-fused estimates. For comparative evaluation, true validation is carried out over the continental United States (CONUS) for 13–30 September 2015 and 7–9 October 2016. The hourly gauge data, radar-only QPE, and satellite QPE used are from the Hydrometeorological Automated Data System, Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor System, and Self-Calibrating Multivariate Precipitation Retrieval (SCaMPR), respectively. For radar–satellite fusion, conditional bias–penalized Fisher estimation is used. The reference merging technique compared is ordinary cokriging (OCK) used in the National Weather Service Multisensor Precipitation Estimator. It is shown that, beyond the reduction due to mean field bias (MFB) correction, both OCK and adaptive CBPCK additionally reduce the unconditional root-mean-square error (RMSE) of radar-only QPE by 9%–16% over the CONUS for the two periods, and that adaptive CBPCK is superior to OCK for estimation of hourly amounts exceeding 1 mm. When fused with the MFB-corrected radar QPE, the MFB-corrected SCaMPR QPE for September 2015 reduces the unconditional RMSE of the MFB-corrected radar by 4% and 6% over the entire and western half of the CONUS, respectively, but is inferior to the MFB-corrected radar for estimation of hourly amounts exceeding 7 mm. Adaptive CBPCK should hence be favored over OCK for estimation of significant amounts of precipitation despite larger computational cost, and the SCaMPR QPE should be used selectively in multisensor QPE.

scholarly journals Assessment of Precipitation Estimation from the NWP Models and Satellite Products for the Spring 2019 Severe Floods in Iran

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (23) ◽  
pp. 2741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aminyavari ◽  
Saghafian ◽  
Sharifi
Keyword(s):  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Precipitation Amount ◽  
Early Warning Systems ◽  
Flood Impacts ◽  
Spatial Coverage ◽  
Basin Scale ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Precipitation Threshold ◽  
Precipitation Thresholds

Precipitation monitoring and early warning systems are required to reduce negative flood impacts. In this study, the performance of ensemble precipitation forecasts of three numerical weather prediction (NWP) models within the THORPEX interactive grand global ensemble (TIGGE) as well as the integrated multi-satellite retrievals for global precipitation measurement (GPM), namely IMERG, for precipitation estimates were evaluated in recent severe floods in Iran over the March–April 2019 period. The evaluations were conducted in three aspects: spatial distribution of precipitation, mean areal precipitation in three major basins hard hit by the floods, and the dichotomous evaluation in four precipitation thresholds (25, 50, 75, and 100 mm per day). The results showed that the United Kingdom Met Office (UKMO) model, in terms of spatial coverage and satellite estimates as well as the precipitation amount, were closer to the observations. Moreover, with regard to mean precipitation at the basin scale, UKMO and European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) models in the Gorganrud Basin, ECMWF in the Karkheh Basin and UKMO in the Karun Basin performed better than others in flood forecasting. The National Centers for Environmental Forecast (NCEP) model performed well at low precipitation thresholds, while at high thresholds, its performance decreased significantly. On the contrary, the accuracy of IMERG improved when the precipitation threshold increased. The UKMO had better forecasts than the other models at the 100 mm/day precipitation threshold, whereas the ECMWF had acceptable forecasts in all thresholds and was able to forecast precipitation events with a lower false alarm ratio and better detection when compared to other models.

Evolving Multisensor Precipitation Estimation Methods: Their Impacts on Flow Prediction Using a Distributed Hydrologic Model

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1414-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Kitzmiller ◽  
Suzanne Van Cooten ◽  
Feng Ding ◽  
Kenneth Howard ◽  
Carrie Langston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Freezing Level ◽  
Distributed Hydrologic Model ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates

Abstract This study investigates evolving methodologies for radar and merged gauge–radar quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) to determine their influence on the flow predictions of a distributed hydrologic model. These methods include the National Mosaic and QPE algorithm package (NMQ), under development at the National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL), and the Multisensor Precipitation Estimator (MPE) and High-Resolution Precipitation Estimator (HPE) suites currently operational at National Weather Service (NWS) field offices. The goal of the study is to determine which combination of algorithm features offers the greatest benefit toward operational hydrologic forecasting. These features include automated radar quality control, automated Z–R selection, brightband identification, bias correction, multiple radar data compositing, and gauge–radar merging, which all differ between NMQ and MPE–HPE. To examine the spatial and temporal characteristics of the precipitation fields produced by each of the QPE methodologies, high-resolution (4 km and hourly) gridded precipitation estimates were derived by each algorithm suite for three major precipitation events between 2003 and 2006 over subcatchments within the Tar–Pamlico River basin of North Carolina. The results indicate that the NMQ radar-only algorithm suite consistently yielded closer agreement with reference rain gauge reports than the corresponding HPE radar-only estimates did. Similarly, the NMQ radar-only QPE input generally yielded hydrologic simulations that were closer to observations at multiple stream gauging points. These findings indicate that the combination of Z–R selection and freezing-level identification algorithms within NMQ, but not incorporated within MPE and HPE, would have an appreciable positive impact on hydrologic simulations. There were relatively small differences between NMQ and HPE gauge–radar estimates in terms of accuracy and impacts on hydrologic simulations, most likely due to the large influence of the input rain gauge information.

scholarly journals A Method for Evaluating the Accuracy of Quantitative Precipitation Estimates from a Hydrologic Modeling Perspective

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan J. Gourley ◽  
Baxter E. Vieux
Keyword(s):  
Hydrologic Modeling ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Hydrologic Models ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Primary Focus ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimates

Abstract A major goal in quantitative precipitation estimation and forecasting is the ability to provide accurate initial conditions for the purposes of hydrologic modeling. The accuracy of a streamflow prediction system is dependent upon how well the initial hydrometeorological states are characterized. A methodology is developed to objectively and quantitatively evaluate the skill of several different precipitation algorithms at the scale of application—a watershed. Thousands of hydrologic simulations are performed in an ensemble fashion, enabling an exploration of the model parameter space. Probabilistic statistics are then utilized to compare the relative skill of hydrologic simulations produced from the different precipitation inputs to the observed streamflow. The primary focus of this study is to demonstrate a methodology to evaluate precipitation algorithms that can be used to supplement traditional radar–rain gauge analyses. This approach is appropriate for the evaluation of precipitation estimates or forecasts that are intended to serve as inputs to hydrologic models.

scholarly journals Intercomparison of Rain Gauge, Radar, and Satellite-Based Precipitation Estimates with Emphasis on Hydrologic Forecasting

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koray K. Yilmaz ◽  
Terri S. Hogue ◽  
Kuo-lin Hsu ◽  
Soroosh Sorooshian ◽  
Hoshin V. Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Model Performance ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Soil Moisture Accounting ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
System Maps ◽  
Accounting Model ◽  
Rain Gauge Network

Abstract This study compares mean areal precipitation (MAP) estimates derived from three sources: an operational rain gauge network (MAPG), a radar/gauge multisensor product (MAPX), and the Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks (PERSIANN) satellite-based system (MAPS) for the time period from March 2000 to November 2003. The study area includes seven operational basins of varying size and location in the southeastern United States. The analysis indicates that agreements between the datasets vary considerably from basin to basin and also temporally within the basins. The analysis also includes evaluation of MAPS in comparison with MAPG for use in flow forecasting with a lumped hydrologic model [Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model (SAC-SMA)]. The latter evaluation investigates two different parameter sets, the first obtained using manual calibration on historical MAPG, and the second obtained using automatic calibration on both MAPS and MAPG, but over a shorter time period (23 months). Results indicate that the overall performance of the model simulations using MAPS depends on both the bias in the precipitation estimates and the size of the basins, with poorer performance in basins of smaller size (large bias between MAPG and MAPS) and better performance in larger basins (less bias between MAPG and MAPS). When using MAPS, calibration of the parameters significantly improved the model performance.

scholarly journals Incorporating Satellite Precipitation Estimates into a Radar-Gage Multi-Sensor Precipitation Estimation Algorithm

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuxiang He ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Robert Kuligowski ◽  
Robert Cifelli ◽  
David Kitzmiller
Keyword(s):  
Estimation Algorithm ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Systematic Bias ◽  
Effective Coverage ◽  
Region I ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Satellite Radar ◽  
Radar Satellite ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimates

This paper presents a new and enhanced fusion module for the Multi-Sensor Precipitation Estimator (MPE) that would objectively blend real-time satellite quantitative precipitation estimates (SQPE) with radar and gauge estimates. This module consists of a preprocessor that mitigates systematic bias in SQPE, and a two-way blending routine that statistically fuses adjusted SQPE with radar estimates. The preprocessor not only corrects systematic bias in SQPE, but also improves the spatial distribution of precipitation based on SQPE and makes it closely resemble that of radar-based observations. It uses a more sophisticated radar-satellite merging technique to blend preprocessed datasets, and provides a better overall QPE product. The performance of the new satellite-radar-gauge blending module is assessed using independent rain gauge data over a 5-year period between 2003-2007, and the assessment evaluates the accuracy of newly developed satellite-radar-gauge (SRG) blended products versus that of radar-gauge products (which represents MPE algorithm currently used in the NWS operations) over two regions: I) inside radar effective coverage and II) immediately outside radar coverage. The outcomes of the evaluation indicate a) ingest of SQPE over areas within effective radar coverage improve the quality of QPE by mitigating the errors in radar estimates in region I; and b) blending of radar, gauge, and satellite estimates over region II leads to reduction of errors relative to bias-corrected SQPE. In addition, the new module alleviates the discontinuities along the boundaries of radar effective coverage otherwise seen when SQPE is used directly to fill the areas outside of effective radar coverage.

The recommended location of rain gauge stations based on radar

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taeyong Kwon ◽  
Sanghoo Yoon
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Water Resources ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Conditional Entropy ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Entropy Theory ◽  
High Entropy ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates

<p>The characteristics of the watershed are important to reduce hydrologic disasters, such as the risk of dam flooding. In other words, quantitative precipitation estimation(QPE) is important to manage water resources in large regions. Both radar and rain gauged data are used to improve QPE. This study is dealt with suggesting the best location of additional rain gauged stations to be installed in order to improve QPE as entropy theory. Conditional entropy is used to quantitatively evaluate the location of additional gauged stations to be installed given the existing rainfall network. Because radar produces high-resolution precipitation estimates, it can be used to identify the high entropy points to reduce rainfall uncertainty. The data were collected from May 2018 to August 2019 in the Bukhan river dam basin. Road networks were also considered for the establishment for a practical approach.</p><p> </p><p>This work was supported by KOREA HYDRO & NUCLEAR POWER CO., LTD</p><p>(No. 2018-Tech-20)</p>

scholarly journals Bias Adjustment of Satellite Precipitation Estimation Using Ground-Based Measurement: A Case Study Evaluation over the Southwestern United States

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1231-1242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farid Ishak Boushaki ◽  
Kuo-Lin Hsu ◽  
Soroosh Sorooshian ◽  
Gi-Hyeon Park ◽  
Shayesteh Mahani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Temporal Distribution ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Systematic Bias ◽  
Southwestern United States ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Crucial Component ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates

Abstract Reliable precipitation measurement is a crucial component in hydrologic studies. Although satellite-based observation is able to provide spatial and temporal distribution of precipitation, the measurements tend to show systematic bias. This paper introduces a grid-based precipitation merging procedure in which satellite estimates from the Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks–Cloud Classification System (PERSIANN–CCS) are adjusted based on the Climate Prediction Center (CPC) daily rain gauge analysis. To remove the bias, the hourly CCS estimates were spatially and temporally accumulated to the daily 1° × 1° scale, the resolution of CPC rain gauge analysis. The daily CCS bias was then downscaled to the hourly temporal scale to correct hourly CCS estimates. The bias corrected CCS estimates are called the adjusted CCS (CCSA) product. With the adjustment from the gauge measurement, CCSA data have been generated to provide more reliable high temporal/spatial-resolution precipitation estimates. In the case study, the CCSA precipitation estimates from the proposed approach are compared against ground-based measurements in high-density gauge networks located in the southwestern United States.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document