scholarly journals Pemenuhan Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1999 Tentang Kemerdekaan Berpendapat Di Muka Umum

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-58
Author(s):  
Nur Yusriyyah Bakhtiar ◽  
La Ode Husen ◽  
Muhammad Rinaldy Bima
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Freedom Of Expression ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The Right

Penelitian ini bertujuan, pertama, Menganalisis dan menjelaskan pemenuhan hak kebebasan berekspresi berdasarkan undang-undang nomor 9 tahun 1998 tentang kemerdekaan menyampaikan pendapat di muka umum. Kedua, Menganalisis upaya negara untuk melindungi hak asasi manusia dari tindakan anarkis dalam kebebasan berekspresi. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode penelitian hukum doctrinal normatif atau penelitian hukum kepustakaan, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Bahan-bahan tersebut disusun secara sistematis, dikaji, kemudian ditarik suatu kesimpulan dalam hubungannya dengan masalah yang diteliti. Hasil penelitian ini: Pertama, Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 tentang Kebebasan Mengemukakan Pendapat di Muka Umum, masih terdapat kekurangan berkaitan dengan pembatasan-pembatasan yang ada, sebab tidak dicantumkan jelas mengenai batasan yang tidak boleh dilanggar seseorang, agar tercipta relevansi di antara peraturan perundang-undangan. Kedua, Menyampaikan pendapat di muka umum merupakan hak bagi setiap warga negara, namun apabila tindakan yang dilakukan oleh para pengunjuk rasa berakhir anarkis, maka tidak dapat dikategorikan sebagai perbuatan melanggar Hak Asasi Manusia sehingga aparat kepolisian dapat menindak berdasarkan aturan hukum yang berlaku. This study aims, firstly, to analyze and explain the fulfillment of the right to freedom of expression under Law No. 9 of 1998 concerning freedom of expression in public. Second, Analyze the efforts of the state to protect human rights from anarchist actions in freedom of expression. This research was conducted with the method of normative doctrinal legal research or library law research, namely legal research conducted by examining library materials or secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The materials are arranged systematically, reviewed, then drawn a conclusion in relation to the problem under study. The results of this study: First, Law No. 9 of 1998 concerning Freedom of Expression in Public, there are still shortcomings related to existing restrictions, because there is no clearly stated boundaries that must not be violated by a person, so as to create relevance between regulations legislation. Second, expressing an opinion in public is a right for every citizen, but if the actions taken by the protesters end up being anarchist, then it cannot be categorized as an act of violating Human Rights so that the police can act based on applicable legal rules

scholarly journals DISKURSUS PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA DI INDONESIA DALAM TINJAUAN UNIVERSALISME HAM DAN RELATIVISME BUDAYA

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Fitrawati Fitrawati
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Universal Declaration ◽  
Cultural Relativism ◽  
The Other ◽  
Freedom Of Religion ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Interfaith Marriage ◽  
Cultural Relativity ◽  
The Right

This paper tries to examine the right to freedom of interfaith marriage in Indonesia from the perspective of Human Rights Universalism and Cultural Relativism. The purpose of this paper is to explain how universalism and cultural relativity view interfaith marriage in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal research. This study uses a literature approach. The findings of this study indicate that interfaith marriage in Indonesia is still not well accepted and has always been controversial news in the community, even considered to have exceeded or violated the provisions of marriage, but there are still followers of different religions who decide to marry. In fact, many of them are smuggling laws so that their marriages are recognized by the state, namely by registering marriages abroad and then continuing the registration in Indonesia. Meanwhile, on the other hand, Indonesia already has a law on Marriage, namely, Article 2 paragraph 1. It is also contained in the article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, namely the right to freedom of marriage (article 16 UDHR) which includes the right to marry between religions (different religions), and the right to freedom of religion (article 18 UDHR) which includes the right to change religions. Meanwhile, in cultural realivism, it rejects everything that is universal.

scholarly journals The Retroactive Principle in Law No. 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rights

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 139
Author(s):  
Ricky Tongam Marpahala Siahaan ◽  
Candra Perbawati ◽  
Ahmad Saleh
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
The State ◽  
Human Rights Violations ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The Past ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

Protection of human rights is a responsibility that must be carried out by the state, in this case the state must also resolve cases of human rights violations that have occurred. There are many cases of human rights violations that occurred in the past but cannot be resolved because there are no legal rules that govern at that time. The presence of Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss is certainly a way for the government to resolve the problem of gross human rights violations in the past. The principle of retroactivity was included in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss so that gross violations of human rights that occurred in the past could be resolved. The retroactive principle in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss is considered to violate existing regulations in Indonesia, especially it is considered contrary to the 1945 Constitution. -Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss. This research uses normative research methods. The data used are secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results of this study indicate that the application of the retroactive principle in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss does not contain elements that are absolutely contradictory to the Law. 1945 foundation.

Human Rights during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hungary with Special Regard to the Right to Have Contact

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Orsolya Szeibert
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Everyday Life ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Special Regard ◽  
Patients Rights ◽  
Medical Crisis ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Parent Child

In Hungary, the government declared a state of danger in March 2020 as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The state of danger was lifted in June, but epidemological preparedness and state of medical crisis were declared by a government decree. In November 2020, the state of danger was declared for the second time, while epidemological preparedness was maintained. In February 2021, the state of danger was declared again. The list of the legal rules which changed and have been continuously changing because of the COVID-19 pandemic since March 2020 is extremly long and the new provision or the modifications have been heavily influencing the population's everyday life. The aim of this paper is to overview primarily the restrictions affecting human rights with special regard to the right to have contact as one of the patients' rights. Important issues of the parent-child contact affected by the COVID-19 pandemic is discussed, as well.

scholarly journals Fifty Shades of Tolerance: Human Rights Argumentations concerning Family Models and Hate Speech

Iuris Dictio ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lóránt Csink
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Hate Speech ◽  
Freedom Of Expression ◽  
Freedom Of Speech ◽  
The State ◽  
Same Sex ◽  
Public Opinions ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Points Of View ◽  
The Right

The protection of human rights is one of the main obligations a state has in order to fulfill its duties. Therefore, the right of freedom of expression shall be protected, especially because it relates directly to the defense of the democratic of a society. Although there are different points of view regarding an issue, especially same-sex marriage, the state is obligated to stay neutral towards public opinions. Consequently, public opinions might end up transforming into hate speech which creates an even larger confrontation within people and the state. This is why, the state must establish fair limits for human rights. Finally, it is essential to understand that promoting tolerance is the most important aspect to safeguard the rights of people to freely speak their minds in order to exercise their right of freedom of speech.

scholarly journals Interpretation of some criminal law aspects of the right to respect for private life

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (15) ◽  
pp. 111-125
Author(s):  
Yuriivna Timofeyeva
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Freedom Of Expression ◽  
Environmental Safety ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The State ◽  
Private Life ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Right

The article considers some issues of interpretation of the right to privacy in the practice of the ECtHR and its impact on the criminal law of Ukraine. Numerous violations of the articles of the Convention require systematic response of the state and appropriate changes in both legislation and changes in law enforcement practices. The violations relate in particular to problems of interpretation of the provisions of the Convention. Provisions of Art. 8 of the Convention are related to other provisions of the Convention and the development of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights on certain issues. It is noted that the Convention is dynamic, it changes under the influence of society, its provisions change in the process of development and acquire new meanings. In particular, the ECtHR recognizes a violation of Art. 8 (right to respect for private life) in those contexts in which he has not previously recognized. In particular, interpretation of Art. 8 of the Convention in the context of the right to environmental safety in case significant harm to the persons health (cases Dubetska and others v. Ukraine, Grymkivska v. Ukraine), the right to beg in the context of the right to freedom of expression (Lakatush v. Switzerland). It is established that the development of these provisions requires analysis and consideration in the development of a new Criminal Code. At the same time, care must be taken to maintain a balance between freedoms and human rights and the security of society and the state. It is important that the rights enshrined in the Convention remain fundamental and do not go beyond the interests and needs of the individual. In addition, it is also necessary to take into account the national characteristics of the state.

scholarly journals PEMBAHARUAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERKAIT BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN PADA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM RANGKA PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afrianto Sagita
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Proof Theory ◽  
Policy Reform ◽  
Burden Of Proof ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
Financial Losses

Abstract This research aims to find out and analyze about how the criminal law policy reform related to the burden of proof theory can be used as the legal instruments in order as a tool to recover the state financial losses. This research has the type of Normative legal research, which has done by examining the library materials or the secondary data. The result for this reserach explain which Presumption Of Guilty is very urgent to be contained on the Eradication Of Corruption Crime Law Policy and it is considered to implement as immediatly. The application of the Presumption Of Guilty theory should be limited only on the evidance step on the trial only. Through the method of reversing the burden of proof, which expected to eliminate the difficulties of Eradication on the Corruption Crime Law Policy which faced during this time. Therefore, it is reasonable if the legislators still desire to contained the reversing of the burden of proof system on the Corruption Crime Law Policy, so it should be able to find out the base of law, which is by making the presumption of guilty to become the foundation or the philosophy which has function as the base of law. Then, level of the principle to be implemented as a norm, so that the policy about the burden of proof can be included on every article clause in the Corruption Crime Law Policy. Legal rules which is in the context of eradicating corruption also should be developed progressively according to the development of times, to reduce the left behind and get lose of current corruption modes nowadays.  Keywords: Criminal Law Policy, Burden of Proof, Corruption

The Underlying Principles of Freedom of Religion or Belief—Towards a Holistic Conceptualization

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bielefeldt Heiner, Prof ◽  
Ghanea Nazila, Dr ◽  
Wiener Michael, Dr
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Freedom Of Expression ◽  
The State ◽  
Freedom Of Religion ◽  
Holistic Understanding ◽  
The Right

This chapter discusses the underlying principles of freedom of religion or belief. While having its specific features as well as specific areas of application, the right to freedom of religion or belief epitomizes the very same principles which define the human rights approach in general: respect for human dignity, normative universalism, freedom, and equality. Highlighting these principles, which freedom of religion or belief shares with other human rights, is important against the background of a growing perception (or rather: misperception) that freedom of religion or belief allegedly stands in an uneasy relationship to other human rights, in particular freedom of expression or claims of gender emancipation. This chapter presents systematic arguments which underline a holistic understanding of freedom of religion or belief as an indispensable part of human rights in general. In order for the State to fulfil its task as formal guarantor of everyone’s right to freedom of religion or belief without discrimination, an inclusive secular constitution may provide the most suitable conditions.

scholarly journals PENGATURAN HUKUM CALON LEGISLATIF MANTAN NARAPIDANA

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Salim Fauzi Lubis ◽  
Ismail Ismail ◽  
Mina Mardiana
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The People ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
Election Commission

Election or local election is a way of channeling the rights of every principle community, which means that the right to vote and vote is contained in his constitutional rights as citizens. In article 28 letter D of the Republic of Indonesia Republic of 1945 which reads that "every citizen has the right to have the same opportunity in government". The sound contained in the article contains the understanding that the State guarantees each of its citizens to obtain the rights to sit in government either as People's Representatives, regents, Mayors, Governors, or even become a President. The method used in this study is normative juridical legal research which uses a statutory approach. The issue raised by the author is How the Human Rights Perspective of Legislative Candidates in Organizing Elections and How Comparative Legal Arrangements for Former Legislative Candidates Examined From Law Number 7 of 2017 Concerning General Elections With Regulation of the Election Commission Number 20 of 2018 Regarding Nominating Members Regional Representative Council, Provincial Regional Representative Council, Regency / City Representative Council. In terms of the implementation of elections need to be held honestly, fairly and democratically based on the spirit of Democracy that has been carried out so far so as to create leaders and representatives of the people who side with their people. Speaking of Human Rights, everyone has the same rights before the State and applies to former corruption convicts who have or have the same political rights as other citizens guaranteed by the constitution.

When the State Speaks, What Should It Say?

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey Brettschneider
Keyword(s):  
Freedom Of Expression ◽  
The State ◽  
Hate Groups ◽  
New Approach ◽  
State Action ◽  
Democratic State ◽  
Theory Of Value ◽  
The Right ◽  
Equal Citizenship ◽  
The Ideal

How should a liberal democracy respond to hate groups and others that oppose the ideal of free and equal citizenship? The democratic state faces the hard choice of either protecting the rights of hate groups and allowing their views to spread, or banning their views and violating citizens' rights to freedoms of expression, association, and religion. Avoiding the familiar yet problematic responses to these issues, this book proposes a new approach called value democracy. The theory of value democracy argues that the state should protect the right to express illiberal beliefs, but the state should also engage in democratic persuasion when it speaks through its various expressive capacities: publicly criticizing, and giving reasons to reject, hate-based or other discriminatory viewpoints. Distinguishing between two kinds of state action—expressive and coercive—the book contends that public criticism of viewpoints advocating discrimination based on race, gender, or sexual orientation should be pursued through the state's expressive capacities as speaker, educator, and spender. When the state uses its expressive capacities to promote the values of free and equal citizenship, it engages in democratic persuasion. By using democratic persuasion, the state can both respect rights and counter hateful or discriminatory viewpoints. The book extends this analysis from freedom of expression to the freedoms of religion and association, and shows that value democracy can uphold the protection of these freedoms while promoting equality for all citizens.

Bantuan Hukum Cuma-Cuma Bagi Tersangka yang Tidak Mampu Pada Tingkat Penyidikan

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rio Saputra ◽  
Mokhammad Najih
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Aid ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Study Techniques ◽  
The Right

<p><em>Suspects have the right to obtain legal assistance, especially for suspects who are classified as economically disadvantaged in accordance with Article 56 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The facts show that there are many irregularities in the implementation of legal aid, therefore it is necessary to know about the implementation of free legal aid for suspects who are incapacitated at the level of investigation and the factors that become obstacles in the implementation of legal aid. This legal research is an empirical legal research and this research is descriptive in nature. The data used are primary data and secondary data. The techniques used to collect data were document study techniques and interview techniques. Inhibiting factors affecting the implementation of free legal aid for suspects who are unable at the level of investigation can be classified and differentiated into 3 factors, namely, legal substance, legal structure, and legal culture).</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>Legal Aid, Criminal Cases</em></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document