scholarly journals Prognostic role of EZH2 in gliomas: a meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung-Soo Pyo ◽  
Dong-Wook Kang
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Prognostic Role ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Ezh2 Expression ◽  
Positive Rate ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Background: The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinicopathological significance of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) expression in gliomas, including its incidence and prognostic role. In addition, we investigated the concordance between immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction for determining the presence or absence of EZH2 in these tumors. Methods: The current meta-analysis included 1,049 gliomas with various WHO tumor grades from 12 eligible studies, which were analyzed for positivity of EZH2 and correlation between EZH2 expression and prognosis. Subgroup analyses were performed based on detection methods and WHO tumor grades. Results: We found the estimated positive rate of EZH2 in gliomas to be 0.663 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.549-0.761). There was no difference between immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction in determination of EZH2 positivity (0.706, 95% CI, 0.539-0.831 vs. 0.673, 95% CI, 0.472-0.825). The positive rate of EZH2 increased by increasing WHO tumor grade. EZH2 expression was significantly correlated with worse overall and progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.436, 95% CI, 1.350-4.393, and HR = 4.071, 95% CI, 1.325-12.508, respectively). The overall concordance rate between immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction was 0.885 (95% CI, 0.300-0.993). Conclusions: EZH2 positivity was significantly correlated with WHO tumor grade and worse prognosis in gliomas.

scholarly journals A meta-analysis of accuracy and sensitivity of chest CT and RT-PCR in COVID-19 diagnosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Khatami ◽  
Mohammad Saatchi ◽  
Seyed Saeed Tamehri Zadeh ◽  
Zahra Sadat Aghamir ◽  
Alireza Namazi Shabestari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Chest Ct Scan

AbstractNowadays there is an ongoing acute respiratory outbreak caused by the novel highly contagious coronavirus (COVID-19). The diagnostic protocol is based on quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and chests CT scan, with uncertain accuracy. This meta-analysis study determines the diagnostic value of an initial chest CT scan in patients with COVID-19 infection in comparison with RT-PCR. Three main databases; PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and EMBASE were systematically searched for all published literature from January 1st, 2019, to the 21st May 2020 with the keywords "COVID19 virus", "2019 novel coronavirus", "Wuhan coronavirus", "2019-nCoV", "X-Ray Computed Tomography", "Polymerase Chain Reaction", "Reverse Transcriptase PCR", and "PCR Reverse Transcriptase". All relevant case-series, cross-sectional, and cohort studies were selected. Data extraction and analysis were performed using STATA v.14.0SE (College Station, TX, USA) and RevMan 5. Among 1022 articles, 60 studies were eligible for totalizing 5744 patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of chest CT scan compared to RT-PCR were 87% (95% CI 85–90%), 46% (95% CI 29–63%), 69% (95% CI 56–72%), and 89% (95% CI 82–96%), respectively. It is important to rely on the repeated RT-PCR three times to give 99% accuracy, especially in negative samples. Regarding the overall diagnostic sensitivity of 87% for chest CT, the RT-PCR testing is essential and should be repeated to escape misdiagnosis.

scholarly journals DETEKSI BAKTERI PENYEBAB PENYAKIT TYPHUS PADA MANUSIA DENGAN POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Muktiningsih Nurjayadi ◽  
Fera Kurnia Dewi ◽  
Dahlia Dahlia ◽  
S, Restu.N S ◽  
Fitri W
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Detection Method ◽  
Serological Test ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Salmonella Typhi ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Dna Fragment ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Salmonella typhi is bacteria that cause typhoid disease in humans. In Indonesia, the morbidity number of typhoid disease tends to be increase. Thus, it has been requiring the alternative for handling or preventing that disease. Recently, the detection method commonly uses for S. typhi detection is Serological test. The weakness of this method is often producing less accurate and not specific detection. The previous research was successfully discovered S. typhi gene that codes protein which is contributed at adherents or colonization those bacteria in epithelial human cell. That result was base to develop detection on S. typhi method by Polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The aim of this research is developing a specific and accurate detection method for S. typhi bacteria by PCR. The research result is performed successfully to amplify the fimbrial-C S. typhi gene using pairs of primer FW-INT 2- REV-1A NEW which was designed and synthesized in previous step. That success showed by the finding of the DNA fragment of 0.2 kilobase (kb) proffers to size of DNA fragment which is hopefully in using S. typhi genome as a template. Specificity and sensitivity test for those primers are still conducting to reproducibility results. Base on the results can be concluded that the research have successfully conducted in developing S. typhi detection method using pairs of S. typhi fimbrial-C primer. Hopefully, the studied of developing detection methods was conducted better compare with former detection methods.Keywords: S. typhi detection method, fim-C S. typhi gene, PCRAbstrakSalmonella typhi merupakan bakteri penyebab penyakit tifus pada manusia. Di Indonesia, angka morbiditas penderita penyakit typhus cenderung meningkat, sehingga diperlukan suatu alternatif untuk penanganan atau pencegahan penyakit tersebut. Sampai saat ini metode deteksi S. typhi yang banyak digunakan adalah uji serologi. Kelemahan metode ini adalah sering menghasilkan deteksi yang kurang akurat dan tidak spesifik. Pada penelitian yang dilakukan sebelumnya, telah berhasil ditemukan gen fimbrial-C S. typhi pengkode protein yang berperan dalam penempelan S. typhi pada usus manusia, hasil ini dijadikan landasan untuk pengembangan metode deteksi menggunakan teknik PCR. Tujuan penelitian ini mengembangkan metode deteksi yang akurat dan spesifik untuk bakteri penyebab penyakit typhus pada manusia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa telah berhasil dilakukan amplifikasi gen fimbrial-C S. typhi menggunakan pasangan primer hasil perancangan yaitu FW-INT 2- REV-1A NEW. Keberhasilan tersebut ditunjukkan dengan diperolehnya pita DNA berukuran 0.2 kilo basa (kb) sesuai dengan ukuran pita DNA yang diharapkan dengan menggunakan template DNA genom bakteri S. typhi. Uji sensitivitas dan spesifisitas terhadap primer hasil rancangan sedang di kaji lebih lanjut untuk memperoleh reprodusibiltas hasil pengujian. Berdasarkan hasil yang diperoleh dapat disimpulkan bahwa telah berhasil dilakukan pengembangan metode deteksi S. typhi menggunakan pasangan primer fimbrial-C S. typhi. Pengkajian pengembangan metode deteksi yang dihasilkan ini diharapkan dapat lebih baik dibanding beberapa metode deteksi yang sudah ada.Kata Kunci: Metode Deteksi Bakteri typhus, fim-C S. typhi, PCR

scholarly journals Prevalence of the Helicobacter pylori babA2 Gene in Children Mainly Depends on the PCR Primer Set Used

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Anja Šterbenc ◽  
Maja M. Lunar ◽  
Matjaž Homan ◽  
Boštjan Luzar ◽  
Nina Zidar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Diagnostic Tool ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Primer Sets ◽  
H Pylori ◽  
Pcr Primer

Various polymerase chain reaction- (PCR-) based methods with varying positivity rates were designed to detect the Helicobacter pylori babA2 gene. To compare different primer sets, babA2 prevalence was determined in 279 H. pylori-positive pediatric samples using the 832 bp, 139 bp, and 271 bp PCR primer sets, resulting in 34.0%, 51.3%, and 79.6% prevalence of the babA2 gene, respectively. The babA2 status determined using the 832 bp and 139 bp PCR primer sets significantly correlated with bacterial density and activity of inflammation, whereas no such correlations were found using the 271 bp PCR primer set. The 139 and 832 bp PCR primer sets concordantly detected the babA2 gene in 93 cases; however, in comparison to the 832 bp PCR primer set, the 139 bp PCR primer set detected additional 50 babA2 cases, whereas only two 832 bp positive cases were missed. The 271 bp PCR primer set missed 32 babA2 cases that were 832 bp and/or 139 bp PCR positive, but tested solely positive in 109 cases. Interestingly, cloning of a subset of 271 bp PCR positive samples revealed amplification of the babA/B gene chimera. Hence, in our opinion, the 271 bp PCR protocol is not a reliable diagnostic tool for detecting the babA2 gene in children. Our results reaffirm previous observations that the use of certain babA2 PCR primer sets can significantly impact estimation of the prevalence and clinical relevance of the H. pylori babA2 gene in children, suggesting babA2 detection methods should be carefully selected.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document