Is There a Need for the Prevented Damages of Extreme Necessity?
The article offers a brief substantive analysis of extreme necessity as a justifying circumstance under Bulgarian criminal law. In this sense, the normatively established requirements for legality of the act in case of extreme necessity are critically approached. The current regulation of extreme necessity is questioned in its part regarding the condition for success of the rescue act, which unreasonably limits its application and distinguishes it from other circumstances excluding public danger. On this basis, it is argued that de lege ferenda expands the scope of the institute by dropping the requirement for a successful outcome in Article 13 of the Bulgarian Criminal Code.