scholarly journals A BUSCA PELA REALIZAÇÃO DA DIGNIDADE DA PESSOA HUMANA NO INSTITUTO DA ADOÇÃO

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-30
Author(s):  
Sarah Carolina Colorado Borges ◽  
Ana Augusta Rodrigues Westin Ebaid

The adoption institute has undergone numerous changes over the years, and from the 1988 Federal Constitution onwards, the most important innovations began to take effect. From that moment on, the adoption began to gain a significant new guise to protect the rights of children and adolescents. In the present work, through doctrinal and jurisprudential research, through books and articles, it aims to make an analysis of the history and adoption process, which is a subject that is always very relevant and discussed in society, bringing positive aspects, such as innovations. who shifted the focus from suitors to minors, and broughta greater guarantee to their rights; and negative aspects such as prejudices, late adoption and the slowness of our legal system. The methodology included bibliographic survey. The main focus is to analyze the adoption process based on the principles of human dignity found in our Charter, and the principles that govern the adoption institute, and how it has been applied in the daily lives of children and adolescents , to ensure their fundamental rights and family life.

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliana Aló Silveira

The pandemic that was caused by COVID 19 made the world rethink ethical principles, morals, and justice, but always side by side with science. Never has bioethics been thought of so much, as a science that aims to provide the ethical content so that the human being is treated with dignity in the face of scientific techniques that concern life. Bio law as a branch of legal science reveals itself as an indispensable branch to the legal system, to regulate and reconcile biotechnological advances with the principle of human dignity, founded on democracy and the defense of fundamental rights. In the international sphere, the right to life is foreseen in art. 4 of the 1969 American Convention on Human Rights, a document that was ratified by Brazil and comes from the regional system. In the Brazilian legal system, the provision is in article 1, clause III, of the Federal Constitution of 1988, which established human dignity as the foundation of the Democratic State of Law, also regulating, in article 5, the right to life. Starting from these guidelines that the human being should not be considered a "thing", or an instrument, the thought, even if philosophical, can lead to important conclusions in the field of scientific experimentation, especially with what has been happening in relation to the vaccines for COVID-19, that even if approved by a committee and following international protocols, one cannot guarantee with them the absolute protection of human dignity, principles of bioethics and fundamental human values. And, because of these discussions, the courts are urged to manifest themselves about the refusals of workers to be vaccinated.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-111
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Barcellos

The paper deals with a situation that perhaps represents one of the most radical and profound challenges to the claim that contemporaneous western societies – and Brazilian society in particular – share the values concerning equality and essential or ontological dignity of mankind. It is an attempt to investigate how Brazilian society, immersed in a context of fear as a result of urban violence, deals with its prison population. This paper is divided into three main parts. Part one deals with a situation of fact: traditional, ongoing, generalized, serious and practically institutionalized violation of the fundamental rights of prison inmates in Brazil. This situation of fact easily leads one to conclude that inmates in Brazil are not treated like human beings (and are probably not even considered as human beings). Part two is an attempt to examine some possible explanations of why this situation exists. In part three, the paper tries to suggest that there is a connection between how prisoners are treated and the current level of urban violence in Brazil as a contributing factor. Considering that neither the principle of human dignity nor the actions of the legal system have been able to change the scenario that has built up in recent decades, perhaps it would be useful to suggest that inhumane treatment of inmates is not just a problem restricted to prisons: society as a whole receives the effects of this policy in the form of more violence. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-111
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Barcellos

The paper deals with a situation that perhaps represents one of the most radical and profound challenges to the claim that contemporaneous western societies – and Brazilian society in particular – share the values concerning equality and essential or ontological dignity of mankind. It is an attempt to investigate how Brazilian society, immersed in a context of fear as a result of urban violence, deals with its prison population. This paper is divided into three main parts. Part one deals with a situation of fact: traditional, ongoing, generalized, serious and practically institutionalized violation of the fundamental rights of prison inmates in Brazil. This situation of fact easily leads one to conclude that inmates in Brazil are not treated like human beings (and are probably not even considered as human beings). Part two is an attempt to examine some possible explanations of why this situation exists. In part three, the paper tries to suggest that there is a connection between how prisoners are treated and the current level of urban violence in Brazil as a contributing factor. Considering that neither the principle of human dignity nor the actions of the legal system have been able to change the scenario that has built up in recent decades, perhaps it would be useful to suggest that inhumane treatment of inmates is not just a problem restricted to prisons: society as a whole receives the effects of this policy in the form of more violence. 


ICL Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-151
Author(s):  
Tímea Drinóczi

Abstract The Constitutional Court declared in its ruling 22/2016 (XII 5) that by exercising its competences, it can examine whether the joint exercise of competences under Article E) (2) of the Fundamental Law of Hungary infringes human dignity, other fundamental rights, the sovereignty of Hungary, or Hungary’s self-identity based on its historical constitution.


2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 445-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Débora Silva de Oliveira ◽  
Eda Regina Doederlein Schwartz

From a legal and psychological standpoint, this article examines some aspects involved in adoption, including the effects of the alterations made to the Statute of Children and Adolescents by the National Adoption Law. It verifies whether or not the Law accelerated the performance of adoption processes. This paper is based on bibliographic searches and statistics from Rio Grande do Sul. Results show that the Law was innovative in many aspects but ceased to tackle others, such as adoption by homosexuals. Proceedings have become more bureaucratic, and the number of adoptions in the state, according to the records, remains insignificant. The New Law has not yet achieved its objective of accelerating the adoption process. Institutional sheltering, which should be temporary, at times becomes permanent, which contradicts the right of children/adolescents to family life and results in significant psychological damage to them.


Author(s):  
Alan Felipe Provin ◽  
Audrey Pongan Borteze

O presente artigo objetiva a análise do direito à liberdade religiosa de crianças e adolescentes, tendo em vista que este é consagrado com um dos direitos fundamentais previstos na Constituição Federal de 1988. A pesquisa possui como problemática o questionamento acerca da possibilidade de atribuir o fundamento da liberdade de convicção religiosa às crianças e adolescentes, ainda que em conflito com o direito à vida, considerando a incapacidade civil dos menores. Ademais, analisa também os direitos constitucionais e princípios aplicados aos menores à luz da doutrina da proteção integral, bem como expõe o conflito entre direitos fundamentais e aborda as posições dos Tribunais quanto ao tema. Em termo de metodologia, utilizou-se a pesquisa qualitativa, indutiva e bibliográfica. Ao final dos estudos, concluiu-se que, em que pese o direito à vida e a liberdade religiosa serem direitos fundamentais, com hierarquia idêntica, há casos em que é permitida a relativização de um direito em prol do outro, devendo ser analisado cada caso em concreto.   Abstract: This article aims to analyze the right to religious freedom of children and adolescents, given that this is enshrined as one of the fundamental rights provided in the Federal Constitution of 1988. The research has as problematic the possibility of attributing the foundation of religious´ freedom to the children and adolescents, although in conflict with the right to life, considering the civil incapacity of the minors. In addition, it also analyzes the constitutional rights and principles applied to minors in the light of the doctrine of integral protection, as well as exposes the conflict between fundamental rights and addresses the positions of the Courts on the subject. In terms of methodology, we used the qualitative, inductive and bibliographic research. At the end of the studies, it was concluded that, in spite of the fact that the right to life and religious freedom are fundamental rights, with a similar hierarchy, there are cases where the relativization of one right is allowed for the other, and each case must be analyzed in particular.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-111
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Barcellos

The paper deals with a situation that perhaps represents one of the most radical and profound challenges to the claim that contemporaneous western societies – and Brazilian society in particular – share the values concerning equality and essential or ontological dignity of mankind. It is an attempt to investigate how Brazilian society, immersed in a context of fear as a result of urban violence, deals with its prison population. This paper is divided into three main parts. Part one deals with a situation of fact: traditional, ongoing, generalized, serious and practically institutionalized violation of the fundamental rights of prison inmates in Brazil. This situation of fact easily leads one to conclude that inmates in Brazil are not treated like human beings (and are probably not even considered as human beings). Part two is an attempt to examine some possible explanations of why this situation exists. In part three, the paper tries to suggest that there is a connection between how prisoners are treated and the current level of urban violence in Brazil as a contributing factor. Considering that neither the principle of human dignity nor the actions of the legal system have been able to change the scenario that has built up in recent decades, perhaps it would be useful to suggest that inhumane treatment of inmates is not just a problem restricted to prisons: society as a whole receives the effects of this policy in the form of more violence. 


2016 ◽  
pp. 49-64
Author(s):  
DUBRAVKO LJUBIC

The study presents the human dignity as the basis of every legal order, its ethics and all the other factors that make a legal system just, a condition for the existence of rights in general. Croatian Constitution does not recognize human dignity as the highest value and the basis of design of the basic legal sphere, but, by accepting the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union human dignity is not becoming just the source and means of interpretation of the basic legal sphere, but it is also becoming the basis for establishing relations between the individual and the state and individuals themselves


Author(s):  
Fábio Siebeneichler de Andrade ◽  
Andressa Da Cunha Gudde

Sumário: Introdução. 1. A Tutela da Personalidade como Direito Fundamental. Conceito e Evolução no Ordenamento Jurídico Pátrio. 2. As Características dos Direitos da Personalidade no Código Civil de 2002. 3. Direitos da Personalidade Aplicados às Relações de Trabalho. Proteção e Indisponibilidade. Autonomia Privada e Ponderação de Valores nas Relações de Trabalho. Casuística. Considerações Finais. Referências. Resumo: A longa trajetória percorrida pelo Direito até o reconhecimento dos direitos da personalidade e sua elevação ao status de direitos fundamentais ajudam a compreender as matizes e os contornos do seu conjunto de valores. No ordenamento jurídico pátrio, os direitos da personalidade caracterizam-se pela indisponibilidade e pelo seu caráter absoluto, ainda que temperados pela necessária convivência com o direito fundamental à liberdade, do que a autonomia privada é uma de suas mais conhecidas facetas. É a partir de tal reconhecimento, e utilizando-se do método dedutivo e dialético, que o presente artigo busca explorar a aplicação dos direitos da personalidade ao contexto das relações de trabalho, no qual os mesmos adquirem contornos próprios, haja vista ser o Direito do Trabalho, no Brasil, fortemente calcado no princípio da proteção e da irrenunciabilidade,em especial. Todavia, por se tratarem os direitos da personalidade e do trabalho de direitos fundamentais, é natural que os mesmos estejam submetidos ao exercício de ponderação, sempre que entrarem em conflito com outros direitos de igual estatura constitucional-fundamental, conforme o caso concreto. É assim que a casuística fornece valiosos exemplos de situações em que os direitos da personalidade e do trabalho cedem espaço a outros direitos fundamentais, como a propriedade, sendo a autonomia privada e o respeito ao núcleo essencial da dignidade da pessoa humana, elementos imprescindíveis à sua legitimação.    Palavras-chave: Direitos da personalidade; Autonomia Privada; Direitos fundamentais; Ponderação; Relações de Trabalho. Abstract: The long journey travelled by the Law to the personality rights recognition and its elevation to fundamental rights status helps to understand the hues and contours of its set of values. In Brazilian legal system, the personality rights are characterized by its unavailability and absoluteness, albeit tempered by the necessary interaction with the fundamental right to freedom, of which private autonomy is one of its best-known facets. It is from this recognition, and using deductive and dialectical method, that this article aims to explore the application of personality rights to the context of labor relations, in which they acquire proper contours, having in mind that, in Brazil, the Labor Law is heavily based on the principle of protection and unavailability, specially. Nonetheless, considering that personality and labor rights are fundamental rights, it is natural that both are subjected to balancing test every time they collide with other fundamental-constitutional rights of same status, as the case. This is how casuistry gives us great examples of situations where personality and labor rights give way to other fundamental rights, such as propriety right, being the private autonomy and the respect to the essential core of the human dignity indispensable constituents to its legitimation.   Keywords: Personality Rights; Private Autonomy; Fundamental Rights; Balancing; Labor Relations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (40) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaianny Saionara Macena de Araújo ◽  
Magno Gurgel Saraiva ◽  
Adriano Marteleto Godinho

RESUMOEste trabalho tem como objetivo desenvolver a discussão sobre a liberdade de expressão e seu conflito com o discurso de ódio no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro. Deste modo, expõe-se o entendimento e a dimensão do discurso de ódio, assim como sua resolução diante de casos concretos e a reparação civil pelos danos oriundos. Neste contexto, a Ciência Jurídica não pode ser indiferente ao conteúdo dessas normas, tampouco à sua capacidade de adequação aos problemas sociais. O exercício das liberdades civis, sob este prisma, tem muito a ser enriquecido, à medida que se expande a compreensão – antes eminentemente limitada à esfera normativa privada – e passa a tratar da proteção e garantia de direitos com uma preocupação finalística que deve cuidar evidentemente dos direitos humanos, de sua validade fundada tanto na lei, quanto na Constituição, e de sua real eficácia em favor da dignidade humana.PALAVRAS-CHAVEDireitos Humanos. Direitos Fundamentais. Discurso de ódio. Dignidade da pessoa humana. Liberdade de expressão. ABSTRACTThis paper aims to develop the discussion about freedom of expression and hate speech in the Brazilian legal system. Thus, it shows the concept and dimension of hate speech, as well as the resolution in specific cases and the civil liability for damages. In this sense, Law can’t be indifferent to the content of these rules, neither to its adequation capacity towards the social problems. The exercise of civil liberties, based on this conception, has a lot to be enriched, as far as it expands the understanding – previously limited eminently to the private normative sphere – and moves on to the protection and guarantee of rights with a concern that obviously has to take care of human rights, as well as its real effectiveness in favor of human dignity.KEYWORDSHuman rights. Fundamental rights. Hate speech. Human dignity. Freedom of speech.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document