scholarly journals Improving Positive Blood Culture Removal Time Significantly Decreases Total Processing Time

2014 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Salazar ◽  
Mukul Divatia ◽  
Patricia L. Cernoch ◽  
Randall J. Olsen ◽  
S. Wesley Long ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Processing Time ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory ◽  
Total Processing Time ◽  
Pathogen Identification ◽  
Critical Function ◽  
Removal Time

Context Timely processing of blood cultures with positive results, including Gram staining and notification of clinicians, is a critical function of the clinical microbiology laboratory. Analysis of processing time in our laboratory revealed opportunities to enhance workflow efficiency. We found that the average time from positive blood culture result to removal of the bottle for processing (positive-to-removal [PR] time) was inadequate for our rapid pathogen identification program. Objective To determine whether increased vigilance about PR time and prioritization of laboratory resources would decrease PR time and total processing time. Design We performed a retrospective analysis of blood culture PR time 7 months before and 7 months after an in-service meeting during which the importance of PR time was emphasized, and corrective measures were implemented. Results Before the in-service meeting, the average PR time for 5057 samples was 38 minutes, with an aggregate time of 192 251 minutes. Unexpectedly, we discovered that only 51.8% (2617 of 5057) of the positive blood cultures were removed in less than 10 minutes. After the in-service meeting, for 5293 samples, the average PR time improved to 8 minutes, the aggregate time improved to 44 630 minutes, and 84.5% (4470 of 5293) of the positive blood cultures were removed in less than 10 minutes. These improvements reduced the time to telephone notification of the Gram stain results to a caregiver by 46.7% (from 105 minutes to 56 minutes). Conclusions Increased awareness of barriers to rapid pathogen identification and interventions for improving performance time significantly enhanced care of patients with bloodstream infections.

scholarly journals 48. Association of Rapid Pathogen Identification and Pharmacist Intervention on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy for Bloodstream Infections at Two Community Hospitals

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S47-S47
Author(s):  
Bryant M Froberg ◽  
Nicholas Torney
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Pharmacist Intervention ◽  
Pathogen Identification ◽  
Community Hospitals ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background As many as 1 in 3 patients with bloodstream infections at community hospitals receive inappropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy. Studies have shown that the coupling of real-time intervention with rapid pathogen identification improves patient outcomes and decreases health-system costs at large, tertiary academic centers. The aim of this study was to assess if similar outcomes could be obtained with the implementation of real-time pharmacist intervention to rapid pathogen identification at two smaller, rural community hospitals. Methods This was a pre-post implementation study that occurred from September of 2019 to March 2020. This study included patients ≥18 years of age admitted with one positive blood culture. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, had a polymicrobial blood culture, known culture prior to admission, hospice consulted prior to admission, expired prior to positive blood culture, or transferred to another hospital within 24 hours of a positive blood culture. Endpoints of patients prior to intervention were compared to patients post-implementation. The primary endpoint was time to optimal antimicrobial therapy. Secondary endpoints included time to effective antimicrobial therapy, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, and overall cost of hospitalization. Results Of 212 patients screened, 88 patients were included with 44 patients in each group. Both groups were similar in terms of comorbidities, infection source, and causative microbial. No significant difference was seen in the mean time to optimal antimicrobial therapy (27.3±35.5 hr vs 19.4± 30 hr, p=0.265). Patients in the post-implementation group had a significantly higher mean hospitalization cost ($24,638.87± $11,080.91 vs $32,722.07±$13,076.73, p=0.013). There was no significant difference in time to effective antimicrobial therapy, in-hospital mortality, or length of hospital stay. Conclusion There were no between-group differences in the primary outcome of time to optimal therapy, with a higher mean hospitalization cost after implementation. These results suggest further antimicrobial stewardship interventions are needed, along with larger studies conducted in the community hospital settings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 81. Reducing Unnecessary Blood Cultures Through Diagnostic Stewardship

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S157-S157
Author(s):  
Sujeet Govindan ◽  
Luke Strnad
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Candida Sp ◽  
Daily Frequency ◽  
Oregon Health

Abstract Background At our institution, we learned the frequency of blood cultures was sometimes being changed from “Once” to “Daily” without a defined number of days. We hypothesized this led to unnecessary blood cultures being performed. Methods Over a 3 month period from 12/6/2019-3/6/2020, we retrospectively evaluated the charts of patients who had a blood culture frequency changed to “Daily”. We evaluated if there was an initial positive blood culture within 48 hours of the “Daily” order being placed and the number of positive, negative, or “contaminant” sets of cultures drawn with the order. Contaminant blood cultures were defined as a contaminant species, present only once in the repeat cultures, and not present in initial positive cultures. Results 95 unique orders were placed with 406 sets of cultures drawn from 89 adults. ~20% of the time (17 orders) the order was placed without an initial positive blood culture. This led to 62 sets of cultures being drawn, only 1 of which came back positive. 78/95 orders had an initial positive blood culture. The most common initial organisms were Staphylococcus aureus (SA) (38), Candida sp (10), Enterobacterales sp (10), and coagulase negative staphylococci (7). 43/78 (55%) orders with an initial positive set had positive repeat cultures. SA (26) and Candida sp (8) were most common to have positive repeats. Central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) were found in 5 of the orders and contaminant species were found in 4 of the orders. 54% of the patients who had a “Daily” order placed did not have positive repeat cultures. The majority of the cultures were drawn from Surgical (40 orders) and Medical (35 orders) services. Assuming that SA and Candida sp require 48 hours of negative blood cultures to document clearance and other species require 24 hours, it was estimated that 51% of the cultures drawn using the "Daily" frequency were unnecessary. Cost savings over a year of removing the "Daily" frequency would be ~&14,000. Data from "Daily" blood culture orders drawn at Oregon Health & Science University from 12/6/2019-3/6/2020 Conclusion Unnecessary blood cultures are drawn when the frequency of blood cultures is changed to "Daily". Repeat blood cultures had the greatest utility in bloodstream infections due to SA or Candida sp, and with CLABSI where the line is still in place. These results led to a stewardship intervention to change blood culture ordering at our institution. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Blood-Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method: a Phenotypic Method for Detecting Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Directly from Positive Blood Culture Broths

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Sfeir ◽  
M. J. Satlin ◽  
K. A. Fauntleroy ◽  
S. G. Jenkins ◽  
L. F. Westblade
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Public Health Surveillance ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Health Surveillance ◽  
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory ◽  
Microbiology Laboratory ◽  
Becton Dickinson ◽  
Diagnostic Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Mechanical Lysis

ABSTRACT A variant of the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) was developed to detect carbapenemase activity directly from positive blood culture broths. The method, termed “Blood-mCIM,” was evaluated using Bactec blood culture bottles (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) inoculated with 27 different carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) isolates and 34 different non-CPE isolates. The assay was positive for all blood culture broths inoculated with CPE isolates and negative for all blood culture broths inoculated with non-CPE isolates, corresponding to a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 100%, respectively. This assay is inexpensive using “off the shelf” reagents, does not require centrifugation or mechanical lysis, and can be readily implemented in any clinical microbiology laboratory. The Blood-mCIM should facilitate expedient administration of antimicrobial therapy targeted toward CPE bloodstream infections and assist infection control and public health surveillance.

scholarly journals Proposal for the use of echocardiography in bloodstream infections due to different streptococcal species

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Chamat-Hedemand ◽  
Niels Eske Bruun ◽  
Lauge Østergaard ◽  
Magnus Arpi ◽  
Emil Fosbøl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Moderate Risk ◽  
Streptococcal Species ◽  
Very High

Abstract Background Infective endocarditis (IE) is diagnosed in 7–8% of streptococcal bloodstream infections (BSIs), yet it is unclear when to perform transthoracic (TTE) and transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) according to different streptococcal species. The aim of this sub-study was to propose a flowchart for the use of echocardiography in streptococcal BSIs. Methods In a population-based setup, we investigated all patients admitted with streptococcal BSIs and crosslinked data with nationwide registries to identify comorbidities and concomitant hospitalization with IE. Streptococcal species were divided in four groups based on the crude risk of being diagnosed with IE (low-risk < 3%, moderate-risk 3–10%, high-risk 10–30% and very high-risk > 30%). Based on number of positive blood culture (BC) bottles and IE risk factors (prosthetic valve, previous IE, native valve disease, and cardiac device), we further stratified cases according to probability of concomitant IE diagnosis to create a flowchart suggesting TTE plus TOE (IE > 10%), TTE (IE 3–10%), or “wait & see” (IE < 3%). Results We included 6393 cases with streptococcal BSIs (mean age 68.1 years [SD 16.2], 52.8% men). BSIs with low-risk streptococci (S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, S. intermedius) are not initially recommended echocardiography, unless they have ≥3 positive BC bottles and an IE risk factor. Moderate-risk streptococci (S. agalactiae, S. anginosus, S. constellatus, S. dysgalactiae, S. salivarius, S. thermophilus) are guided to “wait & see” strategy if they neither have a risk factor nor ≥3 positive BC bottles, while a TTE is recommended if they have either ≥3 positive BC bottles or a risk factor. Further, a TTE and TOE are recommended if they present with both. High-risk streptococci (S. mitis/oralis, S. parasanguinis, G. adiacens) are directed to a TTE if they neither have a risk factor nor ≥3 positive BC bottles, but to TTE and TOE if they have either ≥3 positive BC bottles or a risk factor. Very high-risk streptococci (S. gordonii, S. gallolyticus, S. mutans, S. sanguinis) are guided directly to TTE and TOE due to a high baseline IE prevalence. Conclusion In addition to the clinical picture, this flowchart based on streptococcal species, number of positive blood culture bottles, and risk factors, can help guide the use of echocardiography in streptococcal bloodstream infections. Since echocardiography results are not available the findings should be confirmed prospectively with the use of systematic echocardiography.

scholarly journals Scanning Electron Microscope: A New Potential Tool to Replace Gram Staining for Microbe Identification in Blood Cultures

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1170
Author(s):  
Gabriel Haddad ◽  
Sara Bellali ◽  
Tatsuki Takakura ◽  
Anthony Fontanini ◽  
Yusuke Ominami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscope ◽  
Sample Preparation ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Preliminary Identification ◽  
Gram Staining ◽  
Micro Organisms ◽  
Scanning Electron

Blood culture is currently the most commonly used method for diagnosing sepsis and bloodstream infections. However, the long turn-around-time to achieve microbe identification remains a major concern for clinical microbiology laboratories. Gram staining for preliminary identification remains the gold standard. We developed a new rapid strategy using a tabletop scanning electron microscope (SEM) and compared its performance with Gram staining for the detection of micro-organisms and preliminary identification directly from blood cultures. We first optimised the sample preparation for twelve samples simultaneously, saving time on imaging. In this work, SEM proved its ability to identify bacteria and yeasts in morphotypes up to the genus level in some cases. We blindly tested 1075 blood cultures and compared our results to the Gram staining preliminary identification, with MALDI-TOF/MS as a reference. This method presents major advantages such as a fast microbe identification, within an hour of the blood culture being detected positive, low preparation costs, and data traceability. This SEM identification strategy can be developed into an automated assay from the sample preparation, micrograph acquisition, and identification process. This strategy could revolutionise urgent microbiological diagnosis of infectious diseases.

scholarly journals Molecular epidemiology of catheter-related bloodstream infections caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci in haematological patients with neutropenia

2004 ◽  
Vol 132 (5) ◽  
pp. 921-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. MÜLLER-PREMRU ◽  
P. ČERNELČ
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Staphylococcus Epidermidis ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Peripheral Vein ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Haematological Patients

Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) is common in haematological patients with febrile neutropenia. As the clinical signs of CRBSI are usually scarce and it is difficult to differentiate from blood culture contamination, we tried to confirm CRBSI by molecular typing of CNS isolated from paired blood cultures (one from a peripheral vein and another from the central venous catheter hub). Blood cultures were positive in 59 (36%) out of 163 patients. CNS were isolated in 24 (40%) patients; in 14 from paired blood cultures (28 isolates) and in 10 from a single blood culture. CNS from paired blood cultures were identified as Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined and bacteria were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of bacterial genomic DNA. In 13 patients, the antibiotic susceptibility of isolates was identical. The PFGE patterns from paired blood cultures were identical or closely related in 10 patients, thus confirming the presence of CRBSI. In the remaining four patients they were unrelated, and suggested a mixed infection or contamination. Since CNS isolates from three patients had identical PFGE patterns, they were probably nosocomially spread amongst them.

scholarly journals Clinical Evaluation of the iCubate iC-GPC Assay for Detection of Gram-Positive Bacteria and Resistance Markers from Positive Blood Cultures

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Granato ◽  
Melissa M. Unz ◽  
Raymond H. Widen ◽  
Suzane Silbert ◽  
Stephen Young ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Staphylococcus Epidermidis ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Sequencing Method ◽  
Resistance Markers ◽  
Gram Positive Cocci

ABSTRACT The iC-GPC Assay (iCubate, Huntsville, AL) is a qualitative multiplex test for the detection of five of the most common Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium) responsible for bacterial bloodstream infections, performed directly from positive blood cultures. The assay also detects the presence of the mecA, vanA, and vanB resistance determinants. This study comparatively evaluated the performance of the iC-GPC Assay against the Verigene Gram-positive blood culture (BC-GP) assay (Luminex Corp., Austin, TX) for 1,134 patient blood culture specimens positive for Gram-positive cocci. The iC-GPC Assay had an overall percent agreement with the BC-GP assay of 95.5%. Discordant specimens were further analyzed by PCR and a bidirectional sequencing method. The results indicate that the iC-GPC Assay together with the iCubate system is an accurate and reliable tool for the detection of the five most common Gram-positive bacteria and their resistance markers responsible for bloodstream infections.

scholarly journals Systematic Comparison of Four Methods for Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales Directly from Blood Cultures

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Meier ◽  
Axel Hamprecht
Keyword(s):  
Rapid Detection ◽  
Clinical Microbiology ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory ◽  
Microbiology Laboratory ◽  
Study Protocols ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Good Detection

ABSTRACT Early identification of infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) can help to optimize patient treatment and improve outcome. In this study, protocols for rapid detection of carbapenemase production directly from positive blood cultures were developed applying a concentration and hemolysis step before a test for carbapenemase production was performed. Four different methods (three modified colorimetric assays [β-Carba, bcCarba NP, and NeoRapid Carb] and a variation of the carbapenem inactivation method [CIM] test with blood cultures [bcCIM]) were assessed on blood cultures spiked with 185 different molecularly characterized Enterobacterales isolates. The challenge collection included 81 carbapenemase-negative isolates and 104 CPEs (OXA-48 [n = 25], NDM [n = 20], KPC [n = 18], VIM [n = 25], GIM [n = 5], OXA-48-like [n = 9], and OXA-48-like plus NDM [n = 2]). The sensitivity/specificity was 99.0%/95.1% for bcCarba NP, 99.0%/91.4% for NeoRapid Carb, 100%/95.1% for β-Carba and 100%/100% for bcCIM. Weakly hydrolyzing carbapenemases (e.g., OXA-48-like) were also well detected by the assays. The time to result was 20 to 45 min for β-Carba, 2 to 3 h for bcCarba NP, 2.5 to 2 h for NeoRapid Carb, and 18 to 24 h for bcCIM. In conclusion, all assays demonstrated good detection of CPE. The protocols can be easily implemented in any clinical microbiology laboratory and could help to optimize therapy early in bloodstream infections by CPE.

Blood Culture Contamination in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory of a Teaching Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 152 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S133-S133
Author(s):  
Kemin Xu ◽  
Sarwat Gilani ◽  
Hank Wang ◽  
John Fallon
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Clinical Microbiology ◽  
Diagnostic Errors ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Bacillus Species ◽  
Contamination Rate ◽  
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory ◽  
Current Guideline ◽  
Tertiary Teaching

Abstract Objectives Blood culture is one of the most important tests performed in clinical microbiology laboratories. However, blood culture contamination remains a problematic cause of diagnostic errors for laboratory diagnosis and patient management. This aim of this study was to determine blood culture contamination rates and tendency at Westchester Medical Center (WMC), a tertiary teaching hospital in suburban New York City. Methods All blood culture tests at WMC received from January 2017 to December 2018, as well as some historical data from 2007 to 2014, were retrospectively retrieved. Blood culture contamination rates were determined according to the laboratory’s predefined criteria. Results From 2007 to 2014, a total of 209,750 blood cultures were performed with an average contamination rate of 1.6% (ranging from 0.4% to 3.5% monthly). The total numbers of blood cultures performed in 2017 and 2018 were 27,863 and 28,047, respectively. The overall positive rate of blood culture was 6.8% in 2017 and 7.6% in 2018. The contamination rate of blood culture was 0.6% in 2017 and 0.9% in 2018 with very few variations among different months of the year, which was significantly lower than that of the national benchmark (~2.5%) on blood culture contamination. The majority of contaminants were Staphylococcus epidermidis, accounting for 87% of source contamination, followed by Corynebacterium species (5.5%), Bacillus species and Micrococcus species (3.5% each), and Propionibacterium species (0.5%). Conclusion Adherence to current guideline on appropriate blood collection techniques and monthly monitoring and timely feedback to phlebotomists should be continued to keep a low contamination rate for blood culture, which is not only from the perspective of individual patient care but also from the standpoint of hospital epidemiology and public health.

scholarly journals The Addition of Anaerobic Blood Cultures for Pediatric Patients with Concerns for Bloodstream Infections: Prevalence and Time to Positive Cultures

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Dien Bard ◽  
Todd P. Chang ◽  
Rebecca Yee ◽  
Keya Manshadi ◽  
Nhan Lichtenfeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Culture Positivity ◽  
Blood Culture Positivity ◽  
Anaerobic Bottle ◽  
Clinically Significant

ABSTRACT Anaerobes are an important but uncommon cause of bloodstream infections (BSIs). For pediatric patients, routine inclusion of an anaerobic blood culture alongside the aerobic remains controversial. We implemented automatic anaerobic blood culture alongside aerobic blood cultures in a pediatric emergency department (ED) and sought to determine changes in recovery of obligate and facultative anaerobes. This was a cohort study in a pediatric ED (August 2015 to July 2018) that began in February 2017. Blood culture positivity results for true pathogens and contaminants were assessed, along with a secondary outcome of time to positivity (TTP) of blood culture. A total of 14,180 blood cultures (5,202 preimplementation and 8,978 postimplementation) were collected, with 8.8% (456) and 7.1% (635) positive cultures in the pre- and postimplementation phases, respectively. Of 635 positive cultures in the postimplementation phase, aerobic blood cultures recovered 7.6% (349/4,615), whereas anaerobic blood cultures recovered 6.6% (286/4,363). In 211/421 (50.0%) paired blood cultures, an organism was recovered in both cultures. The number of cases where organisms were only recovered from an aerobic or an anaerobic bottle in the paired cultures were 126 (30.0%) and 84 (20.0%), respectively. The TTP was comparable regardless of bottle type. Recovery of true pathogens from blood cultures was approximately 7 h faster than recovery of contaminants. Although inclusion of anaerobic blood cultures only recovered 2 (0.69%) obligate anaerobes, it did allow for recovery of clinically significant pathogens that were negative in aerobic blood cultures and supports the routine collection of both bottles in pediatric patients with a concern of bloodstream infections.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document