scholarly journals Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Using Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycles to Reduce Unjustified Antibiotic Prescribing in Children Admitted With an Asthma Exacerbation

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 436-443
Author(s):  
Sasha E. Dorzin ◽  
Claudia Halaby ◽  
Maria Lyn Quintos ◽  
Asif Noor ◽  
Gladys El-Chaar
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Asthma Exacerbation ◽  
Journal Club ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Children With Asthma ◽  
Improvement Interventions ◽  
Care Costs

OBJECTIVE Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) ensure appropriate antibiotic use, reduce health care costs, and minimize antibiotic resistance. National asthma guidelines do not recommend antibiotics during an exacerbation unless the child has an infection or comorbidities. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) established a benchmark for unjustified antibiotic use at 6.6%.9 A retrospective study at our institution showed that 7.8% of antibiotics were prescribed without justification in children admitted for asthma. The purpose of this study was to reduce unjustified antibiotic use at our institution by 25% in children through an ASP directed toward asthma. METHODS The study period lasted from November 2015 to March 2016. Children 6 months to 17 years of age, admitted for an asthma exacerbation, were included while those with comorbidities were excluded. A multidisciplinary team from pediatric pharmacotherapy, pulmonology, emergency department (ED), infectious diseases, and quality improvement was formed to focus on process improvement. Interventions were executed in a series of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. In cycle 1, our asthma guidelines on appropriate antibiotic use were disseminated to pediatric house staff and posted in pediatric units. Cycle 2 encompassed presenting the ASP and guidelines to the pediatric ED staff. Cycle 3 consisted of a journal club with the pulmonary division to discuss the role of azithromycin in an asthma exacerbation. RESULTS In cycle 1, twenty-four patients were reviewed in November 2015. Antibiotics were prescribed in 8/24 (33%) children, with an unjustified rate of 2/24 (8.3%). In cycle 2, twenty-three patients were reviewed in December and January with 8/23 (35%) prescribed antibiotics and an unjustified rate of 2/23 (8.7%). For cycle 3, in February and March 2016, twenty-one children were reviewed. Antibiotics were prescribed in 6/21 (27%) children and all were justified. In total, 68 patients were included in our study and had an unjustified antibiotic prescribing rate of 4/68 (5.9%), a reduction of 25%. CONCLUSION Our ASP surpassed the benchmark set by AAP guidelines, by reducing the percentage of unjustified antibiotics in children with asthma to 5.9%.

A retrospective audit of antibiotic prescriptions in a Lebanese Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Ibrahim ◽  
Zeinab Bazzi
Keyword(s):  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Strong Correlations ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Antimicrobial Drugs ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Retrospective Audit ◽  
Attending Physician

Despite the frequent alarms that have been published about the adverse effects of antibiotic use and misuse, physicians prescribe to patients approximately fifty percent of unnecessary antimicrobials. In an attempt to decrease the emergence of antimicrobial resistance and increase awareness, a team approach is required to address this prescribing phenomenon in a feasible manner. A retrospective study was done at a one-hundred-forty-bed hospital with a representative sample size of 368 patients. Patient data was collected and analyzed by a stewardship team. The overall antibiotic inappropriate rate was 45.8%, which is relatively high and consistent with the findings of other studies mentioned in the literature. This study aimed to provide baseline epidemiological data on the use of antibiotics in a Lebanese hospital and has revealed several notable patterns of antibiotic prescribing practices among Lebanese physicians such as the use of antimicrobial drugs example penicillin was consistently high. Strong correlations were identified between the type of attending physician and antibiotic appropriateness. These findings will be important in constructing an antimicrobial stewardship program to reduce antibiotic misuse.

scholarly journals 229. Hospitalists Antimicrobial Scorecard Improves Antibiotic Prescribing at a Community Teaching Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S116-S116
Author(s):  
Julia Sessa ◽  
Helen Jacoby ◽  
Bruce Blain ◽  
Lisa Avery
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Measuring antimicrobial consumption data is a foundation of antimicrobial stewardship programs. There is data to support antimicrobial scorecard utilization to improve antibiotic use in the outpatient setting. There is a lack of data on the impact of an antimicrobial scorecard for hospitalists. Our objective was to improve antibiotic prescribing amongst the hospitalist service through the development of an antimicrobial scorecard. Methods Conducted in a 451-bed teaching hospital amongst 22 full time hospitalists. The antimicrobial scorecard for 2019 was distributed in two phases. In October 2019, baseline antibiotic prescribing data (January – September 2019) was distributed. In January 2020, a second scorecard was distributed (October – December 2019) to assess the impact of the scorecard. The scorecard distributed via e-mail to physicians included: Antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days (corrected for attending census), route of antibiotic prescribing (% intravenous (IV) vs % oral (PO)) and percentage of patients prescribed piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) for greater than 3 days. Hospitalists received their data in rank order amongst their peers. Along with the antimicrobial scorecard, recommendations from the antimicrobial stewardship team were included for hospitalists to improve their antibiotic prescribing for these initiatives. Hospitalists demographics (years of practice and gender) were collected. Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze pre and post data. Results Sixteen (16) out of 22 (73%) hospitalists improved their antibiotic prescribing from pre- to post-scorecard (χ 2(1)=3.68, p = 0.055). The median antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days decreased from 661 pre-scorecard to 618 post-scorecard (p = 0.043). The median PT use greater than 3 days also decreased significantly, from 18% pre-scorecard to 11% post-scorecard (p = 0.0025). There was no change in % of IV antibiotic prescribing and no correlation between years of experience or gender to antibiotic prescribing. Conclusion Providing antimicrobial scorecards to our hospitalist service resulted in a significant decrease in antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days and PT prescribing beyond 3 days. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Development of an Electronic Algorithm to Target Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Efforts for Acute Bronchitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s32-s32
Author(s):  
Ebbing Lautenbach ◽  
Keith Hamilton ◽  
Robert Grundmeier ◽  
Melinda Neuhauser ◽  
Lauri Hicks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Acute Bronchitis ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Diagnostic Codes ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
The Impact

Background: Antibiotic resistance has increased at alarming rates, driven predominantly by antibiotic overuse. Although most antibiotic use occurs in outpatients, antimicrobial stewardship programs have primarily focused on inpatient settings. A major challenge for outpatient stewardship is the lack of accurate and accessible electronic data to target interventions. We sought to develop and validate an electronic algorithm to identify inappropriate antibiotic use for outpatients with acute bronchitis. Methods: This study was conducted within the University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS). We used ICD-10 diagnostic codes to identify encounters for acute bronchitis at any outpatient UPHS practice between March 15, 2017, and March 14, 2018. Exclusion criteria included underlying immunocompromising condition, other comorbidity influencing the need for antibiotics (eg, emphysema), or ICD-10 code at the same visit for a concurrent infection (eg, sinusitis). We randomly selected 300 (150 from academic practices and 150 from nonacademic practices) eligible subjects for detailed chart abstraction that assessed patient demographics and practice and prescriber characteristics. Appropriateness of antibiotic use based on chart review served as the gold standard for assessment of the electronic algorithm. Because antibiotic use is not indicated for this study population, appropriateness was assessed based upon whether an antibiotic was prescribed or not. Results: Of 300 subjects, median age was 61 years (interquartile range, 50–68), 62% were women, 74% were seen in internal medicine (vs family medicine) practices, and 75% were seen by a physician (vs an advanced practice provider). On chart review, 167 (56%) subjects received an antibiotic. Of these subjects, 1 had documented concern for pertussis and 4 had excluding conditions for which there were no ICD-10 codes. One received an antibiotic prescription for a planned dental procedure. Thus, based on chart review, 161 (54%) subjects received antibiotics inappropriately. Using the electronic algorithm based on diagnostic codes, underlying and concurrent conditions, and prescribing data, the number of subjects with inappropriate prescribing was 170 (56%) because 3 subjects had antibiotic prescribing not noted based on chart review. The test characteristics of the electronic algorithm (compared to gold standard chart review) for identification of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were the following: sensitivity, 100% (161 of 161); specificity, 94% (130 of 139); positive predictive value, 95% (161 of 170); and negative predictive value, 100% (130 of 130). Conclusions: For outpatients with acute bronchitis, an electronic algorithm for identification of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is highly accurate. This algorithm could be used to efficiently assess prescribing among practices and individual clinicians. The impact of interventions based on this algorithm should be tested in future studies.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals 142. Implementing an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the Outpatient Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S82-S82
Author(s):  
Travis B Nielsen ◽  
Maressa Santarossa ◽  
Beatrice D Probst ◽  
Laurie Labuszewski ◽  
Jenna Lopez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Inappropriate Prescribing ◽  
The United States ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Stewardship Program

Abstract Background Antimicrobial-resistant infections lead to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Among the most facile modifiable risk factors for developing resistance is inappropriate prescribing. The CDC estimates that 47 million (or ≥30% of) outpatient antibiotic prescriptions in the United States are unnecessary. This has provided impetus for expanding our antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) into the outpatient setting. Initial goals included the following: continuous evaluation and reporting of antibiotic prescribing compliance; minimize underuse of antibiotics from delayed diagnoses and misdiagnoses; ensure proper drug, dose, and duration; improve the percentage of appropriate prescriptions. Methods To achieve these goals, we first sent a baseline survey to outpatient prescribers, assessing their understanding of stewardship and antimicrobial resistance. Questions were modeled from the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Precious Drugs & Scary Bugs Campaign. The survey was sent to prescribers at 19 primary care and three immediate/urgent care clinics. Compliance rates for prescribing habits were subsequently tracked via electronic health records and reported to prescribers in accordance with IRB approval. Results Prescribers were highly knowledgeable about what constitutes appropriate prescribing, with verified compliance rates highly concordant with self-reported rates. However, 74% of respondents reported intense pressure from patients to inappropriately prescribe antimicrobials. Compliance rates have been tracked since December 2018 and comparing pre- with post-intervention rates shows improvement in primary care since reporting rates to prescribers in August 2019. Conclusion Reporting compliance rates has been helpful in avoiding inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. However, the survey data reinforce the importance of behavioral interventions to bolster ASP efficacy in the outpatient setting. Going forward, posters modeled off of the IDPH template will be conspicuously exhibited in exam rooms, indicating institutional commitment to the enumerated ASP guidelines. Future studies will allow for comparison of pre- and post-intervention knowledge and prescriber compliance. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions to Optimize Treatment of Infections in Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 073346482110182
Author(s):  
Sainfer Aliyu ◽  
Jasmine L. Travers ◽  
S. Layla Heimlich ◽  
Joanne Ifill ◽  
Arlene Smaldone
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Meta Analyses

Effects of antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) interventions to optimize antibiotic use for infections in nursing home (NH) residents remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess ASPs in NHs and their effects on antibiotic use, multi-drug-resistant organisms, antibiotic prescribing practices, and resident mortality. Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using five databases (1988–2020). Nineteen articles were included, 10 met the criteria for quantitative synthesis. Inappropriate antibiotic use decreased following ASP intervention in eight studies with a pooled decrease of 13.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: [4.7, 23.0]; Cochran’s Q = 166,837.8, p < .001, I2 = 99.9%) across studies. Decrease in inappropriate antibiotic use was highest in studies that examined antibiotic use for urinary tract infection (UTI). Education and antibiotic stewardship algorithms for UTI were the most effective interventions. Evidence surrounding ASPs in NH is weak, with recommendations suited for UTIs.

The role of electronic health record and “add-on” clinical decision support systems to enhance antimicrobial stewardship programs

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (05) ◽  
pp. 501-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristi M. Kuper ◽  
Jerod L. Nagel ◽  
Jarrod W. Kile ◽  
Larissa S. May ◽  
Francesca M. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Reporting Requirements ◽  
It Systems ◽  
Stewardship Program

AbstractIncreasingly, demands are placed on healthcare systems to meet antimicrobial stewardship standards and reporting requirements. This trend, combined with reduced financial and personnel resources, has created a need to adopt information technology (IT) to help ease these burdens and facilitate action. The incorporation of IT into an antimicrobial stewardship program can help improve stewardship intervention efficiencies and facilitate the tracking and reporting of key metrics, including outcomes. This paper provides a review of the stewardship-related functionality within these IT systems, describes how these platforms can be used to improve antimicrobial use, and identifies how they can support current and potential future antimicrobial stewardship regulatory and accreditation standards. Finally, recommendations to help close the gaps in existing systems are provided and suggestions for future areas of development within these programs are delineated.

scholarly journals 229. The Role of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Appropriate Use, Dose, and Duration of Vancomycin Treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S98-S99
Author(s):  
Olga Kaplun ◽  
Melinda Monteforte ◽  
Samad Tirmizi ◽  
Mersema Abate ◽  
George Psevdos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Appropriate Use ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Vancomycin Treatment

scholarly journals 1119. Implementation of Pediatric Antimicrobial Stewardship Rounds in a Children’s Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S397-S398
Author(s):  
Natalie Tucker ◽  
Ezzeldin Saleh ◽  
Marcela Rodriguez
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) are required in all acute care hospitals per The Joint Commission. ASP must adhere to the recommendations laid out by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but how each ASP chooses to implement these recommendations is left to the individual program. In January 2018, we began formal antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) walking rounds, led by infectious diseases trained physician and pharmacist, in our 99-bed pediatric hospital. Methods In January 2018, we started twice-weekly AMS rounds on the pediatric hospitalist service. A custom-made “Antimicrobial Stewardship Patient List” was designed in our electronic medical record (EMR) to generate a list of all patients receiving antibiotics. The ASP team (comprised of an infectious diseases pharmacist and a pediatric infectious diseases physician) reviewed EMR charts to determine antibiotic prescribing appropriateness and design recommended interventions. Any recommendations and teaching points were then discussed with the hospitalist team in person. After piloting the hospitalist service, AMS rounds were extended to include the general surgery patients and finally the intensive care unit. Data on number of charts reviewed, proposed interventions, and acceptance rates were collected throughout the process. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the intervention data. Results In the first year of the program, 427 patient charts were reviewed with 186 identified interventions. In total, 156 (84.3%) of the interventions were accepted and implemented by the primary team. The most common types of interventions were the duration of therapy (29%), antibiotic discontinuation (16.7%), intravenous to oral conversion (11.3%), de-escalation (10.2%), and infectious diseases consult (5.9%). Conclusion Pediatric AMS rounds led to the successful implementation of the majority of recommended interventions. Future goals of the program include calculating days of therapy per 1000 patient-days to assess antibiotic consumption before and after AMS rounds and to expand into other services to further promote appropriate antibiotic use in hospitalized pediatric patients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Antibiotic Prescription Patterns for Acute Diarrhea in a Hospital in Shanghai in 2016: A Cross-sectional Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S326-S326
Author(s):  
Yanhong Hu ◽  
Shanjuan Wang ◽  
Sunying Hua ◽  
Merlin Willcox ◽  
Michael Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Diarrhea ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Negative Resistance ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Oral Rehydration ◽  
Stewardship Program

Abstract Background Unnecessary antibiotic use increases the risk for antibiotic resistance. The rates of antibiotic use for upper respiratory infections are high in hospitals in China. Although most guidelines advise against the use of antibiotics for acute diarrhea, little is known about antibiotic use practices for acute diarrhea in China. Methods A retrospective prescription review from a Shanghai hospital outpatient electronic health records system was conducted from 1 January 2016 to 30 December 2016. Records were included for adult patients. The microbial resistance seasonal data in 2016 were extracted. Chi-squared and multivariable logistic regression and adjusted odd ratio (aOR) were used to assess the relationships between demographic characteristics and antibiotic prescribing. Results In total, there were 16,565 prescriptions, 16,060 prescriptions were included in the final analysis after excluding the follow up visits. There were 12,131 (76%) prescriptions with antibiotics prescribed. 5505 (45%) of the antibiotics prescribed were injectable. Of the antibiotics prescribed, levofloxacin was the most frequent (85%), followed by various cephalosporins (14%). Of the cephalosporin prescriptions, third-generation products were the most common (97%). Treatment with oral rehydration salts (ORS) was prescribed 34 (0.2%) times, probiotics were prescribed 3414 (21%) times and smectite was prescribed 2209 (14%) times. Multivariable regression analysis showed that those more likely to receive antibiotics were age 31–50 aOR 1.3 (1.1–1.4), P &lt; 0.001, evaluated in the late evening (11pm to 7am) aOR 2.6 (2.2–2.9) P &lt; 0.001, in the early evening (6pm-11pm) aOR 2.0 (1.8–2.2) P &lt; 0.001, in the summer (June-August) aOR 1.7 (1.5–1.9) P &lt; 0.001. At the same time, the Gram-positive and Gram-negative resistance rates to levofloxacin exceeded 40%, including 50% of E. coliisolates. Conclusion High rates of antibiotic use were observed for acute diarrhea in this hospital. Given the inappropriateness of antibiotics for acute diarrhea and the nonsensical high rates of of intravenous levofloxacin use and the concurrent high rates of the levofloxacin resistance, a more effective antibiotic stewardship program is needed to improve patient outcomes, reduce costs, reinforce policy and address the underlying causes of antibiotic abuse. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document