Reviewing and Viewing: Etcetera

1993 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-54

Are you looking for adventure, excitement, fun, and several cooperative-learning activities for a fifth- or sixth-grade mathematics class composed of students of different levels of achievement and experiences? Health Mathematics has the activity book for you! Adventures in Thinking allows students to take an active role in such diverse simulations as being a member of an up-and-coming rock group; taking a voyage to discover hidden treasure; becoming a movie producer; solving mysteries; or acting as an executive in a game company.

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Amna Emda

Students are studying subjects that are required to play an active role in learning activities. The way that can be done to enable such students through the implementation of cooperative learning model, one of which is TPS. TPS application of cooperative learning in the learning of chemistry can stimulate students to express opinions or ideas, mutual cooperation, respect the opinions of others, helping to solve problems and develop students' creativity. Active student involvement in learning will lead to learning motivation that will have an impact on the improvement of learning outcomes


AS-SABIQUN ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-98
Author(s):  
Asri Nurhayani

This study aims to determine the increase in PPKN learning outcomes through the application of the STAD type of cooperative learning model for class IX.I students of SMP Negeri 1 Keruak in 2019/2020 Academic Year. This Classroom Action Research is carried out by applying the STAD (Student Teams Achievement Divisions) Cooperative Learning Model in order to improve the quality of the learning process that helps teachers carry out PPKN learning activities taught by means of maximizing the active role of students especially the knowledge they have and how they are applied in daily life -day. This Classroom Action Research (CAR) was conducted in 2 cycles, and the results of the actions that have been carried out are proven to be able to improve student achievement both in terms of completeness of student learning, namely in cycle I by 67%, can be increased to 90% in cycle II or in terms of the average value of the evaluation results in the first cycle of 70.7 to 76.5 in the second cycle, this means there is an increase of 23%. From the results of this classroom action research also showed an increase in the level of student learning activities from 2.83 Active Enough categories in the first cycle to 4.01 Active categories, meaning there was an increase of 1.18.


1986 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Johnson ◽  
Roger T. Johnson ◽  
Douglas Warring ◽  
Geoffrey Maruyama

The effects of different levels of cooperation on cross-handicap interaction were Compared in two studies. In the first study 72 sixth-grade students were randomly assigned to three conditions (cooperative controversy, cooperative debate, and individualistic) stratifying for sex, ability level, and handicap. They participated in the study for 55 minutes a day for 11 instructional days. In the second study, 51 fourth-grade students were randomly assigned to two conditions (intergroup cooperation and intergroup competition) stratifying for sex, ability, and handicap. They participated in the study for 55 minutes a day for 10 instructional days. An Activity Report Scale was given to students to determine who they interacted with in structured class activities, unstructured class activities, school activities outside of class, and activities in the home. The results indicated that pure cooperation promoted more frequent cross-handicap interaction than did a mixture of cooperation and competition. The interaction patterns formed within cooperative learning situations generalized into unstructured class and school activities.


Author(s):  
Sunanda Roy

Cooperative learning is a successful teaching strategy in which small teams, each with students of different levels of ability, use a variety of learning activities to improve their understanding of a subject. Each member of a team is responsible not only for learning what is taught but also for helping teammates learn, thus creating an atmosphere of achievement. Students work through the assignment until all group members successfully understand and complete it. The author has been using cooperative learning strategy for the last eight odd years. She has observed that although teachers in general have a positive opinion about cooperative learning they have their reservations regarding the hurdles which one may face while using cooperative learning strategy. Some of these are hurdles are due to misconception. The author through this paper tries to clear eight such misconceptions using her experiences with cooperative learning teaching strategy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Zerri Rahman Hakim

The objectives of this research were to determine: 1) Students’ learning activities in social studies after using Question Student Have (QSH) in Cooperative Learning Model, 2) Students’ learning outcomes in social studies after using Question Student Have (QSH) in Cooperative Learning Model. The method used in this research is Classroom Action Research (CAR) with Stephen Kemmis and Mc. Taggart Model which consists of four stages, namely planning, implementation, observation and reflection. This study was conducted by the researcher in two cycles. Instruments used in this research are observational sheet, interview, and test in the last cycle. From the analysis of the data, the researcher found that there is an improvement in students’ learning outcomes. On the basic value, there was only 43,33% students who achieve the learning mastery. In the first cycle, the students who achieve the learning mastery were increased, it was about 30% from the basic value, it reached 73,33%. On the second cycle, the student who achieve the learning mastery were increased about 26,70% from the first cycle, become 100%. The same thing also happened to the students' learning activities. In the first cycle, students’ learning activities is 71,42% and on the second cycle, students’ learning activities were incrased about 21,43% from the first cycle, become 92,85%. Based on the analysis of data of this study it can be concluded that the use of Question Student Have (QSH) in Cooperative Learning Model can improve students’ learning outcomes and learning activities fourth grade students of SDN Saga V in social studies.Keywords: social studies learning outcomes, cooperative learning QSH type.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 591
Author(s):  
Narko '

This research was motivated by lack of civics student learning outcomes. Low learningoutcomes are caused by: (a) students do not really follow civics and they talk to each othersawaktu teacher explains the lesson; (B) students are not active in learning; (C) if the teacherasking questions, very few students who answered; and (d) very few students were askedabout the learning that has not been understood, in addition to the learning activities in theclassroom dominated by teachers and children are much more powerful. This study aims toimprove learning outcomes civics through cooperative learning model NHT. This study is aclass action, which was conducted in 018 primary schools Ukui 1 Subdistrict Ukui. This studyfocused on students' learning outcomes data civics. Based on the results of the study revealedthat the civic education learning outcomes of students has increased. This is evidenced by:Improved student learning outcomes at the preliminary data the number of students who passare 15 students (50%), increasing in the first cycle increased to 26 students (87%) and incycle II further increased up to 27 students (90 %).


Author(s):  
Mukhammad Alfan Khakim ◽  
Maria Veronica Roesminingsih ◽  
Peter Njoroge Murigi ◽  
Agus Suprijono ◽  
Waspodo Tjipto Subroto

Relay Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 360-381
Author(s):  
Gordon Myskow ◽  
Phillip A. Bennett ◽  
Hisako Yoshimura ◽  
Kyoko Gruendel ◽  
Takuto Marutani ◽  
...  

The distinction between Cooperative and Collaborative Learning approaches is not a clear one. Some use the terms interchangeably while others consider Cooperative Learning to be a type of Collaborative Learning. Still others clearly differentiate between them, characterizing Cooperative Learning as more highly structured in its procedures, involving a great deal of intervention by the teacher to plan and orchestrate group interactions. Collaborative Learning, on the other hand, presupposes some degree of learner autonomy-that groups can work effectively toward shared goals and monitor their own progress. This paper takes the view that the distinction between Cooperative and Collaborative Learning is a useful one and that both approaches can play valuable roles in fostering autonomous interaction. It argues that while Collaborative Learning formations may be the ultimate goal for teachers wishing to develop learner autonomy, Cooperative Learning is a valuable means for modeling the skills and abilities to help students get there. The discussion begins with an overview of the two approaches, focusing on their implementation in the Japanese educational context. It then presents seven highly structured Cooperative Learning activities and shows how they can be modified and extended over time to encourage more autonomous interaction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document