scholarly journals Rural Hospitals Closures in the United States : Theoretical Impact Analysis on African Americans Health Care Disparity in the South

2020 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (4) ◽  
pp. 707-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amirhossein Moaddab ◽  
Gary A. Dildy ◽  
Haywood L. Brown ◽  
Zhoobin H. Bateni ◽  
Michael A. Belfort ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 1322-1330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey T. Yorio ◽  
Yang Xie ◽  
Jingsheng Yan ◽  
David E. Gerber

2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 869-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amirhossein Moaddab ◽  
Gary A. Dildy ◽  
Haywood L. Brown ◽  
Zhoobin H. Bateni ◽  
Michael A. Belfort ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 516-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekaterine Shapatava ◽  
Aisha Rios ◽  
Gene Shelley ◽  
Jesse Milan ◽  
Shuenae Smith ◽  
...  

Community-based organizations (CBOs) provide HIV prevention services throughout the United States, including the South where HIV/AIDS burden is high. We assessed Southern CBO response to changes in the HIV prevention landscape, including the National HIV/AIDS Strategy, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) High Impact Prevention. Both strategies aim to improve outcomes for people living with or at high risk for HIV. Inductive qualitative analysis of interviews and consultations with CBOs, capacity building assistance providers, and CDC staff revealed CBOs are building clinical service capacity and cross-agency partnerships to adapt, but face inadequate or reduced funding. A holistic approach to HIV prevention and care in the South is critical, where stigma and other socio-structural factors limit health care options for persons affected by HIV. Health care organizations may benefit by partnering with CBOs because CBOs have the skillsets and community rapport to effectively improve health outcomes of persons living with HIV.


1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard P. Young ◽  
Jerome S. Burstein

Not so long ago, nearly all African-Americans living in the United States were subject to a multitude of racial restrictions officially prescribed and enforced by state governments and their local subsidiaries. Most of the Jim Crow system dated from 1890–1910. By the middle of the twentieth century, this system was well established, so much so that many people assumed that it had always existed and that it expressed the timeless folkways of the South. However, in what strikes the historian as an astonishingly brief period during the 1950s and 1960s, the edifice was largely torn down. The puzzle is this: How could any institutional apparatus so deeply embedded, long-standing, and apparently strong be toppled so quickly? Although many scholars have discussed aspects of the puzzle, no one has offered a simple, clear, and compelling explanation. We aim to do so in this essay.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Hamidian Jahromi ◽  
Anahid Hamidianjahromi

UNSTRUCTURED While WHO has officially announced that COVID-19 outbreak reaching a pandemic level, things have significantly changed inside USA, as this infection spread has reached its exponential phase. A stringent analysis of the COVID-19 epidemiologic data requires much more time and would generally be expected to happen after the exponential phase of the disease is over and when the focus of the health-care system is diverted away from crisis-management. Although much is said about high-risk groups and the vulnerability of elderly and patients with underlying comorbidities, the impact of race and its implications on susceptibility of ethnic minorities in indigent societies towards COVID-19 has not been discussed. There are currently some data on disparities between African American and Caucasians for COVID-19 infection and mortality. While the health-care authorities are reorganizing their resources and the infrastructure to provide care for the COVID-19 symptomatic patients, they should not shy away from protecting the general public as a whole and specifically the most vulnerable members of society, such as the elderly, ethnic minorities, and people with underlying comorbidities as well as African Americans.


2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982199514
Author(s):  
Tasher Losenegger ◽  
Matthew J. Urban ◽  
Ashok J. Jagasia

Though initially spared from the brunt of the COVID-19 pandemic, rural areas in the United States have been ravaged by the disease. With a higher-risk population at baseline and an already strained health care system, rural hospitals face severe challenges in delivering care during the pandemic. In otolaryngology specifically, there has been difficulty in ensuring patient access to care while maintaining safe environments for patients and staff. Partnership between academic medical centers and critical access rural hospitals is urgently needed to help improve care for vulnerable rural populations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. p23
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Armstrong-Mensah ◽  
Harshita Patel ◽  
Priyanka Parekh ◽  
Crystal Lee

Although the rate of mental illness among African Americans and Whites in the United Sates are similar, African Americans tend to have the worst mental health outcomes in the country. This is due to several inequities, particularly those associated with race such as discrimination, provider bias, stereotyping, weak socio-economic status, limited access to health insurance, poor quality mental health care, treatment gaps, culture, and stigma related to mental health care. Recognizing that the differences in mental health outcomes among minority populations in the United States is also driven by race and not just by brain chemistry, or environmental exposures, and developing strategies that target the issue of race, will not only lead to increased access to mental health services among African Americans, but will generally improve upon their mental health status. This article discusses mental health disparities among African Americans, the inequities that cause them, and strategies for addressing the disparities with a focus on race.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document