scholarly journals HER2 and BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective study in Eastern China

PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e8602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangyan Zhang ◽  
Jie Wu ◽  
Lili Wang ◽  
Han Zhao ◽  
Hong Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Eastern China ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Molecular Classification ◽  
Clinicopathological Characteristics ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Poor Differentiation ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Objective To investigate the frequency and prognostic role of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (HER2) and BRAF V600E gene mutation in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods Clinicopathological and survival information from 480 patients with stage I–III CRC were reviewed and recorded. HER2 amplification was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), BRAF V600E mutation was tested by IHC and Sanger sequencing. The relationship between HER2 and BRAF V600E mutation status and clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes were determined. Results The amplification of HER2 and BRAF V600E mutation were identified in 27 of 480 (5.63%) and 19 of 480 (3.96%) CRC patients, respectively. HER2 amplification significantly correlated with greater bowel wall invasion (P = 0.041) and more advanced TNM stage (I vs. II vs. III; 0 vs 5.78% vs. 7.41%, P = 0.013). Patients suffering from tumors with poor differentiation had a higher incidence rate of BRAF V600E mutation than those with moderate/well differentiation (7.77% vs 2.92%, P = 0.04). HER2 amplification was an independent prognostic factor for worse disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 2.53, 95% CI: 1.21–5.30, P = 0.014). Conclusion The prevalence of HER2 amplification and BRAF V600E mutation in stage I–III CRC patients in Chinese was 6% and 4%, respectively, and HER2 amplification appeared to be associated with a worse DFS. More comprehensive molecular classification and survival analysis are needed to validate our findings.

Decoy Receptor 3 Expression Is Associated With Wild-Type EGFR Status, Poor Differentiation of Tumor, and Unfavorable Patient Outcome

2019 ◽  
Vol 152 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-216
Author(s):  
Wei-Chin Chang ◽  
Yi-Chen Yeh ◽  
Hsiang-Ling Ho ◽  
Shie-Liang Hsieh ◽  
Teh-Ying Chou
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Decoy Receptor ◽  
Decoy Receptor 3 ◽  
Poor Differentiation ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinomas

Abstract Objectives The role of decoy receptor 3 (DcR3) in lung cancer, particularly adenocarcinoma, has not been well studied. In this study, we aim to investigate the expression profile and the clinicopathologic implications of DcR3 expression in lung adenocarcinoma. Methods Immunohistochemistry was used to examine DcR3 expression in 461 lung adenocarcinomas. The differences in DcR3 expression among the various histopathologic patterns were analyzed. The relationship between DcR3 expression and clinicopathologic parameters, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, was also investigated. Results DcR3 expression was more frequently expressed in solid, micropapillary, and acinar patterns (P < .0001) and in tumors with wild-type EGFR status (P = .018). In addition, DcR3 expression portends a less favorable disease-free survival in stage I patients (P = .012). Conclusions The expression of DcR3 might be involved in the differentiation and progression of lung adenocarcinoma. Therefore, DcR3 may be applied clinically for prediction of tumor progression in stage I lung adenocarcinoma.

scholarly journals Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Phenotype, Metformin, and Survival for Colorectal Cancer Patients with Diabetes Mellitus II

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaodu Wang ◽  
Zhiyang Wu ◽  
Likuan Hu
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Clinicopathological Parameters ◽  
Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
E Cadherin

Objectives. We aimed to explore the association between metformin treatment and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype and further appraise the prognostic values of metformin and EMT markers E-cadherin and vimentin for colorectal cancer (CRC) in clinical practice. Methods. We collected specimens and evaluated clinicopathological parameters of 102 stage I to III CRC patients with prediagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM II). Expression of E-cadherin and vimentin in tumors was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0. Results. In correlation tests, we found a lower tumor cell EMT degree (more E-cadherin (P=0.014) and less vimentin (P=0.011) expression in patients who used metformin, and the expression of E-cadherin and vimentin was associated with serum CA19-9 (P=0.048, P=0.009), tumor invasive depth (T) (P<0.001, P=0.045), and lymph invasion (N) (P=0.013, P=0.001). In Cox multivariate regression analysis, E-cadherin was identified as a prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.038) and metformin use (P=0.015P=0.044) and lymph invasion (P=0.016P=0.023) were considered as the prognostic factors for both DFS and overall survival (OS). Conclusion. Our study suggested that metformin may impede the EMT process and improve survival for stage I–III CRC patients with DM II.

A study on the genomic alterations of transformation from colorectal adenoma to colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15607-e15607
Author(s):  
Qingjian Chen ◽  
Pan Yang ◽  
Linna Luo ◽  
Wenhua Fan ◽  
Chen Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tissue Sample ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Diagnostic Potential ◽  
Notch Pathways ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
Villous Adenomas

e15607 Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Approximately 85% of colorectal cancers are thought to result from adenoma. However, the molecular mechanism of adenoma transformation into colorectal cancer is still unclear. Methods: Ninety-nine adenoma patients aged from 25 to 78 years old were enrolled in this study. We collected tissue sample from each patient and 77 matched blood samples. Pathological subtypes included tubular villous adenomas, villous adenomas, tubular adenomas, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, and polyps. Eighty-one stage I colorectal cancer patients (CRC I) were also enrolled in this study. All samples underwent Next-generation sequencing with a panel of 405 cancer related genes. Results: Mutational profiles of adenoma and CRC I patients were compared. The top 5 most frequently mutated genes in adenoma were APC (71%), KRAS (41%), ATM (33%), RIF1 (31%), SYNE1 (28%). While in CRC I patients, top 5 mutated genes were APC (78%), TP53 (57%), TTN (35%), KRAS (33%) and TCF7L2 (22%). There were significant differences between TP53 and TTN by chi-square test. The frequency, number and TMB of mutations in stage I colorectal cancer patients were significantly higher than those in various adenoma subtypes. Stage I colorectal cancer patients have more mutated genes enriched in the Wnt and Notch pathways than adenoma patients. We analyzed mutation signatures in CRC I and adenoma patients, and CRC I were more focused on mutation signatures of mismatch repair such as signature 1, signature 6, signature 10, and signature 15. A total of 391 mutations were identified in tissue samples, while 130 mutations were found in plasma cell-free DNA, with 116 mutations shared between them. The two genes with the highest consistency between tissue and blood were PAX7 and KMT2D. Conclusions: TP53 and TTN are associated with the transition from CRC I to adenoma, and Wnt and Notch pathways may also be involved. PAX7 and KMT2D mutations frequently found in adenoma tissue and blood cfDNA demonstrate the diagnostic potential of these two genes in clinic.

Cetuximab Shows Activity in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Tumors That Do Not Express the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor by Immunohistochemistry

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1803-1810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki Young Chung ◽  
Jinru Shia ◽  
Nancy E. Kemeny ◽  
Manish Shah ◽  
Gary K. Schwartz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Pathology Report ◽  
Egfr Expression ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Purpose To establish evidence of activity, or lack thereof, of cetuximab-based therapy in patients with refractory colorectal cancer with tumors that do not demonstrate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Patients and Methods Pharmacy computer records were reviewed to identify all patients who received cetuximab at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in a nonstudy setting during the first 3 months of cetuximab's commercial availability. Medical records of these patients were then reviewed to identify colorectal cancer patients who had experienced failure with a prior irinotecan-based regimen and who had a pathology report indicating an EGFR-negative tumor by IHC. Pathology slides from these patients were reviewed by a reference pathologist to confirm EGFR negativity, and computed tomography scans during cetuximab-based therapy were reviewed by a reference radiologist. Response rates were reported using WHO criteria. Results Sixteen chemotherapy-refractory, EGFR-negative colorectal cancer patients who received cetuximab in a nonstudy setting were identified. Fourteen of these patients received cetuximab plus irinotecan, and two received cetuximab monotherapy. In the 16 patients, four major objective responses were seen (response rate, 25%; 95% CI, 4% to 46%). Conclusion Colorectal cancer patients with EGFR-negative tumors have the potential to respond to cetuximab-based therapies. EGFR analysis by current IHC techniques does not seem to have predictive value, and selection or exclusion of patients for cetuximab therapy on the basis of currently available EGFR IHC does not seem warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document