Abstract
Objective:
Body mass index (BMI) is a time-intensive measurement to assess nutritional status. Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) has been studied as a proxy for BMI in adults, but there is no consensus on its optimal use.
Design:
We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC) of MUAC for BMI <18.5, <17, and <16 kg/m2. We designed a system using two MUAC cutoffs, with a healthy (non-thin) “green” group, a “yellow” group requiring BMI measurement, and a “red” group who could proceed directly to treatment for thinness.
Setting:
We retrospectively analyzed monitoring data collected by the International Committee of the Red Cross in places of detention.
Participants:
11,917 male detainees in eight African countries.
Results:
MUAC had excellent discriminatory ability with AUROCC: 0.87, 0.90, and 0.92 for BMI<18.5, BMI<17, and BMI<16 kg/m2, respectively. An upper cutoff of MUAC 25.5 cm to exclude healthy detainees would result in 64% fewer detainees requiring BMI screening and had sensitivity 77% (95%CI 69.4,84.7) and specificity 79.6 (95%CI: 72.6,86.5) for BMI<18.5 kg/m2. A lower cutoff of MUAC<21.0 cm had sensitivity 25.4% (95%CI: 11.7,39.1) and specificity 99.0% (97.9,100.0) for BMI<16 kg/m2. An additional 50kg weight requirement improved specificity to 99.6% (95%CI: 99.0,100.0%) with similar sensitivity.
Conclusions:
A MUAC cutoff of 25.5 cm, above which detainees are classified as healthy and below receive further screening would result in significant time savings. A cutoff of <21.0 cm and weight <50 kg can identify some detainees with BMI <16 kg/m2 who require immediate treatment.