The role of methylphenidate in depression

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 271-276
Author(s):  
Meghan Ellinger May ◽  
Amy VandenBerg
Keyword(s):  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Terminal Illness ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
First Line ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Resistant Depression ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction Depression is a burdening disease state where up to 30% of individuals do not respond to first-line treatment. Adjunctive use of psychostimulants has been investigated for the treatment of depression in patient populations, including those with treatment-resistant depression or terminal illness. The purpose of this paper is to present a review of the literature on the efficacy of using methylphenidate to manage depression. Methods A search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid/MEDLINE, and PsychINFO using the following key words: psychostimulants, stimulants, methylphenidate, alternative therapy, depression, and major depressive disorder. All reports included were published before June 30, 2015. Results For this review 10 reports, including randomized controlled, case series, and retrospective chart review studies, were identified and assessed. Patient populations studied included patients with treatment-resistant depression, patients with terminal illness, geriatric patients, and patients with miscellaneous indications, such as history of stroke and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). For treatment-resistant depression, treatment differences for fatigue and apathy in favor of methylphenidate were found, but no difference was found for response rates in depression. Additionally, in palliative care and hospice patients, methylphenidate was found to improve fatigue and depressive symptoms. Patients with other conditions (poststroke and HIV patients) achieved some relief of depressive symptoms. Conclusion The efficacy data for methylphenidate in depression are limited, with inconsistent results in specific patient populations that limit external validity. At this time, it should not be recommended as first-line treatment in depression. Future research should be developed focusing on long-term safety and efficacy in nonspecialized patient populations.

California rocket fuel: And what about being a first line treatment?

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S551-S551
Author(s):  
J. Silva ◽  
J. Mota ◽  
P. Azevedo
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Depressed Woman ◽  
Rocket Fuel ◽  
Resistant Depression ◽  
First Line Treatment

IntroductionThe association venlafaxine-mirtazapine is currently known as California Rocket Fuel (CRF). Studies show advantage in terms of efficacy and rapid control of depressive symptoms compared to other associations. Venlafaxine is a selective serotonin-noradrenalin reuptake inhibitor and mirtazapine is a noradrenergic-specific serotonergic antidepressant: the result is a potent noradrenergic and serotonergic effect. Studies say that CRF should be performed only for drug-resistant depression; however, there are case reports of its use as a first line treatment, in selected patients.ObjectivesTo summarize the latest literature about this field and to present a case report.AimTo explore and critically review the controversies of venlafaxine-mirtazapine association as a first line antidepressants strategy.MethodsA brief review of the latest literature was performed, using PubMed and the keywords “venlafaxine-mirtazapine association”. A case report about a depressed woman is presented.ResultsDespite most studies are referent to its utility in drug-resistant depression, there are recent pilot studies that recommend CRF as a first line option.M., a 64-year-old woman, had her first psychiatric consultation. She had been depressed for 2 years, she lost 10 kg, had total insomnia and suicidal thoughts. CRF was started up to 150/15 mg, daily. An improvement was noticed after two weeks of treatment and the stabilization of depressive symptoms were achieved by the fourth month.ConclusionsCRF seems to be effective and useful. Patients with insomnia and weight loss may benefit from CRF as a first line option. However, more studies are needed.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

scholarly journals Prolonged ketamine infusion modulates limbic connectivity and induces sustained remission of treatment-resistant depression

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua S. Siegel ◽  
Ben J. A. Palanca ◽  
Beau M. Ances ◽  
Evan D. Kharasch ◽  
Julie A. Schweiger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Limbic System ◽  
Anterior Cingulate ◽  
Sustained Remission ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Subgenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex ◽  
Post Infusion ◽  
Resistant Depression

AbstractKetamine produces a rapid antidepressant response in over 50% of adults with treatment-resistant depression. A long infusion of ketamine may provide durable remission of depressive symptoms, but the safety, efficacy, and neurobiological correlates are unknown. In this open-label, proof-of-principle study, adults with treatment-resistant depression (N = 23) underwent a 96-h infusion of intravenous ketamine (0.15 mg/kg/h titrated toward 0.6 mg/kg/h). Clonidine was co-administered to reduce psychotomimetic effects. We measured clinical response for 8 weeks post-infusion. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess functional connectivity in patients pre- and 2 weeks post-infusion and in matched non-depressed controls (N = 27). We hypothesized that responders to therapy would demonstrate response-dependent connectivity changes while all subjects would show treatment-dependent connectivity changes. Most participants completed infusion (21/23; mean final dose 0.54 mg/kg/h, SD 0.13). The infusion was well tolerated with minimal cognitive and psychotomimetic side effects. Depressive symptoms were markedly reduced (MADRS 29 ± 4 at baseline to 9 ± 8 one day post-infusion), which was sustained at 2 weeks (13 ± 8) and 8 weeks (15 ± 8). Imaging demonstrated a response-dependent decrease in hyperconnectivity of the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex to the default mode network, and a treatment-dependent decrease in hyperconnectivity within the limbic system (hippocampus, amygdala, medial thalamus, nucleus accumbens). In exploratory analyses, connectivity was increased between the limbic system and frontal areas, and smaller right hippocampus volume at baseline predicted larger MADRS change. A single prolonged infusion of ketamine provides a tolerated, rapid, and sustained response in treatment-resistant depression and normalizes depression-related hyperconnectivity in the limbic system and frontal lobe.ClinicalTrials.gov: Treatment Resistant Depression (Pilot), NCT01179009.

scholarly journals Epidemiology and current treatment patterns of treatment-resistant depression in Scotland: a CPRD study

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S334-S334
Author(s):  
Timothy Ming ◽  
Tom Denee ◽  
Gemma Scott ◽  
Joachim Morrens ◽  
Christopher Weatherburn
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Augmentation Therapy ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
First Line ◽  
Resistant Depression

AimsTo assess the incidence and treatments currently used in clinical practice for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in Scotland.BackgroundPatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have not responded to at least two successive antidepressant (AD) treatments in a single episode are described as having Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD). Epidemiological data on TRD in Scotland is lacking. Furthermore, there is no data to our knowledge on therapies prescribed in Scottish clinical practice to treat TRD.MethodA retrospective, longitudinal cohort study was conducted using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) medical records. Adult patients were indexed on AD prescription, requiring MDD diagnosis within 90 days, from Jan 2011-May 2018 with 360-day baseline and 180-day minimum follow-up periods. Failure of ≥2 adequate oral AD regimens following indexing constituted TRD classification. Incidence rates of MDD and TRD (within the MDD cohort) and treatment lines following TRD classification were derived.ResultThe analysis included 20,059 patients with MDD (mean age 44 years, 63% female, median follow-up 59 months); 1,374 (6.8%) were classified as TRD. Median time-to-TRD classification was 25 months. The incidence rate of MDD was 15.9 per 1,000 patient-years and for TRD was 14.7 per 1,000 MDD-patient-years. For all first four post-TRD treatment lines, SSRI monotherapy was the most commonly prescribed therapy, followed by combination (dual/triple) therapy and augmentation therapy (at least one oral AD supplemented with lithium, an antipsychotic or an anticonvulsant therapy). At first-line of TRD treatment, 1,050 (76.4%) patients received monotherapy AD, 212 (15.4%) received combination AD therapy and 112 (8.2%) received augmentation therapy. The most common monotherapy treatments at first-line TRD were sertraline (15.6%), mirtazapine (13.8%), fluoxetine (12.2%) and venlafaxine (11.6%). Among combination therapies, mirtazapine, venlafaxine, sertraline and amitriptyline were frequently used. Among the TRD and MDD cohort, no somatic treatments were coded in CPRD, although the use of these treatments was likely underestimated.ConclusionMonotherapy AD treatment was the most common therapy type for all four post-TRD treatment lines. These data support the need for new treatments that can achieve and maintain therapeutic response, and avoid continuous cycling through similar AD therapies.This study was sponsored by Janssen Cilag Ltd.

Baseline Working Memory Predicted Response to Low-Dose Ketamine Infusion in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mu-Hong Chen ◽  
Wei-Chen Lin ◽  
Cheng-Ta Li ◽  
Shih-Jen Tsai ◽  
Hui-Ju Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Memory Function ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Ketamine Infusion ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Resistant Depression

Abstract Introduction Pretreatment neurocognitive function may predict the treatment response to low-dose ketamine infusion in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, the association between working memory function at baseline and the antidepressant efficacy of ketamine infusion remains unclear. Methods A total of 71 patients with TRD were randomized to one of three treatment groups: 0.5 mg/kg ketamine, 0.2 mg/kg ketamine, or normal saline. Depressive symptoms were measured using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) at baseline and after treatment. Cognitive function was evaluated using working memory and go-no-go tasks at baseline. Results A generalized linear model with adjustments for demographic characteristics, treatment groups, and total HDRS scores at baseline revealed only a significant effect of working memory function (correct responses and omissions) on the changes in depressive symptoms measured by HDRS at baseline (F=12.862, p<0.05). Correlation analysis further showed a negative relationship (r=0.519, p=0.027) between pretreatment working memory function and changes in HDRS scores in the 0.5 mg/kg ketamine group. Discussion An inverse relationship between pretreatment working memory function and treatment response to ketamine infusion may confirm that low-dose ketamine infusion is beneficial and should be reserved for patients with TRD.

scholarly journals 118 Use of Patient Health Questionnaire to Predict Relapses in Patients with Treatment-resistant Depression Treated With Esketamine + Oral Antidepressant

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 276-277
Author(s):  
Carol Jamieson ◽  
Nan Li ◽  
Ella Daly ◽  
Adam Janik ◽  
Rosanne Lane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Patient Health Questionnaire ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Health Questionnaire ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Relapse Risk ◽  
Total Score Range ◽  
Patient Health ◽  
Resistant Depression

Abstract:Objective:To assess the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as a predictor of relapse of depressive symptoms in treatment-resistant depression (TRD).Method:Analysis included maintenance phase data from SUSTAIN-1 (NCT02493868), a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study in TRD patients that evaluated efficacy of intranasal esketamine (ESK) + oral antidepressant (AD) vs AD + intranasal placebo in delaying relapse of depressive symptoms. A ≥50% reduction in initial symptom score and total score of ≤12 were considered as response and remission, respectively, using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. PHQ-9 total score (range, 0–27), PHQ-2 total score (0–6), and individual items of the PHQ-9 (0–3) were examined as predictors of relapse. Data were collected every 2 weeks. Association between time-varying PHQ-9 and event of depression relapse was evaluated in Andersen-Gill Cox model.Results:Of 176 stable remitters, 63 had a relapse event (ESK+AD [n=24]; AD+placebo [n=39]). Of 121 stable responders, 50 had a relapse event (ESK+AD [n=16]; AD+placebo [n=34]). Among stable remitters, PHQ-9 total score (HR; 95% CI [1.12; 1.04–1.21]) and PHQ-2 total score (1.58; 1.25–1.99) were associated with relapse risk. PHQ-9 items #1 (loss of pleasure, 2.07; 1.38–3.09), #2 (feeling down, 2.18; 1.51–3.15), #4 (feeling tired, 1.54; 1.13–2.11), and #6 (negative self-view, 2.27; 1.41–3.66) were associated with relapse risk. PHQ-2 total scale yielded the smallest Akaike’s Information Criterion among stable remitters and responders.Conclusion:PHQ-9, PHQ-2 total scores or individual items may be useful for predicting relapse of depressive symptoms among stable TRD patients.Funding Acknowledgements:This study was sponsored by Janssen Research and Development, LLC.

scholarly journals Pembrolizumab as first line treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma patients – a case series of patients with various co-morbidities

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 793-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa Bystrup Boyles ◽  
Mette Schødt ◽  
Helle Westergren Hendel ◽  
Anders Krarup-Hansen ◽  
Niels Junker
Keyword(s):  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Merkel Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Merkel Cell ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Somatic Treatment of Catatonia

1995 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 345-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Hawkins ◽  
Katharine J. Archer ◽  
Stephen M. Strakowski ◽  
Paul E. Keck
Keyword(s):  
Case Reports ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Positive Outcome ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Frequency Of Use ◽  
Specific Symptoms ◽  
First Line Treatment ◽  
Malignant Catatonia

Objective: The authors reviewed the recent literature regarding the treatment of catatonia as a syndrome of multiple etiologies. Given the historical and clinical association of catatonia with schizophrenia, the authors' examined the assumption that the first-line treatment of catatonia is antipsychotic medication. Methods: Articles published between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 1994 were located using the Paperchase® medical literature search system. Additionally, references from those identified articles were examined for possible inclusion in this review. To be included in this review, articles had to be written in English and report specific symptoms of catatonia to determine, retrospectively, if DSM-IV criteria for catatonia were met. Results: Seventy publications met inclusion criteria and reported on a total of 178 patients and included 270 separate treatment episodes. Most of the articles were case-reports, although a few case-series were identified. Multiple causes of catatonia were identified in these reports. The most commonly reported treatment for catatonia was with benzodiazepines which were effective in 70 percent of the cases, with lorazepam demonstrating the highest frequency of use and a 79 percent complete response rate. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) was also efficacious (85%) and was more likely to provide a positive outcome in cases of malignant catatonia. Antipsychotics demonstrated poor efficacy. Conclusions: Catatonia is a nonspecific syndrome with multiple etiologies. Treatment of catatonia should be based on the underlying cause when it is identifiable. Lorazepam appears to offer a safe, effective first-line treatment of catatonia. ECT should be considered when rapid resolution is necessary (e.g., malignant catatonia) or when an initial lorazepam trial fails.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document