Venlafaxine and duloxetine: A comparison of efficacy and tolerability for the treatment of depression in elderly patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 258-265
Author(s):  
Hugh Franck ◽  
Jonathan Potter ◽  
Joshua Caballero

The geriatric population has a disproportionally higher rate of depression and related suicide compared to the general population. While selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are considered first line, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are commonly used. Online databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and CINAHL were searched (up to June 2013) to identify trials using SNRIs in the elderly. Results revealed 15 studies involving venlafaxine (n=10) and duloxetine (n=5) use in the elderly. Overall, venlafaxine and duloxetine appear to be similar in efficacy and tolerability in treating late life depression. However, venlafaxine has been more extensively studied in this particular population, appears to carry fewer drug interactions, and is available in generic forms for regular and extended-release formulations. Doses greater than 225 mg/day for venlafaxine or 60 mg/day for duloxetine appear to lead to greater discontinuation rates.

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Kern ◽  
M. Soledad Cepeda ◽  
Frank Defalco ◽  
Mila Etropolski

Abstract Background Understanding how patients are treated in the real-world is vital to identifying potential gaps in care. We describe the current pharmacologic treatment patterns for the treatment of depression. Methods Patients with depression were identified from four large national claims databases during 1/1/2014–1/31/2019. Patients had ≥2 diagnoses for depression or an inpatient hospitalization with a diagnosis of depression. Patients were required to have enrollment in the database ≥1 year prior to and 3 years following their first depression diagnosis. Treatment patterns were captured at the class level and included selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, other antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics/sedatives, and antipsychotics. Treatment patterns were captured during all available follow-up. Results We identified 269,668 patients diagnosed with depression. The proportion not receiving any pharmacological treatment during follow-up ranged from 29 to 52%. Of the treated, approximately half received ≥2 different classes of therapy, a quarter received ≥3 classes and more than 10% received 4 or more. SSRIs were the most common first-line treatment; however, many patients received an anxiolytic, hypnotic/sedative, or antipsychotic prior to any antidepressive treatment. Treatment with a combination of classes ranged from approximately 20% of first-line therapies to 40% of fourth-line. Conclusions Many patients diagnosed with depression go untreated and many others receive a non-antidepressant medication class as their first treatment. More than half of patients received more than one type of treatment class during the study follow up, suggesting that the first treatment received may not be optimal for most patients.


Author(s):  
Gilberto Sousa Alves ◽  
Felipe Kenji Sudo ◽  
Johannes Pantel

Bipolar disorder (BD) is an extremely disabling condition characterized by mood switches, and cognitive and functional impairment. The current chapter discusses the updated review on pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions targeting BD in the elderly. The risk of concurrent medical diseases (eg, metabolic syndrome) and relatively lower tolerability than young BD make the patient safety a major concern in most cases. Evidence-based guidelines, although useful for promoting rational and effective therapy, are generally lacking in elderly BD. Current recommendations for acute mania include atypical antipsychotics, careful use of lithium, and election of valproate as the gold-standard therapy. In acute BD depression, first-line agents in monotherapy may include lithium, lamotrigine, quetiapine, and quetiapine extended release (XR). Electroconvulsive therapy may be an option for severe/refractory cases. Family members or caregivers should be encouraged to support the patient, since potential ethical issues involving patrimony or profession may arise during the treatment.


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (S11) ◽  
pp. 4-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siegfried Kasper

Most effective antidepressants directly or indirectly increase the synaptic concentrations of serotonin (5-HT) and/or norepinephrine (NE) by blocking the reuptake of one or both of the neurotransmitters. This property was initially discovered with the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). Their various additional interactions at different receptors and ion channels are not required for antidepressant action, but are responsible for the poor tolerability and toxicity in overdose of the early antidepressants.The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are effective and well tolerated. Selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, such as reboxetine, also have proven antidepressant activity. A selective action on one or the other of the principal monoamines thus appears to be sufficient for antidepressant activity. The idea that a dual action on both neurotransmitters might produce greater efficacy in certain patients led to the development of the serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) antidepressants, which block the reuptake of both 5-HT and NE without the nonspecific, side-effect–inducing interactions of the TCAs. The three SNRIs—venlafaxine, milnacipran, and duloxetine—constitute a new class of antidepressants.Antidepressant response rates rarely exceed 60% to 70% and remission rates are usually <50%. Although SNRIs clearly provide superior efficacy in certain populations, their use has not dramatically changed antidepressant therapy. The search for agents that are more effective, rapidly acting, and better tolerated continues. However, clinicians must find ways to better use the antidepressants that are available today. This supplement, based on a symposium held at the International Forum on Affective Disorders in Budapest in December 2007, discusses several everyday problems in the treatment of depression, with a focus on SNRIs.


1994 ◽  
Vol 39 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alastair J. Flint

This paper highlights recent advances in the pharmacological management of geriatric affective disorders and dementia. The current roles of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) in the treatment of depression in old age are discussed. Recent findings pertaining to continuation and maintenance of antidepressant treatment are also addressed. The treatment of bipolar affective disorder in the elderly has received much less study than has unipolar depression. A number of issues relating to efficacy, side-effects and optimal blood levels of lithium, carbamazepine and valproate in bipolar disorder remain unresolved and await further study. Finally, drug treatment of the cognitive impairment and psychiatric complications of Alzheimer's disease is reviewed.


1982 ◽  
Vol 16 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 547-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex A. Cardoni ◽  
Ellen D. Fields

Nomifensine is an isoquinoline antidepressant that inhibits the reuptake of dopamine at central synapses. It also inhibits norepinephrine reuptake but is only a weak inhibitor of 5-hydroxytryptamine. Open and controlled trials comparing nomifensine with placebo and other standard antidepressants have shown it to be an effective antidepressant in divided doses up to 200 mg/d. The full dosage range of 50–200 mg/d is well tolerated, and doses can be selected to suit patient disease, age, and therapeutic response. Minimal anticholinergic and sedative side effects and no impairment of psychomotor performance make nomifensine a suitable drug for use in a wide variety of ambulatory outpatients, including the elderly. A relative lack of cardiotoxicity and epileptogenic activity add to this profile; the safety of the drug, when taken in overdose, has been documented. However, the place of nomifensine in the treatment of depression, relative to other antidepressants, is still unclear.


2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 302-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte L. Allan ◽  
Klaus P. Ebmeier

SummaryDepressive disorder in those over the age of 60 has many clinical similarities to depression in younger adults, but biological changes related to ageing may necessitate a different approach to treatment. We present an evidence-based review of treatment for late-life depression, focusing on pharmacological approaches, including monotherapy, combination and augmentation strategies. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors such as sertraline and citalopram are well tolerated, have the advantage of a favourable side-effect profile, and are good options for first-line treatment. Second-line treatment options include combination therapy with a second antidepressant, or treatment augmentation with an antipsychotic or lithium. We also consider evidence for nonpharmacological treatment strategies, including psychological therapy and neurostimulation. Finally, we summarise evidence for treatment of depression in patients in dementia.


1995 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 147-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.C. Taylor ◽  
J.G. McConnell

Depression in the elderly is a common problem, cited as occurring in up to 10% of elderly people living at home, half of whom may need specialist referral.1 The introduction of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors has been reported as a major advance in the treatment of depression in that they are less sedating, have fewer anticholinergic effects and are less toxic in overdose.2 We report three cases of severe hyponatraemia, seen in the past 12 months, associated with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors fluoxetine and sertraline. Hyponatraemia has been reported as a rare adverse effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.3,4


10.23856/3216 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-130
Author(s):  
Bartosz Wanot ◽  
Barbara Szczygieł ◽  
Wojciech Wanot ◽  
Mariana Magerčiaková

The key symptom of depression is lowering the mood, but this is not the only sign of depression. Depression is a disease in which the symptoms reach various intensities and occur in many configurations. We distinguish the following types of depression: reactive, endogenous, neurotic, anankastic, agitated, large and small, morning (subclinical and subliminal), seasonal, masked, psychotic, postpartum, drug resistant, in children and adolescents, in the elderly, involutional, organic , in bipolar disorder, dysthymia, depression and anxiety, and in somatic diseases. Psychotherapy is now a popular and effective method of treating depression. The effects of treatment after the use of antidepressants appear only after a few weeks from the beginning of therapy. Old-generation medicines: these are tricyclic antidepressants (TLPDs), inhibitors of neuromediator reuptake and monoamine oxidase enzyme (IMAO) inhibitors. The new generation of drugs is distinguished by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), four-ring drugs, noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, selective reversible MAO inhibitors, and drugs with other mechanisms of action. Phototherapy (treatment of light) is currently a widely accepted method of winter depression therapy. Other treatments for depression include electroconvulsive therapy and transcranial magnetic stimulation.


Author(s):  
Matthew J. Friedman

This chapter reviews the published literature on pharmacotherapy for PTSD with specific attention to randomized clinical trials. Specific agents reviewed include: antidepressants, antiadrenergic agents, glucocorticoids, anticonvulsants, D-cycloserine, benzodiazepines, and antipsychotics. The empirical evidence indicates that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors can be considered first line medications for PTSD. It also indicates that neither atypical antipsychotic agents nor benzodiazepines can be recommended at this time. Combined approaches are also reviewed in which pharmacotherapy is combined with psychotherapy or other medications. Important gaps in current knowledge are also considered.It is clear that pharmacotherapy remains an important clinical option because medications are effective; they are often useful for treating comorbid depression and other anxiety disorders; they are generally wellaccepted by patients; and, finally the availability of prescribing clinicians is much greater than the availability of qualified psychotherapists.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Kern ◽  
M. Soledad Cepeda ◽  
Frank Defalco ◽  
Mila Etropolski

Abstract Background: Understanding how patients are treated in the real-world is vital to identifying potential gaps in care. We describe the current pharmacologic treatment patterns for the treatment of depression. Methods: Patients with depression were identified from four large national claims databases during 1/1/2014-1/31/2019. Patients had ≥2 diagnoses for depression or an inpatient hospitalization with a diagnosis of depression. Patients were required to have enrollment in the database ≥1 year prior to and three years following their first depression diagnosis. Treatment patterns were captured at the class level and included selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, other antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics/sedatives, and antipsychotics. Treatment patterns were captured during all available follow-up. Results: We identified 269,668 patients diagnosed with depression. The proportion not receiving any pharmacological treatment during follow-up ranged from 29% to 52%. Of the treated, approximately half received ≥2 different classes of therapy, a quarter received ≥3 classes and more than 10% received 4 or more. SSRIs were the most common first-line treatment; however, many patients received an anxiolytic, hypnotic/sedative, or antipsychotic prior to any antidepressive treatment. Treatment with a combination of classes ranged from approximately 20% of first-line therapies to 40% of fourth-line. Conclusions: Many patients diagnosed with depression go untreated and many others receive a non-antidepressant medication class as their first treatment. More than half of patients received more than one type of treatment class during the study follow up, suggesting that the first treatment received may not be optimal for most patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document