Toxic Keratoconjunctivitis from Coral Reef

A 25-year-old woman presented with right eye pain, lid edema, conjunctival injection and chemosis, and mild corneal epitheliopathy after exposure to fluid content from an aquarium coral reef. Topical moxifloxacin and prednisolone were started 4 times daily, with full clinical resolution after 2 weeks. Toxin-mediated keratoconjunctivitis may occur after exposure to zoanthid coral reef, particularly in aquarium enthusiasts. Topical corticosteroids in tandem with topical antibiotics appear to be effective in mild disease. However, in severe cases that exhibit corneal infiltrates and stromal thinning, close observation is warranted in case of possible keratolysis.

Ocular Surface Microbiota in Contact Lens Users and Contact-Lens-Associated Bacterial Keratitis

Our objectives were to investigate whether the conjunctival microbiota is altered by contact lens wear and/or bacterial keratitis and to explore the hypothesis that commensals of conjunctival microbiota contribute to bacterial keratitis. Swab samples from both eyes were collected separately from the inferior fornix of the conjunctiva of non-contact-lens users (nparticipants = 28) and contact lens users (nparticipants = 26) and from patients with contact-lens-associated bacterial keratitis (nparticipants = 9). DNA from conjunctival swab samples was analyzed with 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Pathogens from the corneal infiltrates were identified by cultivation. In total, we identified 19 phyla and 283 genera; the four most abundant genera were Pseudomonas, Enhydrobacter, Staphylococcus, and Cutibacterium. Several pathogens related to bacterial keratitis were identified in the conjunctival microbiota of the whole study population, and the same bacteria were identified by both methods in the conjunctiva and cornea for four patients with contact-lens-associated bacterial keratitis. The overall conjunctival microbiota profile was not altered by contact lens wear or bacterial keratitis; thus, it does not appear to contribute to the development of bacterial keratitis in contact lens users. However, in some individuals, conjunctival microbiota may harbor opportunistic pathogens causing contact-lens-associated bacterial keratitis.

Microsporidial stromal keratitis: an uncommon etiology of bilateral simultaneous corneal infection

We report three cases of bilateral microsporidial keratitis, which is an unusual presentation. All three patients presented with bilateral, simultaneous, asymmetrical, deep stromal corneal infiltrates with symptoms ranging from 5 to 12 months. Predisposing factors were noted in two of three patients. Corneal scrapings for microbiology and histopathology of corneal tissue revealed microsporidial spores from both eyes of all patients. There was no response to medical therapy and all underwent bilateral corneal transplantation. Case one additionally had recurrences in the graft and underwent repeat keratoplasties and eventually keratoprosthesis. Microsporidial stromal keratitis is a possible cause of keratitis in cases of very long-standing, indolent, culture-negative, deep stromal corneal infiltrates. So far, this infection has been reported as unilateral; however, we report these cases of bilateral infection, which is rare. Corneal transplantation is the preferred line of management due to lack of response to medical therapy.

Hypersensitivity reactions after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction: a case report of corneal infiltrates

Background Femtosecond laser corneal refractive surgery is generally considered safe and effective; however, this procedure is rarely associated with severe allergic reactions. We reported a rare case of hypersensitivity reactions which caused bilateral peripheral corneal infiltrates after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule (SMILE) surgery in a man with a history of fruits allergy. Case presentation Here we report the case of a young man who developed white, ring-shaped bilateral peripheral infiltrates that appeared 1 day after an uneventful SMILE surgery. The overlying corneal epithelium was intact; the infiltrate was negative for bacterial culture, but high titers of immunoglobulin E was demonstrated in the blood. Symptomatically, a clinical diagnosis of sterile corneal infiltrates was made, and the patient was treated with topical and systemic steroids. The infiltrates were immunogenic in origin, which may be caused by the contact lenses used for suction duration in surgery. It resolved without corneal scarring in the subsequent months following steroid treatment. The patient’s visual acuity improved. Conclusions When patients with a history of allergy who aim to perform corneal refractive surgery, surgeons must consider possible hypersensitivity reactions after treatment. More studies are needed to clarify the relationship between contact glass used in femtosecond laser corneal refractive surgery and IgE mediated hypersensitivity reactions.

Comparison of Steroid with Cyclosporine Eye Drops in Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis

Purpose: To compare the effect of topical steroid with cyclosporine eye drops in recurrence of sub-epithelial corneal infiltrates in epidemic keratoconjunctivitis. Study Design: Quasi Experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: CMH Kharian from Jan 2017 to June 2018. Methods: Eighty eight patients with epidemic keratoconjunctivitis were divided into two groups. Group A included patients who received topical steroid drops and group B received topical Cyclosporine eye drops. The inclusion criteria comprised of fresh cases of SEIs, between the ages of 20 to 50 years, having a vision of 6/6 before the illness. The exclusion criteria included patients suffering from allergic conjunctivitis, ocular surface disease like Sjogren syndrome, corneal ulcer, blepharitis, old corneal opacity, glaucoma and those who had been using steroids in the past e.g. uveitis. The patients were followed up at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. On resolution of sub-epithelial infiltrates (SEIs), both regimen were tapered off in next two weeks. The patients were advised to continue monthly follow up for two months to see any recurrence. Results: SEIs resolved in both the groups by week 12, however the resolution was slightly quicker in group A. SEIs resolved in 84.1% of cases in group A and in 70.4% cases in group B at the end of 4 weeks. Recurrence was higher in group A (11.3%) while it was 4.5% in group B. Conclusion: Cyclosporine eye drops are a safe and equally effective treatment of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis related SEIs, with an added advantage of reduced recurrence rate. Key Words: Epidemic, Keratoconjunctivitis (EKC), Cornea, Subepithelial Infiltrates, Cyclosporine.

The role of ozonized oil and a combination of tobramycin/dexamethasone eye drops in the treatment of viral conjunctivitis: a randomized clinical trial

Purpose To determine whether topical tobramycin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% plus ozonized oil eye drops reduces clinical signs and infectious viral titers of presumed viral conjunctivitis more than tobramycin/dexamethasone eye drops alone. Methods Prospective, single-blind, randomized, parallel-groups trial. Eighty patients with a clinical diagnosis of presumed viral conjunctivitis were randomizedly divided into two treatment groups: a study group and a control group, 40 for each group. Patients in the study group received topical tobramycin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% eye drops, plus ozonized oil eye drops, both four times daily; patients in the control group received only topical tobramycin 0.3%/dexamethasone eye drops four times daily. The treatment was for seven days in both groups. Swabs were taken from the conjunctival fornix for adenovirus PCR analysis on the day of recruitment and at seven days follow-up. Clinical signs were also recorded on the day of recruitment and at follow-up examination: the main outcomes were conjunctival injection and conjunctival chemosis, graded on a 4-point clinical scale, presence or absence of superficial punctate keratitis and subepithelial corneal infiltrates. Results No statistically significant difference was reached in adenoviral infection negativization between the two groups, although the study group showed a higher number of PCR negative results at seven days follow-up. PCR real time detected adenoviral infection in 17 of 24 patients on the day of recruitment and it was positive in 4 patients on the seventh day (viral positivity reduction of 76%). In the control group PCR was positive for adenovirus in 18 of 24 patients on the day of recruitment and in 7 patients at seven days follow-up (reduction of 61%). There was statistically significant difference on conjunctival clinical signs between the study and control groups. Significant difference was also found on superficial punctate keratitis resolution between the study and the control group. In the former superficial punctate keratitis was detected in 14 eyes on the first day and in 5 eyes after seven days while in the latter superficial punctate keratitis was found in 124 eyes on the first day and in 6 eyes on the seventh day. No difference was found in subepithelial corneal infiltrates appearance between the two groups. Conclusions The use of ozonized-oil containing eye drops in combination with topical tobramycin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% eye drops four times daily seems to reduce the signs of conjunctivitis, and the duration of viral infection, although it does not affect the subepithelial corneal infiltrates appearance.