eukaryotic ribosome
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

112
(FIVE YEARS 15)

H-INDEX

31
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Birikmen ◽  
Katherine E. Bohnsack ◽  
Vinh Tran ◽  
Sharvari Somayaji ◽  
Markus T. Bohnsack ◽  
...  

Ribosome assembly is an essential and carefully choreographed cellular process. In eukaryotes, several 100 proteins, distributed across the nucleolus, nucleus, and cytoplasm, co-ordinate the step-wise assembly of four ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) and approximately 80 ribosomal proteins (RPs) into the mature ribosomal subunits. Due to the inherent complexity of the assembly process, functional studies identifying ribosome biogenesis factors and, more importantly, their precise functions and interplay are confined to a few and very well-established model organisms. Although best characterized in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), emerging links to disease and the discovery of additional layers of regulation have recently encouraged deeper analysis of the pathway in human cells. In archaea, ribosome biogenesis is less well-understood. However, their simpler sub-cellular structure should allow a less elaborated assembly procedure, potentially providing insights into the functional essentials of ribosome biogenesis that evolved long before the diversification of archaea and eukaryotes. Here, we use a comprehensive phylogenetic profiling setup, integrating targeted ortholog searches with automated scoring of protein domain architecture similarities and an assessment of when search sensitivity becomes limiting, to trace 301 curated eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis factors across 982 taxa spanning the tree of life and including 727 archaea. We show that both factor loss and lineage-specific modifications of factor function modulate ribosome biogenesis, and we highlight that limited sensitivity of the ortholog search can confound evolutionary conclusions. Projecting into the archaeal domain, we find that only few factors are consistently present across the analyzed taxa, and lineage-specific loss is common. While members of the Asgard group are not special with respect to their inventory of ribosome biogenesis factors (RBFs), they unite the highest number of orthologs to eukaryotic RBFs in one taxon. Using large ribosomal subunit maturation as an example, we demonstrate that archaea pursue a simplified version of the corresponding steps in eukaryotes. Much of the complexity of this process evolved on the eukaryotic lineage by the duplication of ribosomal proteins and their subsequent functional diversification into ribosome biogenesis factors. This highlights that studying ribosome biogenesis in archaea provides fundamental information also for understanding the process in eukaryotes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxim S. Svetlov ◽  
Timm O. Koller ◽  
Sezen Meydan ◽  
Vaishnavi Shankar ◽  
Dorota Klepacki ◽  
...  

AbstractMacrolide antibiotics bind in the nascent peptide exit tunnel of the bacterial ribosome and prevent polymerization of specific amino acid sequences, selectively inhibiting translation of a subset of proteins. Because preventing translation of individual proteins could be beneficial for the treatment of human diseases, we asked whether macrolides, if bound to the eukaryotic ribosome, would retain their context- and protein-specific action. By introducing a single mutation in rRNA, we rendered yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells sensitive to macrolides. Cryo-EM structural analysis showed that the macrolide telithromycin binds in the tunnel of the engineered eukaryotic ribosome. Genome-wide analysis of cellular translation and biochemical studies demonstrated that the drug inhibits eukaryotic translation by preferentially stalling ribosomes at distinct sequence motifs. Context-specific action markedly depends on the macrolide structure. Eliminating macrolide-arrest motifs from a protein renders its translation macrolide-tolerant. Our data illuminate the prospects of adapting macrolides for protein-selective translation inhibition in eukaryotic cells.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 6170-6183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ketty Pernod ◽  
Laure Schaeffer ◽  
Johana Chicher ◽  
Eveline Hok ◽  
Christian Rick ◽  
...  

Abstract Translation fidelity relies essentially on the ability of ribosomes to accurately recognize triplet interactions between codons on mRNAs and anticodons of tRNAs. To determine the codon-anticodon pairs that are efficiently accepted by the eukaryotic ribosome, we took advantage of the IRES from the intergenic region (IGR) of the Cricket Paralysis Virus. It contains an essential pseudoknot PKI that structurally and functionally mimics a codon-anticodon helix. We screened the entire set of 4096 possible combinations using ultrahigh-throughput screenings combining coupled transcription/translation and droplet-based microfluidics. Only 97 combinations are efficiently accepted and accommodated for translocation and further elongation: 38 combinations involve cognate recognition with Watson-Crick pairs and 59 involve near-cognate recognition pairs with at least one mismatch. More than half of the near-cognate combinations (36/59) contain a G at the first position of the anticodon (numbered 34 of tRNA). G34-containing tRNAs decoding 4-codon boxes are almost absent from eukaryotic genomes in contrast to bacterial genomes. We reconstructed these missing tRNAs and could demonstrate that these tRNAs are toxic to cells due to their miscoding capacity in eukaryotic translation systems. We also show that the nature of the purine at position 34 is correlated with the nucleotides present at 32 and 38.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Senjuti Banerjee ◽  
Sehnaz Ferdosh ◽  
Amar Nath Ghosh ◽  
Chandana Barat

Author(s):  
Bo Eng Cheong ◽  
Olga Beine-Golovchuk ◽  
Michal Gorka ◽  
William Wing Ho Ho ◽  
Federico Martinez-Seidel ◽  
...  

AbstractArabidopsis REIL proteins are cytosolic ribosomal 60S-biogenesis factors. After shift to 10°C, reil mutants deplete and slowly replenish non-translating eukaryotic ribosome complexes of root tissue, while tightly controlling the balance of non-translating 40S- and 60S-subunits. Reil mutations compensate by hyper-accumulation of non-translating subunits at steady-state temperature; after cold-shift, a KCl-sensitive 80S sub-fraction remains depleted. We infer that Arabidopsis buffers fluctuating translation by pre-existing non-translating ribosomes before de novo synthesis meets temperature-induced demands. Reil1 reil2 double mutants accumulate 43S-preinitiation and pre-60S-maturation complexes and have altered paralog composition of ribosomal proteins in non-translating complexes. With few exceptions, e.g. RPL3B and RPL24C, these changes are not under transcriptional control. Our study suggests requirement of de novo synthesis of eukaryotic ribosomes for long-term cold acclimation, feedback control of NUC2 and eIF3C2 transcription and links new proteins, AT1G03250, AT5G60530, to plant ribosome biogenesis. We propose that Arabidopsis requires biosynthesis of specialized ribosomes for cold acclimation.Highlight of this studyREIL proteins affect paralog composition of eukaryotic ribosomes and suppress accumulation of 43S-preinitiation and pre-60S-maturation complexes, suggesting functions of ribosome heterogeneity and biogenesis in plant cold acclimation.


eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Purnima Klingauf-Nerurkar ◽  
Ludovic C Gillet ◽  
Daniela Portugal-Calisto ◽  
Michaela Oborská-Oplová ◽  
Martin Jäger ◽  
...  

Eukaryotic ribosome precursors acquire translation competence in the cytoplasm through stepwise release of bound assembly factors, and proofreading of their functional centers. In case of the pre-60S, these steps include removal of placeholders Rlp24, Arx1 and Mrt4 that prevent premature loading of the ribosomal protein eL24, the protein-folding machinery at the polypeptide exit tunnel (PET), and the ribosomal stalk, respectively. Here, we reveal that sequential ATPase and GTPase activities license release factors Rei1 and Yvh1 to trigger Arx1 and Mrt4 removal. Drg1-ATPase activity removes Rlp24 from the GTPase Nog1 on the pre-60S; consequently, the C-terminal tail of Nog1 is extracted from the PET. These events enable Rei1 to probe PET integrity and catalyze Arx1 release. Concomitantly, Nog1 eviction from the pre-60S permits peptidyl transferase center maturation, and allows Yvh1 to mediate Mrt4 release for stalk assembly. Thus, Nog1 co-ordinates the assembly, maturation and quality control of distant functional centers during ribosome formation.


Biomolecules ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prattes ◽  
Lo ◽  
Bergler ◽  
Stanley

AAA-ATPases are molecular engines evolutionarily optimized for the remodeling of proteins and macromolecular assemblies. Three AAA-ATPases are currently known to be involved in the remodeling of the eukaryotic ribosome, a megadalton range ribonucleoprotein complex responsible for the translation of mRNAs into proteins. The correct assembly of the ribosome is performed by a plethora of additional and transiently acting pre-ribosome maturation factors that act in a timely and spatially orchestrated manner. Minimal disorder of the assembly cascade prohibits the formation of functional ribosomes and results in defects in proliferation and growth. Rix7, Rea1, and Drg1, which are well conserved across eukaryotes, are involved in different maturation steps of pre-60S ribosomal particles. These AAA-ATPases provide energy for the efficient removal of specific assembly factors from pre-60S particles after they have fulfilled their function in the maturation cascade. Recent structural and functional insights have provided the first glimpse into the molecular mechanism of target recognition and remodeling by Rix7, Rea1, and Drg1. Here we summarize current knowledge on the AAA-ATPases involved in eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis. We highlight the latest insights into their mechanism of mechano-chemical complex remodeling driven by advanced cryo-EM structures and the use of highly specific AAA inhibitors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 307-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry Pelletier ◽  
Nahum Sonenberg

The stage at which ribosomes are recruited to messenger RNAs (mRNAs) is an elaborate and highly regulated phase of protein synthesis. Upon completion of this step, a ribosome is positioned at an appropriate initiation codon and primed to synthesize the encoded polypeptide product. In most circumstances, this step commits the ribosome to translate the mRNA. We summarize the knowledge regarding the initiation factors implicated in this activity as well as review different mechanisms by which this process is conducted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document