Role of Intermediate Care Unit Admission and Noninvasive Respiratory Support during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Cohort Study

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The COVID-19 pandemic has led to shortage of intensive care unit (ICU) capacity. We developed a triage strategy including noninvasive respiratory support and admission to the intermediate care unit (IMCU). ICU admission was restricted to patients requiring invasive ventilation. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to the IMCU. <b><i>Method:</i></b> Retrospective cohort including consecutive patients admitted between March 28 and April 27, 2020. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure avoiding ICU admission. Secondary outcomes included the rate of emergency intubation, 28-day mortality, and predictors of ICU admission. <b><i>Results:</i></b> One hundred fifty-seven patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia were admitted to the IMCU. Among the 85 patients admitted for worsening respiratory failure, 52/85 (61%) avoided ICU admission. In multivariate analysis, PaO₂/FiO₂ (OR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96–0.99) and BMI (OR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.78–0.98) were significantly associated with ICU admission. No death or emergency intubation occurred in the IMCU. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> IMCU admission including standardized triage criteria, self-proning, and noninvasive respiratory support prevents ICU admission for a large proportion of patients with COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, IMCUs may play an important role in preserving ICU capacity by avoiding ICU admission for patients with worsening respiratory failure and allowing early discharge of ICU patients.

Implementing Delirium Screening in an Intermediate Care Unit

BackgroundDelirium occurs in as many as 82% of hospitalized patients. Use of a valid and reliable tool allows for early detection and management to mitigate adverse effects, including a decrease in patient falls.ObjectiveTo conduct a quality improvement project to implement the confusion assessment method (CAM) tool in an intermediate care unit and measure delirium screening compliance, feasibility of the tool, and the effect on reported patient falls.MethodsWeb-based training using a 14-item pre–post assessment for knowledge comprehension. The CAM tool was added to the electronic health record (EHR), and documentation compliance was measured for eight weeks. Afterwards, a nurse perception survey was distributed, and 60-day pre- and post-intervention patient falls were compared.ResultsForty-seven nurses completed the training. Post-test averages were higher than the pre-test (p = .16); five answers showed significant improvement (p < .02). Screening and documentation compliance were 79.1%. Twenty-one nurses completed the perception survey, demonstrating agreement that delirium CAM screening is a feasible intervention. Patient falls were reduced by 57%.ConclusionAddition of the CAM tool into the EHR-enhanced screening compliance.Implications for NursingEarly delirium detection may reduce patient falls. The CAM is a feasible instrument and delirium screening is a worthwhile intervention.

Safety of transition from a routine to a selective intensive care admission pathway after elective open aneurysm repair

Background: There is a growing trend to implement intermediate care units to avoid unnecessary costs associated with intensive care unit (ICU) admission and associated resources. We sought to evaluate the safety of transitioning from a routine to a selective policy of postoperative transfer to the ICU for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive open elective AAA repair procedures performed at a single centre from Aug. 8, 2010, to Dec. 1, 2014. Patients were identified through a prospectively maintained database, and electronic charts were reviewed. Patients with interventions before Mar. 13, 2012, were routinely sent to the ICU after operation (group A). Patients treated after this date were sent directly to an intermediate care unit (group B) unless preoperative or intraoperative factors deemed them suitable for ICU admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital death; secondary outcomes were perioperative complications and length of stay. We used logistic and linear regression to determine the association between the use of an intermediate care unit and the primary and secondary outcomes after adjusting for confounders and clinically relevant covariates. Results: The cohort comprised 310 patients (266 men, 44 women) with a mean age of 69.7 (standard deviation 10.1) years and a mean AAA diameter of 61.2 mm (SD 9.6 mm). Groups A and B included 118 and 192 patients, respectively. Admission to the ICU was spared in 149 patients (77.6%) in group B. Only 2 patients (1.3%) in group B were subsequently admitted to the ICU. There was no statistically significant difference in in-hospital mortality or perioperative complications between the 2 groups on multivariable logistic regression. There was a nonsignificant trend toward slightly shorter length of stay in group B. Conclusion: In this single-centre experience with the majority of patients sent directly to an intermediate care unit, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality or morbidity between routine and selective ICU admission. Our results confirm the safety of a selective ICU admission pathway.

Time to Positivity of Blood Cultures Could Inform Decisions on Antibiotics Administration in Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis

(1) Background: Empirical antibiotics for suspected neonatal early-onset sepsis are often prolonged administered, even in the absence of clinical signs of infection, while awaiting the blood cultures results. The C-reactive protein is widely used to guide antibiotic therapy, although its increase in the first hours of life is not always evidence of infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the time to positivity (TTP) of blood cultures (BC) that develop pathogens in our population of neonates and determine whether TTP could safely inform the decisions on empirical antibiotic discontinuation in neonatal early-onset sepsis and reduce the use of unnecessary antibiotics. (2) Methods: We retrospectively collected data of all newborns ≥ 34 weeks admitted to the Neonatal Intermediate-Care Unit at Policlinico “A. Gemelli” University Hospital (Rome, Italy) from 2014 to 2018, with suspected early-onset sepsis (EOS). The TTP was the time in hours from the first BC inoculation to the bacterial growth. We defined as positive BC only those with a pathogenic organism. (3) Results: In total, 103 out of 20,528 infants born in the five-year study period were admitted to our Neonatal Intermediate-Care Unit because of a suspected EOS and enrolled into the study. The mean TTP of pathogenic organisms was 17.7 ± 12.5 h versus 80.5 ± 55.8 h of contaminants (p = 0.003). We found ten positive BCs. The TTP of BC was lower than 12, 36, and 48 h in 80%, 90%, and 100% of cases, respectively. CRP levels on admission were similar in infants with a positive and negative BC (p = 0.067). The discontinuation of therapy in asymptomatic infants 48 h after initiation would have resulted in a saving of 217 days of antibiotics (31.1% of total days administered). (4) Conclusion: From our data, the TTP of blood cultures that develop pathogens is less than 48 h in 100% of cases. Therefore, in late preterm and full-term infants with suspected EOS, stopping empiric antibiotics 48 h after initiation may be a safe practice to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, when blood cultures are negative and infants asymptomatic.