academic cheating
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

160
(FIVE YEARS 55)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 321
Author(s):  
Nurlita Novianti

The purpose of this study is to explain and predict the effect of respondent integrity and religiosity in relation to the possibility of academic fraud, which is mostly done by students. The study was also supposed to look at the effect of gender on students’ academic fraud behavior. This study involved 102 accounting students from public universities in Malang, Indonesia. Researchers used survey methods to collect data, and data were analyzed by SPSS software using multiple linear regression and moderated regression analysis. The findings of this study indicate that a lack of integrity and religion has a negative impact on the likelihood of academic fraud. This shows that students with higher levels of honesty and religion are less likely to commit academic fraud. While gender did not appear to have a substantial impact on the effect between integrity, religiosity, and the likelihood of academic cheating, both male and female students had similar levels of integrity and religiosity. The findings of this study will be useful for universities in formulating academic policies related to academic fraud prevention measures.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-149
Author(s):  
Jarmila HONZÍKOVÁ ◽  
Daniel AICHINGER ◽  
Jan KROTKÝ ◽  
Ján BAJTOŠ

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. e3168
Author(s):  
Igor Pereira da Luz ◽  
Pamela Raquel Wagnitz ◽  
Rodrigo Rengel

Academic cheating proves to be a concern in the professional education of students. In this context, the culture of the individuals (self-interest) and the environment (ethical climate) that meet may explain such behaviors. This study aimed to analyze the influence of ethical climate on academic cheating conduct mediated by self-interest among accounting students. The study is characterized as descriptive, quantitative, and of the survey type. The sample included 158 responses from accounting students from public and private universities located in southern Brazil. Exploratory factorial analysis was used for analyzing the data, and the partial least squares Structural Equation Modeling for testing the hypotheses. The results point out that the ethical climate perceived by the students influences self-interest and academic cheating conduct negatively, and that self-interest positively influences academic cheating conduct. It was also observed that self-interest acts as a mediator variable in the relationship between ethical climate and academic cheating conduct. The findings demonstrate that the cheating conduct may be motivated by the defense of student self-interest, besides being minimized by the ethical climate present in the university environment. In this sense, the study contributed to the accounting education literature by emphasizing the importance of rules and social responsibility in the conduct of undergraduate students. Also, by demonstrating that both personal and academic environment aspects may mold student behavior. From the exposed, greater dissemination and monitoring of programs that encourage good conduct is suggested, with the goal of propagating ethically accepted practices to avoid an environment conducive to cheating.


Author(s):  
Dodik Juliardi ◽  
Triadi Agung Sudarto ◽  
Rahmatullah at Taufiqi

There are many forms of academic cheating that occur among students, especially the practice of cheating. There are many factors that encourage students' academic cheating practices, especially with the aim of getting a targeted high score. Therefore, the researcher tries to find out the factors that influence the actions of academic cheating among students by referring to the fraud triangle theory which is relevant to the theme of this research. The variables observed in this study were: pressure (X1), opportunity (X2), rationalization (X3), misuse of information technology (X4), and student integrity (X5) as independent variables (independent), while the dependent variable (dependent) used behavior academic cheating on students (Y). This study used an instrument in the form of an open questionnaire with a Likert scale. The population that took as many as 500 accounting students, UM, and samples collected as many as 30 samples that have been filtered according to the criteria (purposive sampling). Analysis of the data used is multiple linear regression analysis. The results show that simultaneously, the variables of pressure, opportunity, rationalization, misuse of information technology, and student integrity have an influence on student academic fraud. The partial test shows that only the misuse of information technology has an effect on academic cheating of accounting students, ME, while the other variables have no significant effect. This is because when students learn online during the Covid-19 pandemic, they are able to take advantage of technological sophistication in this globalization era, especially in the current industry 4.0 era to carry out academic cheating actions that are oriented towards targeted values (GPA).


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 227
Author(s):  
Dian Oktarina

The purpose of this research is to show the fraud pentagon perspective on academic cheating in accounting students. The independent variabels in this research are pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capabilities, and personal ethics, while dependent variabel is academic cheating. This research used primary data on online questionnaire. The sample of this research used purposive sampling with criteria of STIE Perbanas Surabaya active accounting students until 2019 and willing to fill out a questionnaire. The research used multiple linear regression. The result is pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and capabilities no effect on cheating academic, while personal ethics negative effect on cheating academic. This is because STIE Perbanas Surabaya has character building activities namely Super Soft skills Mentoring (SSM) which makes the students have good personal ethics, so that minor academic cheating occurs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 265
Author(s):  
Marina Begoña Martínez-González ◽  
Claudia Patricia Arenas-Rivera ◽  
Aura Alicia Cardozo-Rusinque ◽  
Aldair Ricardo Morales-Cuadro ◽  
Mónica Acuña-Rodríguez ◽  
...  

This study aimed to analyze gender, anxiety, and psychological inflexibility differences of high school students’ behaviors in a simulated situation of peer coercion into academic cheating. Method: A total of 1147 volunteer adolescents participated, (Men: N = 479; Mage = 16.3; Women: N = 668; Mage = 16.2). The participants saw 15 s animated online video presenting peer coercion into an academic cheating situation, including a questionnaire about their reactions to face the situation. They also answered the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory for children and adolescents and the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y). Gender was associated with the behaviors facing the situation. Higher state anxiety and inflexibility were present in those participants that avoided aggressive behaviors facing the situation; on the other hand, trait anxiety was present in those who reacted aggressively. Finally, higher anxiety and inflexibility were associated with the used moral disengagement mechanisms, but also with peers’ perception as sanctioning or being against the participants’ decision. The most aggressive students were more flexible and less stressed than those who tried to solve assertively. Expectations about peers seem to be relevant to the decision-making facing moral dilemmas and peer victimization.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-30
Author(s):  
Fahrul Rozi

This research aims to determine the role of the disposition of patience on the effect of self-efficacy on academic cheating. Participants involved in this study were 340 people with 38% women (mean age of all subjects = 19.3 and SD = 2.01). The measuring instrument used to measure the self-efficacy variable is the General Self Efficacy Scale (Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995), the patience variable is measured by the First version of the Patience Scale (El Hafiz Lila, Rozi, Ilham, 2013), and the academic cheating variable is measured by the Academic Dishonesty Scale (Bashir & Bala, 2018). The statistical analysis used in this study is the moderating analysis of Process Hayes (2013) which provides an overview of the role of the disposition of patience on the effect of self-efficacy on academic cheating. The disposition of patience will strengthen the negative effect of self-efficacy on academic cheating. The results show that patience acts as a significant moderating variable on the effect of self-efficacy on academic cheating and the disposition of patience strengthens the negative effect between these variables. Where, the negative effect on the effect of self-efficacy on academic cheating depends on the disposition of the level of patience. The higher the disposition of patience, the higher the negative effect of self-efficacy on academic cheating.


Telaah Bisnis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Lulu Amalia Nusron ◽  
Risa Tika Sari

Higher education is expected to be able to produce professionals who are able to compete in the era of globalization both in science and in morals, however fraudulent practices are often found in the world of education which is often referred to as academic fraud. This study aims to determine the factors that influence student academic fraud by using the fraud diamond concept and religiosity. Collecting data in this study using online questionnaires and purposive sampling techniques with the criteria of active students who have taken auditing courses 2. The sample of this study was 80 active students of the Accounting Study Program at Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta, and Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta. Data analysis techniques using multiple linear regression models and data testing using SPSS. The results of this study indicate that opportunity and rationalization have a significant positive effect on academic cheating while pressure, capability, and religiosity have no effect on academic cheating.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document