Two-phase late Paleozoic magmatism (~ 313–312 and ~ 299–298 Ma) in the Lusatian Block and its relation to large scale NW striking fault zones: evidence from zircon U–Pb CA–ID–TIMS geochronology, bulk rock- and zircon chemistry

Late Paleozoic (Variscan) magmatism is widespread in Central Europe. The Lusatian Block is located in the NE Bohemian Massif and it is part of the Saxothuringian Zone of the Variscan orogen. It is bordered by two major NW-trending shear zones, the Intra-Sudetic Fault Zone towards NE and the Elbe Fault Zone towards SW. The scarce Variscan igneous rocks of the Lusatian Block are situated close to these faults. We investigated 19 samples from Variscan plutonic and volcanic rocks of the Lusatian Block, considering all petrological varieties (biotite-bearing granites from the Koenigshain and Stolpen plutons, amphibole-bearing granites from three boreholes, several volcanic dykes, and two volcanites from the intramontane Weissig basin). We applied whole-rock geochemistry (18 samples) and zircon evaporation dating (19 samples). From the evaporation data, we selected six representative samples for additional zircon SHRIMP and CA–ID–TIMS dating. For the Koenigshain pluton, possible protoliths were identified using whole-rock Nd-isotopes, and zircon Hf- and O-isotopes. The new age data allow a subdivision of Variscan igneous rocks in the Lusatian Block into two distinct magmatic episodes. The spatial relation of the two age groups to either the Elbe Fault Zone (298–299 Ma) or the Intra-Sudetic Fault Zone (312–313 Ma) together with reports on the fault-bound character of the dated intrusions suggests an interpretation as two major post-collisional faulting episodes. This assumption of two distinct magmatic periods is confirmed by a compilation of recently published zircon U–Pb CA–ID–TIMS data on further Variscan igneous rocks from the Saxothuringian Zone. New geochemical data allow us to exclude a dominant sedimentary protolith for the Koenigshain pluton as supposed by previous investigations. This conclusion is mainly based on new O- and Hf-isotope data on zircon and the scarcity of inherited zircons. Instead, acid or intermediate igneous rocks are supposed as the main source for these I-type granitoids from the Koenigshain pluton.

Late- to post-Variscan magmatism in the Lusatian Block occurred during two short episodes: Evidence from zircon dating

<p>In the Late Carboniferous to Early Permian, post-orogenic processes led to the intrusion of compositionally diverse granitoids and to intense silicic volcanism in Central Europe. In the Lusatian Block, which is situated in the eastern part of the Saxothuringian Zone of the Variscan orogen, the late- to post-Variscan granitoids are subordinate in comparison to the Cadomian basement and late- to post-Variscan volcanic rocks are almost absent. The Lusatian Block is bound towards the NE and the SW by major deep reaching fault zones. Both the granitoid and the volcanic rocks are situated near the boundaries of the block and probably associated with the major NW trending faults of the Elbe Fault Zone (e.g. Hammer et al., 1999, Lisowiec et al., 2014, Oberc-Dziezic et al., 2015). The Elbe Fault Zone is a continental scale zone of crustal weakness that was reactivated with different kinematics at different times (Scheck et al., 2002). </p><p>We acquired new precise CA-ID-TIMS U-Pb zircon ages of the Koenigshain and the Stolpen granites and the volcanics of the Weissig Basin. Our new data show that the Variscan magmatism of the Lusatian Block occurred at two distinct periods, depending on the structures on which they are bound. The age difference between the two groups (12 Myr) is clearly evident in both CA-ID-TIMS and evaporation analyses. Consequently, zircon evaporation data of other granitoid and volcanic rocks that were not dated with CA-ID-TIMS can be assigned to one of the two groups in the Lusatian Block. The new age dating allows comparison of the evolution of the investigated rocks to adjacent Variscan magmatic rocks.</p><p> </p><p>References:</p><p>Hammer et al. (1999), Z. geol. Wiss 27, 401-415.</p><p>Lisowiec et al. (2014), Acta Geologica Polonica 64 (4), 457-472.</p><p>Oberc-Dziezic et al. (2015), Int. J. Earth. Sci. 104, 1139-1166.</p><p>Scheck et al. (2002), Tectonophysics 360, 281-299.</p>

A novel semiairborne frequency-domain controlled-source electromagnetic system: Three-dimensional inversion of semiairborne data from the flight experiment over an ancient mining area near Schleiz, Germany

We have developed a novel semiairborne frequency-domain electromagnetic (EM) system and successfully tested it within the DESMEX project. The semiairborne approach relies on the fact that part of the system is positioned on the ground and the rest is airborne. This allows us to take advantage of ground and airborne techniques. In particular, a high-moment transmitter can be installed on the earth’s surface, which enables us to inject and induce strong EM fields in the subsurface. Moreover, galvanic coupling is possible, which is an advantage if additional ground stations are deployed. The airborne receivers allow easier, significantly faster, and more uniform spatial coverage of the study area than the ground receivers. In our implementation, transmitters and electric field receivers are installed on the ground. Magnetic field sensors, such as commercially available fluxgate, total field magnetometers, and newly developed induction coils, are installed on a helicopter-towed bird. First, we describe the results of a semiairborne survey performed in a selected area with ancient mining located in the Saxothuringian zone near Schleiz, Germany. A 3D semiairborne inversion model represents several conductive anomalies, which agree well with the outcrop of alum shale formations at the surface. In addition, the shallow parts of the semiairborne model are compared with the result of an independent helicopter-borne survey, which consists of stepwise 1D models.

REE and Y Mineralogy of the Krudum Granite Body (Saxothuringian Zone)

The Krudum granite body comprises highly fractionated granitic rocks ranging from medium-F biotite granites to high-F, high-P2O5 Li-mica granites. This unique assemblage is an ideal site to continue recent efforts in petrology to characterize the role of zircon, monazite and xenotime as hosts to REEs. The granitic rocks of the Krudum body analysed in this study were found to contain variable concentrations of monazite and zircon, while xenotime was only found in the high-F, high-P2O5 Li-mica granites and in the alkali-feldspar syenites of the Vysoký Kámen stock. For analysed monazites of all magmatic suites cheralite substitution was significant. The highest concentration of cheralite was found in monazites from the high-F, Li-mica granites and from the alkali-feldspar syenites. The proportion of YPO4 in all analysed xenotimes ranges from 71 to 84 mol. %. Some xenotimes were found to be hydrated and the observed water content estimated from analytical data ranged from 5 to 11 wt. % H2O. Analysed xenotimes were commonly enriched in HREEs (9.3– 19.5 wt. % HREE2O3) and thorite-coffinite and cheralite exchange was observed. Analysed zircons from granite suites of the Krudum granite body contained moderate Hf concentrations (1.0–4.7 wt. % HfO2; 0.010–0.047 apfu Hf). The highest concentrations of HfO2 were found in zircons from the high-F, high P2O5 Li-mica granites (1.2–4.7 wt. % HfO2) and from the alkali-feldspar syenites (1.3–4.1 wt. % HfO2). Zircons from the high-F, high-P2O5 Li-mica granites were often hydrated and fluorised. The concentrations of F in zircon from partly greisenised high-F, high-P2O5 Li-mica granites reached up to 1.2 wt. % (0.26 apfu F). In zircons from the alkali-feldspar syenites enrichment in P, which is not associated with a simultaneous enrichment in Y + REE, was also observed. Analysed zircons from the high-F, high P2O5 Li-mica granites were enriched in Y (up to 5.5 wt. % Y2O3; 0.10 apfu Y) and Sc (up to 1.17 wt. % Sc2O3; 0.03 apfu Sc).