Anti-B-cell therapy in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs) are a group of central nervous system autoimmune diseases characterized by similar clinical manifestations, optic neuritis, and transverse myelitis being the most frequent among them. In most cases, the pathogenesis of NMOSDs is associated with autoantibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG). However, AQP4-IgG is not detected in at least 10-20% of patients with NMOSDs. In this subgroup and in patients with isolated transverse myelitis or optic neuritis, IgG antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) were detected. Patients seronegative for both AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG have also been described.Objective: to evaluate rituximab (RTX) effectiveness in preventing relapses and disability in patients with NMOSDs.Patients and methods. The study included 27 patients with NMOSDs (9 men and 18 women) aged 20-51 years who received RTX in 2019-2021. The treatment protocol included intravenous infusions of 1000 mg of RTX on the 1st and 15th days, the second and subsequent courses (maintenance therapy) - intravenous infusions of 1000 mg of RTX once every six months. Treatment effectiveness was assessed by the average annualized relapse rate, the median changes of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and based on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes.Results and discussion. The annualized relapse rate at baseline and 18 months after the start of treatment was: all patients (n=27) — 0.6±0.3 and 0.07±0.27(p<0.0001); AQP4-IgG+ patients (n=6) — 1.1±0.9 and 0.17±0.41 (p=0.028); MOG-IgG+ patients (n=14) — 0.4±0.3 and 0.07±0.28(p=0.001); AQP4-IgG-, MOG-IgG-patients (n=7) — 0.8±0.4 and 0.0±0.0 (p=0.018). The EDSSscore at baseline and 18months after the start of treatment was: all patients — 4.5 [3.25; 6.0] and 4.0 [3.0; 5.75] (p=0.679); AQP4-IgG+ — 3.5 [2.625; 4.75] and 3.5 [2.5; 4.5] (p=0.869); MOG-IgG+ - 5.5[3.75; 6.5] and 5.5[2.75; 6.25] (p=0.465); AQP4-IgG-, MOG-IgG- - 4.0[3.75; 5.25] and 3.5[3.0; 3.5] (p=0.043). We observed two clinical relapses during the study period: one in an AQP4-IgG+ male and another one in a MOG-IgG+ woman. There was a significant decrease in the annualized relapse rate in all groups. The disability indicator did not increase during the study period, and in AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG seronegative patients, it slightly but significantly decreased. Brain and spinal cord MRI monitoring during the treatment period revealed new active foci only in two patients with clinical relapses.Conclusion. RTX treatment in NMOSDs is reasonably efficient and safe, but with the obligatory prior patient evaluation and monitoring of treatment results.

Effect of switching glatiramer acetate formulation from 20 mg daily to 40 mg three times weekly on immune function in multiple sclerosis

Background Many RRMS patients who had been treated for over 20 years with GA 20 mg/ml daily (GA20) switched to 40 mg/ml three times-a-week (GA40) to reduce injection-related adverse events. Although GA40 is as effective as GA20 in reducing annualized relapse rate and MRI activity, it remains unknown how switching to GA40 from GA20 affects the development of pathogenic and regulatory immune cells. Objective To investigate the difference in immunological parameters in response to GA20 and GA40 treatments. Methods We analyzed five pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-23, IL-12, IL-18, TNF-α), and three anti-inflammatory/regulatory cytokines (IL-10, IL-13, and IL-27) in serum. In addition, we analyzed six cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-17A, GM-CSF, IL-10, IL-6, and IL-27) in cultured PBMC supernatants. The development of Th1, Th17, Foxp3 Tregs, M1-like, and M2-like macrophages were examined by flow cytometry. Samples were analyzed before and 12 months post switching to GA40 or GA20. Results Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines were comparable between the GA40 and GA20 groups. Development of Th1, Th17, M1-like macrophages, M2-like macrophages, and Foxp3 Tregs was also comparable between the two groups. Conclusions The immunological parameters measured in RRMS patients treated with GA40 three times weekly are largely comparable to those given daily GA20 treatment.

Multiple sclerosis: Is there a risk of worsening after yellow fever vaccination?

Background: Yellow fever vaccine (YFV) is not advised for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients because of the potential risk of post-vaccine relapses. Objective: To assess the risk of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS) worsening after YFV. Methods: Non-interventional observational retrospective, exposed/non-exposed cohort study nested in the French national cohort including MS. Results: 128 RR-MS were included. The 1-year annualized relapse rate (ARR) following YFV did not differ between exposed: 0.219 (0.420) and non-exposed subjects: 0.208 (0.521) ( p = 0.92). Time to first relapse was not different between groups (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.53–3.30, p = 0.54). Conclusion: These results suggest that YFV does not worsen the course of RR-MS.

Efficacy classification of modern therapies in multiple sclerosis

Background: The Association of British Neurologists (ABN) 2015 guidelines suggested classifying multiple sclerosis therapies according to their average relapse reduction. We sought to classify newer therapies (cladribine, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, ozanimod) based on these guidelines. Materials & methods: Therapies were classified by using direct comparative trial results as per ABN guidelines and generating classification probabilities for each therapy based on comparisons versus placebo in a network meta-analysis for annualized relapse rate. Results: For both approaches, cladribine and ofatumumab were classified as high efficacy. Ocrelizumab and ozanimod (1.0 mg) were classified as moderate or high efficacy depending on the approach used. Conclusion: Cladribine and ofatumumab have an efficacy comparable with therapies classified in the ABN guidelines as high efficacy.

Efficacy and acceptability of the S1P receptor in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis

Background and objective Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptors are extensively used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the optimal therapeutic role of S1P in MS patients has still remained elusive. This network meta-analysis (NMA) systematically evaluated the efficacy and acceptability of S1P receptors, as disease-modifying drugs, in the treatment of patients with MS, so as to find out the most appropriate therapeutic strategy and provide a reliable basis for the prescription of S1P drugs for patients with MS. Methods We conducted a systematic review and NMA to compare the efficacy and acceptability of S1P receptors for treating MS patients. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which were published until May 2020, were retrieved from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The primary outcome in this study was the treatment efficacy for the S1P receptor for MS patients, in terms of decrease in annualized relapse rate. The secondary outcomes were adverse events leading to discontinuation of a study, such as an unfavorable or unintended sign/symptom. Outcomes were appraised using a random effects model expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively, and were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probabilities for hierarchical clustering of interventions. Results A total of 13 RCTS were included, which enrolled 10,554 patients. The results of NMA showed that Fingolimod, Laquinimod, Siponimod, Ozanimod, Amiselimod, and Ponesimod were superior to placebo in terms of reducing the annualized relapse rate of MS patients. Regarding efficacy, the best and worst treatments were Amiselimod (0.4 mg; SUCRA 8.1%) and placebo (SUCRA 90.5%), respectively. As for acceptability, the best and worst interventions were Ozanimod (1 mg; SUCRA 20.4%) and Ponesimod (40 mg; SUCRA 96.0%), respectively. The comparison-adjusted funnel plots of annualized relapse rate and side effects in the included studies revealed that there was no significant funnel plot asymmetry Conclusions This NMA indicated that Amiselimod (0.4 mg) is the most effective treatment strategy as a S1P receptor for MS patients. However, the abovementioned findings need to be further confirmed in the next researches.

Oral nomegestrol acetate and transdermal 17-beta-estradiol for preventing post-partum relapses in multiple sclerosis: The POPARTMUS study

Background: Sex steroids could explain the course of multiple sclerosis (MS) in pregnancy. Objective: To compare the annualized relapse rate (ARR) 12 weeks post-partum in women treated with nomegestrol acetate (NOMAc) and 17-beta-estradiol (E2) versus placebo. Methods: POPARTMUS is a randomized, proof-of-concept trial in women with MS, receiving oral NOMAc 10 mg/day and transdermal estradiol 75 µg/week, or placebo. Results: Recruitment was stopped prematurely due to slow inclusions ( n = 202). No treatment effect was observed on ARR after 12 weeks (sex steroids = 0.90 (0.58–1.39), placebo = 0.97 (0.63–1.50) ( p = 0.79)). Conclusion: POPARTMUS failed showing efficacy of a NOMAc–E2 combination in preventing post-partum relapses.

Comparison of ofatumumab and other disease-modifying therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis

Aim: To compare the efficacy of ofatumumab to other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Materials & methods: A network meta-analysis was conducted to determine the relative effect of ofatumumab on annualized relapse rate and confirmed disability progression at 3 months and 6 months. Results: For each outcome, ofatumumab was as effective as other highly efficacious monoclonal antibody DMTs (i.e., alemtuzumab, natalizumab and ocrelizumab). Conclusion: Ofatumumab offers beneficial outcomes for RMS by reducing relapse and disability progression risk.

Ozanimod for Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Ozanimod has been approved for use in the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis by the United States FDA. As a novel, orally available sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator, ozanimod selectively binds to S1P1 and S1P5 receptor with high affinity, minimizing safety concerns caused by S1P3 receptor activation.Methods: e systematically searched PUBMED, EMBASE database, and Cochrane Library database to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to June 28, 2020. Trials were considered eligible if they 1) were randomized clinical trials (RCTs); 2) enrolled adult participants diagnosed with Relapsing-remitting MS; 3) compared ozanimod with placebo or any other approved DMDs that evaluated in phase III or phase II clinical trials; 4) enrolled over 100 participants; 5) provided any available information for predefined primary or secondary outcomes.Results: 2917 participants from three high-quality, multi-centered randomized clinical trials were pooled in our analysis. We found that using ozanimod was significantly associated with the reduction of the annualized relapse rate during the treatment period (RR, −0.10 [95% CI, −0.15, −0.06]). Also, the decreased number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions at the end of the trial was relative to the treatment of ozanimod (ozanimod, 0.29; control, 0.65; RR, −0.20 [95% CI, −0.34, −0.06]). Compared with patients in the control group, the number of new or enlarging T2 lesions over the treatment period decreased in patients treated with ozanimod (ozanimod, 1.82; control, 3.55; RR, −1.12 [95% CI, −1.52, −0.71]). As to the safety endpoints, patients in the ozanimod group reported a lower rate of adverse events (ozanimod, 66.03%; control, 77.07%; RR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.43, 0.95]). Similar incidence of infection-related TEAEs was found across treatment groups (nasopharyngitis: ozanimod, 11.19%; control, 9.83%; RR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.77–1.57]; urinary-tract infection: ozanimod, 3.81%; control, 2.97%; RR, 1.29 [95% CI, 0.83–2.00]). No case of macular edema was noted as well as second-degree, type 2, or third-degree atrioventricular block. As for the subgroup analysis, compared with 0.5 mg ozanimod, 1 mg ozanimod is related with a significant reduction of the annualized relapse rate during the treatment period (1 mg ozanimod, 0.18; 0.5 mg ozanimod, 0.24; RR, 0.05 [95% CI, 0.01, 0.09])and a decreased number of new or enlarging T2 lesions over the treatment period (1 mg ozanimod,1.58; 0.5 mg ozanimod, 2.05; RR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.19, 0.79]). No significant difference in causing adverse events between 1 and 0.5 mg was found.Conclusions: Our meta-analysis found that, with favorable safety performance, the use of ozanimod as a treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in adults was associated with a significant reduction of the annualized relapse rate during the treatment period, decreased number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions at the end of the trial, and lowered number of new or enlarging T2 lesions over the treatment period. Ozanimod 1 mg outperformed 0.5 mg dose in efficacy without increasing the risk of adverse events.

BEST-MS: A prospective head-to-head comparative study of natalizumab and fingolimod in active relapsing MS

Background: There are few head-to-head studies to compare highly active treatments in multiple sclerosis (MS) Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness between natalizumab (NTZ) and fingolimod (FTY) in active relapsing–remitting MS Method: Best Escalation STrategy in Multiple Sclerosis (BEST-MS) is a multicentric, prospective study with a 12-month follow-up including patients with active MS. Treatment choice was at the discretion of physician. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were collected at baseline and at 12 months. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reaching no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included annualized relapse rate and MRI activity. Results: A total of 223 patients were included (NTZ: 109 and FTY: 114). Treatment groups were well balanced at baseline. Proportion of NEDA patients was 47.8% in NTZ group versus 30.4% in FTY group ( p = 0.015). This superiority was driven by annualized relapse rate and MRI activity. In the multivariate analysis, treatment group was the only factor associated with NEDA at 12 months with a lower probability in FTY group (odds ratio (OR) = 0.49, p = 0.029). Conclusion: BEST-MS is a prospective study that compared head-to-head the effectiveness of NTZ and FTY in active relapsing–remitting MS. Our results suggest a superiority of NTZ over FTY.