pharmacokinetic drug interaction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

71
(FIVE YEARS 14)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2172
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Karbownik ◽  
Danuta Szkutnik-Fiedler ◽  
Tomasz Grabowski ◽  
Anna Wolc ◽  
Joanna Stanisławiak-Rudowicz ◽  
...  

A combination of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor—sorafenib—and the opioid analgesic—morphine—can be found in the treatment of cancer patients. Since both are substrates of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and sorafenib is also an inhibitor of P-gp, their co-administration may affect their pharmacokinetics, and thus the safety and efficacy of cancer therapy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the potential pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions between sorafenib and morphine using an animal model. The rats were divided into three groups that Received: sorafenib and morphine (ISOR+MF), sorafenib (IISOR), and morphine (IIIMF). Morphine caused a significant increase in maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration–time curves (AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞) of sorafenib by 108.3 (p = 0.003), 55.9 (p = 0.0115), and 62.7% (p = 0.0115), respectively. Also, the Cmax and AUC0–t of its active metabolite—sorafenib N-oxide—was significantly increased in the presence of morphine (p = 0.0022 and p = 0.0268, respectively). Sorafenib, in turn, caused a significant increase in the Cmax of morphine (by 0.5-fold, p = 0.0018). Moreover, in the presence of sorafenib the Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞ of the morphine metabolite M3G increased by 112.62 (p < 0.0001), 46.82 (p = 0.0124), and 46.78% (p = 0.0121), respectively. Observed changes in sorafenib and morphine may be of clinical significance. The increased exposure to both drugs may improve the response to therapy in cancer patients, but on the other hand, increase the risk of adverse effects.


Author(s):  
Yannis K. Valtis ◽  
Kristen E. Stevenson ◽  
Andrew E. Place ◽  
Lewis B Silverman ◽  
Lynda M Vrooman ◽  
...  

Adolescent and young adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have superior outcomes when treated on pediatric regimens. Pediatric ALL regimens rely heavily on corticosteroids and asparaginase and are known to increase the risk of osteonecrosis (ON) and fractures in children, particularly adolescents. Orthopedic toxicity among young adults treated on pediatric-inspired regimens is not well described. Here, we report the symptomatic orthopedic toxicities of patients aged 15-50 years treated on sequential Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL Consortium protocols. Among 367 patients with a median age of 23 years (range 15-50, 68% &lt; 30 years), 60 patients were diagnosed with ON (5-year cumulative incidence (CI) 17%; [95% confidence interval 13-22]) and 40 patients experienced fracture (5-year CI 12% [95% CI 8-15]). Patients &lt; 30 years were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with ON (5-year CI 21% vs. 8%, p=0.004). Patients treated more recently on pegaspargase-based protocols were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with ON compared to those treated on earlier trials with native E.coli asparaginase (5-year CI 24% vs 5%, p&lt;0.001). Of the 54 ON events for which adequate information was available, surgery was performed in 25 (46%). Patients with ON had superior overall survival (OS) compared to those without (multivariable OS HR 0.15 [95% CI: 0.05-0.46], p=0.001; ON included as a time-varying exposure). Increased rates of orthopedic toxicity in late generation protocols may be driven by the pharmacokinetic drug interaction between pegaspargase and dexamethasone, leading to higher dexamethasone exposure.


Author(s):  
JANVIER ENGELBERT AGBOKPONTO ◽  
LOCONON ACHILLE YEMOA ◽  
ASSOGBA GABIN ASSANHOU ◽  
RUIJUAN LIU ◽  
HABIB GANFON ◽  
...  

Objective: This study was conducted to develop a sensitive and effective LC-MS/MS method for the determination of bencycloquidium bromide (BCQB) and its application in pharmacokinetic drug interaction study between BCQB and paroxetine. Methods: The chromatographic separation was performed on Hedera ODS-2 C18 column with a mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile-10 mmol/l ammonium acetate containing 0.2% acetic acid (33:67, v/v) at 550 μl/min, and the plasma samples were processed using solid-phase extraction. The MS/MS transitions were m/z 330.2 → 142.0 for BCQB and m/z 344.2 → 156.1 for the I. S in positive ESI mode. Results: The validated method was linear over the concentration range of 2-1200 pg/ml with the correlation coefficient r2>0.998. The intra-and inter-batch precisions of the assay were lower than 8.2% and 9.1%, respectively. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 2 pg/ml. The stability data at different storage conditions of BCQB were within±5% RE. The mean AUC0-36 of BCQB was increased by approximately 33%, after the administration of BCQB alone and upon co-administration with paroxetine during the drug interaction study. Conclusion: The LC-MS/MS method validated in this study was robust, reproducible, accurate, precise and reliable and was successfully applied in the pharmacokinetic drug interaction studies.


Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 740
Author(s):  
Ji-Sang Lee ◽  
Hyo-Sung Kim ◽  
Yong-Seob Jung ◽  
Hyeon-Gyeom Choi ◽  
So-Hee Kim

Fungal infections are prevalent in patients with immune diseases. Voriconazole, a triazole antifungal drug, inhibits the cytochromes CYP3A4 and CYP2C, and tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, is metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 in humans. Here, we investigated their interaction during simultaneous administration of both drugs to rats, either intravenously or orally. The area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to time infinity (AUC) of tofacitinib was significantly greater, by 166% and 171%, respectively, and the time-averaged non-renal clearance (CLNR) of tofacitinib was significantly slower (59.5%) than that for tofacitinib alone. An in vitro metabolism study showed non-competitive inhibition of tofacitinib metabolism in the liver and intestine by voriconazole. The concentration/apparent inhibition constant (Ki) ratios of voriconazole were greater than two, indicating that the inhibition of tofacitinib metabolism could be due to the inhibition of the CYP3A1/2 and CYP2C11 enzymes by voriconazole. The pharmacokinetics of voriconazole were not affected by the co-administration of tofacitinib. In conclusion, the significantly greater AUC and slower CLNR of tofacitinib after intravenous and oral administration of both drugs were attributable to the non-competitive inhibition of tofacitinib metabolism via CYP3A1/2 and CYP2C11 by voriconazole in rats.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarvesh Sabarathinam ◽  
Satish Kumar Rajappan Chandra ◽  
Vijayakumar Thangavel Mahalingam

AbstractMaha yogaraja guggulu (MYG) is a classical herbomineral polyherbal formulation being widely used since centuries. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of MYG formulation and its major constituents E & Z guggulsterone on CYP3A4 mediated metabolism. In vitro inhibition of MYG and Guggulsterone isomers on CYP3A4 was evaluated by high throughput fluorometric assay. Eighteen Adult male Sprague–Dawley rats (200 ± 25 g body weight) were randomly divided into three groups. Group A, Group B and Group C were treated with placebo, MYG and Standard E & Z guggulsterone for 14 days respectively by oral route. On 15th day, midazolam (5 mg/kg) was administered orally to all rats in each group. Blood samples (0.3 mL) were collected from the retro orbital vein at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h of each rat were collected. The findings from the in vitro & in vivo study proposed that the MYG tablets and its guggulsterone isomers have drug interaction potential when consumed along with conventional drugs which are CYP3A4 substrates. In vivo pharmacokinetic drug interaction study of midazolam pointed out that the MYG tablets and guggulsterone isomers showed an inhibitory activity towards CYP3A4 which may have leads to clinically significant interactions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 100619
Author(s):  
Vijayakumar Thangavel Mahalingam ◽  
Ilango Kaliappan ◽  
Satish Kumar Rajappan Chandra ◽  
Melvin George ◽  
Mohan Kumar Ramasamy ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 2101-2111
Author(s):  
Woo Youl Kang ◽  
Hae Won Lee ◽  
Mi-Ri Gwon ◽  
Seungil Cho ◽  
Wang-Seob Shim ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Namyi Gu ◽  
Sang-In Park ◽  
Hyewon Chung ◽  
Xuanyou Jin ◽  
SeungHwan Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document