AbstractIn Part I, an electrification scheme was described and a simulation of an observed cold-based storm from the US High Plains was validated with electrical observations. Most charge in the storm was separated by rebounding collisions of secondary ice originating from prior graupel-snow collisions.In this Part II, sensitivity tests are performed with the control simulation (Part I) and influences from environmental factors (aerosols, temperature, moisture, shear) on lightning are elucidated. Environmental factors (e.g. Convective Available Potential Energy [CAPE]) controlling updraft speed are salient. When ascent is reduced by 30% and 70%, flashes become 70% fewer and disappear respectively; faster ascent promotes positive cloud-to-ground (+CGs) flashes. Since cloud-base is too cold (1 °C) for coalescence, cloud condensation nucleus (CCN) aerosol concentrations do not influence the lightning appreciably. The electrical response to varying concentrations of active ice nuclei (IN) is limited by most ice particles being secondary and less sensitive, a natural ‘buffer’.Imposing a maritime sounding suggests that the land-sea contrast in lightning for such storms is due to the vertical structure of environmental temperature and humidity. Weak CAPE, and both entrainment and condensate weight from a low cloud-base, suppress ascent and charging. Maritime thermodynamic conditions reduce simulated flash rates by two orders of magnitude. Reducing aerosol loadings from continental to maritime reinforces this suppression.A conceptual model is provided for how any simulated storm is normal (inverted/anomalous) because graupel/hail is mostly positively (negatively) charged, with environmental factors controlling the charging. Finally, impacts from microphysical processes on lightning are analysed.