Time efficiency and reliability of established computed tomographic obstruction scores in patients with acute pulmonary embolism

Objective Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening disease with a high mortality. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is used in clinical routine for diagnosis of PE. Many pulmonary obstruction scores were proposed to aid in stratifying clinical course of PE. The purpose of the present study was to compare common pulmonary obstruction scores in PE in regard of time efficiency and interreader agreement based upon a representative patient sample. Methods Overall, 50 patients with acute PE were included in this single center, retrospective analysis. Two readers scored the CT images blinded to each other and assessed the scores proposed by Mastora et al., Qanadli et al., Ghanima et al. and Kirchner et al. The required time was assessed of each reading for scoring. Results For reader 1, Mastora score took the longest time duration, followed by Kirchner score, Qanadli score and finally Ghanima score (every test, p<0.0001). The interreader variability was excellent for all scores with no significant differences between them. In the Spearman’s correlation analysis strong correlations were identified between the scores of Mastora, Qanadli and Kirchner, whereas Ghanima score was only moderately correlated with the other scores. There was a weak correlation between time duration and Mastora score (r = 0.35, p = 0.014). For the Ghanima score, a significant inverse correlation was found (r = -0.67, p<0.0001). Conclusion For the investigated obstruction scores, there are significant differences in regard of time consumption with no relevant differences in regard of interreader variability in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Mastora score requires the most time effort, whereas the score by Ghanima the least time.

ACE Gene I/D Polymorphism and Acute Pulmonary Embolism in COVID19 Pneumonia: A Potential Predisposing Role

Most recent studies have stressed a high risk of thromboembolism in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly in those with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Counterbalance between angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) and ACE2 activities in COVID-19 disease may be crucially involved in the thrombo-inflammatory process. Currently, no study has investigated ACE I/D polymorphism involvement in COVID-19 disease complicated by pulmonary embolism, hence the aim of the present pilot study. This is a retrospective, single-center observational case-control study, conducted at the Sub-Intensive Care Unit of A.O.R.N. Ospedali dei Colli, Cotugno Hospital, Naples (Italy). We included 68 subjects with severe/critical COVID-19 pneumonia. COVID-19 patients were divided according to occurrence of PE (PE+, n = 25) or absence of thromboembolic complications (PE−, n = 43). Assessment of ACE I/D polymorphisms showed a statistically significant difference between PE+ and PE− patients (p = 0.029). Particularly, prevalence of D/D homozygous polymorphism was significantly higher in PE+ COVID-19 patients than in PE− (72 vs. 46.5%; p = 0.048), while heterozygote I/D polymorphism was significantly lower expressed in PE+ patients than in PE− (16 vs. 48.8%; p = 0.009). Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography showed predominantly mono/bilateral sub-segmental embolisms. In conclusion, our findings let us hypothesize a genetic susceptibility to thromboembolism in COVID-19 disease. ACE D/D polymorphism might represent a genetic risk factor, although studies on larger populations are needed.

A Rare Cause of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in COVID-19: MINOCA Syndrome

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is defined as having a stenosis of less than 50% or no stenosis in coronary angiography in a patient diagnosed with myocardial infarction. Because of its thrombogenic predisposition in COVID-19, the diagnosis of MINOCA syndrome is rarely thought in the patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial Infarction on electrocardiogram. In this case report, we discuss a 47-year-old male patient diagnosed with MINOCA who was followed up with respiratory failure due to COVID-19 viral pneumonia in intensive care unit. His 12-lead electrocardiogram showed “inferior STEMI”. A 30-40% stenosis was also shown in the midportion of left anterior descending artery in emergency coronary angiography. The patient had a normal computed tomographic pulmonary angiography and was discharged with a full recovery. MINOCA may be triggered by hyperinflammation or various processes due to COVID-19. To explain these processes associated with MINOCA syndrome, further clinical trials are needed.

Pulmonary Thromboembolism in a Patient with Behcet’s Disease: A Case Report

Behcet’s disease is a multisystem vasculitis characterized by recurrent oral ulcers and any of several systemic manifestations.We report on a case of a 53-year-old woman with Behcet’s disease who was admitted for cough and erythema nodosum. The patient had dyspnea on the third day of admission. The computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and SPECT pulmonary perfusion imaging showed pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary embolism is a rare complication of Behcet’s disease, early diagnosis and treatments are essential for the management of Behcet’s disease. Written consent for publication was obtained from the patient.

Is computed tomographic pulmonary angiography justified in all patients with suspected pulmonary embolism – tertiary multidisciplinary hospital perspective

Background According to 2019 ESC guidelines for management in patients with the pulmonary embolism (PE), the computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the diagnostic method of choice in suspected high-risk PE defined as patients with hemodynamic instability. In stable cases, it is recommended to assess the pre-test probability of the PE. However, CTPA with its great accuracy and wide availability in most medical centers is used as often to confirm as to exclude the diagnosis in PE suspected patients, despite the fact that it is linked with the risk of radiation and iodine-containing contrast exposure. Purpose The aim of the study was to assess the validity of CTPA use in patients with suspected PE form the perspective of multidisciplinary clinical center. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of from 52,474 hospitalized patients between 01.2018 and 12.2019. A total of 261 (0.5%) consecutive patients with suspected PE (in the emergency department or during hospitalization) were included into the study. Due to suspicion of PE all patients underwent the CTPA. In this group, we analyzed all available clinical data, results of laboratory and diagnostic tests (before and after CTPA) including estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatinine level, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and planar ventilation/perfusion (lung scintigraphy) scan (V/Q SPECT) if performed. Results The CTPA confirmed PE in 28.9% of patients. The most common final diagnoses, established in the group with negative CTPA result, include heart failure (33.9%), pneumonia (14.4%) exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma (9.3%) and acute coronary syndrome (5.9%). Acute PE was the cause of in-hospital death in 2.4% of patients and the rate of all cause in-hospital death was 11.4%. In 54.2% of patients we observed the eGFR decline and creatinine level increase, meeting the criteria of the acute contrast-induced nephropathy in 33 of them of them (19.8%). In the group with excluded PE, mean eGFR before CTPA was 70.9ml/min/1.73m2 with the decline to mean 60.4ml/min/1.73m2 during the hospitalization (p&lt;0.01). In patients with negative CTPA result and the worsening of the renal function mean eGFR decline was 17.8ml/min/1.73m2 (p&lt;0.01) and mean creatinine level increase was 38.6μmol/l (p&lt;0.01). CONSLUSIONS The initial data collected show the overuse of CTPA in suspected PE, as the diagnosis was confirmed in less than one-third of them. Although CTPA allows to exclude or confirm PE unambiguously, its use is associated with risk of acute contrast-induced nephropathy. Additionally, in patients with exacerbation of heart failure established as final diagnosis after excluding PE, intensive diuretic treatment is crucial and may cause further accompanying renal function worsening. Therefore, optimizing the diagnostic pathway in patients with suspected PE into less aggravating procedures such as TTE or V/Q SPECT is justifiable. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Coronavirus Disease 2019

Background Pulmonary embolism is a severe condition prone to misdiagnosis given its nonspecific signs and symptoms. Previous studies on the pneumonia outbreak caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) showed a number of patients with elevated d-dimer, whether those patients combined with pulmonary embolism got our attention. Methods Data on clinical manifestations, laboratory and radiological findings, treatment, and disease progression of 19 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia,who completed computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) during hospitalization in the Central Hospital of Wuhan from January 2 to March 26, 2020, were reviewed. Results Of the 19 suspected pulmonary embolism and subjected to CTPA patients, six were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism. The Wells’ score of the six patients with pulmonary embolism was 0–1, which suggested a low risk of pulmonary embolism. The median level of d-dimers collected at the day before or on the day of CTPA completion in the patients with pulmonary embolism was 18.36 (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.69–61.46) µg/mL, which was much higher than that in the patients without pulmonary embolism (median 9.47 [IQR: 4.22–28.02] µg/mL). Of the 6 patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism, all patients received anticoagulant therapy, 5 of which survived and were discharged and 1 died. Conclusion A potential causal relationship exists between COVID-19 infection and pulmonary embolism, but whether this phenomenon is common remains uncertain. The clinical manifestations of COVID-19 patients who developed pulmonary embolism are similar to those of patients with increased d-dimer alone, prompting a significant challenge on differential diagnoses.