For 75 years, the journal Population Studies has advanced research on key substantive demographic topics of fertility, mortality, family, migration, and beyond to contributions in methods, and policy. Yet we lack a systematic and rigorous scientometric review that evaluates how research topics have evolved and by whom has authored them. We review all papers (N=1,901) and authorship contributions (N=3,267) published in the journal between 1947 and 2020. Our techniques employ natural language processing, social network analysis, and a novel mixed-method approach to incorporate un-supervised machine learning models conjoint with qualitative coders. After a brief history of the journal we show that authorship and articles have evolved over time, with a shift to shorter and multi-authored articles, with 34\% female authorships and skewed gender ratios in certain topics. The majority of articles have covered fertility, mortality and family research, studying groups, time and change, with topics expanding and waning in prevalence over time. Children are rarely studied and if examined, in relation to infant mortality or sex-preferences of parents. Research on women focuses on family planning and contraception, fertility decline, unions and divorce, whereas men’s domains are migration, historical demography (war, famine) and employment. Geographical bias is also present with family planning examined in Africa and Asia and fertility decline in North American and Europe. Our results inform policy for hiring and tenure committees and identify research gaps relevant for editors, funders and researchers.