Nup93 and CTCF modulate spatiotemporal dynamics and function of the HOXA gene locus during differentiation

Nucleoporins regulate nuclear transport and are also involved in DNA damage, repair, cell cycle, chromatin organization, and gene expression. Here, we studied the role of nucleoporin Nup93 and the chromatin organizer CTCF in regulating HOXA expression during differentiation. ChIP sequencing revealed a significant overlap between Nup93 and CTCF peaks. Interestingly, Nup93 and CTCF are associated with the 3' and 5′HOXA genes respectively. Depletions of Nup93 and CTCF antagonistically modulate expression levels of 3′and 5′HOXA genes in undifferentiated NT2/D1 cells. Nup93 also regulates the localization of the HOXA gene locus, which disengages from the nuclear periphery upon Nup93 but not CTCF depletion, consistent with its upregulation. The dynamic association of Nup93 and CTCF with the HOXA locus during differentiation correlates with its spatial positioning and expression. While Nup93 tethers the HOXA locus to the nuclear periphery, CTCF potentially regulates looping of the HOXA gene cluster in a temporal manner. In summary, Nup93 and CTCF complement one another in modulating the spatiotemporal dynamics and function of the HOXA gene locus during differentiation.

Establishing the Role of EPS15, DVL2 and Cortactin in CALM-AF10 Leukemogenesis

Background: Leukemia is the most common type of childhood cancer. Although the prognosis for many pediatric leukemias has improved, leukemias associated with the t(10;11) CALM-AF10 translocation remain difficult to treat. CALM-AF10 leukemias account for ~5-10% of childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL)as well as a subset of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). CALM-AF10 leukemias exhibit increased expression of proleukemic HOXA genes, but relatively little is known about the cellular mechanisms that drive CALM-AF10 leukemogenesis. Our laboratory has demonstrated that the CALM protein contains a nuclear export signal (NES) that is critical for CALM-AF10-dependent leukemogenesis. The NES interacts with the CRM1/XPO1 nuclear export receptor, which shuttles proteins from the nucleus to the cytoplasm through the nuclear pore complex. We have shown that transcriptional activation of HOXA genes by CALM-AF10 is dependent on its interaction with CRM1. Importantly, CRM1 does not contain a recognized DNA binding domain, and it is not currently understood how the CALM-AF10/CRM1 complex interacts with regulatory regions of HOXA genes. To identify proteins that mediate the interaction between the CALM-AF10/CRM1 complex and DNA, we took advantage of a proximity-based labeling approach using BioID2, a second-generation biotin ligase. When fused to a protein of interest and in the presence of biotin, BioID2 biotinylates proteins in close proximity to the ligase. These biotinylated proteins can then be identified by mass spectrometry (MS). Methods: We prepared an expression plasmid in which BioID2 was cloned in-frame with CALM-AF10. Human Embryonic Kidney 293 (HEK293) cells were transiently transfected with BioID2-CALM-AF10 and grown in the presence or absence of biotin. MS was performed to identify candidate interacting proteins. We validated direct interactions of candidate proteins with CALM-AF10 using co-immunoprecipitation experiments in HEK293 cells transfected with a CALM-AF10 plasmid. We confirmed that candidate proteins are present in murine CALM-AF10 leukemia cells via Western blotting. In order to efficiently knockout (KO) candidate proteins, we have generated a human U937 cell line (which harbors a t(10;11) CALM-AF10 translocation) with a stable incorporated Cas9. To assess whether KO of EPS15, DVL2 or CTTN affects HOXA5 expression, we performed RT-qPCR in U937-Cas9 cells lines with confirmed KO. Results: We carried out three independent transfections/MS experiments, which identified 71, 95 and 61 proteins, respectively. Of the proteins identified, 12 candidates were common to all three experiments . Importantly, we identified Disruptor Of Telomeric silencing 1-Like (DOT1L), a protein known to interact with AF10, and Nuclear pore complex protein 214 (NUP214), a protein that interacts with CRM1 and that is involved in leukemogenic translocations. We chose EPS15, DVL2 and CTTN for further study, as each of these proteins plays a role in leukemogenesis. We performed initial validation of direct interactions via co-immunoprecipitation and found that all three proteins co-precipitate with CALM-AF10. Western blotting showed that all three proteins are expressed in a murine CALM-AF10 leukemia cell line. We effectively knocked out EPS15 protein expression in U937 cells, and showed that HOXA5 expression is reduced in the setting of EPS15 knockout. Conclusion: We used biotin ligase-dependent proximity-based labeling to identify candidate proteins that potentially interact with the CALM-AF10 fusion protein. Our identification of DOT1L validates the approach, since DOT1L is known to interact with CALM-AF10. We have started to investigate three candidate proteins - EPS15, DVL2 and CTTN - all of which are involved in leukemogenic transformation. We have shown that EPS15, DVL2 and CTTN are expressed in murine CALM-AF10 leukemia cells and directly interact with the CALM-AF10 fusion protein. Knockout of EPS15 in U937 cells results in decreased HOXA5 expression, suggesting the importance of EPS15 in CALM-AF10 leukemogenesis. Evaluation of the roles of these proteins in leukemogenesis may lead to identification of novel pathways involved in CALM-AF10 leukemogenesis. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

A SIX1/EYA2 Inhibitor Impairs CALM-AF10 and Jurkat Leukemia Cell Proliferation

Background : The CALM-AF10 translocation is found in 5-10% of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias (T-ALL), and a subset of acute myeloid leukemias (AML). CALM-AF10 leukemias are characterized by elevated expression of proleukemic HOXA genes. Since HOXA genes are difficult to target, we hypothesized that identification of non-HOXA CALM-AF10 effector genes could potentially yield novel therapeutic targets. To discover novel CALM-AF10-regulated genes, we took advantage of our prior observation that the nuclear export factor CRM1/XPO1 tethers CALM-AF10 to HOXA genes by interacting with a nuclear export signal within CALM. Using microarrays, we identified a set of genes that showed decreased expression in response to the CRM1 inhibitor Leptomycin B (LMB), similar to Hoxa genes, in murine CALM-AF10 leukemia cells. Then using RNA-sequencing, we discovered a set of genes increased in murine hematopoietic stem cells transduced with CALM-AF10. There were 11 genes that were both decreased in response to LMB and increased in response to CALM-AF10, which included the Hoxa gene cluster, as well as Six1. We demonstrated that CALM-AF10 increases Six1 expression and localizes to the Six1 locus, as it does the Hoxa genes. SIX1, like the Hoxa genes, is a homeobox gene that is associated with embryogenesis and is quiescent post-embryologically. In addition, SIX1 and its cofactor EYA2 are overexpressed in numerous solid tumors, and an inhibitor of the SIX1/EYA2 complex (Compound 8430) has recently been described. While there is evidence of a role for SIX1 in solid tumors, its role in leukemias has not been explored. Objective : Evaluate the effect of a SIX1/EYA2 complex inhibitor on leukemia cell proliferation. Design/Methods : SIX1 gene and protein expression were assessed in CALM-AF10, Jurkat (T-ALL) and NOMO1 (AML) leukemia cell lines via Western Blot and RT-qPCR. CALM-AF10 leukemias were derived from murine models in our lab, Jurkat and NOMO1 cell lines were obtained from ATCC. The effect of compound 8430 - an inhibitor of the Six1/Eya2 interaction - on cell proliferation was evaluated using Cell-Titer-Glo Assays and liquid culture proliferation assays. In addition, we used the the CRM1 Nuclear Export Inhibitor KPT-330 alone and in combination with 8430 in these cell lines. SynergyFinder2 (https://synergyfinder.fimm.fi/) was used to assess synergy of 8430 and KPT-330. δ-score is a calculated value that indicates synergistic drug interaction, with a higher δ-score indicative of a synergistic effect of the drugs. Results : SIX1 gene and protein expression are increased in CALM-AF10 leukemia cell lines and Jurkat T-ALL cells, but not NOMO1 cells. Compound 8430 decreases cell proliferation in CALM-AF10 leukemias and Jurkat leukemia cell lines, however it did not affect the AML line NOMO1. Correspondingly, liquid cultures showed that 8430 alone slowed the proliferation of CALM-AF10 leukemia and the Jurkat cells, but not NOMO1 cells. The addition of KPT-330 to 8430 was synergistic in CALM-AF10 leukemia cells with a KPT-330 dose of 60 nM and multiple dose levels of 8430 (δ-scores 17-19) while in the Jurkat leukemia cells a dose of 30 nM of KPT-330 was synergistic at multiple dose levels of 8430 (δ-score 6-8) (Figure 1). Conclusions : The SIX1 homeobox gene is highly expressed during development, and its expression is silenced post-embryogenesis. Through an initial unbiased screen, we discovered that Six1 may play a role in CALM-AF10 leukemogenesis. We have determined that Six1 expression is upregulated in the presence of CALM-AF10. A role for Six1 in CALM-AF10 leukemogenesis is further supported by the ability of a SIX1/EYA2 inhibitor to slow the proliferation of CALM-AF10 leukemia cells. Importantly, based on our observation that 8430 slows proliferation of Jurkat cells, SIX1 inhibition may be relevant in other leukemias. Finally, our demonstration that 8430 synergizes with KPT-330, a Nuclear Export Inhibitor, suggests the possibility of a novel therapeutic approach for CALM-AF10 and other leukemias. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The SIX1 homeobox Gene Is a Novel Therapeutic Target in CALM-AF10 Leukemogenesis

Background : The CALM-AF10 translocation is found 5-10% of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias (T-ALL), and a subset of acute myeloid leukemias (AML). CALM-AF10 leukemias are characterized by elevated expression of proleukemic HOXA genes. Since HOXA genes are difficult to target, we hypothesized that identification of non-HOXA CALM-AF10 effector genes could potentially yield novel therapeutic targets. To discover novel CALM-AF10-regulated genes, we took advantage of our prior observation that the nuclear export factor CRM1/XPO1 tethers CALM-AF10 to HOXA genes by interacting with a nuclear export signal within CALM. Using microarrays, we identified a set of genes that showed decreased expression in response to the CRM1 inhibitor, Leptomycin B (LMB), similar to Hoxa genes, in murine CALM-AF10 leukemia cells. Then using RNA-sequencing, we discovered a set of genes increased in murine hematopoietic stem cells transduced with CALM-AF10. There were 11 genes that were both decreased in response to LMB and increased in response to CALM-AF10, which included the Hoxa gene cluster, as well as Six1. Similar to HOXA genes, SIX1 is a homeobox gene that is associated with embryogenesis and is quiescent post-embryologically. Additionally, SIX1 and its cofactor EYA2 have been found to be overexpressed in numerous solid tumors, and inhibitor of the SIX1/EYA2 complex has recently been described. While there is evidence of a role for SIX1 in solid tumors, its role in leukemias has not been explored. Objective: To evaluate the role of SIX1 in CALM-AF10 leukemias. Design/Methods: RT-qPCR and Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) were performed using bone marrow progenitors transduced with CALM-AF10 or an empty vector, with and without LMB. Methylcellulose colony assays assessed the ability of SIX1 to enhance self-renewal of hematopoietic progenitors. An inhibitor of the Six1/Eya2 interaction (compound 8430) was used to evaluate cell proliferation. Downstream targets of Six1 were evaluated using RT-qPCR in CALM-AF10 cells treated with Six1/Eya2 inhibitor (8430). Results: RT-qPCR confirmed overexpression of SIX1 in CALM-AF10 leukemia cells, and showed decreased SIX1 expression in the presence of LMB. Furthermore, ChIP revealed that CALM-AF10 binds to the SIX1 gene locus. Overexpression of SIX1 in fetal liver progenitors was sufficient to increase self-renewal potential. The 8430 Six1/Eya2 inhibitor slowed cell growth in CALM-AF10 cells compared to cells treated with DMSO alone. Finally, downstream targets such as Slc2a1, Cdk2, and Cyclina2 were decreased in 8430-treated CALM-AF10 leukemia cells. Conclusions: The SIX1 homeobox gene is highly expressed during embryogenesis, and its expression is silenced post-embryogenesis. Through an initial unbiased screen, we discovered that Six1 may play a role in CALM-AF10 leukemogenesis. We have determined that Six1 expression is upregulated in the presence of CALM-AF10. Further, we have shown a potential oncogenic role for Six1, as it was able to increase the self-renewal potential of hematopoietic progenitors. The role of Six1 in CALM-AF10 leukemia is further supported by the ability of a SIX1/EYA2 inhibitor to slow the growth of CALM-AF10 leukemia cells and decrease the expression of downstream targets of SIX1. These observations suggest that Six1 plays a pathogenic role in leukemogenesis, and may be a novel therapeutic target in CALM-AF10 leukemias. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Characterizing Proteins That Mediate CALM-AF10 Leukemogenesis

Background: Leukemia is the most common type of childhood cancer. Although the prognosis for many pediatric leukemias has improved, leukemias associated with the t(10;11) CALM-AF10 translocation remain difficult to treat. CALM-AF10 leukemias account for ~5-10% of childhood T-cell acute lymphoid leukemia (T-ALL) as well as a subset of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). CALM-AF10 leukemias exhibit increased expression of proleukemic HOXA genes, but relatively little is known about the cellular mechanisms that drive CALM-AF10 leukemogenesis. Our laboratory has demonstrated that the CALM protein contains a nuclear export signal (NES) that is critical for CALM-AF10-dependent leukemogenesis. The NES interacts with the CRM1/XPO1 nuclear export receptor, which shuttles proteins from the nucleus to the cytoplasm through the nuclear pore complex. We have shown that transcriptional activation of HOXA genes by CALM-AF10 is critically dependent on its interaction with CRM1. Importantly, CRM1 does not contain a recognized DNA binding domain, and it is not currently understood how the CALM-AF10/CRM1 complex interacts with regulatory regions of HOXAgenes. In order to identify proteins that mediate the interaction between the CALM-AF10/CRM1 complex and DNA, we took advantage of a proximity-based labeling approach using BioID2, a second-generation biotin ligase. When fused to a protein of interest and in the presence of biotin, BioID2 biotinylates proteins in close proximity to the ligase. These biotinylated proteins can then be identified by mass spectrometry (MS). Methods: We prepared an expression plasmid in which BioID2 was cloned in-frame with CALM-AF10. We then transiently transfected Human Embryonic Kidney 293 (HEK293) cells with the BioID2-CALM-AF10 plasmid, grew them in the presence or absence of biotin, and performed streptavidin-pulldown followed by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to identify candidate interacting proteins. Proteins were considered candidates if they had a peptide spectrum match (PSM) score > 10 and at least a two-fold greater PSM score versus negative control. We validated direct interactions of candidate proteins with CALM-AF10 by performing co-immunoprecipitation experiments. Results: We first confirmed that the addition of BioID2 to CALM-AF10 does not affect the transcriptional activation of HOXA genes or CALM-AF10 mediated immortalization of hematopoietic stem cells. We carried out three independent transfections/LC-MS/MS experiments, which identified 71, 95 and 61 proteins, respectively. Of the proteins identified, 11 candidates were common to all three experiments.Of particular interest, we identified Disruptor Of Telomeric silencing 1-Like (DOT1L), a protein known to interact with AF10, and Nuclear pore complex protein 214 (NUP214), a protein that has been identified in leukemogenic translocations. The nine additional candidate proteins included: EPS15, DVL2, DVL3, and DDX3X -all known to play a role in leukemogenesis. We performed initial validation of direct interactions via co-immunoprecipitation and found that Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Substrate 15(EPS15) co-precipitates with CALM-AF10. Conclusion: We used biotin ligase-dependent proximity-based labeling to identify candidate proteins that potentially interact with the CALM-AF10 fusion protein. Our identification of DOT1L validates the approach, since DOT1L is known to interact with CALM-AF10. We have started to investigate other candidate proteins, focusing on known translocation partners in various leukemias. Our screen identified EPS15, a protein involved in receptor-mediated endocytosis of epidermal growth factor and a known translocation partner for MLL/KMT2A. KMT2A-EPS15 translocations (t(1;11)(p32;q23)) have been identified in both AML and ALL, and KMT2A-EPS15 is among the eight most common KMT2A rearrangements. We have shown that EPS15 co-immunoprecipitates with CALM-AF10, suggesting that EPS15 may also play a role in CALM-AF10 leukemogenesis. Further evaluation of this interaction is underway, and may lead to identification of novel pathways involved in CALM-AF10 leukemogenesis. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Landscape Of HOXA Genes Methylation in Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most common cancers worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in Malaysia. The HOXA gene cluster is a family of Homeobox A genes encoding transcriptional regulators that play vital roles in cancer susceptibility and progression. Dysregulated HOXA expression influences various aspects of carcinogenesis processes. Therefore, this study aims to elucidate the methylation landscape of HOXA genes in CRC. Twelve pairs of CRC — adjacent normal tissues were subjected to Infinium DNA MethyEPIC array. Differentially methylatedregions were identified using the ChAMP Bioconductor and methylation levels of HOXA genes were manually curated. We identified 100 significantly differentially methylated probes annotated to HOXA genes. HOXA3 has the highest number of differentially methylated probes (n=27), followed by HOXA2 (n=20) and HOXA4 (n=14). The majority (43%) of the probes were located at the transcription start site (TSS) 200, which is one of the gene promoters. In respect to CpG islands (CGI), the probes were equally located in the island and shore regions (47% each) while a minor percentage was in the shelf (6%). Our work gave a comprehensive assessment of the DNA methylation pattern of HOXA genes and provide the first evidence of HOXA2, HOXA3 and HOXA4 differential methylation in Malaysian CRC. The new knowledge from this study can be utilized to further increase our understanding of CRC methylomics, particularly on the homeobox A genes. The prognostic and diagnostic roles of the differentially methylated HOXA genes warrant future investigations.