Abstract
Background
Many health systems have responded to growing population needs and expanded long-term care services for older people (LTC). However, no country managed to adequately increase the human resources for health. A large group of transnationally mobile migrant carers fill the gaps and mitigate policy failure. This study aims to explore the connections between health labour markets, migrant care workers and populism and to reveal blind spots in the governance of the LTC workforce.
Methods
An explorative comparative approach was applied, which draws on a rapid review of the literature, public statistics and document analysis. A novel analytical framework was developed, which is informed by transsectoral governance and combines four major dimensions: LTC system (e.g. cash benefits, public responsibility), health labour market situation (supply-demand) in the LTC sector, labour migration policies relevant for LTC, and the role of populist parties. Five EU countries were selected which represent different conditions in LTC: Austria, Denmark, Germany, Italy and Poland.
Results
Typologies of sending and receiving countries are no longer sustainable, but transnational mobility flows still impact differently in healthcare systems and national labour markets. Undersupply coupled with cash-benefits and a culture of family responsibility are predicting high inflows of migrant carers, who are channelled in low-level positions or in the informal care sector. These conditions can often be observed in countries with strong populist movements.
Conclusions
Health labour markets, LTC systems, culture and political factors combine to create a double jeopardy for migrant carers, exploited as labour market subjects and exposed to hostile social environments as individual citizens. Action has to be taken to improve public health advocacy for migrant carers and to establish effective European health labour market regulation and transnational health workforce governance.