A Comparative Study of Interannual Oscillation Models for Determining Geophysical Polar Motion Excitations

Similar to seasonal and intraseasonal variations in polar motion (PM), interannual variations are also largely caused by changes in the angular momentum of the Earth’s geophysical fluid layers composed of the atmosphere, the oceans, and in-land hydrologic flows (AOH). Not only are inland freshwater systems crucial for interannual PM fluctuations, but so are atmospheric surface pressures and winds, oceanic currents, and ocean bottom pressures. However, the relationship between observed geodetic PM excitations and hydro-atmospheric models has not yet been determined. This is due to defects in geophysical models and the partial knowledge of atmosphere–ocean coupling and hydrological processes. Therefore, this study provides an analysis of the fluctuations of PM excitations for equatorial geophysical components χ1 and χ2 at interannual time scales. The geophysical excitations were determined from different sources, including atmospheric, ocean models, Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On data, as well as from the Land Surface Discharge Model. The Multi Singular Spectrum Analysis method was applied to retain interannual variations in χ1 and χ2 components. None of the considered mass and motion terms studied for the different atmospheric and ocean models were found to have a negligible effect on interannual PM. These variables, derived from different Atmospheric Angular Momentum (AAM) and Oceanic Angular Momentum (OAM) models, differ from each other. Adding hydrologic considerations to the coupling of AAM and OAM excitations was found to provide benefits for achieving more consistent interannual geodetic budgets, but none of the AOH combinations fully explained the total observed PM excitations.

Using feature-based verification methods to explore the spatial and temporal characteristics of the 2019 chlorophyll-<i>a</i> bloom season in a model of the European Northwest Shelf

Two feature-based verification methods, thus far only used for the diagnostic evaluation of atmospheric models, have been applied to compare ∼7 km resolution pre-operational analyses of chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) concentrations to a 1 km gridded satellite-derived Chl-a concentration product. The aim of this study was to assess the value of applying such methods to ocean models. Chl-a bloom objects were identified in both data sets for the 2019 bloom season (1 March to 31 July). These bloom objects were analysed as discrete (2-D) spatial features, but also as space–time (3-D) features, providing the means of defining the onset, duration and demise of distinct bloom episodes and the season as a whole. The new feature-based verification methods help reveal that the model analyses are not able to represent small coastal bloom objects, given the coarser definition of the coastline, also wrongly producing more bloom objects in deeper Atlantic waters. Model analyses' concentrations are somewhat higher overall. The bias manifests itself in the size of the model analysis bloom objects, which tend to be larger than the satellite-derived bloom objects. The onset of the bloom season is delayed by 26 d in the model analyses, but the season also persists for another month beyond the diagnosed end. The season was diagnosed to be 119 d long in the model analyses, compared to 117 d from the satellite product. Geographically, the model analyses and satellite-derived bloom objects do not necessarily exist in a specific location at the same time and only overlap occasionally.

CP-DSL: Supporting Configuration and Parametrization of Ocean Models with UVic (2.9) and MITgcm (67w)

Ocean models are long-living software systems facing challenges with increasing complexity, architecture erosion, and managing legacy code. These challenges increase maintenance costs in development and use, which reduces the time and resources available for research. Software engineering addresses these challenges by separation of concerns and modularization. One particular approach is to separate concerns by tailor-made notations, i.e. Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs). Using DSLs, the model developer can focus on one concern at a time without the need to consider other concerns of a software system simultaneously. In ocean and climate models, DSL tooling, like PSyclone and Dusk/Dawn, is used for instance to separate scientific and technical code. CP-DSL complements this approach with a focus on configuration and parametrization, which play an important role in ocean models, especially in parameter optimization and scenario-based simulations. CP-DSL is designed to be model agnostic and provides a unified interface to different ocean models. Furthermore, the DSL can be integrated into tools and processes used by domain experts. In this paper we report on the DSL design, implementation, and the evaluation with scientists and research software engineers. The implementation of CP-DSL is available as open source software and a replication package for configuration and parameterization of UVic and MITgcm is provided.

Coupled regional Earth system modeling in the Baltic Sea region

Nonlinear responses to externally forced climate change are known to dampen or amplify the local climate impact due to complex cross-compartmental feedback loops in the Earth system. These feedbacks are less well represented in the traditional stand-alone atmosphere and ocean models on which many of today's regional climate assessments rely (e.g., EURO-CORDEX, NOSCCA and BACC II). This has promoted the development of regional climate models for the Baltic Sea region by coupling different compartments of the Earth system into more comprehensive models. Coupled models more realistically represent feedback loops than the information imposed on the region by prescribed boundary conditions and, thus, permit more degrees of freedom. In the past, several coupled model systems have been developed for Europe and the Baltic Sea region. This article reviews recent progress on model systems that allow two-way communication between atmosphere and ocean models; models for the land surface, including the terrestrial biosphere; and wave models at the air–sea interface and hydrology models for water cycle closure. However, several processes that have mostly been realized by one-way coupling to date, such as marine biogeochemistry, nutrient cycling and atmospheric chemistry (e.g., aerosols), are not considered here. In contrast to uncoupled stand-alone models, coupled Earth system models can modify mean near-surface air temperatures locally by up to several degrees compared with their stand-alone atmospheric counterparts using prescribed surface boundary conditions. The representation of small-scale oceanic processes, such as vertical mixing and sea-ice dynamics, appears essential to accurately resolve the air–sea heat exchange over the Baltic Sea, and these parameters can only be provided by online coupled high-resolution ocean models. In addition, the coupling of wave models at the ocean–atmosphere interface allows for a more explicit formulation of small-scale to microphysical processes with local feedbacks to water temperature and large-scale processes such as oceanic upwelling. Over land, important climate feedbacks arise from dynamical terrestrial vegetation changes as well as the implementation of land-use scenarios and afforestation/deforestation that further alter surface albedo, roughness length and evapotranspiration. Furthermore, a good representation of surface temperatures and roughness length over open sea and land areas is critical for the representation of climatic extremes such as heavy precipitation, storms, or tropical nights (defined as nights where the daily minimum temperature does not fall below 20 ∘C), and these parameters appear to be sensitive to coupling. For the present-day climate, many coupled atmosphere–ocean and atmosphere–land surface models have demonstrated the added value of single climate variables, in particular when low-quality boundary data were used in the respective stand-alone model. This makes coupled models a prospective tool for downscaling climate change scenarios from global climate models because these models often have large biases on the regional scale. However, the coupling of hydrology models to close the water cycle remains problematic, as the accuracy of precipitation provided by atmosphere models is, in most cases, insufficient to realistically simulate the runoff to the Baltic Sea without bias adjustments. Many regional stand-alone ocean and atmosphere models are tuned to suitably represent present-day climatologies rather than to accurately simulate climate change. Therefore, more research is required into how the regional climate sensitivity (e.g., the models' response to a given change in global mean temperature) is affected by coupling and how the spread is altered in multi-model and multi-scenario ensembles of coupled models compared with uncoupled ones.

On the Importance of High-Resolution in Large-Scale Ocean Models

Eddying global ocean models are now routinely used for ocean prediction, and the value-added of a better representation of the observed ocean variability and western boundary currents at that resolution is currently being evaluated in climate models. This overview article begins with a brief summary of the impact on ocean model biases of resolving eddies in several global ocean-sea ice numerical simulations. Then, a series of North and Equatorial Atlantic configurations are used to show that an increase of the horizontal resolution from eddy-resolving to submesoscale-enabled together with the inclusion of high-resolution bathymetry and tides significantly improve the models’ abilities to represent the observed ocean variability and western boundary currents. However, the computational cost of these simulations is extremely large, and for these simulations to become routine, close collaborations with computer scientists are essential to ensure that numerical codes can take full advantage of the latest computing architecture.