Pure Motor Onset and IgM-Gammopathy Occurrence in Multifocal Acquired Demyelinating Sensory and Motor Neuropathy

Objectives:To longitudinally investigate patients with multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor (MADSAM) neuropathy, quantifying timing and location of sensory involvements in motor-onset patients, along with clinico-histopathological and electrophysiological findings to ascertain differences in patients with and without monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance (MGUS).Methods:Patients with MADSAM neuropathy seen at Mayo Clinic and tested for monoclonal gammopathy and ganglioside antibodies, were retrospectively reviewed (January 1st, 2007-December 31st, 2018).Results:Of 76 patients with MADSAM, 53% had pure motor, 16% pure sensory, 30% sensorimotor and 1% cranial nerve onsets. Motor-onset patients were initially diagnosed as multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). MGUS occurred in 25% (89% IgM subtype), associating with ganglioside autoantibodies (p<0.001) and higher IgM titers (p<0.04). Median time to sensory involvements (confirmed by electrophysiology) in motor-onset patients was 18 months (range: 6-180). Compared to initial motor nerve involvements, subsequent sensory findings were within the same territory 35% (14/40), outside 20% (8/40), or both 45% (18/40). Brachial and lumbosacral plexus MRI was abnormal in 87% (34/39) and 84% (21/25), respectively, identifying hypertrophy and increased T2 signal predominantly in brachial plexus trunks (64%), divisions (69%), and cords (69%), and intrapelvic sciatic (64%) and femoral (44%) nerves. Proximal fascicular nerve biopsies (n=9) more frequently demonstrated onion-bulb pathology (p=0.001) and endoneurial inflammation (p=0.01) than distal biopsies (n=17). MRI and biopsy findings were similar amongst patient subgroups. Initial Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability scores were higher in patients with MGUS relative to without (p=0.02). Long-term treatment responsiveness by INCAT score reduction ≥1 or motor Neuropathy Impairment Score (mNIS) >8 point reduction occurred in 75% (49/65) irrespective of MGUS or motor-onsets. Most required ongoing immunotherapy (86%). Patients with MGUS more commonly required dual-agent immunotherapy for stability (p=0.02).Discussion:Pure motor-onsets are the most common MADSAM presentation. Long-term follow-up, repeat electrophysiology and nerve pathology help distinguish motor-onset MADSAM from MMN. Better long-term immunotherapy responsiveness occurs in motor-onset MADSAM compared to MMN reports. Patients having MGUS commonly require dual immunotherapy.Classification of Evidence:This study provides Class II evidence that most clinical, electrophysiological, and histopathological findings were similar between patients with MADSAM with and without monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance.

Treatment Approaches for Atypical CIDP

The variants of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) differ not just in their clinical, pathological and electrophysiological characteristics, but often in their indifferent response to conventional immunosuppressive agents which are effective in typical CIDP. High quality evidence is lacking as far as the management of these atypical variants is concerned. In this review, we summarize the treatment approaches to each of these CIDP variants based on existing data. Distal acquired demyelinating symmetric polyneuropathy (DADS) has the phenotype of a symmetric, demyelinating sensory, length-dependent polyneuropathy and is frequently associated with paraproteinemia and anti myelin associated glycoprotein (MAG) antibodies. While the management of idiopathic DADS (DADS-I) is the same as CIDP, DADS-M responds suboptimally and has a favorable response to rituximab. Multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM) manifests as a chronic progressive demyelinating mononeuropathy multiplex which can evolve to a confluent pattern indistinguishable from CIDP. Evidence favors treating MADSAM with conventional immunomodulatory therapy (IMT), but this disorder responds less favorably than CIDP. Some patients present with purely sensory symptoms, known as pure sensory CIDP or chronic inflammatory sensory polyradiculoneuropathy (CISP), the latter localizing to a pre-ganglionic pathology. Both respond well to first line IMT, particularly to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), but patients relapse without maintenance therapy. Pure motor CIDP resembles multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMNCB), but the previously reported worsening status after steroid treatment was not reproduced in recent studies, and IVIG remains the first-line therapy. Some focal forms of CIDP defy exact classification, but respond well to first-line IMT including IVIG. Overall, atypical CIDP responds to treatment with first-line IMT, but has a suboptimal response compared to CIDP. There is evidence for effectiveness with agents such as rituximab, especially in DADS-M, and this medication can also be used in cases refractory to conventional IMTs. Rituximab is also effective in CIDP with IgG4 antibodies which has distinct clinical features and is mostly refractory to first-line IMT.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome Outbreak in Peru 2019 Associated With Campylobacter jejuni Infection

ObjectiveTo identify the clinical phenotypes and infectious triggers in the 2019 Peruvian Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) outbreak.MethodsWe prospectively collected clinical and neurophysiologic data of patients with GBS admitted to a tertiary hospital in Lima, Peru, between May and August 2019. Molecular, immunologic, and microbiological methods were used to identify causative infectious agents. Sera from 41 controls were compared with cases for antibodies to Campylobacter jejuni and gangliosides. Genomic analysis was performed on 4 C jejuni isolates.ResultsThe 49 included patients had a median age of 44 years (interquartile range [IQR] 30–54 years), and 28 (57%) were male. Thirty-two (65%) had symptoms of a preceding infection: 24 (49%) diarrhea and 13 (27%) upper respiratory tract infection. The median time between infectious to neurologic symptoms was 3 days (IQR 2–9 days). Eighty percent had a pure motor form of GBS, 21 (43%) had the axonal electrophysiologic subtype, and 18% the demyelinating subtype. Evidence of recent C jejuni infection was found in 28/43 (65%). No evidence of recent arbovirus infection was found. Twenty-three cases vs 11 controls (OR 3.3, confidence interval [CI] 95% 1.2–9.2, p < 0.01) had IgM and/or IgA antibodies against C jejuni. Anti-GM1:phosphatidylserine and/or anti-GT1a:GM1 heteromeric complex antibodies were strongly positive in cases (92.9% sensitivity and 68.3% specificity). Genomic analysis showed that the C jejuni strains were closely related and had the Asn51 polymorphism at cstII gene.ConclusionsOur study indicates that the 2019 Peruvian GBS outbreak was associated with C jejuni infection and that the C jejuni strains linked to GBS circulate widely in different parts of the world.

Recognizing Aphemia and How to Differentiate From Aphasia in the Era of Telemedicine

Background: Aphemia, or pure motor mutism, is a phenomenon that has been reported previously in the literature and typically is associated with small infarcts in the inferior dominant precentral gyrus, pars opercularis, or inferior perirolandic gyrus. Clinically, it is important to distinguish aphemia from aphasia syndromes. Telemedicine is becoming more prevalent and involving neurologists across the country. This is an important consideration when addressing aphemic patients as many mistakes can be made during a virtual exam clouding a patient’s clinical picture. Case Presentation: Our patient is a 61-year-old female with a past medical history of hypertension, diabetes, and an old right frontoparietal stroke without any residual deficits. She presented after her family stated that she “quit speaking” for about seven hours. Initial neurological evaluation was done via telemedicine due to the COVID-19 pandemic and was pertinent for decreased consciousness, inability to answer either orientation question, a right facial droop, and aphasia. Later it was found that the patient exhibited a pure motor mutism rather than aphasia and had an MRI lesion in the left inferior precentral gyrus. Conclusion: Differentiating aphemia from aphasia is an important clinical skill for a neurologist to foster especially in the era of telemedicine. An intimate knowledge of the parts of a speech exam are vital in directing emergency staff during stroke evaluation. Additionally, distinguishing these clinical syndromes has implications with respect to prognosis and long-term rehabilitation.

The continuum between neurodegeneration, brain plasticity, and movement: a critical appraisal

While the “physiological” aging process is associated with declines in motor and cognitive features, these changes do not significantly impair functions and activities of daily living. Differently, motor and cognitive impairment constitute the most common phenotypic expressions of neurodegeneration. Both manifestations frequently coexist in the same disease, thus making difficult to detect “pure” motor or cognitive conditions. Movement disorders are often characterized by cognitive disturbances, and neurodegenerative dementias often exhibit the occurrence of movement disorders. Such a phenotypic overlap suggests approaching these conditions by highlighting the commonalities of entities traditionally considered distinct. In the present review, we critically reappraised the common clinical and pathophysiological aspects of neurodegeneration in both animal models and patients, looking at motricity as a trait d’union over the spectrum of neurodegeneration and focusing on synaptopathy and oscillopathy as the common pathogenic background. Finally, we discussed the possible role of movement as neuroprotective intervention in neurodegenerative conditions, regardless of the etiology. The identification of commonalities is critical to drive future research and develop novel possible disease-modifying interventions.

The comparison of MRN, electrophysiology and progression among typical CIDP and atypical CIDP subtypes

We aimed to compare the electrophysiology and magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) results of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) subtypes and to explore the progression from atypical CIDP to typical CIDP. We collected the medical records of 45 CIDP patients to analyse the rate of progression from atypical CIDP to typical CIDP subtypes. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein (p = 0.024) and overall disability sum score (ODSS) (p = 0.000) differed among patients with typical CIDP, distal acquired demyelinating symmetric neuropathy (DADS) and Lewis-Sumner syndrome (LSS). The compound motor action potential (CMAP) of typical CIDP was lower than that of the other subtypes (p = 0.016, p = 0.022 and p = 0.012). The cross-sectional area (CSA) of nerve roots in typical CIDP was significantly thicker than that of nerve roots in DADS and LSS. There were fewer DADS and LSS patients who progressed to typical CIDP than those who progressed to pure motor and pure sensory CIDP (p = 0.000), and the progression from pure motor to typical CIDP required a significantly longer time than the progression from pure sensory to typical CIDP (p = 0.007). Typical CIDP was more severe than the other subtypes not only in terms of clinical and electrophysiology factors but also in terms of MRN factors.